Community > Advocacy, Agencies, Access
Wildlife Corridor Conservation Act Introduced
wolfbait:
http://www.freedomadvocates.org/articles/wildlands_project/wildlife_corridor_conservation_act_introduced_20100706416/
Wildlife Corridor Conservation Act Introduced
Tuesday, 06 July 2010 05:31
Politicians and other agents of Agenda 21 are inundating us with overlapping schemes that quietly and deliberately drown our property rights and freedom. For surefire evidence, take a look at U.S. Congress - H.R. 5101 Wildlife Corridors Conservation Act of 2010. This bill includes transboundary tax-payer funded projects for wild animal bridges and tunnels, increasing roadless areas and other means to capture more natural resources and private property for government and its partners.
Sample projects already in existence:
Wildlife Overcrossing at Easton Hill, WA www.chattoogariver.com Roadless Conservation
H.R. 5101 states that "The Secretary, in cooperation with the States and Indian tribes, shall develop a Habitat and Corridors Information System, that shall include maps and descriptions of projected shifts in habitats and corridors of fish and wildlife species in response to climate change; and to assess the impacts of existing development on habitats and corridors." The System is charged with identifying, prioritizing and describing "key parcels of non-Federal land (i.e. state lands and private property) located within the boundaries of units of the National Park System, National Wildlife Refuge System, National Forest System, or National Grassland System that are critical to maintenance of wildlife habitat and migration corridors." This is way over and above what the federal government has already swallowed up under other guises.
Congress and other elites are desperately clinging to the fraud of man-made global warming in an attempt to illegitimately wrest control of private property. Many people still nominally own and pay taxes on their private property but if their property is even slightly proximate to the imagined wildlife corridors, then animals rule as "new habitat" is created for them in response to "climate change" and other "threats" (meaning people). It doesn’t matter that grandma’s house has been there for 100 years and she and the animals get along fine. Not anymore, with this bill government will determine what if any use might be made of land that falls in or near corridors invented ostensibly to protect animals (in truth this is done to take private property and to control the human population).
The difference between this bill and previous wildland’s programs is that this one doesn't just have teeth, it has fangs. Not only does it have "strong language calling on agencies to actually take steps to protect corridors" but it also calls for a funding mechanism (more taxes) to support "such protective action." In short, we will be footing the bill for the global elite to further control our property and diminish our freedom under the guise of habitat protection. And "the Secretary of the Interior may transfer funds to the Foundation under this subsection in advance, without regard to when expenses are incurred." How many of us can get paid whenever we want, even if we haven’t yet done the work?
Here are a few examples of Wildlife Corridor Program across the United States. Once again they are bad programs hiding behind pretty pictures and phony words. Rim of the Valley Los Angeles Basin, California, Buffalo Commons Plains States, USA andYellowstone to Yukon or "Y to Y" plus there are many more.
Norman MacLeod of Washington explains that HR 5101 incorporates the legislative provisions of Section 481 of HR 2454 (the House version of the climate bill) and Section 6009 of the Kerry-Lieberman climate bill draft. These sections authorize a wildlife corridors information system. HR 5101 builds on this with implementation programs, mostly to be housed with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Funding mechanisms and public-private structures are included. The bill has been referred to the House Natural Resources Committee.
This bill is intended to lead to the formal creation of several continental-scale wildlife corridor systems that include core habitat, connectivity, and buffer systems that will impact livelihoods, homes, ranches, farms, access to resources, outdoor recreation and more.
The bill can be tracked at www.thomas.gov
Cougeyes:
I would rather pay taxes on projects like this that would benefit wildlife and preserve and or enhance land for wildlife than pay taxes for something less meaningful. I hope the elk use the wildlife crossing at easton hill, that is a good place for it to go in. I wish it wouldn't take a bill for people to see the value in wildlife corridors and the need for conservation of those lands even if the vast majority may fall on your own property. I for one would like to see more roadless areas for conservation measures.
Elkaholic daWg:
Yellowstone to Yukon? greenies at their best, using public lands users against each other. Unfortunately it works! Thanks Todd.
wolfbait:
--- Quote from: Cougeyes on August 31, 2010, 11:49:33 AM ---I would rather pay taxes on projects like this that would benefit wildlife and preserve and or enhance land for wildlife than pay taxes for something less meaningful. I hope the elk use the wildlife crossing at easton hill, that is a good place for it to go in. I wish it wouldn't take a bill for people to see the value in wildlife corridors and the need for conservation of those lands even if the vast majority may fall on your own property. I for one would like to see more roadless areas for conservation measures.
--- End quote ---
Do you know anything about the wildlife corridors, this is not about wildlife this is about taking land and locking it up so that only a previlaged few can use it. Cougeyes if you are a hunter, fisherman or just like wondering through the mountains, you will be locked out, end of story. You might want to take a gander at this site, and then look back at the spotted owl among others. http://www.takingliberty.us/TLHome.html
Cougeyes:
I know a lot about that actually. I just didn't read the entire article and the main punchline was towards the bottom where it mentions skimmed the article and didn't really catch that this is a "ploy" by government agencies to obtain private property and control what goes on on private property.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version