collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: talked to a biologist today who said we need wolves  (Read 35594 times)

Offline GlennGTR

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Feb 2009
  • Posts: 334
  • Location: Olympic Mountains
Re: talked to a biologist today who said we need wolves
« Reply #90 on: August 28, 2011, 05:21:35 PM »
There is a solution to WDFW mismanagement, vote in a hard hunting Independent to the State House of Representatives.....someone in the 35th district, running for position 2............someone that cares about hunting and fishing, has it in his blood real bad like an incurable disease and doesnt want a cure....someone like...that Glenn Gaither in Mason county..... 8)
You don't need a flatter shooting rifle or a larger caliber.What you need is good field marksmanship. Jeff Cooper.

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: talked to a biologist today who said we need wolves
« Reply #91 on: August 28, 2011, 05:54:52 PM »
Too bad we have to fight it at the fed level first. The wolves make sick elk by running them.

Offline JimmyHoffa

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 14538
  • Location: 150 Years Too Late
Re: talked to a biologist today who said we need wolves
« Reply #92 on: August 28, 2011, 06:15:32 PM »
As for wolves taking weak and sick....
If weak and sick refers to pregnant cows and calves, then maybe.  One of the standout observations of the former large herds of ID, WY and MT is how few calves are seen with the herds.  The cows will sometimes leave the herd for a few days to give birth and get the calf oriented.  When they do join the herd, the calves are usually slower/weaker than adults so they are still the easiest prey.

Offline ribka

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+3)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2008
  • Posts: 5647
  • Location: E side
  • That's what she said
Re: talked to a biologist today who said we need wolves
« Reply #93 on: August 28, 2011, 06:23:34 PM »
The wolves have been documented to really target the deer, elk and especially moose calves.

Really po's me with all of the wolf hugging misinformation/propaganda that the general non-hunting public buys into.

These anti-hunting groups are really savvy and are well-finaced to the tune of tens of millions of dollars. They understand the importance of misleading propaganda and its affect on the public's perception ( emotions) of hunting and wildlife management.

Offline Wenatcheejay

  • Past Sponsor
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Sep 2008
  • Posts: 4723
Re: talked to a biologist today who said we need wolves
« Reply #94 on: August 28, 2011, 09:23:13 PM »
There is a solution to WDFW mismanagement, vote in a hard hunting Independent to the State House of Representatives.....someone in the 35th district, running for position 2............someone that cares about hunting and fishing, has it in his blood real bad like an incurable disease and doesnt want a cure....someone like...that Glenn Gaither in Mason county..... 8)

Agreed,

People need to financially support such people and endeavors.
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN.

Offline Maverick

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Sourdough
  • *****
  • Join Date: Nov 2010
  • Posts: 2264
  • Location: Tri Cities
Re: talked to a biologist today who said we need wolves
« Reply #95 on: August 28, 2011, 09:46:35 PM »
Anyone want to do it? Theyve got my vote!

Offline twistiron

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Hunter
  • ***
  • Join Date: Jul 2011
  • Posts: 166
  • Location: Glenhaven WA
Re: talked to a biologist today who said we need wolves
« Reply #96 on: August 31, 2011, 08:49:54 AM »
little dave, well said and i could not agree more. there is no way we can get rid of the wolves at this point but they should be de listed and a hunting season should be implemented to keep the numbers under control as well as give ungulate game a chance to adapt to a new predator. what wolves are doing to our ungulate herds are much like what rebels in south africa are doing to the locals, massicaring a defensless prey. give herds a chance to learn to live with wolves again. any one who knows anything about an ecosystem will agree it would be best for all in the long run because wolves are going to run out of prey at the rate they are killing and then we will be left with a huge number of wolves who will eat anything they can find(humans, pets, and livestock)  :bdid:. there are examples to prove this, mongoose in hawaii (there are several birds that are gone because of them) once the rats where gone they ate everything they could find. there are others as well but you all get the idea.

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8802
  • Location: the Holocene, man
Re: talked to a biologist today who said we need wolves
« Reply #97 on: August 31, 2011, 09:11:32 AM »
what wolves are doing to our ungulate herds are much like what rebels in south africa are doing to the locals, massicaring a defensless prey.

What rebels in South Africa?


there are examples to prove this, mongoose in hawaii (there are several birds that are gone because of them) once the rats where gone they ate everything they could find.

As point of argument, mongoose were introduced into Hawaii. It is contended that  Cascadian wolves were reintroduced by natural migration from Canada.  Using the mongoose as an example is probably not the best choice because of their extreme dissimilarities in mechanism of introduction.

Offline BIGINNER

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 3836
Re: talked to a biologist today who said we need wolves
« Reply #98 on: August 31, 2011, 09:24:14 AM »
what wolves are doing to our ungulate herds are much like what rebels in south africa are doing to the locals, massicaring a defensless prey.

What rebels in South Africa?


there are examples to prove this, mongoose in hawaii (there are several birds that are gone because of them) once the rats where gone they ate everything they could find.

As point of argument, mongoose were introduced into Hawaii. It is contended that  Cascadian wolves were reintroduced by natural migration from Canada.  Using the mongoose as an example is probably not the best choice because of their extreme dissimilarities in mechanism of introduction.

actually, the mckinsee valley wolves (spelling) that were introduced in adaho and yellowstone are alot bigger than the native wolves that lived there before. 40- 60 lbs difference.

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8802
  • Location: the Holocene, man
Re: talked to a biologist today who said we need wolves
« Reply #99 on: August 31, 2011, 09:31:38 AM »

actually, the mckinsee valley wolves (spelling) that were introduced in adaho and yellowstone are alot bigger than the native wolves that lived there before. 40- 60 lbs difference.

Where's adaho?

Offline BIGINNER

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 3836
Re: talked to a biologist today who said we need wolves
« Reply #100 on: August 31, 2011, 09:36:24 AM »

actually, the mckinsee valley wolves (spelling) that were introduced in adaho and yellowstone are alot bigger than the native wolves that lived there before. 40- 60 lbs difference.

Where's adaho?

i'm pretty sure if you had any common sence you would figure out what i ment,.. also by looking at me screen name you can easily figure out that my spelling sucks  :tup:

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8802
  • Location: the Holocene, man
Re: talked to a biologist today who said we need wolves
« Reply #101 on: August 31, 2011, 09:44:22 AM »
I have plenty of common sense.  And I realize that taking the effort to spell correctly and attempting to use proper punctuation is not a waste of time.  Criticizing others for pointing out your ludicrous spelling mistakes is a waste of effort.  Your mistakes reflect poorly on you and show a lack of effort.  This is something you will hopefully realize as you mature

Offline high country

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: May 2007
  • Posts: 5133
Re: talked to a biologist today who said we need wolves
« Reply #102 on: August 31, 2011, 09:54:56 AM »
just another reason I pronounce it "eat-a-hoe" just makes people a bit more quizzical.
 
back to wolves and bullchit now.

Offline Elkaholic daWg

  • Political & Covid-19 Topics
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Mar 2009
  • Posts: 6060
  • Location: Arlington Wa / Rock n Roll-Kelly Hill
Re: talked to a biologist today who said we need wolves
« Reply #103 on: August 31, 2011, 10:04:37 AM »


actually, the mckinsee valley wolves (spelling) that were introduced in adaho and yellowstone are alot bigger than the native wolves that lived there before. 40- 60 lbs difference.

 :yeah:  MacKenzie?
Blue Ribbon Coalition
CCRKBA
SAF
NRA                        
Go DaWgs!!

Offline Knocker of rocks

  • Non-Hunting Topics
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Old Salt
  • ******
  • Join Date: Aug 2011
  • Posts: 8802
  • Location: the Holocene, man
Re: talked to a biologist today who said we need wolves
« Reply #104 on: August 31, 2011, 10:15:00 AM »
back to wolves and bullchit now.

 :sry:  :hello:

actually, the mckinsee valley wolves (spelling) that were introduced in adaho and yellowstone are alot bigger than the native wolves that lived there before. 40- 60 lbs difference.

This is interesting, if factual.  Anybody have a source for this?

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal