Hunting Washington Forum
Big Game Hunting => Deer Hunting => Topic started by: longrange7mm on July 30, 2012, 12:54:24 PM
-
Found this guy last night what do you think of him would you use a quality tag on him :)
-
Narrow, but tall. And some nice forks. Yup id put him on my wall
-
Big enough for sure
-
165-180 not to good at judging velvet
-
I'd like to see more pics of the buck in the middle.
-
awesome pics. yes worth a tag for sure
-
Looks like a compilation of the 4 bucks I've taken the last 4 years.......
Wha......? Oh, sorry.......... I'm awake now.
-
Yep, definitely all wall hangers. :drool: :drool: :drool:
-
Not even a second thought.. pick what I think is the biggest... bang. flop. eating fresh liver and onions for dinner...
-
Not even a hesitation on my part..
-
Wouldn't matter which one either....
-
BANG
I like tall ones :dunno:
-
170ish. Deep fronts and long tines which help the score, but not that wide so that hurts it. I would be proud to kill it...
-
170- 180 hard to score velvet but has nice forks.
-
170 ish is my guess also. Nice photo's, thanks.
-
Quality is in the eye of the beholder. If you like him, try and take him. Personally, I'd keep looking as I like 'em wider...but I'd sure keep tabs on him. ;)
As to your question, he'll tape out to be a pretty darn good buck in this state.
-
In my opinion 180 is high, I was thinking low 170's...
Regardless that is a really nice buck and I would take him any day of the season with any tag
-
I'd like to see more pics of the buck in the middle.
:yeah:
I see a kicker on his port side, he looks more interesting to me but the deep forks of the first one are neat as well.
-
No not bang .....whack :chuckle: nice ones :tup:
-
My guess would be low 170's. I'd have no problem taking any of those bucks. :twocents:
-
He looks pretty young. Now there's no way in hell I would pass him up, or any of the others for that matter. It just makes me wonder what his true potential is.
-
174
-
What unit is this? Dont give the exact location but a GMU would be nice? Those are nice WA deer if that is where they are from.
-
This area has put several 190" class bucks that look identical to this guy. I've seen several, none of which were 24". I don't think this buck goes that high, but his score will fool a lot of you. ;)
-
This area has put several 190" class bucks that look identical to this guy. I've seen several, none of which were 24". I don't think this buck goes that high, but his score will fool a lot of you. ;)
Couldn't agree more I would take this buck over a wide week forked buck :chuckle:
-
Love the tine length!! But man he is only 22-23" wide.. Pass!
-
I agree with MtnMuley. That buck's score would suprise several with those forks. I also doubt this is a WA buck. Which quality tag do you have?
-
This area has put several 190" class bucks that look identical to this guy. I've seen several, none of which were 24". I don't think this buck goes that high, but his score will fool a lot of you. ;)
Couldn't agree more I would take this buck over a wide week forked buck :chuckle:
Ouch!
-
82" sheds plus spread puts him at a solid 180" class buck. BANG!!!
Looks like Utah
your on it :chuckle: I took these the other night by my rig in UT
-
This area has put several 190" class bucks that look identical to this guy. I've seen several, none of which were 24". I don't think this buck goes that high, but his score will fool a lot of you. ;)
Couldn't agree more I would take this buck over a wide week forked buck :chuckle:
Ouch!
:chuckle: I hope your not thinking im calling the buck you took last year in wy weak forked :sry: if your buck and this buck were the two on that hill side I would have made the same decision you did :tup:
-
Very nice buck...175
-
162 and 1/16 Plus or minus a 32nd I suck at judging. Nice pics