Hunting Washington Forum
		Big Game Hunting => Bow Hunting => Topic started by: NOCK NOCK on August 24, 2013, 07:54:56 AM
		
			
			- 
				After following the bow head shot thread, was wondering what you all think about the "Texas heart shot"....Have you ever taken one?....I know its not the best shot to take, but done correctly it is extremely deadly, taking out multiple organs.
 I have only did one, 20 years ago, had a 4ft wide, 25yd long blood trail, pretty impressive, but looks like a blender was turned on inside the animal.  Have not attempted it since
 
 20yd shot, missed the bullseye by 1/2 inch, arrow penetrated half way up the vanes.
- 
				Makes me cring just thinking about it
			
- 
				I've seen it done as a follow up shot on an elk.  Huge amount of blood mass damage.  I probably wouldn't attempt it as a first shot.
			
- 
				The circumstances would have to be just right
			
- 
				Its a tough shot you have very little room for error.
			
- 
				I can't see any situation where this would be an acceptable bow shot. Not as a first shot or as a finishing shot. I predict this thread will be locked as the discussion heats up about the lack of ethics employed to do this.  :bdid:
			
- 
				It’s not even an acceptable rifle shot, under any situation.   :twocents:
			
- 
				If it's the only shot you have after you have already stuck him, and there is a chance you could loose the animal, why would this not be an acceptable finishing shot. I would rather take this shot (if I think the animal needs a second arrow) then  let a wounded animal walk away and possibly loose him. 
 
 I would never take this as my first shot.
- 
				Why not as a second shot once the animal has already been hit :dunno:
			
- 
				I can't see any situation where this would be an acceptable bow shot. Not as a first shot or as a finishing shot. I predict this thread will be locked as the discussion heats up about the lack of ethics employed to do this.  :bdid:
 
 
 Theres a huge artery right there, very lethal shot. Its actually about as hard to hit as a full on front shot that we hear so many guys on here taking. Me, ill take neither, but I wont hate on a guy who can make it happen.
- 
				Why not as a second shot once the animal has already been hit :dunno:
 
 
 Because it's such a low percentage shot that it would make the animal run if it's bad, instead of the shooter backing out and letting him lie down. I'm most appalled by it as a first shot, however.
- 
				Femoral? artery right there......did it 20 years ago with a .270 on a mule deer.  It turned and ran 50 yards down hill, looked like it kicked in after burners, blowin out all its blood......that thing was blood free when it hit the ground....best eating deer ever.  I dont look for that shot as a bowhunter or even with a rifle, but it presented itsself and I took it with great results.  My guess is I will never see or take that shot again.    :twocents:
			
- 
				I would take it all day long with a rifle, I haven't seen it not work with a rifle.
 
 With a bow, it just doesn't seem right for me.  But, then again, they don't die of heart attacks.
- 
				How many on here can 1-say exactly where that artery is and 2-hit a target that size every time. 2nd or follow up shot....maybe.  
			
- 
				tagging
			
- 
				How many on here can 1-say exactly where that artery is and 2-hit a target that size every time. 2nd or follow up shot....maybe. 
 
 
 Anybody have good pics of the target size a bow hunter has when attempting this shot ??
- 
				I can 100% say I have never and will never take it, even with a rifle.   I have let multiple animals walk because that was my only shot.
			
- 
				Some confusion here - talking about two different shots. Texas heart shot is in the femoral artery in the ham. The other is trans-anal into the abdomen severing mesenteric vessels. Both shots are horrible because there's just no room for error. Yes either is deadly if you make it, but two inches off and you've just got a horribly wounded animal. 
			
- 
				The femoral artery are approximately .5 inches wide.  If you miss and go through the body cavity you have a good chance of hitting something important and it going down quickly.  You also have a chance of the animal not going down for a long time and therefore losing it or it no being consumable.  Take a shot in the heart/ lung area as we have be taught and that animals is going down.  
 
 It puzzles me that people would take a low percentage shot or risk losing meet just because it is the only shot they have.  Score another for the anti-hunters.
 
- 
				Thats in the butthole no? How would a butthole shot be your "only available second shot" lol 
 I wouldnt even be taking pictures of that.
- 
				NEVER for a first shot... and I don't think even a second shot... but I can picture a scenario where a bad first shot can sometimes force hunters to make different decision than they would normally make, and if they felt that shot was their ONLY possibility for a SECOND shot, I would not fault them.  :twocents:
			
- 
				It puzzles me that people would take a low percentage shot or risk losing meet just because it is the only shot they have.  Score another for the anti-hunters. 
 :yeah:
 
 
 That's being nice.
- 
				My god.... :bash:
			
- 
				This is a poor shot that just is not one that should be taken.  A bull or buck is just not worth it. If your off just a tiny bit with a rifle your going to ruin a lot of meat on the hams or the backstrap.  If your off target with the arrow, you now have an animal with a ugly wound that might not slow him down for a long time..   
			
- 
				I've never been that hungry, or trophy horny to shoot an animal in the "back-end", my dad taught me better. He also taught me not to talk smack about a shot someone takes. Especially if I was no where near it. I know people who have, but that's cool for them. One of my friends has a hell of a buck.
 
 Hunterman(Tony)
- 
				As a second shot to help bring the animal down I have taken that shot.  
			
- 
				With rifle:  No, I'd sooner shoot for the neck.  It would destroy so much meat anyway.
 
 With bow: No, no, no, no
- 
				Never!! Let the animal walk and you get to go hunting another day!! Too low a percentage shot every time!
			
- 
				How many on here can 1-say exactly where that artery is and 2-hit a target that size every time. 2nd or follow up shot....maybe. 
 
 
 I CAN
- 
				You've got a 1/2" target to hit that isn't in the exact spot on every animal every time that can and will move. Sorry but I doubt it. 
			
- 
				You've got a 1/2" target to hit that isn't in the exact spot on every animal every time that can and will move. Sorry but I doubt it.
 
 see pic
- 
				No comment!! My butt hurts now...
			
- 
				First off, I knew I would get blasted for this post.
 This is the one and only time I have/or will attempt this shot.
 A "texas heart shot" is not in the femoral artery....its through the anal passage area, taking out multiple organs.
 
 I have seen many deer running around with arrows hanging from various parts of their body, most from a high success shot called broadside.
 
 The point is, if you are a serious bowhunter, you should be able to hit a 1-2" grouping at 20 yds. every single shot, I can and have been doing so for 25+ years.
 
 
- 
				I'm glad it worked out for you this one time. 
 
 I wouldn't call it hunting though, it's called shooting an animal in the butthole because you weren't hunter enough to get any other shot.
 That arrow looked to shred the intestines and maybe bladder spraying feces all over the hams and tenderloin - no thanks I won't be eating at your house.
 
 
 Did you process that animal yourself?
 
 
 
 [edit]
 Also to add,  I think people are blasting "you" so much to try and curb others from trying this shot themselves.
 
 I'd hate to see someone read this thread then later in the year looking at a puckerhole and thinking to themselves
 "hrm, it worked for that dude on hunting-washington forum"
 
 
 twang - smack!      there goes a deer running around town with an arrow stuck out it's azz.
 
 So I don't mean to attack you personally nock nock so much as the method (others trying it because they seen your pic)
 
 
 
 
 
- 
				
 You've got a 1/2" target to hit that isn't in the exact spot on every animal every time that can and will move. Sorry but I doubt it.
 
 see pic
 
 
 You got lucky in my book.
- 
				I'm glad it worked out for you this one time. 
 
 I wouldn't call it hunting though, it's called shooting an animal in the butthole because you weren't hunter enough to get any other shot.
 That arrow looked to shred the intestines and maybe bladder spraying feces all over the hams and tenderloin - no thanks I won't be eating at your house.
 
 
 Did you process that animal yourself?
 
 
 
 [edit]
 Also to add,  I think people are blasting "you" so much to try and curb others from trying this shot themselves.
 
 I'd hate to see someone read this thread then later in the year looking at a puckerhole and thinking to themselves
 "hrm, it worked for that dude on hunting-washington forum"
 
 
 twang - smack!      there goes a deer running around town with an arrow stuck out it's azz.
 
 So I don't mean to attack you personally nock nock so much as the method (others trying it because they seen your pic)
 [/quote
 
 
 
 
 
 
 The moment anyone "shoots" an animal it is no longer hunting it is killing.
 "not hunter enough"...wont even touch that one....way to call names....I did that in third grade
 
 It's OK I have thick skin,
 
 Just wish I could be perfect like some on here
 
 
- 
				There is no honor nor nobility in shooting any creature in the back for any reason
			
- 
				The moment anyone "shoots" an animal it is no longer hunting it is killing.
 "not hunter enough"...wont even touch that one....way to call names....I did that in third grade
 
 It's OK I have thick skin,
 
 Just wish I could be perfect like some on here
 
 
 To each their own, if you want to keep shooting them in the pooper be my guest.   (I'll never condone it)
 
 
 I just hope no one else gets a wise idea when the season is ending and they're staring at a butthole contemplating the "Texas heart shot" as seen on hunting-washington.
 
 
 
- 
				I would take it all day long with a rifle, I haven't seen it not work with a rifle.
 
 With a bow, it just doesn't seem right for me.  But, then again, they don't die of heart attacks.
 
 
 300 ultra mag in the pooper  :yike:
 
 I'd hate to be your butcher
- 
				lol Yall are heartless. In no way is a booty shot justifiable.  :tup:
			
- 
				
 
 
 I have only did this 1 time. Think I was in my late teens.
 I am in no way advocating this type of shot, nor will I probably ever take it again.
 
 It saddens me that not one person asked "why" I took this shot, Just went straight to bashing :( :( :( :(
 To think that some will say hey "say it on H-W" I'm gonna take that shot is just silly.
 
 
- 
				I would take it all day long with a rifle, I haven't seen it not work with a rifle.
 
 With a bow, it just doesn't seem right for me.  But, then again, they don't die of heart attacks.
 
 
 300 ultra mag in the pooper  :yike:
 
 I'd hate to be your butcher
 
 i don't see how it's much different than a gut shot, either way it will destroy the stomach/ intestines. There are a lot of animals that get gut shot every year and if taken care of properly they are fine to eat. Is it a high percentage shot? No, does it work sometimes? Yes. I probably wouldn't take it unless I needed to hit one again after a first shot that didn't get the job done.
- 
				
 
 
 I have only did this 1 time. Think I was in my late teens.
 I am in no way advocating this type of shot, nor will I probably ever take it again.
 
 It saddens me that not one person asked "why" I took this shot, Just went straight to bashing :( :( :( :(
 To think that some will say hey "say it on H-W" I'm gonna take that shot is just silly.
 
 
 
 Why nock nock  :'(, why would you do such a thing  :dunno: What did that poor, innocent, fragile, delicious, tasteful creature ever do to you?  :IBCOOL:
- 
				I would take it all day long with a rifle, I haven't seen it not work with a rifle.
 
 With a bow, it just doesn't seem right for me.  But, then again, they don't die of heart attacks.
 
 
 300 ultra mag in the pooper  :yike:
 
 I'd hate to be your butcher
 
 i don't see how it's much different than a gut shot, either way it will destroy the stomach/ intestines. There are a lot of animals that get gut shot every year and if taken care of properly they are fine to eat. Is it a high percentage shot? No, does it work sometimes? Yes. I probably wouldn't take it unless I needed to hit one again after a first shot that didn't get the job done.
 
 All I can think is...
 BOOOM  :bfg: Gotta poop.
- 
				Last year my wonderful wife made a 50 ish yard shot on a blacktail doe.  I was sure she connected when we saw a bunch of hair on the ground behind where it was standing - broadside.  As it had not gone down at the shot, but sort of trotted away in an irregular and hesitant manner, we felt sure it was going to bleed out and lie down.  We were in fairly open cover and could see it  continue to put distance between us.
 A light rain and fading light making bloodtrailing impossible,  pushed me to urge her to close the distance and try for a second shot.  The Texas Heart Shot was on my list of "never do it" techniques until that moment.  I urged her to consider that a wounded deer could suffer a slow death otherwise.  She put the next shot in the center of the 8 on the doe's backside and when we approached the area, there was no longer any worries about a blood trail, the bushes were red from bottom to almost three feet up. the deer was piled up less than 20 feet from that spot.
 
 Disclaimer:
 She was using a 50cal muzzleloader.
 I nor anybody I hunt with would take that shot under any lesser conditions, never as a "first shot" with any weapon.
 The second slug was found in the severely damaged pelvic bone and the (femoral?) artery was severed ,- no entrails were touched!
 
 Definitely not the way we want our hunt to unfold, but under the circumstances, making a judgement call to follow through seemed the obvious choice.
- 
				
 
 
 I have only did this 1 time. Think I was in my late teens.
 I am in no way advocating this type of shot, nor will I probably ever take it again.
 
 It saddens me that not one person asked "why" I took this shot, Just went straight to bashing :( :( :( :(
 To think that some will say hey "say it on H-W" I'm gonna take that shot is just silly.
 
 
 
 Why nock nock  :'(, why would you do such a thing  :dunno: What did that poor, innocent, fragile, delicious, tasteful creature ever do to you?  :IBCOOL:
 
 
 C'mon now... don't get butt hurt  :chuckle:
- 
				As hunters it is more important than ever to be aware of our image in the eye of the public and how we conduct ourselves.  Hunting is about personal choice and circumstances and what you have been taught.  I do know a big game animal waundering around with an arrow stuck in its rump gets lots of people's attention.   
			
- 
				
 
 
 I have only did this 1 time. Think I was in my late teens.
 I am in no way advocating this type of shot, nor will I probably ever take it again.
 
 It saddens me that not one person asked "why" I took this shot, Just went straight to bashing :( :( :( :(
 To think that some will say hey "say it on H-W" I'm gonna take that shot is just silly.
 
 
 
 Why nock nock  :'(, why would you do such a thing  :dunno: What did that poor, innocent, fragile, delicious, tasteful creature ever do to you?  :IBCOOL:
 
 
 C'mon now... don't get butt hurt  :chuckle:
 
 Haha oh snap! He said that.
- 
				I can honestly say I have never blood trailed an animal more than 200 yards shot solidly in the hams with a well designed properly sharpened broadhead.  Most being recovered in less than 100 yards.  Wish I could say the same thing about animals taken in just one lung or the liver.  While the heart lung area should always be the first choice on any animal I won't lose sleep if an arrow goes off target and hits solidly in the ham.  Fred Bear actually thought it was the preferred shot on animals with a similar physiology/anatomy to deer.
 
 With a rifle the amount of meat loss is so great the shot is ill advised.  But with an arrow there is nearly no loss of meat.
 
 The further you get from the heart and into the extremities blood vessels get smaller.  Yet at the same time they multiply in volume.  As a result the buttocks holds nearly the same quantity of blood as areas closer to the heart.  These smaller vessels and dense tissue clot easier yet must drain primarily external.  With these smaller vessels it is increasingly important to have a broadhead super sharp with few edge burrs that create platelet traps of tissue.  And to assist in prolonging coagulation the ferrule and vent configurations should limit the amount of oxygen sucked into the wound as oxygen is a major stimulant that bonds blood platelets and forms the foundation of coagulation.  Rapid coagulation is your biggest enemy when addressing dense tissue shots.  Due to the high percentage of external discharge of blood a solid ham shot produces one of the more extraordinary blood trails.
 
 While I do not fear the ham shot on the entire Cervidae family of animals I do fear this shot on the Ursidae family of animals.  Their anatomy/physiology has a much reduced concentration of larger blood vessels in the buttock area coming closer to the resemblance of humans.  Thus the optimal target is much smaller and much more difficult to locate consistently.
 
 In my ideal world every animal I shoot would be facing away 10 to 25 degrees from broadside.  My arrow would enter behind the shoulder closest to me and destroy the shoulder opposite.  Every shot would completely dissect the ascending and descending aorta's from the heart while simultaneously punching through both lungs.  Unfortunately my ideal world struggles to exist amongst reality in the hunting field.  So the equipment I use is supportive of those shots that fall short of those ideal.  And I fear little the occasional shot in the hams.  My quarry should still expire rapidly and humanely and recovery is almost guaranteed successful.
- 
				Ill tell you right now if I stick a elk or a buck and hes still standing and hasnt gone down  I will let an arrow fly anywhere I can get one in! 
			
- 
				Got to love a the "ethics" threads. Very entertaining. 
 
 sent from my typewriter
 
- 
				I can 100% say I have never and will never take it, even with a rifle.   I have let multiple animals walk because that was my only shot.
 
 
 
 :yeah:  That said I did have my arrow deflect last year on a whitetail doe.  Entered behind the last rib and exited above the tail on the opposite side.  The blood trail was massive and short.
- 
				I've heard of the shot but to see it in picture, wow. 
			
- 
				A 'Texas Heart Shot' is just making fun of Texans saying they can't hit the heart and hit the animal in the butt. There is so much meat in the rump, why would you risk damaging all that meat?