Hunting Washington Forum

Big Game Hunting => Elk Hunting => Topic started by: Critter Ritter on December 10, 2012, 08:21:26 PM


Advertise Here
Title: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Critter Ritter on December 10, 2012, 08:21:26 PM
Which do you think will be Better hunting For a BIG Bull?
Blue Mountains? OR Colockum?
Heard a lot about the Blue Mountains. And not much about Colockum.
Any pics of Bulls been shot? Which would you prefer?
Title: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: time2hunt on December 10, 2012, 08:22:57 PM
Hanford :)
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: bobcat on December 10, 2012, 08:25:47 PM
How many points do you have?
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Critter Ritter on December 10, 2012, 08:26:23 PM
There isn't a open permit unit for Hanford? Is There?


I have 5 points.
Title: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: time2hunt on December 10, 2012, 08:29:14 PM
Nope but that where the big boys are :) Your  going to get a bunch if confusing report on this subject the clockum boys are going to tell you blue and the blues boys are going to say clockum just remember the governor tag is shot in the blues every year :)
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: predatorpro on December 10, 2012, 08:34:29 PM
biggest bull i have ever seen by far was on the colockum...he could scratch his butt with his antlers...im guessing he was 400 inches...absolutely huge!
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: carpsniperg2 on December 10, 2012, 08:35:37 PM
Next person to post C post to mess with someone is not going to like what happens. We have been threw this! This guy does not know it is a joke!
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: buglebuster on December 10, 2012, 08:47:22 PM
After being in both, and seeing many bulls in both areas, i dont knkw how people can say there are bigger bulls in the colockum. They obviously havent been to the blues :tup:
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: bobcat on December 10, 2012, 09:16:19 PM
I have 5 points.

Only 5 points? OK, well ask this question again in 15 years.   :chuckle:
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Bob33 on December 10, 2012, 09:20:30 PM
I have 5 points.

Only 5 points? OK, well ask this question again in 15 years.   :chuckle:
Come on now. We know that Pomeroy locals draw every year with 1 point because they drew the previous year.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Todd_ID on December 10, 2012, 09:27:11 PM
I have 5 points.

Only 5 points? OK, well ask this question again in 15 years.   :chuckle:
In 15 years the points creep will require 40 points to draw the best tag in the state: Colockum!  :tup:
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Dan-o on December 10, 2012, 09:36:25 PM
1.  Blues
2.  C-Post
3.   Skip season
4.  Colockum.... just to take a walk.  No bulls there.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Bob33 on December 10, 2012, 09:37:56 PM
I have 5 points.

Only 5 points? OK, well ask this question again in 15 years.   :chuckle:
In 15 years the points creep will require 40 points to draw the best tag in the state: Colockum!  :tup:
Doesn't the world end in 11 days anyway?
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Critter Ritter on December 10, 2012, 09:39:38 PM
I have 5 points.

Only 5 points? OK, well ask this question again in 15 years.   :chuckle:
I've been pretty lucky so far. i got drawn 3 yrs in a row. with 3 points and under. one was for the Alklai Bull elk.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Kola16 on December 10, 2012, 09:41:55 PM
Here is one from the Clock that KNOPISH posted. 400+
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: bobcat on December 10, 2012, 10:17:32 PM
I have 5 points.

Only 5 points? OK, well ask this question again in 15 years.   :chuckle:
I've been pretty lucky so far. i got drawn 3 yrs in a row. with 3 points and under. one was for the Alklai Bull elk.

Must be an archery hunter then?

If so, then you actually do have a chance.

Either place has good bulls. The Blues are probably a tougher hunt due to the steep terrain, if that matters.

You could go on a road trip and check out both areas to see which you prefer. But I think you'll be happy with the size of the bulls in either one.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: MuleySniper on December 10, 2012, 10:43:39 PM
I have 5 points.

Only 5 points? OK, well ask this question again in 15 years.   :chuckle:

 :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
Title: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: NWWA Hunter on December 10, 2012, 11:20:26 PM
The north east. It's the only tag most people can hunt
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: deerslyr on December 10, 2012, 11:54:49 PM
Winston.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: skywalker253 on December 11, 2012, 09:41:19 PM
I have 5 points.

Only 5 points? OK, well ask this question again in 15 years.   :chuckle:

Funniest post of the year thus far. LMFAO
Good one Bobcat
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: skywalker253 on December 11, 2012, 09:53:22 PM
I have 17 points and have been out scouting around to try and prepare for next year.

What is the terrain like in the Clockum? I have not made it in there yet.
Is the Clockum multiple GMUs? That is what I read in the regulations, so I am assuiming it is GMUs 328, 329, 335. Which is the most productive GMU of the 3?
Which is the best hunt to put in for? I hunt modern firearm. I see there is a late "any bull" hunt open in Dec through the end of the month. Must be a snow hunt.

Lastly...
Every year I look at the elk on the Handford property. Are there any GMUs, which those elk travel back and fourth into? Are they worth applying for?

If the Blues and the Clockum are top 2, which is number 3, 4, and 5 in your opinions.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: splitshot on December 11, 2012, 10:08:03 PM
blues!!  i have seen elk bigger than the one in the pic.  mike w
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: 400out on December 12, 2012, 05:42:07 AM
Pomeroy :yike: I haven't seen that ! I wish
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: KNOPHISH on December 12, 2012, 06:18:44 AM
Sorry Kola, That bull is at the casino in Kamilche. I posted it to stir the Colockum pot. I don't know where is was taken. I have seen extra large elk in both areas so it's a toss up. Here is the Colockum bull my bro got.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Woodchuck on December 12, 2012, 06:52:09 AM
That bull is about average for the Colockum. Monster anywhere else.  :tup:
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: C-Money on December 12, 2012, 07:04:16 AM
I knew it was only a matter of time before you would show up on this one Woodchuck! :chuckle: I knew that bull in the pic above, I watched him run cows a time or two and he has plenty of kids running around to pass on his great genes. I know he was about as big as they got up there that year as well. If it was me with only 5 points, I would just put in for where ever area I felt I knew the best. Slim odds in drawinga tag, but you never know with the WA Draw system.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Woodchuck on December 12, 2012, 07:08:07 AM
 :hello: That is probably the best advice on here right there. Go with what ya know.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Maverick on December 12, 2012, 09:58:03 AM
Let's be honest to the guy. No one will give you a straight answer because no one wants another guy putting in for what any of the guys in here are putting in for. Both the colockum and the blues have nice bulls. With 5 points its possible but chances are it'll be awhile. It took me 14 points for my blues tag this year. What you need to do is go scout both areas, see what you like. Personally is choose an area that is closer to you so that when you do get drawn it'll be a little easier on the wallet to drive over and scout a bunch. good luck buddy!
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: rosscrazyelk on December 12, 2012, 10:23:43 AM
There are big elk everywhere. You just need put in the work. :yeah:
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: deerslyr on December 12, 2012, 10:45:40 AM
 :yeah: Id venture to say if you put in the time and depending on what you consider "big" most of the yakima units would produce a few bulls I consider "big" and be much easier to draw. It will require a lot more ground work to find one then in the blues or the clok but there in there.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: skywalker253 on December 12, 2012, 10:53:41 AM
I have 17 points and have been out scouting around to try and prepare for next year.

What is the terrain like in the Clockum? I have not made it in there yet.
Is the Clockum multiple GMUs? That is what I read in the regulations, so I am assuiming it is GMUs 328, 329, 335. Which is the most productive GMU of the 3?
Which is the best hunt to put in for? I hunt modern firearm. I see there is a late "any bull" hunt open in Dec through the end of the month. Must be a snow hunt.

Lastly...
Every year I look at the elk on the Handford property. Are there any GMUs, which those elk travel back and fourth into? Are they worth applying for?

If the Blues and the Clockum are top 2, which is number 3, 4, and 5 in your opinions.

Ok...if nobody is going to answer my questions, then let me ask one question.

What GMU is the Clock in? What difference does it make if somebody gives up information on the GMU. It is a highly difficult permit to draw. Somebody like myself, who has a ton of points will find out one way or the other. I am just hoping someone call give me a little intelligence, so I can go scout the area. I may not even put in for it anyway, as I would rather hunt the Blues. But I would be stupid to not at least check out some other areas, which I DON'T know.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: bobcat on December 12, 2012, 10:56:36 AM
I consider the Colockum to be the Naneum and Quilomene units.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Bob33 on December 12, 2012, 11:05:54 AM
I have 17 points and have been out scouting around to try and prepare for next year.

What is the terrain like in the Clockum? I have not made it in there yet.
Is the Clockum multiple GMUs? That is what I read in the regulations, so I am assuiming it is GMUs 328, 329, 335. Which is the most productive GMU of the 3?
Which is the best hunt to put in for? I hunt modern firearm. I see there is a late "any bull" hunt open in Dec through the end of the month. Must be a snow hunt.

Lastly...
Every year I look at the elk on the Handford property. Are there any GMUs, which those elk travel back and fourth into? Are they worth applying for?

If the Blues and the Clockum are top 2, which is number 3, 4, and 5 in your opinions.

Ok...if nobody is going to answer my questions, then let me ask one question.

What GMU is the Clock in? What difference does it make if somebody gives up information on the GMU. It is a highly difficult permit to draw. Somebody like myself, who has a ton of points will find out one way or the other. I am just hoping someone call give me a little intelligence, so I can go scout the area. I may not even put in for it anyway, as I would rather hunt the Blues. But I would be stupid to not at least check out some other areas, which I DON'T know.
The modern permit is hunt 2018. If you look that up in the regs it will tell you the GMUs.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Bofire on December 12, 2012, 11:06:12 AM
 :) I used to hunt the Clock, a friend still does he stays the entire season and hunts off horses. I quit it because of the crowd, lots of hunters, and I ran into some really BIG mouth butt heads that thought they owned the place. I like the Blues.
Carl
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: skywalker253 on December 12, 2012, 01:34:22 PM
I consider the Colockum to be the Naneum and Quilomene units.

Thanks Bobcat. Now take me there and show me where the elk are at. Kidding...
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: skywalker253 on December 12, 2012, 01:34:54 PM
I have 17 points and have been out scouting around to try and prepare for next year.

What is the terrain like in the Clockum? I have not made it in there yet.
Is the Clockum multiple GMUs? That is what I read in the regulations, so I am assuiming it is GMUs 328, 329, 335. Which is the most productive GMU of the 3?
Which is the best hunt to put in for? I hunt modern firearm. I see there is a late "any bull" hunt open in Dec through the end of the month. Must be a snow hunt.

Lastly...
Every year I look at the elk on the Handford property. Are there any GMUs, which those elk travel back and fourth into? Are they worth applying for?

If the Blues and the Clockum are top 2, which is number 3, 4, and 5 in your opinions.

Ok...if nobody is going to answer my questions, then let me ask one question.

What GMU is the Clock in? What difference does it make if somebody gives up information on the GMU. It is a highly difficult permit to draw. Somebody like myself, who has a ton of points will find out one way or the other. I am just hoping someone call give me a little intelligence, so I can go scout the area. I may not even put in for it anyway, as I would rather hunt the Blues. But I would be stupid to not at least check out some other areas, which I DON'T know.
The modern permit is hunt 2018. If you look that up in the regs it will tell you the GMUs.

Thank you
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: bobcat on December 12, 2012, 01:58:46 PM
The quality permit includes Teanaway, which to me is not the Colockum.

The Colockum, in my mind, is east of hwy 97.

I might include the Mission unit as being a part of it, but not the Teanaway.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: skywalker253 on December 12, 2012, 02:06:23 PM
The quality permit includes Teanaway, which to me is not the Colockum.

The Colockum, in my mind, is east of hwy 97.

