Hunting Washington Forum
Equipment & Gear => Scopes and Optics => Topic started by: deerhunter_98520 on December 24, 2013, 04:58:12 PM
-
Alright guys I'm starting to look for my first nice spotter....Im thinkin a Leupold gold ring....any others around that price range that you would consider over the Leupold that's just as good or better?
-
Check out CameraLandNY , they have a large selection and great prices. Pentax is a good option.
-
vortex vortex vortex! all day save up a bit more and get their new baby razor!!!! :twocents:
-
vortex vortex vortex! all day save up a bit more and get their new baby razor!!!! :twocents:
:tup:
Have recently got to play with one of these, and for a lightweight, compact scope for the high country ( the only way i hunt), this scope is second to none!
-
I have the gold ring 15-30x, really like it, small enough to pack.
-
For that price range I would look at Leupold Goldring. The only Vortex worth that kinda cash is the Razor and it is about the same price as Swarovski. Given the choice between the two I would vote Swarovski.
-
Vortex Razor Hd 11-33x50. $999 MSRP, can be had for less. Shorter, brighter, lighter, great features for throwing in a pack and heading up hill! :tup:
-
Vortex Razor Hd 11-33x50. $999 MSRP, can be had for less. Shorter, brighter, lighter, great features for throwing in a pack and heading up hill! :tup:
Not a bad deal just a little low on the magnification and a 50mm objective is a tad narrow, maybe not so bad at 33 power . Be good for a backcountry type hunt.
-
The only option in the Leupold line that is less then that is in their compact line. Also only 50 on the objective, and only goes to 30x. Plus, they only surface coat the lenses on those models. We all know fully coated internal lenses lead to brighter, clearer images.
-
For that price range I would look at Leupold Goldring. The only Vortex worth that kinda cash is the Razor and it is about the same price as Swarovski. Given the choice between the two I would vote Swarovski.
The Vortex Razor goes from $999.00 to $1500.00. Great scope for the money but does not compare to the equal power in Swarovski. Swarovski in the 85mm is over $3000.00
Hard to compete with the swarovski brightness and clearity
-
Take a look at the Konus 20x60 x 80. There are some pretty good reviews on some of the shooting sights about it, especially for the $$$ - . Works for me. I got the angled eye piece. Have a friend in Wyoming that I recommended one to. He uses the heck out of his and loves it. You would need to upgrade to a taller tripod than what comes with it. I use that one for my compact Burris 12-24 x 50 scope I carry in my pack quite a bit. Perfect size for that scope. There are some pretty reasonable carbon fiber tripods out there.
:twocents:
-
I don't really care about size and weight...I won't be backpacking with it.....mostly for spotting deer....I had a few deer at first and last light that I know where bucks but not sure how big.....they had big bodies but my Bushnell trophy spotter just wasn't bright enough and I'm not gonna miss alotber opportunity because of it....if I need to spend a little more I will...but I want to make sure and get good optics
-
This is the one I was lean in towards
http://www.cameralandny.com/optics2/leupold.pl?page=leupold_gr_12-40x60mm (http://www.cameralandny.com/optics2/leupold.pl?page=leupold_gr_12-40x60mm)
-
I have that scope deer hunter and I love it. Not as much performance as a swarovski or ziess but for the size and price it's hard to beat. Can't imagine you'd be disappointed.
-
I have the spotting scope you listed but the HD. Look around and you can usually find the regular one around $600 and I got the hd with tripod for $750.. Long range hunting is a very good place to find optics. I do really like mine.
-
Thanks guys :tup: I'll have to getup to cabelas and check one out first hand.....is swaro that much better to save up and spend another $600-1000 ....I see the cameralandny has demo models for sale also...I could save up more and get one of the 65mm swaros
-
Thanks guys :tup: I'll have to getup to cabelas and check one out first hand.....is swaro that much better to save up and spend another $600-1000 ....I see the cameralandny has demo models for sale also...I could save up more and get one of the 65mm swaros
Nothing wrong with that Leupold you saw at cameraland. It just isn't Swaro, so it all depends on what you want out of your spotting scope. Me, I wanted the best quality glass I could afford and bought the Swaro.
-
I don't really care about size and weight...I won't be backpacking with it.....mostly for spotting deer....I had a few deer at first and last light that I know where bucks but not sure how big.....they had big bodies but my Bushnell trophy spotter just wasn't bright enough and I'm not gonna miss alotber opportunity because of it....if I need to spend a little more I will...but I want to make sure and get good optics
Thanks guys :tup: I'll have to getup to cabelas and check one out first hand.....is swaro that much better to save up and spend another $600-1000 ....I see the cameralandny has demo models for sale also...I could save up more and get one of the 65mm swaros
size and raising the top cap on dollars not an issue, definetly go with the Swaro!! :tup:
-
good luck with your choice! :hello:
I just have one last question for you! you save for the next 6 months for your glass, ten years from now you happen to fall and break the glass or housing! Ouch that hurts :bash: :bash: :bash: does the brand you chose ask no questions and send you a new one :dunno: :dunno: :dunno: vortex will! The one reason I will go with them for all my optics from here on out :twocents: Mery christmas and good luck
-
Thanks guys :tup: I'll have to getup to cabelas and check one out first hand.....is swaro that much better to save up and spend another $600-1000 ....I see the cameralandny has demo models for sale also...I could save up more and get one of the 65mm swaros
The swarovski is more superior than any thing on the market. I love mine and glad that I finally bit the bullet this past year. I let a friend borrow it for his sheep hunt this year. He has some kind of nikon ed scope. Not a bad scope some where right around the 1k range. He put them side by side and looked at the same ram at a 1000 yards. With the nikon he could not count rings. Clear as day with the swarovski. Now he is in the hunt for one. Your can easily count points clearly up to 1.5-2 miles away. :twocents:
-
good luck with your choice! :hello:
I just have one last question for you! you save for the next 6 months for your glass, ten years from now you happen to fall and break the glass or housing! Ouch that hurts :bash: :bash: :bash: does the brand you chose ask no questions and send you a new one :dunno: :dunno: :dunno: vortex will! The one reason I will go with them for all my optics from here on out :twocents: Mery christmas and good luck
Leopold did this with binocs for me ....I got my grandpas when he passed and they fogged up and Leopold sent me new ones :tup:
-
Vortex viper hd.
-
I keep hearing vortex or swaro ....vortex must be pretty good then....who sells vortex around here son I can check them out
-
I keep hearing vortex or swaro ....vortex must be pretty good then....who sells vortex around here son I can check them out
This is the biggest hold up I have. I really want to look at them outside before dropping the cash.
FWIW, I picked up a Leupold MK 4 spotting scope with the TMR reticle for about $900 new off of Camofire about a year ago. You can find them in that price range if you look around.
Andrew
-
The only Vortex that might compare to Swaro is the Razor line. The Viper line is about the same as Leupold, decent glass but nothing great.
-
Can you really "easily" count points on a buck 2 miles away? What x magnification are you talking about? Legit question. Not trying to be a smart guy.
-
And just and FYI I hunt western Washington so I'll be glassing at most 1000yds if that makes a difference
-
I personally think when you're comparing a $1k scope to a $2k+ scope, you're spending lots more money for tiny little differences that 90% of people won't even notice. I used a Swaro a couple times...20-60x60 and found it to be awesome, but I'm not sure, for me, that it's $1k+ more awesome than the ones you're looking at in the $1k range. I realize not everyone will share the same opinions.
-
My :twocents:
For 1000 yd spotting I would save the money and avoid getting into the high end Swarovski and Vortex Razor Line. Those scopes really shine at long distances, low light or when being used to initially spot game at a mile+.
I have been fortunate to use a Swarovski STM 65 and stx85 over the past two seasons and while they are great glass I don't know if the price is worth the extra $1000 to $2500 depending on the model.
I would recommend you look at the Vortex Viper line. They have the HD version as well. This recommendation is based only for your use as if you wanted to start looking at further distances I would recommend the Swarovski or vortex razor.
http://www.cameralandny.com/optics/vortex.pl?page=vortexviper15-45x65 (http://www.cameralandny.com/optics/vortex.pl?page=vortexviper15-45x65)
-
I have a Nikon 15x - 45x and an Alpen 20x - 60x and use them for target shooting. The power and clarity is needed to see which side of the line a bullet hole is on a black target at 200 yards on a rainy, cloudy morning against a black hillside.
If the Swarovski's have more resolution than the two I have I'd like to compare.
I started out with a 25x Tasco as it was my hunting spotting scope, albiet heavy. I was "lunchmeat" at the shoots until I got the Nikon. The Alpen was a tad better.
One issue with high power spotting scopes is heat waves/mirage. I've been on prairie dog trips in Montana when the July temps hit close to 100. I had a 20x scope on my rifle and had to dial down to around 12 because of heatwaves/mirage.
-
I keep hearing vortex or swaro ....vortex must be pretty good then....who sells vortex around here son I can check them out
I myself have been looking at spotting scopes and have narrowed it down to the vortex razor hd. Find a dealer with one and check them out but if you want to purchase one pm Elknut on this forum and he will hook you up! :tup:
-
Thanks for the input guys :tup: that's exactly what I was wanting to hear....so unless I come across a great deal on a swaro it will probably be a vortex or Leupold gold ring.....OK so now what do you guys like straight or angled eye piece...advantages/disadvantages? I've only used straight
-
Straight is better for target acquisition and when being used on a Ridgeline. The downfall is the tripod will need to be taller (stability) and the neck will fatigue faster.
The pros for the angled is the lower tripod height, glassing out of the bottoms and more comfortable over long periods. Downfall for me is not being able to quickly find the target.
With that said I prefer a straight spotter.
-
Straight is better for target acquisition and when being used on a Ridgeline. The downfall is the tripod will need to be taller (stability) and the neck will fatigue faster.
The pros for the angled is the lower tripod height, glassing out of the bottoms and more comfortable over long periods. Downfall for me is not being able to quickly find the target.
With that said I prefer a straight spotter.
Well said, straight for me too!
-
Good enough reasons for me straight it is
-
Can you really "easily" count points on a buck 2 miles away? What x magnification are you talking about? Legit question. Not trying to be a smart guy.
that's at 60x.
-
I rarely use the 60 power unless I really want to get up close. For reference this is a bull from last week at 20 power using my phone camera at I think was 3 or 4 hundred yards.
-
Where was this spot at so I can check it out with my Bushnell to compare :chuckle:
-
Straight is better for target acquisition and when being used on a Ridgeline. The downfall is the tripod will need to be taller (stability) and the neck will fatigue faster.
The pros for the angled is the lower tripod height, glassing out of the bottoms and more comfortable over long periods. Downfall for me is not being able to quickly find the target.
With that said I prefer a straight spotter.
Well said, straight for me too!
:yeah: I have a straight view Nikon and can be on target instantly almost aiming the spotting scope before looking thru it. I spent ten minutes with my buddies angled scope and was lost as soon as I put my eyes thru it. The straight does take getting use to what glassing positions are most comfortable but become habit quickly.
-
I went with angled. Seemed easier for me to usee on a tripod amd the window mount.
-
I favored straight eyepiece spotting scopes for hunting and angled for target shooting. My first straight eyepiece scope also had a set of big "peep sights" on one side that allowed rough aiming at an object. They were situated so that the object was then in the scope's field of view. Might be a good add on for an angled eyepiece spotting scope as they shouldn't be too hard to align.
-
Tagging. Also I used a swarovski last elk season and the angle eye piece is hard to use on a car window mount .
-
my previous nikon was straight. The new swarovski is angled. It took quite a few times of using it to get dialed in on my target. I mainly use it in the high country and the angled is the only way to go.
-
I checked out the vortex razor hd today and all I can say is wow is that clear...I'll be purchasing one of those like a lot of you recommended :tup:
-
I checked out the vortex razor hd today and all I can say is wow is that clear...I'll be purchasing one of those like a lot of you recommended :tup:
Good choice :tup: I ordered mine last Monday.. Can't wait for it to arrive!
-
Nice! Where did you get yours from? I just looked at it at cabelas today...time to shop around and find the best deal
-
65mm or 85mm? Which one to get?
-
I got a pro deal on mine so mines coming straight from vortex. I went with the 85mm and the straight eye piece. Like a lot of people I prefer it over the angled. I can see where the angled could be nice, but for use in the field the straight eyepiece is more practical
-
The all purpose spotter is the 65mm, this means it's great for packing for miles in your back pack or also great for the road near ones rig. The 85mm is very nice as well but not as manageable to back pack with because of bulky size & extra wt. -- Check us out as we have multiple Specials going on the Spotters & Binos! Feel free to PM me for a quote. Thanks.
ElkNut1 - Paul
-
Tagging
-
I personally think when you're comparing a $1k scope to a $2k+ scope, you're spending lots more money for tiny little differences that 90% of people won't even notice. I used a Swaro a couple times...20-60x60 and found it to be awesome, but I'm not sure, for me, that it's $1k+ more awesome than the ones you're looking at in the $1k range. I realize not everyone will share the same opinions.
I disagree. Maybe for the guy that uses one for a few hours a year, but for those of us that use their spotting scope for days on end some years, the difference is HUGE! Compare lesser scopes to higher end optics, you need to look thru them for several hours. Step away, then look back thru them...if your eyes instantle tense up from a lesser scope, compared to having them relax when you look back thru a higher end scope...well, to me, thats a HUGE difference. Shows the difference between coated externals and fully coated lenses, more so with silver phos glass
-
I checked out the vortex razor hd today and all I can say is wow is that clear...I'll be purchasing one of those like a lot of you recommended :tup:
:tup:
-
Mine came i'n this morning! Love it even more than when I was comparing them. I spent part of my day building a camera adaptor out of some PVC fittings rather than paying for one from them. Works great!
-
Mine came i'n this morning! Love it even more than when I was comparing them. I spent part of my day building a camera adaptor out of some PVC fittings rather than paying for one from them. Works great!
Can you post a pic? I'd like to see this....I want one but don't want to fork out the money they want for some plastic
-
I personally think when you're comparing a $1k scope to a $2k+ scope, you're spending lots more money for tiny little differences that 90% of people won't even notice. I used a Swaro a couple times...20-60x60 and found it to be awesome, but I'm not sure, for me, that it's $1k+ more awesome than the ones you're looking at in the $1k range. I realize not everyone will share the same opinions.
I disagree. Maybe for the guy that uses one for a few hours a year, but for those of us that use their spotting scope for days on end some years, the difference is HUGE! Compare lesser scopes to higher end optics, you need to look thru them for several hours. Step away, then look back thru them...if your eyes instantle tense up from a lesser scope, compared to having them relax when you look back thru a higher end scope...well, to me, thats a HUGE difference. Shows the difference between coated externals and fully coated lenses, more so with silver phos glass
You're making my point for me. The guy that uses one a few hours a year is likely not spending $2500 on a scope. At least 90% of those guys aren't dropping that coin on a spotter. Most of those guys aren't going to take the time to even make the comparison you just described.
-
No, i am agreeing with your point. Not everyone needs or wants to pay that kind of money for the upper tier glass. The point I am trying to make is simply that there is a bigger difference between the two levels of glass in those pricerange, and it is noticable when compared side to side. Anyone who has looked at them side to side will see this. The brightness, clarity and resolution can be huge. Bottom line, as always when it comes to optics, is buy the best you can afford!
-
The difference in my opinion between a $1,000 scope or binos and a 2,000k is image quality all the way around. What that is worth to someone is a personal decision.
-
Mine came i'n this morning! Love it even more than when I was comparing them. I spent part of my day building a camera adaptor out of some PVC fittings rather than paying for one from them. Works great!
Can you post a pic? I'd like to see this....I want one but don't want to fork out the money they want for some plastic
I'll try to get some posted tomorrow.
-
Those demo ZEN ED2 spotter is a steal
http://www.zen-ray.com/shop/demo/zenspotter82-angled-demo.html (http://www.zen-ray.com/shop/demo/zenspotter82-angled-demo.html)
I also like the Vortex razor spotter. The only thing that you need to watch out for is the low light performance. The unit to unit variation is quite big. If you use spotter mainly during the bright daylight, it may not be a concern for you.