Community > Advocacy, Agencies, Access

Mealy-mouthed goals and objectives...WDFW

<< < (2/2)

woodswalker:

--- Quote from: wolfbait on March 06, 2010, 05:31:20 PM ---
--- Quote from: ICEMAN on March 06, 2010, 05:07:43 PM ---If the dept of wildlife chooses not to manage game, hunters must step up.

Game management seems like it would be best achieved by those who know the area, can personally observe variations in carrying capacity, threats to local herds, etc...and then simply deal with the issues as they are faced. Maybe 39 different game management groups, one for each county, folks from the county, for the county... Please don't tell me that a group of non-hunters, directed by the legislature, HQ'd in Olympia can and do the job well. We have 39 sheriffs in this state.

--- End quote ---

Sounds like a good plan Iceman, but we will need a crew of wolf shooters if there are any plans to manage the game herds.

--- End quote ---

I can do that.

ICEMAN:
Works for me!

colockumelk:
Having been to a WDFW meeting I can honestly say that the committee is in WAY, WAY, WAY over their  heads.  While I gave my speal on why the Colockum should be permit only, one of them asked me "where did you get those radical statistics from."  My response "FROM THE WDFW WEBSITE."  His response.  "Oh!"

I witnessed them get thorough briefs by their biologists and then despite the bio's advice decided to do the opposite.  To be honest I don't think they undertsood half of what the bio's said.

The WDFW does have an agenda and it has nothing to do with wildlife managment.  Make no mistake about it the WDFW can exist without hunting.  They might have to downsize but at the end of the day the people in power with still have a job. 

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page