I might include the Mission unit as being a part of it, but not the Teanaway.

would this also cover blewitt pass or am I to far north. I will go to the Sportmans Warehouse and pickup a couple of maps. I travel from the Tacoma area to Eastern WA every week. Last week I went thru there to go to Chelan to screw around the Entiat area looking at deer. I am really trying to hit it hard this year, so if I get drawn I will know right where to go. I have alot of points for deer and elk.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: skywalker253 on December 12, 2012, 02:27:27 PM
I was looking at the regulations to see the GMUs. Looks like the it is everything WEST of the 97 hwy, which would be everything NORTH of I90. I will double check in the GMU descriptions. Thank you for your insight. I am curious to find out in the harvest reports, which GMU fills more tags, or if it is a mix. Only 6 quality modern tags. I'm guessing the early tag in Sept. is the one to get (1 tag), while the elk are still rutting. Hmmmm
17 points is alot of points to put towards only giving out 1 tag or 6 for that matter. I'd almost rather try for something else, which has good public access and gives out a fair amount of tags. I really want to get drawn this year. Any suggestions? I am willing to do my part scouting and not just show up the day of the hunt and hope for the best. I don't expect anyone to tell me where to go. I'm only looking for opinions and general areas.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: PlateauNDN on December 12, 2012, 02:31:46 PM
I'd say with your 17 points is probably about the average number of points by everybody that applies.  The quality of bulls is there and due to low numbers is what makes that tag so hard to get.  In my opinion any 300 gmu is good for elk and if you just want to get drawn during the rut then I'd suggest a different unit where you have a better chance at getting drawn next year.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: skywalker253 on December 12, 2012, 02:35:19 PM
PS- I have never harvested a bull elk. Only a couple of cows. That explains why I am so on it this year. In previous years I have not been as committed to elk hunting. Moving forward I am going all out until a put a bull in the dirt and take it home.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: bobcat on December 12, 2012, 02:38:09 PM
I would pick one of the near-impossible to draw permits as a first choice, then pick one of the 300 units with a high number of permits for your second choice.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: PlateauNDN on December 12, 2012, 02:39:46 PM
I would pick one of the near-impossible to draw permits as a first choice, then pick one of the 300 units with a high number of permits for your second choice.

 :yeah: :tup:
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: skywalker253 on December 12, 2012, 02:40:12 PM
I'd say with your 17 points is probably about the average number of points by everybody that applies.  The quality of bulls is there and due to low numbers is what makes that tag so hard to get.  In my opinion any 300 gmu is good for elk and if you just want to get drawn during the rut then I'd suggest a different unit where you have a better chance at getting drawn next year.

Yes you are correct. The regs say 11 point avg for the Oct hunt. 13 for the 1 tag in Sept. If you count the 1 tag given for Teanaway; it took at avg 11 points to get drawn. So 17 should but me in the mix. Would I be wasting my time scouting now? The reason I ask; I am wondering if they live there throughout the year or migrate in. 
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: skywalker253 on December 12, 2012, 02:41:34 PM
I would pick one of the near-impossible to draw permits as a first choice, then pick one of the 300 units with a high number of permits for your second choice.

Wenaha East

You only get 2 choices or is it 4?
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Boss .300 winmag on December 12, 2012, 02:45:28 PM
nooksack
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: skywalker253 on December 12, 2012, 02:53:55 PM
nooksack

I have been up there a few times on I5, but I have never ventured off deep in the GMU. Looked pretty steep from the main hwy. How open is it to the public? Any pics of some big bulls you can post? Get us excited!
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: 270Flat on December 12, 2012, 02:57:37 PM
FYI Blues are STEEP too!! I saw a couple real bruisers this year with a spike tag in my pocket.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: skywalker253 on December 12, 2012, 03:16:55 PM
FYI Blues are STEEP too!! I saw a couple real bruisers this year with a spike tag in my pocket.

