Post by: Naches Nightmare on July 31, 2013, 01:47:59 PM
Post by: carpsniperg2 on July 31, 2013, 01:56:01 PM
Post by: WSU on July 31, 2013, 02:01:36 PM
Post by: pianoman9701 on July 31, 2013, 02:02:30 PM
Post by: xd2005 on July 31, 2013, 02:52:10 PM
I thought the agreement was that there'd ne no non-Native fishing on the river after taking down the dam.
It's already open and has been since January.
Not sure on dredging...think they do an annual sediment survey to determine if necessary.
Post by: Naches Nightmare on August 08, 2013, 06:37:20 PM
Post by: washelkhunter on August 08, 2013, 07:21:50 PM
Post by: logger on August 08, 2013, 07:40:08 PM
Post by: klickman on August 09, 2013, 05:47:44 AM
I have picts. of a excavator sittin on mats throwin mud in the channel to get rid of it! I even look at a tree within a half mile of a creek and i'm in trouble!
That's bs. Let the river fix itself. If the Indians can't get to and from their boat launch so be it. They were the biggest supporter of the breach.
Klickman
Post by: klickriverchromer on August 09, 2013, 07:01:55 AM
:yeah:I have picts. of a excavator sittin on mats throwin mud in the channel to get rid of it! I even look at a tree within a half mile of a creek and i'm in trouble!
That's bs. Let the river fix itself. If the Indians can't get to and from their boat launch so be it. They were the biggest supporter of the breach.
Klickman
Thruth be told brother