Hunting Washington Forum

Big Game Hunting => Backcountry Hunting => Topic started by: Mr Mykiss on March 21, 2014, 10:04:01 AM


Advertise Here
Title: Water dilemma
Post by: Mr Mykiss on March 21, 2014, 10:04:01 AM
I will be embarking on a Idaho backpack hunt in late October this year. The problem arises when I look at the fact that there may be virtually NO WATER available to us once we start our hike. My partner(s) says that I'm soft so I'm not allowed to look into hiring a packer just to take all of our gear + 8 gal of water to the top, I would hope that it would only be a few hundred for that service. Our hike will take us from 6-9k feet and takes me almost 2 hours without a 60# pack.
I don't really want to:
a. Pack up 15# of water
b. Hike back down every two days

Thoughts?
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: cbond3318 on March 21, 2014, 10:11:32 AM
Is it possible to make a couple scouting trips and rat hole some water?
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: baldopepper on March 21, 2014, 10:12:19 AM
15# of water would be less than 2 gallons (approx. 8#/gal)  Don't know how much hiking you've done at that altitude, but keep in mind that if you're coming from sea level it's going to take a lot of your stamina away.  Not much of an alternative if your dry camping other than packing it in.  I'd sure look at a drop camp situation if you can afford it and it's available.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: washelkhunter on March 21, 2014, 10:13:11 AM
8 gallons of h2o weighs over 65#! I'd be camping next to a reliable water source. You probably wont be doing much hunting if youre just being a mule.  :chuckle:
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: cvandervort on March 21, 2014, 12:26:06 PM
Split 8 gallons between all of your hunting partners and cut weight elsewhere?
My pack for a few days is around 45 lbs, but I could go lower...if you can cut to 45, plus a couple gallons, you'd be right at 60.
Just a thought.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: jackmaster on March 21, 2014, 12:31:03 PM
like someone else said, goet on over there and do some scouting and pack in some water , or if there is a tone of snow up in there right now, pack in a empty 30 gallon plastic drum, they aint that big, and start a fire and melt snow to fill it, at least you will have water you can boil, if you put screen over it or a cover you wont have to wirry about bugs, maybe put a little chlorine in the drum, of course you will have to do the math on that  :tup:
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: snowpack on March 21, 2014, 12:35:52 PM
So, is the decision not to use a packer yours or your partner's?  If I wanted a packer and they didn't because of being 'soft', I'd probably still get a packer--pack in your water and other drinks.  If you're not comfortable while hunting, you usually don't spend as much time actually hunting.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: vandeman17 on March 21, 2014, 12:53:01 PM
As mentioned I think your two options would be to hike in early and make a few deposits of water or just find a place to camp closer to a water source. If you pack in water, I am sure with a trip or two you could get a good amount in if a few water jugs was all you were packing. Not to mention it would help get ya in shape for the actual hunt.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: pianoman9701 on March 21, 2014, 01:15:58 PM
Get a filtering straw. Take a few liters with you and get the rest on the road.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Mr Mykiss on March 21, 2014, 01:28:38 PM
15# of water would be less than 2 gallons (approx. 8#/gal)  Don't know how much hiking you've done at that altitude, but keep in mind that if you're coming from sea level it's going to take a lot of your stamina away.  Not much of an alternative if your dry camping other than packing it in.  I'd sure look at a drop camp situation if you can afford it and it's available.
I was up there yesterday. I'll be up there plenty between now and then, that doesn't mean that I want to pack 20# of water up there every time I go on a hike...
I'll be investigating a packer/local friend to get our stuff up there. I'll also scour the earth (Goolge Earth) to try and find a water source up there but I don't have high hopes.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Mr Mykiss on March 21, 2014, 01:31:36 PM
Get a filtering straw. Take a few liters with you and get the rest on the road.
Proof that some people don't read posts. Use the filtering straw to filter what? Dirt? Pine needles?
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Mr Mykiss on March 21, 2014, 01:34:50 PM
Really. Thanks for all of your ideas guys. My partner just called me soft, he can piss off, it's my hunt and I can do what I want :chuckle:
Jackmaster. The 30 gallon drum idea is genius!! Maybe even a 20 gallon drum. Better yet I'll get my partner to buy it for me!!!
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: cbond3318 on March 21, 2014, 01:42:52 PM
Jackmaster's got it right, although I would pack up multiple empty 1 gallon jugs, that would be easier to conceal and less likely to be sabotaged.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: baldopepper on March 21, 2014, 01:52:59 PM
I've stored water in an old water bed mattress.  Very light to haul around when empty and they hold a ton of water when full. Used to have to take water to my off the grid cabin and they worked great in the back of a pick up, didn't roll around like barrels and held a lot of water.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: pianoman9701 on March 21, 2014, 01:54:22 PM
Get a filtering straw. Take a few liters with you and get the rest on the road.
Proof that some people don't read posts. Use the filtering straw to filter what? Dirt? Pine needles?