Yes...I have hunted deer there for over 25 years. It can be a real dangerous in there. I suggest hiring Dave at Western Outfitters for an trophy bull hunt. I won't hunt elk there to shoot a spike. I have always hunted the westside for elk, but considering the number of points I have.........I GOING EAST!!!
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: coachcw on December 13, 2012, 06:33:59 AM
The reallty is the blues have more big bulls , but the country is steep and deep . there's some good bulls in the cloc , teannaway and peaches , chuck bumping in for fun. the central units can produce bulls in the 370-380 range with some hard work and sure there's a couple that push 400 but i've yet to see them . So it really depends how far one wants to travell and how good of shape your in . I'm gonna play a ace this year and hope for a draw .
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Boss .300 winmag on December 13, 2012, 08:13:11 AM
nooksack

I have been up there a few times on I5, but I have never ventured off deep in the GMU. Looked pretty steep from the main hwy. How open is it to the public? Any pics of some big bulls you can post? Get us excited!

The herd west of Birdsview had a monster bull in it this year, plus the one just east of Sedro Wolley had a nice one as well.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Woodchuck on December 13, 2012, 08:33:03 AM
The reallty is the blues have more big bulls , but the country is steep and deep . there's some good bulls in the cloc , teannaway and peaches , chuck bumping in for fun. the central units can produce bulls in the 370-380 range with some hard work and sure there's a couple that push 400 but i've yet to see them . So it really depends how far one wants to travell and how good of shape your in . I'm gonna play a ace this year and hope for a draw .
Dude, what did I ever do to you?  :bash:  :chuckle:
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Roperfive88 on December 13, 2012, 03:27:13 PM
Arizona or New Mexico. Lots of big bulls :chuckle:
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: coachcw on December 15, 2012, 08:05:38 PM
Don't wory woodchuck most guys wont do what it takes to kil a big bull and only a hanfull just happen on one .
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: BOWHUNTER45 on December 15, 2012, 08:20:41 PM
nooksack
:nono: :nono: :nono: :violent1: :beatdeadhorse: :DOH: :tdown:
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: PolarBear on December 15, 2012, 08:21:09 PM
Here is one from the Clock that KNOPISH posted. 400+
Those are reproduction antlers.  I know the taxidermist in Shelton who made them and did the mount.  He is a horrible taxidermist by the way.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: BOWHUNTER45 on December 15, 2012, 08:23:43 PM
Man I think thats the way I need to hunt ...Just order me up some of those repos and hunt from my house ... :yeah:
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: BOWHUNTER45 on December 15, 2012, 08:26:31 PM
nooksack

I have been up there a few times on I5, but I have never ventured off deep in the GMU. Looked pretty steep from the main hwy. How open is it to the public? Any pics of some big bulls you can post? Get us excited!
all the bulls in that unit are now spikes  :yeah:
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: trophyhunt on December 15, 2012, 08:36:58 PM
I hope your not expecting to draw just because you have 17 points, I quit expecting a few years ago and I also have 17 points now.  If you have have never killed a bull you should do yourself a favor and put in for the rifle 300 units, your odds of drawing are much better and there are a few guys on here that will help with your hunt. You only get 2 choices for quality elk, I would do what someone already suggested on here, put in for a tough draw like the blues then put in for one of the 300 units for your second choice. Good luck on what ever you do, and don't count on anything when it comes to drawing in this state. When I had 15 points I applied for a quality hunt that had 3 permits, the three tags went to guys with 6, 4, and 2 points. It could be another 5 years before we draw or more.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: nwhunter on December 15, 2012, 08:53:58 PM
Or you could split your points with someone who has a history of being real lucky in the draws and go hunting! :chuckle: nwhunter
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: deerslyr on December 15, 2012, 09:52:47 PM
Or you could split your points with someone who has a history of being real lucky in the draws and go hunting! :chuckle: nwhunter

 :chuckle:
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: colockumelk on December 16, 2012, 03:54:06 PM
I would pick one of the near-impossible to draw permits as a first choice, then pick one of the 300 units with a high number of permits for your second choice.

If you have 17 points don't waste it on a general season big bull permit. Because then its basically a crap shoot. Basically you hope a big one is pushed by you.  The Little Nachese (GMU 346) Has a special season for the rifle that goes from Oct 1-10. There isnt a general season there and the bulls are still screaming their heads off. Plus they give out 10 tags.  That is an awesome tag to draw. That unit also has ALOT of elk.  If you put in the time to scout a large trophy bull is mote than doable. So put in for one of the rut tags (Colockum or Blues) as #1 and then the Little Naches tag #2.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: 400out on December 16, 2012, 04:43:51 PM
I would pick one of the near-impossible to draw permits as a first choice, then pick one of the 300 units with a high number of permits for your second choice.


If you have 17 points don't waste it on a general season big bull permit. Because then its basically a crap shoot. Basically you hope a big one is pushed by you.  The Little Nachese (GMU 346) Has a special season for the rifle that goes from Oct 1-10. There isnt a general season there and the bulls are still screaming their heads off. Plus they give out 10 tags.  That is an awesome tag to draw. That unit also has ALOT of elk.  If you put in the time to scout a large trophy bull is mote than doable. So put in for one of the rut tags (Colockum or Blues) as #1 and then the Little Naches tag #2.
wow that was honest! I take back what I say about you at the meetings 
:tup:  :tup:  :tup:  :tup:  :tup: to you
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: bobcat on December 16, 2012, 05:16:36 PM
It all depends on how bad he wants to draw a bull permit . I think he said he very much wanted to draw a bull permit THIS year.

Which is why I would suggest applying for one of the hunts that falls after the rut.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Critter Ritter on December 16, 2012, 07:40:36 PM
Alot of good info. Thanks guys. :)
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: effin-steve on December 17, 2012, 10:48:14 PM
I work for a big orange tree expert co. that sends me all over the state to work the high lines doing line clearence. Every summer we start in wenachee go up and over the colockum to cle elum to the top of stamped pass and through the green river water shed. I see big bulls in the colockum every year but if I had 17 points I would put in for unit 485. We see more big bulls and big bucks in the watershed then we see any where else the place is loaded.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: pd on December 18, 2012, 08:38:35 PM
SkyWalker, thank you starting an interesting thread.

May I hijack this??  I would like to bribe one of the old salts on this forum with beer, and get a good lesson on the points and special hunts for elk.  Do any of you live in Kitsap, or somewhere around here?

I have never bothered with the special hunts, and don't really have any knowledge of the ins & outs of the system.  There is so much to learn.  I could really use some advice (not on where to go, but how to apply).  Does anybody ever run a lecture during the off season?

PD
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: Critter Ritter on December 19, 2012, 09:38:45 PM
I work for a big orange tree expert co. that sends me all over the state to work the high lines doing line clearence. Every summer we start in wenachee go up and over the colockum to cle elum to the top of stamped pass and through the green river water shed. I see big bulls in the colockum every year but if I had 17 points I would put in for unit 485. We see more big bulls and big bucks in the watershed then we see any where else the place is loaded.
The 2 BIGGEST Bulls I ever saw were in the Unit 485 they were both dandy 6pts :drool:, Me and my dad were 200 yrds away and they stood there for like 5 minutes looking at us, And I had a Black-tail tag. Dang-it
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: paytonma on December 19, 2012, 09:44:25 PM
the nooksack unit has some giant bulls, typical and some weird non typical ones too. Natives killed most of em though  :bash:
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: adamR on December 20, 2012, 06:33:39 AM
if you have 17 points can I assume you have that many in the "bull" category as well as the "quality" category or at least 14 points if you haven't applied since the category change?  If that's the case and you have a high number of points in both categories then why waste your quality points just to get drawn for a big bull in an easier to draw unit just because you haven't killed one?  I would say use your "bull" points to get drawn for an easy 300 unit during general season and get that first bull out of the way.  Use your "quality" points and wait until you can get drawn for either the colockum, the blues, or the 1 tag for little naches.
This is why I am one of the few that loves the new categories because you don't have to settle anymore just to get drawn faster.
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: splitshot on January 13, 2013, 10:18:28 PM
the blues and a 338 rum or 338 wsm.  mike w
Title: Re: Which Would Be better for a BIG Bull?
Post by: JamesK. on January 14, 2013, 09:17:45 AM
I started a thread about a week ago. It is titled Archery Elk Blue Mountains. Check it out. There is some good information on it, unfortunately with only 5 pts your odds are slim but never hurts to apply
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal