Post by: wolfbait on March 31, 2014, 09:18:27 AM
Idaho Gov. Butch Otter signed a bill Thursday that establishes an Idaho Wolf Depredation Control Board.
The amended bill places the new board within the governor’s office to fund wolf management with $400,000 from general tax dollars, and additional funds from hunting and fishing licenses and taxes on livestock. Supporters say the board simply will replace funding lost by cuts to the U.S. Department of Agriculture’s Wildlife Services Agency.
But critics say it’s a part of a targeted attack on wolves that breaks the state’s commitment to manage the predators like it does other game animals. Jamie Rappaport Clark, a former U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service director and now president of Defenders of Wildlife, told the Idaho Statesman Thursday the state’s wolf management program was “irresponsible.”
“This is not about hunting,” Clark said. “This is an issue of extermination as fast as they can.”
Idaho’s wolf population has steadily decreased since 2009 when they were first removed from the protection of the Endangered Species Act. Lawsuits by wildlife groups, including Defenders, convinced a federal judge to order the animal back on the list in 2010.
Congress took the unprecedented action of removing them from the list again in 2011. Today, a minimum of 480 wolves remain after a high of more than 850.
Under the Endangered Species Act, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is required to monitor the wolf population for five years. The Center for Biological Diversity said this month the dramatic population drop and the state’s unwillingness to protect wolves in the Frank Church-River of No Return wilderness violates commitments Idaho made. CBD said it was preparing a lawsuit to require the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service step in and either relist the wolf or extend the monitoring period another five years.
I asked to interview U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe but was told he would be unavailable. His spokesman, Gavin Shire in Washington, referred me to the state, which controls wolves as long as they are above the recovery level of 150 wolves.
“Should wolf numbers drop below that threshold, the Service can re-list either or both populations of the gray wolf under the Endangered Species Act and re-assume responsibility for wolf management,” he said.
Interior officials are troubled by Idaho’s actions, Clark said, but they have not carried out the leadership through their monitoring responsibilities she expects. “Instead they seemed to have turned a blind eye to what has happened in the Northern Rockies,” Clark said.
Steve Alder represents Idaho for Wildlife, a Lewiston-based hunters group that has lobbied for more wolf killing. He said he hopes the control board’s funds are used to quickly radio-collar 150 wolves to ensure Idaho can prove it's meeting the recovery goal.
“We have to make sure we have a cushion and a threshold with that 150,” he said. “We don’t want to trigger the feds coming back in."
Clark said she supports the Center for Biological Diversity’s goal to get her old agency to intervene with Idaho.
“I don’t think they are at a point where they will be able to involve the (Endangered Species Act),” Clark said. “But this is not what success looked like when we put these wolves in Idaho.”
Read more here: http://www.idahostatesman.com/2014/03/27/3103860/otter-signs-bill-creating-new.html#storylink=cpy (http://www.idahostatesman.com/2014/03/27/3103860/otter-signs-bill-creating-new.html#storylink=cpy)
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. s: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml (http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml)
Post by: jasnt on March 31, 2014, 08:26:42 PM
Yet another lawsuit costing tax payers. I just dont understand how the grey wolf could even be on the endangered species list. They where never endangered! Never will be! History repeats its self im sure this country will again pay tons of money trying to rid us of these wolves. Then along will come some body thinking its a good idea to bring in more. They say there's no cougar left over on the east coast. Maybe we should reintroduced lions over there. But this time lets use African lions. :bash:
Post by: wolfbait on March 31, 2014, 08:46:44 PM
Thanks wolfbait. I appreciate your threads keeping us informed
Yet another lawsuit costing tax payers. I just dont understand how the grey wolf could even be on the endangered species list. They where never endangered! Never will be! History repeats its self im sure this country will again pay tons of money trying to rid us of these wolves. Then along will come some body thinking its a good idea to bring in more. They say there's no cougar left over on the east coast. Maybe we should reintroduced lions over there. But this time lets use African lions. :bash:
Thanks for taking an interest Jasnt. There are many now that are educating people as of the true meaning of the wolves that were illegally introduced.
Wolf Recovery in the Northern Rockies:
What Pro-Wolf Advocates Do Not Want You to Know
By Charles E. Kay
http://prfamerica.org/speeches/16th/WolfRecovery.html (http://prfamerica.org/speeches/16th/WolfRecovery.html)
But critics say it’s a part of a targeted attack on wolves that breaks the state’s commitment to manage the predators like it does other game animals. Jamie Rappaport Clark, a former U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service director and now president of Defenders of Wildlife, told the Idaho Statesman Thursday the state’s wolf management program was “irresponsible.”
Post by: jasnt on April 01, 2014, 10:09:57 AM
Post by: pianoman9701 on April 01, 2014, 10:30:25 AM
Post by: idahohuntr on April 02, 2014, 12:49:35 PM
Extermination. Interesting word from a state that's seen enough of these dogs. I hope they're successful. I have my doubts that they will be.There is no official in Idaho calling for extermination...as usual your posts are lacking facts.
Post by: pianoman9701 on April 02, 2014, 01:16:59 PM
Extermination. Interesting word from a state that's seen enough of these dogs. I hope they're successful. I have my doubts that they will be.There is no official in Idaho calling for extermination...as usual your posts are lacking facts.
Nice contribution, as usual. I didn't say it was from an official. You made that up. Why don't you go to the Defenders page and post there for a while. This article is about the need for action by the State of ID to stem the tide of damage by wolves. If you don't believe it, you've got your head in the sand.
Post by: idahohuntr on April 02, 2014, 01:36:57 PM
No, you mischaracterized the post. 'Extermination' was uttered by the greenies. :rolleyes:Extermination. Interesting word from a state that's seen enough of these dogs. I hope they're successful. I have my doubts that they will be.There is no official in Idaho calling for extermination...as usual your posts are lacking facts.
Nice contribution, as usual. I didn't say it was from an official. You made that up. Why don't you go to the Defenders page and post there for a while. This article is about the need for action by the State of ID to stem the tide of damage by wolves. If you don't believe it, you've got your head in the sand.
Post by: pianoman9701 on April 02, 2014, 01:44:07 PM
Post by: bearpaw on April 02, 2014, 05:39:48 PM
Post by: bearpaw on April 02, 2014, 05:41:47 PM
Quote
Steve Alder represents Idaho for Wildlife, a Lewiston-based hunters group that has lobbied for more wolf killing. He said he hopes the control board’s funds are used to quickly radio-collar 150 wolves to ensure Idaho can prove it's meeting the recovery goal.
This is a very good move to insure they maintain a stable and viable wolf population. :tup:
Post by: mkcj on April 02, 2014, 06:01:56 PM