Post by: bearpaw on July 12, 2012, 06:57:25 PM
NRA: UN Arms Treaty Must Exclude Civilian Weapons
Thursday, 12 Jul 2012 10:38 AM
By Newsmax Wires
The National Rifle Association (NRA) has demanded that the United Nations leave civilian weapons out of a treaty on international arms sales that it is negotiating this month.
Wayne LaPierre, the group’s CEO, warned Wednesday that the treaty won’t pass Congress if it does include restrictions on civilian arms, as this would trump Americans’ right to bear arms under the Second Amendment, The Hill reports.
He said 58 senators have promised to oppose a treaty that covers civilian weapons. A U.N. treaty would need approval from two-thirds of the Senate to become law in the United States.
“I am here to announce NRA's strong opposition to anti-freedom policies that disregard American citizens' right to self-defense. No foreign influence has jurisdiction over the freedoms our Founding Fathers guaranteed to us,” LaPierre said at the U.N Arms Trade Treaty Conference.
.
“The only way to address NRA's objections is to simply and completely remove civilian firearms from the scope of the treaty. That is the only solution. On that, there will be no compromise.”
The 58 senators cited by LaPierre signed a letter to President Barack Obama and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton on the issue. The note, written by Sens. Jerry Moran, R-Kansas, and Jon Tester, D-Mont., doesn’t completely reject regulation of civilian arms sales, but indicates it will be difficult for Congress to pass a treaty including civilian arms.
The senators oppose “any inclusion of small arms, light weapons, ammunition or related materials that would make the treaty overly broad and virtually unenforceable,” the letter says. The senators can’t accept a treaty that “in any way restricts the rights of law-abiding U.S. citizens to manufacture, assemble, possess, transfer or purchase firearms, ammunition, and related items.”
Treaty proponents say keeping civilian weapons out of the agreement would make it easier for terrorists and rogue regimes to gain deadly arms. And they say there’s no need to worry about the Second Amendment, as the Constitution trumps international law.
Post by: buckfvr on July 12, 2012, 08:00:36 PM
Post by: Bean Counter on July 12, 2012, 08:04:14 PM
Don't be myopic--even if you don't buy foreign guns or ammo, the UN adoption of a resolution regulating small arms will affect you. Even if you don't buy foreign made ammo for your AK, if other people stop buying it and start buying what you used to, you WILL see the prices go up. Econ 101.
Keep buying ammo....
Post by: washelkhunter on July 12, 2012, 08:07:49 PM
Post by: huntinguy on July 12, 2012, 09:12:53 PM
Its inconceivable to me that such a ban could be enforced in this country. Whos going to go around and collect the guns?
I think Big Sis can handle it. That agency is getting... well.... :yike:
Post by: Bean Counter on July 12, 2012, 09:49:16 PM
Post by: Mudman on July 12, 2012, 10:23:58 PM
Post by: sebek556 on July 12, 2012, 10:35:21 PM
Post by: Helix on July 12, 2012, 10:47:55 PM
Post by: Alchase on July 13, 2012, 11:50:26 AM
The UN would enforce it. A truck full if Pakistani soldiers in blue helmets will go door to door in your neighborhood to round up all the evil civilian guns. They will be hoping you resist so they can open up on you with a .50 BMG. :mgun:
Would not have to, the Pakistanis would run away leaving all the other UN soldiers on their own!
Did we not learn that from Somalia?
Post by: CAMPMEAT on July 13, 2012, 12:02:42 PM
Post by: buckfvr on July 13, 2012, 12:48:31 PM
Post by: bassquatch on July 13, 2012, 02:02:20 PM
I believe if it's the ammo they want, then it's the ammo we should give them...at 2800fps!! :mgun: