Post by: Jekemi on January 16, 2013, 01:40:46 PM
If there was ever any doubt as to what the President's real intentions were with regards to the 2nd Amendment it should be crystal clear. Now we must take the offensive. We must rally our like-minded colleagues, friends, and family and shove these new proposals down their liberal throats right to their bleeding hearts. Time to take the gloves off and come out swinging. 20,000 gun laws on the books now can't stop crazy people from doing crazy things. This won't work either.
Just remember, the 2nd Amendment was designed to protect us from people like Obama!
Post by: GEARHEAD on January 16, 2013, 01:47:07 PM
Post by: magnanimous_j on January 16, 2013, 01:53:25 PM
Post by: turkeyfeather on January 16, 2013, 01:55:02 PM
Which of his listed Executive Orders do you think violates the constitution?:yeah:
Post by: Woodchuck on January 16, 2013, 02:03:09 PM
Any of them that take away from that. :yeah:
Post by: huntnphool on January 16, 2013, 02:17:23 PM
President Obama, in a move to head off a Constitutional battle, cited the Constitution as his defense for tighter gun control. He used to be a lecturer on the Constitution. Taking lessons in Constitutional law from Obama would be like taking English lessons from Charles Barkley (no offense to Sir Charles).oh thats just turrable :chuckle:
Post by: elkinrutdrivemenuts on January 16, 2013, 02:33:07 PM
Visualize a very tall tower and at the top is our right to "keep and bear arms", no way to climb it, no way to tear it down, impenetrable and immovable! It will be there for all time and as long as its there we keep our guns.
Government came in and built a wall around that tower and its been getting taller through the years. Now they want to build it so high that we cannot see the tower. They will tells us it no longer exists because we can't see it, and since it doesn't exist, we can't have guns anymore. They want us to forget about it and believe them.
What they don't know is that their wall is poorly built and we can tear it down to find out for ourselves if the tower still exists. Will we tear it down or will we trust them? Time will tell.
Post by: christopheri on January 16, 2013, 06:36:22 PM
Which of his listed Executive Orders do you think violates the constitution?
None of it violates the constitution but none of it makes any of us any safer. None of it makes our schools safer. None of it keeps guns out of the hands of criminals. Some of it may possably violate HIPPA
What Information is Protected
Protected Health Information. The Privacy Rule protects all "individually identifiable health information" held or transmitted by a covered entity or its business associate, in any form or media, whether electronic, paper, or oral. The Privacy Rule calls this information "protected health information (PHI)."12
“Individually identifiable health information” is information, including demographic data, that relates to:
•the individual’s past, present or future physical or mental health or condition,
•the provision of health care to the individual, or
•the past, present, or future payment for the provision of health care to the individual,
and that identifies the individual or for which there is a reasonable basis to believe it can be used to identify the individual.13 Individually identifiable health information includes many common identifiers (e.g., name, address, birth date, Social Security Number).
The Privacy Rule excludes from protected health information employment records that a covered entity maintains in its capacity as an employer and education and certain other records subject to, or defined in, the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 20 U.S.C. §1232g.
De-Identified Health Information. There are no restrictions on the use or disclosure of de-identified health information.14 De-identified health information neither identifies nor provides a reasonable basis to identify an individual. There are two ways to de-identify information; either: (1) a formal determination by a qualified statistician; or (2) the removal of specified identifiers of the individual and of the individual’s relatives, household members, and employers is required, and is adequate only if the covered entity has no actual knowledge that the remaining information could be used to identify the individual.15