Hunting Washington Forum

Big Game Hunting => Backcountry Hunting => Topic started by: throttlejocky20 on April 13, 2013, 09:58:14 AM


Advertise Here
Title: New Pack
Post by: throttlejocky20 on April 13, 2013, 09:58:14 AM
I am desperatly needing a new pack. I bought a cheap starter pack a few years ago and now that i plan to get more serious i need a better pack. I am looking at the new Tenzing CF13 system. I just dont know if 3400ci is going to be enough for a 7 day trip. I also really like the TZ5000.
Has anyone on here used these packs? Whats your thoughts? Any and all advice would be helpfull as I want the best pack for wilderness hunting thats comfortable and strong enough to load a boned out mule deer!
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: romaknows on April 13, 2013, 10:13:03 AM
Do you plan on "bivy hunting" or are you going to hunt out of a "spike camp"?

If I was truly bivy style hunting I like heavy duty internal frame pack, If i will be hunting out of a spike camp i prefer a heavy duty external frame with a lightweight day pack . :twocents:
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: couesbitten on April 13, 2013, 01:44:49 PM
This topic has been discussed previously on numerous occasions.  Try these links;

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,122591.0.html (http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,122591.0.html)

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,106789.0.html (http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,106789.0.html)

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,115707.0.html (http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,115707.0.html)

Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: 7mag. on April 13, 2013, 04:50:17 PM
I was also interested in a Tenzig pack, but after doing some research, I found that they have some very negative reviews. In my opinion, Kifaru, Mystery Ranch, and Stone Glacier are the top 3, and are head and shoulders above all the rest. They are also more expensive, but, if you are planning on packing your camp and hunting gear for several nights, and hopefully an animal, most packs are not designed for that.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: couesbitten on April 13, 2013, 05:12:25 PM
Kifaru, Mystery Ranch, and Stone Glacier are the top 3

 :yeah:   Some great information on this thread about Kifaru and Stone Glacier packs. http://www.rokslide.com/forums/showthread.php?4375-Stone-Glacier-and-Kifaru (http://www.rokslide.com/forums/showthread.php?4375-Stone-Glacier-and-Kifaru)
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: throttlejocky20 on April 13, 2013, 05:22:55 PM
Thabks for the help!
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: Tim in Wa. on April 13, 2013, 05:33:25 PM
Those packs got lots of bad reviews!
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: acnewman55 on April 16, 2013, 12:42:45 AM
Do you plan on "bivy hunting" or are you going to hunt out of a "spike camp"?

What is a spike camp?
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: cvandervort on April 16, 2013, 06:30:04 AM
Spike camp = hiking in, dropping your camp somewhere, and hunting from that spot (returning every night)
Bivy hunt = hike in, hunt until night, sleep where you are, wake up and repeat
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: JM on April 16, 2013, 12:22:27 PM
I pack fairly light and a 3400 cu in pack definately wouldn't work for a 7 day trip. I'd get one that is 4500 or larger if you plan on living out of a pack for any amount of time.

Even if you aren't going to fill it up, just having the extra room in your pack is nice and it'll hardly add any weight to your hike anyway.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: Karl Blanchard on April 16, 2013, 04:12:53 PM
I pack fairly light and a 3400 cu in pack definately wouldn't work for a 7 day trip. I'd get one that is 4500 or larger if you plan on living out of a pack for any amount of time.

Even if you aren't going to fill it up, just having the extra room in your pack is nice and it'll hardly add any weight to your hike anyway.
  :yeah:  If I was to buy another pack right this minute it would be the Kifaru Timberline 2 or the Mystery Ranch Long Bow.  Better to have too much room than too little.  There are certain things you penny pinch on but your pack is not one of them.  If it fails then you fail!
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: dreamingbig on April 16, 2013, 04:22:15 PM
I have ythe kifaru duplex timberline 2.  It is an awesome pack.  :tup:
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: Karl Blanchard on April 16, 2013, 04:26:08 PM
I have ythe kifaru duplex timberline 2.  It is an awesome pack.  :tup:
  Little bit jealous, not gonna lie!
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: dreamingbig on April 16, 2013, 04:27:47 PM
Do what I did and buy the frame and cargo panel in year one then add the bag in year two.  Worth every penny.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: throttlejocky20 on April 17, 2013, 12:57:02 PM
I have been thinking about that but I need a whole new set up. I paid $90 for the pack I have 5 years ago and now that I have been getting serious about hiking its not working anymore!
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: asl20bball on April 20, 2013, 12:46:53 PM
I have the TZ5000...I like it!  My problem has been finding a bag that has all the bells and wistles I want AND that actually fits my waist line (I'm 5'10, 155, 32'waist). the Tenzing bags fit me very well in that regard. In fact I think I may get a tenzing day pack as well. In addition, I really like the side pockets on the waist belt- it is big/deep enough to holster my pistol for bow hunting. So far I really like the TZ bags.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: bmccalister on April 21, 2013, 04:26:44 PM
I am looking at upgrading my current pack system and I have narrowed my search down to four packs. The Eberlestock Just One J34 / Dragonfly or Nimrod apex / wilderness pack systems.

http://eberlestock.com/J34%20Just%20One.htm (http://eberlestock.com/J34%20Just%20One.htm)

http://www.nimrodpacks.com/n325.html (http://www.nimrodpacks.com/n325.html)

I believe the nimrod pack systems are the most versatile but most expensive with all the accessories to meet a persons needs.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: SilkOnTheDrySide on April 21, 2013, 04:50:02 PM
I think each has it's benefits.  If that is your pricerange, I would definetely consider the wilderness pack since they carry the heavier loads better.  The Nimrod really isn't designed to carry giant loads.  But if you are using it for a daypack, or a horse hunt, then the nimrods versatility really shines.  The eberlestock is the jack of all trades, master of none.  Depends on how you want to use it!
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: washelkhunter on April 21, 2013, 05:13:41 PM
Spike camp = hiking in, dropping your camp somewhere, and hunting from that spot (returning every night)
Bivy hunt = hike in, hunt until night, sleep where you are, wake up and repeat



Bivy hunt? Ewwww! We gotta do better than that. How about "range camp" or "rovers hunt" ? Anybody?
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: motg9_6 on July 05, 2013, 03:18:02 PM
 i have the tz6000 being a bigger guy. like it so far lots of features you have to pay alot extra for with others. good quality but only time will tell.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: scottcrb on July 05, 2013, 04:27:09 PM
i just got he nimrod pinnacle and am gonna get the frame and one of the bigger bags later i really like the versatility and the quality plus its a local company and is made and serviced in the USA,
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: dreamingbig on July 05, 2013, 04:33:22 PM
My high camp bag and grab it showed up the other day.  With the duplex frame, dt2 bag or high camp bag, cargo panel and grab it I am set!
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: JustinC on July 05, 2013, 06:06:21 PM
Get the same pack that Scott got and you'll be set. Don't waste your time with the other packs. Get the T1 or the BT1 and you'll never need anything else.

This is my T1 used as a day pack.

(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi393.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fpp18%2FJustincrossley_album%2F2013%2FIMG_0574_zps776ee5dc.jpg&hash=f28d64bafb24b170d06ad9df2d8a33a592e33fef) (http://s393.photobucket.com/user/Justincrossley_album/media/2013/IMG_0574_zps776ee5dc.jpg.html)

With 130 lbs of elk meat. What else do you need? Still plenty of room if this would have been a backpack hunt.

(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi393.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fpp18%2FJustincrossley_album%2FHunting%2FTravisBullElkNov102012036_zps410594eb.jpg&hash=0d2edffb8a8946cd1eb1421354d6dcd99cebee6d) (http://s393.photobucket.com/user/Justincrossley_album/media/Hunting/TravisBullElkNov102012036_zps410594eb.jpg.html)
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: 7mag. on July 06, 2013, 01:08:52 AM
i just got he nimrod pinnacle and am gonna get the frame and one of the bigger bags later i really like the versatility and the quality plus its a local company and is made and serviced in the USA,

Nimrod makes one of the most comfortable and versatile day packs on the market, and their customer service is excellent. Don't waste your money on the frame. They don't carry weight well at all. I sold mine because I got sick of killing my back and shoulders packing out meat. If you want to pack weight (any thing over 35 lbs), spend the money and buy a pack that is made for it, that has actual load lifters that work.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: Olympics777 on July 07, 2013, 10:34:18 AM
 3400 cubic inches is to small to carry your gear and pack out a muley as well. Even is you are an ultralight type guy who only carrys around 2500 c.i. of gear, that only leaves 900 cubic inches for meat and skull( depending on how you pack out the most precious part of the critter:) Get 4000 for a hunting pack, minimum, and try to get one that can be made easily smaller or larger, depending on how much your carrying, like one with a super adjustable lid, for example.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: Olympics777 on July 07, 2013, 10:38:47 AM
 Does anyone have a Sitka or Mystery Ranch pack they could tell me about? I'm curious how they perform...
Title: New Pack
Post by: Ridgerunner on July 07, 2013, 11:11:11 AM
I can tell you mystery ranch are among the best performing packs out there, people knock them for their weight but the metcalf doesn't weigh too much.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: JLS on July 07, 2013, 11:13:53 AM
I bought a MR Longbow a year ago and really like it.  I haven't had a chance to load it up with meat yet, but as for hauling gear I am happy with it.  I wish I would have know the Metcalf was coming out, it is more suited to what I wanted in a pack.

What are your priorities (price, weight, durability, etc.) and how do you intend to use it?
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: Olympics777 on July 07, 2013, 04:56:43 PM
I want it mostly for bivy hunting, and I carry no more than 20 pounds of gear, no matter how many nights I go out. but I don't like going back in to pick up more meat, so I don't mid carrying 100 pound extra to get it all out. I want to spend 500 or less, and I don't want it to weigh more than 6 pounds, but that might not be realistic:) I almost always have a brother or friend to help pack out the critter, so if the whole thing won't fit that is going to usually be ok, and if it is to big, then it will swallow up my gear!! Basically, I'm really picky.
Title: New Pack
Post by: Ridgerunner on July 07, 2013, 05:30:25 PM
Mr metcalf will fill the bill nicely.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: SilkOnTheDrySide on July 07, 2013, 07:02:49 PM
I want it mostly for bivy hunting, and I carry no more than 20 pounds of gear, no matter how many nights I go out. but I don't like going back in to pick up more meat, so I don't mid carrying 100 pound extra to get it all out. I want to spend 500 or less, and I don't want it to weigh more than 6 pounds, but that might not be realistic:) I almost always have a brother or friend to help pack out the critter, so if the whole thing won't fit that is going to usually be ok, and if it is to big, then it will swallow up my gear!! Basically, I'm really picky.

I'd like to see your gear list.

Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: couesbitten on July 07, 2013, 07:04:03 PM
 :yeah:
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: dreamingbig on July 07, 2013, 10:11:25 PM
I want it mostly for bivy hunting, and I carry no more than 20 pounds of gear, no matter how many nights I go out. but I don't like going back in to pick up more meat, so I don't mid carrying 100 pound extra to get it all out. I want to spend 500 or less, and I don't want it to weigh more than 6 pounds, but that might not be realistic:) I almost always have a brother or friend to help pack out the critter, so if the whole thing won't fit that is going to usually be ok, and if it is to big, then it will swallow up my gear!! Basically, I'm really picky.

Weight has to be excluding food.  I can never get my packs to the weigh the same for a 9 day hunt as they do for a 2 night trip. :)
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: SilkOnTheDrySide on July 07, 2013, 10:17:07 PM
I want it mostly for bivy hunting, and I carry no more than 20 pounds of gear, no matter how many nights I go out. but I don't like going back in to pick up more meat, so I don't mid carrying 100 pound extra to get it all out. I want to spend 500 or less, and I don't want it to weigh more than 6 pounds, but that might not be realistic:) I almost always have a brother or friend to help pack out the critter, so if the whole thing won't fit that is going to usually be ok, and if it is to big, then it will swallow up my gear!! Basically, I'm really picky.

Weight has to be excluding food.  I can never get my packs to the weigh the same for a 9 day hunt as they do for a 2 night trip. :)

I think it's excluding a lot.  He's talking day pack, or he's never weighed his pack. 

Think about this...

Pack: 5-10 pounds
Gun: 7 Pounds
Sleep System: 4-8 pounds.

Over 20 pounds right there...
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: Olympics777 on July 08, 2013, 12:03:33 PM
Actually, I weigh my pack all the time, every time I go out, to make sure I am staying under goal weight. Also, that weight does not include my gun, because I carry that in my hands. Basically, I carry my bag(3.4pounds), half of a tent,(whoever goes with carrys the other half) about 10 rounds of ammo, a super light shell( the TNF cipher windstopper) and about 1 liter of water, a couple mountain house meals(pro packs) and a lot of granola bars(minus the box). I sometimes carry a very small survival kit depending on how well I know the area. Anything else(knife, flashlight if I choose to carry one) goes in my pockets. I don't use a sleeping pad(yes, I freeze) and who needs game bags? My pack by itself I have now weighs 3 pounds. Generally, I go out for 3 days or less, sorry for not specifying.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: SilkOnTheDrySide on July 08, 2013, 12:32:56 PM
Actually, I weigh my pack all the time, every time I go out, to make sure I am staying under goal weight. Also, that weight does not include my gun, because I carry that in my hands. Basically, I carry my bag(3.4pounds), half of a tent,(whoever goes with carrys the other half) about 10 rounds of ammo, a super light shell( the TNF cipher windstopper) and about 1 liter of water, a couple mountain house meals(pro packs) and a lot of granola bars(minus the box). I sometimes carry a very small survival kit depending on how well I know the area. Anything else(knife, flashlight if I choose to carry one) goes in my pockets. I don't use a sleeping pad(yes, I freeze) and who needs game bags? My pack by itself I have now weighs 3 pounds. Generally, I go out for 3 days or less, sorry for not specifying.

Just a few questions...stove? Fuel? Knife? Water filter? Para cord? Rain gear? Sleeping bag? Head lamp, pot, fork....

I'm not trying to be confrontational, I'm just legitimately curious how you manage to pull that off. What pack are you running?
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: SilkOnTheDrySide on July 08, 2013, 12:48:23 PM
Plus rangefinder, binos, spotter. All not necessary, but it seems like you are risking yourself a bit not taking some serious basics into the woods. How far in do you usually go?
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: Olympics777 on July 08, 2013, 01:08:59 PM
I completely understand the questions, and its fine!! When I say bag(3.4)  I mean a sleeping bag. I don't bring rain gear, and sometimes get wet, but usually my windproof shell blocks water. I hate headlamps and don't bring one, I bring a tiny Cabelas flashlight. I do bring a couple feet of paracord, as well as a stove and fuel, but as I never go solo my partner and I split that and the water filter. I also have a little spoon I bring, that weighs a couple grams( I am thinking of cutting off some of the handle to make it lighter:) I occasionally bring a little tin cup, but not always, because that means more water, and some cocoa packets, and it adds more weight and bulk, so when I am cold I just do some jumping jacks, or head uphill!! I carry my knife in the pocket of my Sitka pants, so I don't count that as pack weight. The pack I have is a inexpensive one I got at sportsmans warehouse, and it only cost me $140. It is kind of an off brand, and not made real well, and that is why I want a new one. I looked up the MR Metcalf and it looks perfect, though it will raise my pack weight, but I guess that is bound to happen sometime, and eventually when I am old and gray I will need a sleeping pad. But when that happens, I'll get the thermarest Zlite, and cut of the corners and two feet at the bottom to lighten it.  Oftentimes when I look at all the gear  I DO carry, I am amazed at the weight other people carry, so I fill up my pack with everything and go weigh it, and it is always the same as before. I am also always scheming on how to cut out a few grams or an ounce. For me, I don't care if I am cold and wet if I can cut out an extra pound, but most of the time I am worm and dry. (except for in my bag on a 10 degree night) I am also hoping to completely cut out my tent and use a little tarptent thingy.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: Olympics777 on July 08, 2013, 01:14:33 PM
I don't have a spotter, or a rangefinder either. It has never been an issue, I see it with binos( they go on a harness around my neck) and I guesstimate range. Usually I go in about 3 miles, but it depends on where I am. This year I'm going to hunt a super steep mountainside about 2 miles from the road. The mountain itself is in a roadless area.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: JLS on July 08, 2013, 01:47:56 PM
There's a Metcalf in multicam on sale on the Rokslide forum, might want to check that out. 

It'd be a cold day in Hades before I went without a sleeping pad.   :yike:
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: SilkOnTheDrySide on July 08, 2013, 01:56:43 PM
How old are you olympics? Must have a strong back!
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: shanevg on July 08, 2013, 02:57:04 PM
If you're truly going that light you should purchase one of the GoLite packs. MR makes a great pack but they'd take up a third of your total pack weight. Never purchase a Sitka pack for hunting. Their clothes is great but their packs suck.

I have a GoLite Pinnacle that I used for a year and lacked out 85 pounds if bear near with it. I stopped using it because it wasn't the most comfortable pack to wear but if you are primarily concerned with weight it should fit the bill.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: JustinC on July 08, 2013, 04:08:03 PM
Olympics,
If I was you, I would find a used Kifaru KU5200.
Weighs less than your current pack and it can carry over 100 lbs in relative comfort.

You could also use a Kifaru bikini frame and a large ultra light bag which would really haul the weight and still keep your pack really light.

Like Shane said, don't get the Sitka pack as they really suck. They don't carry weight well at all and I know quite a few guy who have had them totally fail with a load.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: BenC567 on July 08, 2013, 04:13:50 PM
You should check out the new Kuiu Icon packs.  I'm going to be ordering the 5200 here pretty soon.  The issue I have with MR packs is that they look like to a giant duffle bag with shoulder straps to me.  I prefer to at least have the option to organize my gear.

https://store.kuiu.com/categories/packs/
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: throttlejocky20 on July 08, 2013, 06:34:38 PM
I ended up with a Kifaru and wouldnt go with anything else.  :twocents:
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: Olympics777 on July 08, 2013, 07:11:21 PM
Silkonthewetside, yes, I have a strong back, and thanks everyone for the advice.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: jjhunter on July 08, 2013, 07:24:52 PM
If you're truly going that light you should purchase one of the GoLite packs. MR makes a great pack but they'd take up a third of your total pack weight. Never purchase a Sitka pack for hunting. Their clothes is great but their packs suck.

I have a GoLite Pinnacle that I used for a year and lacked out 85 pounds if bear near with it. I stopped using it because it wasn't the most comfortable pack to wear but if you are primarily concerned with weight it should fit the bill.

I had my whole Idaho buck, minus one hind quarter that I carried over my shoulder, in my flash 20 pack last year.  Worked like a champ!   :chuckle:
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: Olympics777 on July 08, 2013, 08:06:19 PM
Silkonthewetside, I know this is not super relavent anymore, but I just went and double checked everything I carry,(including food) and then added some extra stuff to make sure in case I was forgetting anything, and then weighed everything individual, and everything together, and the together weight was exactly 15 pounds. So even if I had a sleeping pad and a better pack I still would be under twenty!!
Title: New Pack
Post by: jackelope on July 08, 2013, 08:06:57 PM
Not bringing rain gear into the Cascades on a multiple-day trip  in September or October is asking for trouble if you ask me. I'll cope with the extra half pound or whatever my space rain amounts to. Ruined trip, hypothermia, the list goes on. Not me.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: dreamingbig on July 08, 2013, 10:30:36 PM
Not bringing rain gear into the Cascades on a multiple-day trip  in September or October is asking for trouble if you ask me. I'll cope with the extra half pound or whatever my space rain amounts to. Ruined trip, hypothermia, the list goes on. Not me.

I agree.  My 9 day pack usually comes in at 65 lbs but I do like to be comfortable.  ;)
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: fillthefreezer on July 09, 2013, 08:15:04 AM
for the most part i have really light gear. i dont take much in the way of extras. and for the longest time i couldnt figure out how all these people were packing so much lighter than i can.

the only way ive found people are getting these super low pack weights is by not counting this or that or whatever when im counting everything. i dont count my rifle cus i hand carry it. i dont count bino cus they are around my neck not in my pack. etc.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: JLS on July 09, 2013, 08:23:01 AM
Pretty easy to skew or distort numbers, isn't it?  I don't go by pack weight comparison, but rather by what I have and is it extraneous.

I don't count my hat cus it's on my head 8)
Title: New Pack
Post by: MuleySniper on July 09, 2013, 08:37:56 AM
I just bought a kifaru a few weeks ago. I'm anxious to try it out. They get solid reviews.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: JustinC on July 09, 2013, 06:24:14 PM
I ended up with a Kifaru and wouldnt go with anything else.  :twocents:

Great choice! Which one did you get?
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: Olympics777 on July 09, 2013, 07:46:09 PM
Sorry for "distorting and skewing numbers", but no, i don't count the weight of my hat, cause it IS on my head, not in my pack. Why would I count it in my pack weight if it never goes in my pack?
Title: New Pack
Post by: jackelope on July 09, 2013, 08:02:45 PM
I guess I always considered it gear weight. You could just put all the heavy stuff in your pockets. Why cut the handle off your toothbrush to save an ounce when it would fit perfectly in your pocket.
:dunno:
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: JLS on July 09, 2013, 08:13:38 PM
This is kind of like the thread on what gear costs.  I'm giving people a hard time about how they arrive at pack weight.  Everyone has a different way, and honestly at times it's like trying to find out what a used vehicle is really worth.  Everyone has a different way of figuring it out.

Don't get bent, it was nothing personal.  I honestly could care less how you arrive at your pack weight.  I'm much more interested in the total amount of gear that folks take along.  That is the list that actually means something.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: rosscrazyelk on July 09, 2013, 08:29:05 PM
I guess I always considered it gear weight. You could just put all the heavy stuff in your pockets. Why cut the handle off your toothbrush to save an ounce when it would fit perfectly in your pocket.
:dunno:
Why even bring a tooth brush.   :chuckle:
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: throttlejocky20 on July 09, 2013, 09:01:58 PM
I ended up with a Kifaru and wouldnt go with anything else.  :twocents:

Great choice! Which one did you get?
Longhunter
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: motg9_6 on July 10, 2013, 10:15:17 AM
Lightweight tooth brush options  look for what they call a whisp in the tooth brush isle 1 time use extremely light with tooth pic and comes with paste already on. 1 a day holds me over just dandy.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: Bullbuster on July 10, 2013, 11:44:07 AM
I have the Kuiu Icon 6000 pack and have used it multiple times for long backcountry trips.  From what I have found, they have the best waist belt out of all the packs I have used.  The 2013 packs now also have a load shelf built into the back between the back and the frame.  This would be a big upgrade allowing for your boned meet to be placed outside of the pack.  If you are looking for a new pack, I would highly recommend the 2013 Kuiu packs.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: GHETTO GUIDE on July 10, 2013, 12:37:44 PM
Bullbuster:   Where can you see the Kuiu?  Iam pack shopping and Iam having a hard time finding places to "fondel" them before I buy.     

sweet,   I just used "fondel" in a sentence.  :chuckle:
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: fillthefreezer on July 10, 2013, 02:45:21 PM
I have the Kuiu Icon 6000 pack and have used it multiple times for long backcountry trips.  From what I have found, they have the best waist belt out of all the packs I have used.  The 2013 packs now also have a load shelf built into the back between the back and the frame.  This would be a big upgrade allowing for your boned meet to be placed outside of the pack.  If you are looking for a new pack, I would highly recommend the 2013 Kuiu packs.
i dont understand this craze of trying to have meat outside the pack.... load shelf, meat shelf, expandable, mesh etc... i dont get it
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: lostbackpacker on July 10, 2013, 03:00:29 PM
I have the Kuiu Icon 6000 pack and have used it multiple times for long backcountry trips.  From what I have found, they have the best waist belt out of all the packs I have used.  The 2013 packs now also have a load shelf built into the back between the back and the frame.  This would be a big upgrade allowing for your boned meet to be placed outside of the pack.  If you are looking for a new pack, I would highly recommend the 2013 Kuiu packs.
i dont understand this craze of trying to have meat outside the pack.... load shelf, meat shelf, expandable, mesh etc... i dont get it

it's pretty simple... you dont have to get your gear all messed up or rearrange your pack.  works really slick.. meat goes in game bag, game bag goes on meat shelf in  between pack and frame. 

Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: JPhelps on July 10, 2013, 03:16:08 PM
I have the Kuiu Icon 6000 pack and have used it multiple times for long backcountry trips.  From what I have found, they have the best waist belt out of all the packs I have used.  The 2013 packs now also have a load shelf built into the back between the back and the frame.  This would be a big upgrade allowing for your boned meet to be placed outside of the pack.  If you are looking for a new pack, I would highly recommend the 2013 Kuiu packs.
i dont understand this craze of trying to have meat outside the pack.... load shelf, meat shelf, expandable, mesh etc... i dont get it

it's pretty simple... you dont have to get your gear all messed up or rearrange your pack.  works really slick.. meat goes in game bag, game bag goes on meat shelf in  between pack and frame.

I like the idea in theory but what I dont like Is when carrying camp out you have just moved all that weight away from your back.  An overturning moment is created about your lower back (mass x distance).  Which is not desired when packing 30+ lbs of gear out.

By going with a large bag all of the weight is close to my back.  I throw the meat in a 65L sea to summit dry bag or black contractors bag so I dont worry about getting my gear or pack bloody (worst case scenario I really only need to protect my down sleeping bag).
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: 7mag. on July 10, 2013, 09:57:12 PM
I have the Kuiu Icon 6000 pack and have used it multiple times for long backcountry trips.  From what I have found, they have the best waist belt out of all the packs I have used.  The 2013 packs now also have a load shelf built into the back between the back and the frame.  This would be a big upgrade allowing for your boned meet to be placed outside of the pack.  If you are looking for a new pack, I would highly recommend the 2013 Kuiu packs.
i dont understand this craze of trying to have meat outside the pack.... load shelf, meat shelf, expandable, mesh etc... i dont get it

it's pretty simple... you dont have to get your gear all messed up or rearrange your pack.  works really slick.. meat goes in game bag, game bag goes on meat shelf in  between pack and frame.

I like the idea in theory but what I dont like Is when carrying camp out you have just moved all that weight away from your back.  An overturning moment is created about your lower back (mass x distance).  Which is not desired when packing 30+ lbs of gear out.

By going with a large bag all of the weight is close to my back.  I throw the meat in a 65L sea to summit dry bag or black contractors bag so I dont worry about getting my gear or pack bloody (worst case scenario I really only need to protect my down sleeping bag).

I agree. It sounds really good until you think about the geometry. By moving the pack bag away from your body, you are moving the pack's center of gravity further away from your body's center of gravity, resulting in a cumbersome, unbalanced load.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: dreamingbig on July 10, 2013, 10:07:40 PM
I had a blacks creek Canadian that had this feature.  I hauled exactly one boned out elk out of the mountains with it and then got rid of it.  Kifaru makes a really good pack and makes meat loads feel lighter than you ever imagined.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: Olympics777 on July 11, 2013, 07:59:39 AM
JLS, I am sorry if I was seeming a little rude in my last post. The original question I asked was simply about some pack advice, and I figured that everyone could better give that advice if they knew my pack weight, so I gave the weight of my pack only, because it seemed the only thing that mattered, but next time I will give all weight. My entire weight, between what goes in my pack and what I carry, is probably more like 35 pounds or so. What I was carrying outside of my pack did not seen relevant...
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: SilkOnTheDrySide on July 11, 2013, 08:25:04 AM
JLS, I am sorry if I was seeming a little rude in my last post. The original question I asked was simply about some pack advice, and I figured that everyone could better give that advice if they knew my pack weight, so I gave the weight of my pack only, because it seemed the only thing that mattered, but next time I will give all weight. My entire weight, between what goes in my pack and what I carry, is probably more like 35 pounds or so. What I was carrying outside of my pack did not seen relevant...