I read your post. I don't believe there's absolutely no standing water anywhere or there wouldn't be any critters. You don't have to be a jerk.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: lostbackpacker on March 21, 2014, 02:02:24 PM
no water, no animals.... find the water, find the animals
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: WSU on March 21, 2014, 02:03:12 PM
Really. Thanks for all of your ideas guys. My partner just called me soft, he can piss off, it's my hunt and I can do what I want :chuckle:
Jackmaster. The 30 gallon drum idea is genius!! Maybe even a 20 gallon drum. Better yet I'll get my partner to buy it for me!!!

I'd get the packer to haul a nice comfy camp in for me and tell my partner to piss off and let him be thirsty/uncomfortable.  Easy decision!
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Mr Mykiss on March 21, 2014, 04:56:33 PM
10 4. I apologize pianoman. I was outta line but I have to go on the assumption that there is no water since I haven't found any before. But animals...oh yeah there's animals!! On the other hand this is a location that I don't ever have time to explore fully and I'll hunt it for a week and still not cover half the area I want to.

Now's your time to strike pianoman...I've never had a chance to explore the north side of the mountain, think there's some H2O over there?
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: CAMPMEAT on March 21, 2014, 05:08:39 PM
When I was capable of hiking, I would get some sort of candy to suck on to at least keep my mouth wet. I used to carry a canteen full of water and a purifier just in case there was water. But we always camped by water. Even a trickle can be a life saver.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Wanttohuntmore on March 21, 2014, 06:06:05 PM
2 gallons each trip up won't be that bad.  If 16 lbs is too much, I don't know how you'll handle a 3k ft climb with a 60 lb pack when the trip comes up.  There were times I was down to 4 oz of water and was getting awful scared!
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: washelkhunter on March 21, 2014, 06:43:22 PM
There has to be a seep somewhere close by, either N or S slope. Look for the tells. Your time would be well spent finding that and developing a reliable water source.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Mr Mykiss on March 21, 2014, 06:45:58 PM
Looks like I've got a mission between now and October...
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Bean Counter on March 21, 2014, 08:03:21 PM
Subscription   8)
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Karl Blanchard on March 21, 2014, 09:18:51 PM
SOOOFFFFTTTTTT!!!!!!!!! :chuckle:
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: ICEMAN on March 21, 2014, 10:15:56 PM
Save the weight and forget the water. Pack gatorade.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: pianoman9701 on March 21, 2014, 10:26:03 PM
 :tup:
10 4. I apologize pianoman. I was outta line but I have to go on the assumption that there is no water since I haven't found any before. But animals...oh yeah there's animals!! On the other hand this is a location that I don't ever have time to explore fully and I'll hunt it for a week and still not cover half the area I want to.

Now's your time to strike pianoman...I've never had a chance to explore the north side of the mountain, think there's some H2O over there?
We're good.

If you're finding animals, there's water somewhere. Happy hunting.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Expedition Scout on March 22, 2014, 06:53:44 AM
Get a filtering straw. Take a few liters with you and get the rest on the road.
Proof that some people don't read posts. Use the filtering straw to filter what? Dirt? Pine needles?

I read your post. I don't believe there's absolutely no standing water anywhere or there wouldn't be any critters. You don't have to be a jerk.

I was thinking the same thing (what are you hunting that doesn't need water?)
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: jackmaster on March 22, 2014, 08:12:06 AM
Animals don't need a water source like we do, they get with of H2O out of the plants they eat, they travel alot further than we do in a day, never rely on a water source being found, always plan for the worse, a water source now may not be there in October  :tup: a little work now could save a ton of work later....
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Mr Mykiss on March 22, 2014, 08:30:15 AM
There's the Middle Fork of the Salmon River at 6k feet that those varmints can go down and visit if they really need. I would hope that there would be some water on the north facing side of the hill but finding it could be problematic since Idaho "hills" are pretty big. The majority of time I spend in Idaho is during August and it's drier than a popcorn fart, so that's got me all worried. I'm just working on the logistics because at the end of the day that's what will make or break the hunt, how well you've planned.

PS: This hunt used to be called "Idaho Man Hunt" but I'm thinking about calling it "Softie Hunt 2014" :chuckle:
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Karl Blanchard on March 22, 2014, 08:41:27 AM
SOOOFFFFTTTTTT!!!!!!!!!!! :chuckle:
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: baldopepper on March 22, 2014, 09:35:15 AM
I've hunted areas in Utah where the jack rabbits carry canteens it's so dry, but there are deer there.  We've often wondered what they do for water because in October there is no source within miles. (country is true desert with no trees and only some pockets of scrub brush which are very easy to check for a water source)  It's not hard for me to believe Mr Mykiss's area has no water source.  Mule deer seem to be very adaptable and don't need to go to water on a daily basis, don't ask me where they get the water we all know they need in areas like that. All I know is that there are deer there and we've scouted if for days without finding any water.  (some very big deer come out of the west desert area every year)
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Mr Mykiss on March 22, 2014, 09:48:17 AM
It's about time somebody believed me!!
However due to the realization that I'm to soft and weak for this hunt I will be signing up for a high fence hunt instead, and not one of those 10,000 acre high fence hunts either, more like the kind where they put em in a cattle chute... :chuckle:
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: JM on March 22, 2014, 09:56:57 PM
How far is the pack in? If it's not too far I'd just make day trips
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Mr Mykiss on March 23, 2014, 02:18:46 PM
Pack in is about 2 miles.
1. I don't want to do a 3000' climb every morning to start the hunt
1a. Kills energy
1b. Kills time
2. Part of the fun is camping right in the middle of it all

**Exactly 7 months away and I'm starting to iron out the details, I'm proud of myself now but there'll be plenty of room for epic failure down the road :chuckle:
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: fillthefreezer on March 23, 2014, 02:44:07 PM
It's about time somebody believed me!!
However due to the realization that I'm to soft and weak for this hunt I will be signing up for a high fence hunt instead, and not one of those 10,000 acre high fence hunts either, more like the kind where they put em in a cattle chute... :chuckle:
i thought the fact mule deer dont drink water was common knowledge?  :chuckle:
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Mr Mykiss on March 23, 2014, 03:28:02 PM
Most animals don't drink water. Only camels, guinea pigs and redassed baboons as far as I know...
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: JM on March 23, 2014, 07:28:11 PM
I agree that sleeping in the backcountry is half of the fun, but if water is that big of a concern then 2 miles and 3000' of elevation gain should only take 30 minutes tops even with gear and not trying to break a serious sweat.

I know it doesn't answer your question, but it could be a solution to your problem.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Mr Mykiss on March 23, 2014, 08:59:09 PM
30 min :yike::yike: please see previous posts... me S-O-F-T :hello: I think I'm gonna try for the melt snow into a jog approach in a few weeks.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: SilkOnTheDrySide on March 24, 2014, 08:27:25 AM

I agree that sleeping in the backcountry is half of the fun, but if water is that big of a concern then 2 miles and 3000' of elevation gain should only take 30 minutes tops even with gear and not trying to break a serious sweat.

I know it doesn't answer your question, but it could be a solution to your problem.

I never doubt someone's physical abilities (see my bear thread last year), but that's a pretty ambitious pace with no load.

For example, Mt Peak in Enumclaw is 1 mile 1050 ft of elevation gain, my personal record is 15:40, fastest I've heard was 14 min. That's practically running. I did 75 lbs up it last week and it took 35 min.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: romaknows on March 24, 2014, 09:12:20 AM
I agree that sleeping in the backcountry is half of the fun, but if water is that big of a concern then 2 miles and 3000' of elevation gain should only take 30 minutes tops even with gear and not trying to break a serious sweat.

I know it doesn't answer your question, but it could be a solution to your problem.

WOW, 3000 ft and 2 miles in under 30 minutes, I guess I am in really bad shape.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Timberstalker on March 24, 2014, 01:33:29 PM
I agree that sleeping in the backcountry is half of the fun, but if water is that big of a concern then 2 miles and 3000' of elevation gain should only take 30 minutes tops even with gear and not trying to break a serious sweat.

I know it doesn't answer your question, but it could be a solution to your problem.

Can you help me pack this Fall?  I could use you. :chuckle: :chuckle:
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: JM on March 24, 2014, 05:11:31 PM
I agree that sleeping in the backcountry is half of the fun, but if water is that big of a concern then 2 miles and 3000' of elevation gain should only take 30 minutes tops even with gear and not trying to break a serious sweat.

I know it doesn't answer your question, but it could be a solution to your problem.

WOW, 3000 ft and 2 miles in under 30 minutes, I guess I am in really bad shape.

I guess so
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: JM on March 24, 2014, 05:15:35 PM

I agree that sleeping in the backcountry is half of the fun, but if water is that big of a concern then 2 miles and 3000' of elevation gain should only take 30 minutes tops even with gear and not trying to break a serious sweat.

I know it doesn't answer your question, but it could be a solution to your problem.

I never doubt someone's physical abilities (see my bear thread last year), but that's a pretty ambitious pace with no load.

For example, Mt Peak in Enumclaw is 1 mile 1050 ft of elevation gain, my personal record is 15:40, fastest I've heard was 14 min. That's practically running. I did 75 lbs up it last week and it took 35 min.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Never say never, because you just did
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Holg3107 on March 24, 2014, 05:26:53 PM
Quote
I agree that sleeping in the backcountry is half of the fun, but if water is that big of a concern then 2 miles and 3000' of elevation gain should only take 30 minutes tops even with gear and not trying to break a serious sweat.

I know it doesn't answer your question, but it could be a solution to your problem.

This is hilarious!!!! 30 minutes tops  :chuckle:  :chuckle:  :chuckle: JM must be some kind of mountain god or something. 2 miles and 3000' without gear is at least an hour and that's moving pretty good. Normal walking pace is 20 minutes per mile on flat land.

There has to be water access somewhere.
If not I would pack in water and store it during scouting trips. Or do a pre-trip water run. One guy could take 6 gallons up in one trip and come back down in the same day. If you and your hunting partner did that once and stored it you would be good to go.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Karl Blanchard on March 24, 2014, 08:21:07 PM
Be willing to put quite a bit of money on JM being able to walk most on this forum into the ground............just sayin.
Title: Water dilemma
Post by: jackelope on March 24, 2014, 08:26:21 PM
Be willing to put quite a bit of money on JM being able to walk most on this forum into the ground............just sayin.

I don't know the guy and I'd never doubt him, but thinking everyone should be able to keep that pace is sort of over the top. That's a ridiculous speed. I'm not very  fast but I dont think I'm too slow either.  I do 2.5-3 mph on an average hike.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: SilkOnTheDrySide on March 24, 2014, 08:28:19 PM

Be willing to put quite a bit of money on JM being able to walk most on this forum into the ground............just sayin.

I don't know the guy and I'd never doubt him, but thinking everyone should be able to keep that pace is sort of over the top. That's a ridiculous speed.

This...I think he misunderstood my post, while I was trying to be crystal clear I wasn't doubting him per say.  But 99% of the hunters in the world, maybe more, couldn't maintain that pace.  I'm sure there's one or two floating around on Hunt Wa who can, maybe JM is it. 

I know I'm not.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: JM on March 24, 2014, 08:29:09 PM
Be willing to put quite a bit of money on JM being able to walk most on this forum into the ground............just sayin.

Thanks for sticking up for me, but don't worry about it. I have no reason to try and argue anything with the mob on this site. Besides you know that nothing could bother me right now. I've been on cloud 9 since Friday
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Karl Blanchard on March 24, 2014, 08:58:24 PM
I
Be willing to put quite a bit of money on JM being able to walk most on this forum into the ground............just sayin.

Thanks for sticking up for me, but don't worry about it. I have no reason to try and argue anything with the mob on this site. Besides you know that nothing could bother me right now. I've been on cloud 9 since Friday
standard maternity leave.  Stare at baby until baby falls asleep, then get on huntwa until baby wakes up, repeat process!  :chuckle:
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Watimberghost on March 24, 2014, 09:05:53 PM
2 miles, 3000', 30 minutes tops... everyday of my hunt?? When dealing with any type of decent elevation climb(3000' in 2 miles), especially with a pack, 20+ minute miles are about all I want to do. And if I were to be doing it everyday, it wouldn't be 20 minute miles for long. I try to push myself to the limits preseason so that I'm in the best shape possible for hunting season. But like previous posts, I'd rather do a few ass-whipping pre season hikes with lots of H2O on my back then do a daily up and down. I'm not doubting the fact that 3000' in 2 miles can be done in 30 minutes by certain people, I just see it as a waste of much needed energy that could be focused on "the hunt".

There have been multiple years where I have packed in water to high country elevations that I was less than confident in the water supply. The pre season trips were brutal, but day 3 of my hunt I was beyond grateful. Good luck on your hunt!
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: BLUEBULLS on April 26, 2014, 09:12:41 PM
I agree that sleeping in the backcountry is half of the fun, but if water is that big of a concern then 2 miles and 3000' of elevation gain should only take 30 minutes tops even with gear and not trying to break a serious sweat.

I know it doesn't answer your question, but it could be a solution to your problem.

Ridiculous statement. Yeah it can be done but I surely wouldn't say 30 minutes "TOPS".

That's 4 mph and I'd honestly bet my left n$# that 90+% of backcountry hunters don't do that on flat ground with pack on.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: BLUEBULLS on April 26, 2014, 09:16:16 PM
30 min :yike::yike: please see previous posts... me S-O-F-T :hello: I think I'm gonna try for the melt snow into a jog approach in a few weeks.

Hey bud, you need to relax. You're going to hurt yourself with this water stress. I'll just have my wife carry yours in for you. She's not a softy.
 :chuckle:
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Mr Mykiss on April 27, 2014, 09:48:39 AM
From what I've seen of your wife's hunting exploits I have confidence in her ability to shoot something bigger than 89"...

I had another thought. Not sure if'n the locals told me there was water up there because...
a. There's water up there.
or
b. There's no water up there and they want us to wither and die or just leave and get the hell outta their cash money huntin spot...
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Mr Mykiss on May 15, 2014, 05:51:41 AM
I agree that sleeping in the backcountry is half of the fun, but if water is that big of a concern then 2 miles and 3000' of elevation gain should only take 30 minutes tops even with gear and not trying to break a serious sweat.

You were right, I guess I underestimated myself. I'm fat, outta shape and sick and I made it in just under 28 minutes yesterday. I had about 20# on me but I reckon with a full pack and a little working out I should be right around 30 min.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: dmv9 on May 15, 2014, 07:21:13 AM
I agree that sleeping in the backcountry is half of the fun, but if water is that big of a concern then 2 miles and 3000' of elevation gain should only take 30 minutes tops even with gear and not trying to break a serious sweat.

I know it doesn't answer your question, but it could be a solution to your problem.

Sorry, guy, but for normal out of weight people, 30 mins is not close. I use 2 mi/hr at around 1000-2000 elevation gain. And yes, I am sweating and probably will drink most of the water on the way up.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Stein on June 08, 2014, 11:44:07 AM
1.  Hire a packer and have him schlep in a cooler with good beer, donuts and steaks a week before your trip.
2.  Sell half at ballpark prices to your buddy to pay for the packer.

Outside that, the best idea would be to take 1-2 gallons up and stash them each scouting trip.  Or, take up empty containers and a stove and melt that snow that is up there now.  I have seen plenty of places where you can't easily get at water.  Animals can go up and down 3000 feet without much trouble.  It takes me more effort, plus all that time is minutes and hours I am not hunting.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: JM on June 08, 2014, 07:34:15 PM
Just saw this again and noticed you guys were still taking shots at my post?

So how about just over a mile with 2200' of gain and a 55 pound pack in 40 minutes? How's this sound?
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: jackelope on June 08, 2014, 08:19:03 PM

Just saw this again and noticed you guys were still taking shots at my post?

So how about just over a mile with 2200' of gain and a 55 pound pack in 40 minutes? How's this sound?

The last comment about your post was almost a month ago.

:dunno:
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: kentrek on June 08, 2014, 08:34:56 PM
Just  saw this again and noticed you guys were still taking shots at my post?

So how about just over a mile with 2200' of gain and a 55 pound pack in 40 minutes? How's this sound?

Still alil out of reach for the average guy

In general its one hour per 1000 feet regardless of distance to an extent....guys in shape can cut that in Half....thats not with out a heavy pack

Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: SilkOnTheDrySide on June 08, 2014, 10:44:10 PM
Just  saw this again and noticed you guys were still taking shots at my post?

So how about just over a mile with 2200' of gain and a 55 pound pack in 40 minutes? How's this sound?

Still alil out of reach for the average guy

In general its one hour per 1000 feet regardless of distance to an extent....guys in shape can cut that in Half....thats not with out a heavy pack

What trail are you doing this on?  Not being a smart ass, just legitimately curious.  I'd like to test my metal against it.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: kentrek on June 08, 2014, 10:56:43 PM
Me ?
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: SilkOnTheDrySide on June 08, 2014, 11:24:33 PM
Me ?

No sorry JM.  He was talking about 2200 vert in 1 mile.  Just curious where he's finding that at.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: kentrek on June 09, 2014, 12:03:20 AM
He could be talking "air miles"
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: jdb on June 09, 2014, 06:09:05 AM
Not many people can probably stay up to speed with JM on them hills.

And 2200 feet in elevation gain is not an exaggeration.  I know of a few places here that you can go to to fit that criteria.  Heck, if you start at the sheep feeding station and go to the right of meystre and head up, that is over a 2,000 vertical hike.  The sheep station is 1700 feet and the tallest part of clemans above the sheep feeding station (the point on top) is over 4000 feet.

Bottom line, a person under the age of 45 should be able to hike a 2000+vertical mile in less than 40 min with at least 50 lbs on.  If you cant, get off the couch and lose a few pounds.
your age is showing
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Jingles on June 09, 2014, 06:31:20 AM
to the original poster. Finding water during your scouting trips early in the summer might not mean there will be water at those places in the fall.  I have spent  probably more time than anyone one here except the packers in the wilderness and a water source has a tendency to dry up as the summer progresses unless you can find one coming out of the ground. if your hunting partners decide to rely solely on natural water sources cache some water on your scouting trips even if only in 1 gallon jugs or bear the expense of having it packed in.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Stein on June 09, 2014, 09:55:45 AM
I have a new idea.  Pack up an empty 6 gallon bucket with lid next scouting trip.  Fill it up with snow and pack it in as tight as possible, it should melt down to a gallon or two by the time summer comes around.  2-3 buckets in different locations should give you all you need with a margin of error.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Mr Mykiss on June 09, 2014, 11:56:09 AM
Thanks for the H2O ideas but I've since found water, kinda. Locals thought I was an idiot for wanting to stash water but now I'll begrudgingly drop 800' in elevation to get water. I really just liked the idea of having a bunch of water in camp.
Also I've cut my 2 mile, 3000 ' climb time down to just under 14 minutes by using a pair of rollerblades...
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: jackelope on June 09, 2014, 12:02:54 PM
Also I've cut my 2 mile, 3000 ' climb time down to just under 14 minutes by using a pair of rollerblades...

Never thought of that.
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: boneaddict on June 09, 2014, 12:13:47 PM
Quote
Bottom line, a person under the age of 45 should be able to hike a 2000+vertical mile in less than 40 min with at least 50 lbs on.  If you cant, get off the couch and lose a few pounds.

That's funny :chuckle:
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Timberstalker on June 09, 2014, 12:22:12 PM
This is too good to miss out on.... Tag :chuckle:
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Curly on June 09, 2014, 12:25:37 PM
Rollerblades would really cut down the time packing an animal back down the trail. :o

I'd love to see a video of that. :chuckle:
Title: Re: Water dilemma
Post by: Bill W on June 09, 2014, 12:32:32 PM
If the water's down low and none up high.... the deer have to drink sometime.    Hunt down around the water area or find a trail down the mountain they're using.

Older hunters have the advantage of hunting smarter than the young ones.

I had a youngster in on the High Hunt with me.  He was a "graduate" of the Seattle Mountaineers.   I was a graduate of the la-z boy couch.   I gave him a hunting spot to check out and told him to let me know when he was done.   He was back in camp by lunch and said he didn't see any thing.  I was told by others that he was spotted running across the open areas and jumping from rock to rock.  It took me three more years to teach him "The Way of the Snail".   I had intended for him to take the whole day to hunt that area and move slowly.

He initially wondered why I was so lazy and sat with my back against a rock, holding my binoculars.  He learned.

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal