Post by: kirkl on March 23, 2014, 03:57:28 PM
Post by: Grizzly95 on March 23, 2014, 04:12:04 PM
Post by: northwesthunter84 on March 23, 2014, 04:40:24 PM
Post by: bowhunterforever on March 23, 2014, 04:53:55 PM
Holy crap, wow. Ok somebody help this make sense to me. People buy a home/ranch in the country and don't expect to have to share land with wildlife. I understand that she draws income from cattle grazing. Then she should put up a fence. WDFW is not responsible for this kind of stuff. The elk were here long before that homestead. I find it weird because I was raised to charish and respect the wildlife. Oh and people shouldn't plant tasty food that animals like. As far as the Native Heritage site it too should be blocked off. If they are so worried about it the tribes should put up a fence.:yeah: :tup:
Post by: RELV on March 23, 2014, 05:27:50 PM
Being a landowner in elk country with a large herd, I am sympathetic. My fences get torn down, I can't grow corn. I didn't mind it when I could hunt the elk, but since the state changed the GMU boundaries I need a draw permit to hunt my land. Changed my attitude about the elk trampling my stuff.
Post by: JJB11B on March 23, 2014, 05:34:51 PM
Post by: dreamunelk on March 23, 2014, 05:46:24 PM
Post by: northwesthunter84 on March 23, 2014, 05:55:16 PM
Post by: bowguy on March 23, 2014, 06:12:59 PM
Post by: northwesthunter84 on March 23, 2014, 06:18:43 PM
Post by: buckcanyonlodge on March 24, 2014, 05:50:32 AM
Post by: headshot5 on March 24, 2014, 06:23:48 AM
Quote
Build a fence.
Yeah that wouldn't be cost prohibitive... 1100 acres, that is only a 27,000 or so foot fence (permiter fence). At 8 feet hight to keep elk, out I'm sure it would be extremely cheap for a 72 year old woman to afford... :rolleyes:
Post by: boneaddict on March 24, 2014, 07:14:27 AM
Post by: time2hunt on March 24, 2014, 07:50:00 AM
Post by: returnofsid on March 24, 2014, 07:53:24 AM
Post by: TopOfTheFoodChain on March 24, 2014, 07:54:03 AM
So the elk trample the "Indian site" but the cattle don't?? Seems she (the 72 yr. old landowner) would be in violation of disturbing an "Indian site" by leasing the land to cattle grazing where the "Indian site" is located.
:yeah:
Post by: doyourtime89 on March 24, 2014, 08:10:57 AM
Post by: Jonathan_S on March 24, 2014, 08:26:42 AM
:chuckle:
Post by: boneaddict on March 24, 2014, 08:59:41 AM
Post by: buckcanyonlodge on March 24, 2014, 09:40:46 AM
by the way, if she opened her land to shed hunters or say, Ellensburg blue rockhounds like my daughter, then I bet the elk wouldn't be bothering her anymore.
I'm with you there.. But they ( the yakIma Indians ) would say she could possibly trample their site and maybe find one of these.. see pic (it's an Ellensburg Blue)
Post by: vandeman17 on March 24, 2014, 09:57:17 AM
Post by: boneaddict on March 24, 2014, 11:45:25 AM
by the way, if she opened her land to shed hunters or say, Ellensburg blue rockhounds like my daughter, then I bet the elk wouldn't be bothering her anymore.
I'm with you there.. But they ( the yakIma Indians ) would say she could possibly trample their site and maybe find one of these.. see pic (it's an Ellensburg Blue)
:yike: THat is insane. That's like the holy grail of all arrowheads I have ever seen. :yike: :yike:
That's just cool. First of all, I wouldn't even try knapping a piece of blue. :tup:
Post by: buckcanyonlodge on March 24, 2014, 11:53:48 AM
by the way, if she opened her land to shed hunters or say, Ellensburg blue rockhounds like my daughter, then I bet the elk wouldn't be bothering her anymore.
I'm with you there.. But they ( the yakIma Indians ) would say she could possibly trample their site and maybe find one of these.. see pic (it's an Ellensburg Blue)
:yike: THat is insane. That's like the holy grail of all arrowheads I have ever seen. :yike: :yike:
That's just cool. First of all, I wouldn't even try knapping a piece of blue. :tup:
Yea, that is SO cool. I want one real bad. I checked with the rock club up here is Colville and am going to talk to one of the guys that does knapping to see if he can do one for me. I've got a couple pieces that might work.
Post by: TrkyBob53 on March 24, 2014, 12:12:18 PM
Yakima vs. Yakama...which is it? The article seems to use both forms of spelling...lack of spelling ability or is there actually difference in spelling, between the name of the town and the name of the tribe?The tribe is Yakama, and the town is Yakima.
Post by: buckcanyonlodge on March 24, 2014, 12:23:35 PM
Yakima vs. Yakama...which is it? The article seems to use both forms of spelling...lack of spelling ability or is there actually difference in spelling, between the name of the town and the name of the tribe?The tribe is Yakama, and the town is Yakima.
Born and raised in Yakima and for all my life it was Yakima tribe. Just changed it a few years ago to yakAma. Why?? Can't teach this old dog new tricks.
Post by: KopperBuck on March 25, 2014, 09:25:01 AM
Yakima vs. Yakama...which is it? The article seems to use both forms of spelling...lack of spelling ability or is there actually difference in spelling, between the name of the town and the name of the tribe?The tribe is Yakama, and the town is Yakima.
Born and raised in Yakima and for all my life it was Yakima tribe. Just changed it a few years ago to yakAma. Why?? Can't teach this old dog new tricks.
From what I understand it's strictly about pronunciation, nothing more.
Post by: kirkl on March 25, 2014, 09:32:27 AM
Post by: boneaddict on March 25, 2014, 12:08:36 PM
This resolution clarifies the spelling of "Yakama" opposed to "Yakima." The language is made public through the Yakama Nation Museum and Cultural Center website, courtesy of the Yakama Nation Museum:
"NOTE: Resolution T-053-94 has recognized the new spelling of the word 'YAKAMA.' "Whereas, for many years the symbolic spelling of our nation has been 'YAKIMA' with all of our documents, resolutions, letterheads, and nation's flag, etc.", and "whereas, in accordance with our Treaty negotiations, the confederacy of the 14 original tribes and bands shall be know as Confederated Tribes and Band of the Yakama Indian Nation."
Read more: http://www.ehow.com/list_6926999_bylaws-yakama-nation.html#ixzz2x0Fr1xQc (http://www.ehow.com/list_6926999_bylaws-yakama-nation.html#ixzz2x0Fr1xQc)
Post by: jackmaster on March 25, 2014, 12:12:38 PM
Begs the question....what came first the indian or the elk. Pick the elk and its an obvious answer. Since we all know the answer that the whiteman brought the elk here, then the WDFW should take care of this lady, but the Yakamas shouldn't be able to harvest elk as part of their treaty, since they really should have no ceremonial right to elk. :dunno: :chuckle::yeah: :yeah: :tup: BINGO......
Post by: MR5x5 on March 25, 2014, 12:35:30 PM
The true be told all she want was the master hunters to check in on a daily basis so she knew who was in her property and the game dept. Told that wasn't required!! She was tired of people driving in and not checking with her.If this is true, then this all could have been very easily, reasonably managed.
Did I just use "easily and reasonably managed" in a sentence directed to WDFW?
Sorry, my apologies.
Post by: dreamingbig on March 27, 2014, 12:35:36 PM
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: Sitka_Blacktail on March 27, 2014, 01:07:07 PM
Post by: Moose Master on March 27, 2014, 04:39:23 PM
Post by: DIYARCHERYJUNKIE on April 06, 2014, 01:17:06 PM
But that's even bigger of a joke.
Post by: go4itlab on April 06, 2014, 10:02:40 PM