Post by: bearpaw on September 17, 2012, 12:56:59 PM
Yellowstone Wolves Hit by Disease
Megan Gannon, News Editor
Date: 10 September 2012 Time: 11:23 AM ET
Less than two decades after wolves were reintroduced to Yellowstone National Park, viral diseases like mange threaten the stability of the new population.
Humans had killed off gray wolves in the region by the 1930s, but in 1995, U.S. wildlife officials tried to restore the native population by bringing 31 wolves captured from Canada into the national park.
The new wolf community initially expanded rapidly, climbing to more than 170 at its peak. But researchers from Penn State University say that the most recent data show the number of animals has dipped below 100.
"We're down to extremely low levels of wolves right now," researcher Emily S. Almberg, a graduate student in ecology, said in a statement. "We're down to [similar numbers as] the early years of reintroduction. So it doesn't look like it's going to be as large and as a stable a population as was maybe initially thought."
The researchers point to pathogens as the culprit in the population's instability. By 1997, all of the new wolves at the park that were tested for disease had at least one infection, including canine distemper, canine parvovirus and canine herpesvirus. Starting in 2007, wolves inside the park were testing positive for mange — an infection in which mites burrow under the skin causing insatiable scratching and so much hair loss that infected wolves often freeze to death in the winter.
A group of wolves known as Mollie's pack was the first in Yellowstone to show signs of mange, in January 2007, but they recovered from the disease by March 2011. Meanwhile, another group, called the Druid pack — once one of the park's most stable new packs — was decimated by the end of winter 2010 after showing signs of mange just half a year earlier, the researchers said.
"It was in a very short amount of time that the majority of the animals [in Druid] became severely infected," Almberg said in a statement. "The majority of their hair was missing from their bodies and it hit them right in the middle of winter. The summer before it got really bad, we saw that many of the pups had mange."
The Penn State researchers found that distance made a difference in the spread of the disease. For every six miles between a pack of mangy wolves and an uninfected pack, there was a 66 percent drop in risk of disease for the healthy pack, the researchers said. Thus the high wolf densities afforded by protection within Yellowstone may come at the cost of some population stability, the researchers wrote in their paper in the current issue of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.
Mange was introduced into the Yellowstone ecosystem in 1905 in an attempt to accelerate wolf eradication during an era when wildlife officials tried to cut down predator populations. When the wolves were gone, the disease likely persisted among regional carnivores, like coyotes and foxes, the researchers said.
"Many invasive species flourish because they lack their native predators and pathogens, but in Yellowstone we restored a native predator to an ecosystem that had other canids (animals in the dog family) present that were capable of sustaining a lot of infections in their absence," said Almberg. "It's not terribly surprising that we were able to witness and confirm that there was a relatively short window in which the reintroduced wolves stayed disease-free."
Post by: X-Force on September 17, 2012, 01:10:19 PM
Post by: bonkellekter on September 17, 2012, 01:15:36 PM
Post by: Woodchuck on September 17, 2012, 01:17:23 PM
Post by: JimmyHoffa on September 17, 2012, 01:25:19 PM
:brew: heres hoping the diseases spead even faster than the wolves have!!!If ever there was a pack to start translocating!!
Post by: stuckalot on September 17, 2012, 01:29:43 PM
Post by: 300rum on September 17, 2012, 01:31:38 PM
Post by: C-Money on September 17, 2012, 01:46:10 PM
This comment is not based on any factual information, just a strong dislike for wolves. :chuckle:
Post by: rtspring on September 17, 2012, 01:48:52 PM
RTSPRING
Post by: Woodchuck on September 17, 2012, 02:02:51 PM
Curious that their conclusion had to be disease or parasites, the population decline couldn't possibly be because they have decimated the ungulate poplulations in the park and have moved on!ding ding ding
Post by: ICEMAN on September 17, 2012, 06:42:32 PM
Post by: Heredoggydoggy on September 17, 2012, 06:59:32 PM
Post by: sebek556 on September 17, 2012, 09:29:33 PM
Post by: bonkellekter on September 17, 2012, 09:41:00 PM
:yeah: mange it's what's for wolves :tup:
Now that's bumper sticker material right there!!!! Lol
Post by: Bob33 on September 17, 2012, 09:44:22 PM
Who would have known....
"Sarcoptic mange was introduced into the Northern Rockies in 1909 by state wildlife veterinarians in an attempt to help eradicate local wolf and coyote populations. Scientists believe the troublesome mite that causes the disease persisted among coyotes and foxes after wolves were exterminated."
Post by: ICEMAN on September 18, 2012, 04:27:28 AM
http://nrmsc.usgs.gov/research/mange_wolvesYNP (http://nrmsc.usgs.gov/research/mange_wolvesYNP)
Who would have known....
"Sarcoptic mange was introduced into the Northern Rockies in 1909 by state wildlife veterinarians in an attempt to help eradicate local wolf and coyote populations. Scientists believe the troublesome mite that causes the disease persisted among coyotes and foxes after wolves were exterminated."
Ahhh, yes....back in the good old days when governement scientists and wildlife staff worked with farmers and hunters in an attempt to actually improve the habitat for farming and hunting.
Post by: farmin4u_98948 on September 18, 2012, 06:57:42 AM
Post by: pianoman9701 on September 18, 2012, 07:29:41 AM
hmmmmm no mention of lead poisoning :dunno:
:yeah: I was thinking the exact same thing. :chuckle:
Post by: sebek556 on September 18, 2012, 08:24:51 AM
Now they have adapted this let it go back to nature theory while refusing to acknowledge man for what his is, a predator. We have almost all of the predator characteristics, forward facing eyes, canine teeth and incisors, etc. While our senses may have been dulled over the years genetically we are still a predator, but they refuse to acknowledge us as one. :bash:http://nrmsc.usgs.gov/research/mange_wolvesYNP (http://nrmsc.usgs.gov/research/mange_wolvesYNP)
Who would have known....
"Sarcoptic mange was introduced into the Northern Rockies in 1909 by state wildlife veterinarians in an attempt to help eradicate local wolf and coyote populations. Scientists believe the troublesome mite that causes the disease persisted among coyotes and foxes after wolves were exterminated."
Ahhh, yes....back in the good old days when governement scientists and wildlife staff worked with farmers and hunters in an attempt to actually improve the habitat for farming and hunting.