I think the confusion is around what you bring. You seem to be setting yourself up for a dangerous situation by not bringing critical gear for unpredictable weather. That is why most of us are/were skeptical on your weight. IMO it's dangerous to go in so minimal, but then by your description, you aren't that far away from a road.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: Olympics777 on July 11, 2013, 10:42:27 AM
Silkonthewetside, I actually moved to Idaho not to long ago,(it is not all its cracked up to be) and it almost never rains here, so last hunting season I cut out my rain jacket. When I lived in Port Angeles I always wore one, now I just pack one of those little disposible ones that weighs like an ounce. I guess I never thought of a sleeping pad as a matter of safety, but everybody is different, I guess... Other than that, I think I carry almost everything other people carry. Maybe I'm the crazy one.  :chuckle:
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: Colville on July 12, 2013, 01:25:18 PM
They're just trade offs.  With short ranges and just 3 day windows you can make some pretty serious compromises.  My Sept hunts are going to be 10+ miles one way in most cases, last 5+ days and all but assure me of filthy weather at some point.  If I brought no sleep pad and desired to just suffer for weight savings I'd pay ever more for that call the longer the trip. Lack of sleep is cumulative in addition to the increase in calories you'll need from fighting off cold. 

The reason to add the other stuff when you make comparisons is that the advice you get is based on some pretty simplistic but traditionally agreed upon givens in packing, your pack weight is;  the weight of everything you aren't wearing as clothing. That creates a standard from which we have a consistent conversation, hence the "how in hell do you get to 20 lbs", by excluding rifles and optics.

For a couple miles only, there's no way in hell I choose to suffer at sleep time.  I can make that trip back and forth to the car any number of times in a day. If I have a really big critter I'm probably going to make two trips anyway so a 10 OZ blue foam and 2+lb air mat become meaningless. To each is own but it seems to me that the suffering is purely voluntary rather than a well considered compromise that achieves something necessary or even useful.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: JustinC on July 13, 2013, 09:06:26 PM
lostbackpacker,
I believe those meat shelves are a fad that will die fast. Like others have already said, the weight will too far from your back and cause you to lean forward to compensate.  :bdid:

Get a pack that is big enough and use a garbage bag. Really simple and it works. :twocents:

Throttlejocky,
That will be a great pack for you!
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: SilkOnTheDrySide on July 14, 2013, 09:47:11 PM
Check this out.  We got Scott's pack down to ZERO POUNDS.

It doesn't count because he's carrying it  :chuckle: :chuckle:
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: Olympics777 on July 15, 2013, 06:27:06 PM
You guys are simply brutal, aren't I entitled to my own opinion? I guess not, and I must just take it.

Anyway, Colville, what you say makes sense, thanks. I guess, if I get a less than one pound pad, then the extra tiny bit of weight won't matter when I have 100 pounds of deer in my pack. And really, I guess it would help conserve calories if I slept warmer... it's something to think about. 
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: lostbackpacker on July 15, 2013, 07:01:53 PM
A lot of you guys must have tons of cash sitting around talking about kifarus. I roll with a Northface terra 4500 for a 1-6 day pack. My pack weighs in at 25# for the high hunt in September minus rifle. I ditch mostly everything I can. NO stove (I bring dried fruit and nuts, Top ramen cooked or not it does its job). No tent ( painters plastic goes a long way). No pad. (cut some ferns or pines boughs to sleep on or find a mossy patch).

Have a buddy with a horse on speed dial to pack that animal out.

How much does the horse cost. A kifaru is pretty cheap compared to normal people hiring a pack out??
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: SilkOnTheDrySide on July 15, 2013, 08:17:17 PM
You guys are simply brutal, aren't I entitled to my own opinion? I guess not, and I must just take it.

Anyway, Colville, what you say makes sense, thanks. I guess, if I get a less than one pound pad, then the extra tiny bit of weight won't matter when I have 100 pounds of deer in my pack. And really, I guess it would help conserve calories if I slept warmer... it's something to think about.

Just giving you a bad time man.  I hope you notch a big one this year!  Looking forward to pictures and story.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: JPhelps on July 15, 2013, 08:24:46 PM
A lot of you guys must have tons of cash sitting around talking about kifarus. I roll with a Northface terra 4500 for a 1-6 day pack. My pack weighs in at 25# for the high hunt in September minus rifle. I ditch mostly everything I can. NO stove (I bring dried fruit and nuts, Top ramen cooked or not it does its job). No tent ( painters plastic goes a long way). No pad. (cut some ferns or pines boughs to sleep on or find a mossy patch).

Kifaru packs are worth their price tag.  When hauling a 130+ lb loads on inferior packs I would have paid any amount for a Kifaru or Mystery ranch.

I like to enjoy myself on my trips.  While I could make it with plastic and sleeping on the ground.  I will take my Big Agnes Q-core SL pad (17 oz) and Tarp tent (32 oz).  The weight will make up for the energy by getting a much better sleep. :tup:
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: JPhelps on July 15, 2013, 10:05:03 PM

I have a coupe buddies that I mountaineer/ hunt with that have kifarus and the packs seem to spend more time at home compared to a Arteryx, Gregory, or Osprey packs.

That makes zero sense for hunting.  While Arcteryx, Gregory and Osprey make great backpacking packs it is a whole different story when you start piling on the weight.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: liljozie495 on July 15, 2013, 10:10:24 PM
 :yeah: why leave your kifaru at home...
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: SilkOnTheDrySide on July 16, 2013, 06:20:54 AM

I have a coupe buddies that I mountaineer/ hunt with that have kifarus and the packs seem to spend more time at home compared to a Arteryx, Gregory, or Osprey packs.

That makes zero sense for hunting.  While Arcteryx, Gregory and Osprey make great backpacking packs it is a whole different story when you start piling on the weight.

If that's truly the case, your friends need their head examined...
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: fillthefreezer on July 16, 2013, 07:50:24 AM
I have a coupe buddies that I mountaineer/ hunt with that have kifarus and the packs seem to spend more time at home compared to a Arteryx, Gregory, or Osprey packs.
yep, mine sits in a glass case at home, no chance id log 40+ miles with it last weekend  :tup:
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: JustinC on July 16, 2013, 11:03:38 AM
I have a coupe buddies that I mountaineer/ hunt with that have kifarus and the packs seem to spend more time at home compared to a Arteryx, Gregory, or Osprey packs.

I would still be using an Arc'teryx Bora if it was lighter. I went to the Kifaru Timberline1 because it has  more space than the Bora and weighs less.

Gregory and Osprey are not in the same league at all. They are fine for backpacking with lighter loads but not 100+ lbs IMO.

And yes I have used all of them.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: 7mag. on July 16, 2013, 08:50:07 PM
When you start depending on other people as a primary plan, you are eventually going to end up screwed. If you go into the back country without the ability and or gear to pack out what you kill, you are being foolish and irresponsible.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: SilkOnTheDrySide on July 16, 2013, 09:20:54 PM
When you start depending on other people as a primary plan, you are eventually going to end up screwed. If you go into the back country without the ability and or gear to pack out what you kill, you are being foolish and irresponsible.


Making prior arrangements to have someone help pack out an animal only seems more than responsible to me. 

Having the physical endurance to get an animal out is probably the most important to me. It may take multiple trips to get an animal out.

I'm not saying your wrong btw, I'm just having a discussion. 

But I think this is where philosophies differ.  If you are 15-20 miles from the truck, you aren't going to be taking two trips to get an animal out.  You are going to do it in one trip.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: JPhelps on July 16, 2013, 09:47:53 PM
When we go elk hunting in the backcountry we plan on packing one out as a group.  With deer the plan is for everyone to pack their own deer and camp.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: SilkOnTheDrySide on July 16, 2013, 10:09:57 PM
When we go elk hunting in the backcountry we plan on packing one out as a group.  With deer the plan is for everyone to pack their own deer and camp.

Ya, I will amend my prior statement.  You are more of a man then me if you can pack an entire elk out by yourself :)  But yes, you should be able to pack a deer and camp out.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: 7mag. on July 16, 2013, 10:12:31 PM
When you start depending on other people as a primary plan, you are eventually going to end up screwed. If you go into the back country without the ability and or gear to pack out what you kill, you are being foolish and irresponsible.


Making prior arrangements to have someone help pack out an animal only seems more than responsible to me. 

Having the physical endurance to get an animal out is probably the most important to me. It may take multiple trips to get an animal out.

Making prior arrangements is responsible, and making multiple trips, especially with elk, is often the only option. My point is, depending on others that are supposed to be in the area, is asking for trouble. Often, others aren't willing to drop every thing and end their hunt, to pack out another's animal. People's plans also change, and they may not be where you think they are.

I didn't want to start an argument, just discourage people from heading into the wilderness unprepared.
Title: Re: New Pack
Post by: ridgefire on July 16, 2013, 11:44:11 PM
Time to find new hunting partners if they are not willing to give you a hand packing meat out. I stop my hunt to help pack meat and my partners do the same. Nothing irresponsible IMO to plan on your hunting partner to give you a hand if that's how you plan your hunt. Back to packs.. I would suggest using your pack and saving money till you can buy a bt2 our a highcamp with the bikini frame. Also as said, the ku packs would be something worth looking into as well.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal