Hunting Washington Forum

Big Game Hunting => Elk Hunting => Topic started by: Bean Counter on June 18, 2014, 07:38:25 PM


Advertise Here
Title: 385"?? Really?
Post by: Bean Counter on June 18, 2014, 07:38:25 PM
Do you see 385" here?  :dunno:
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: 270Shooter on June 18, 2014, 07:40:57 PM
Pretty long tines, very few deductions, and what looks like pretty long beams. And lots of points so yeah it's probably pretty close.
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: kentrek on June 18, 2014, 07:46:25 PM
More like 380  :chuckle:

It has smaller thirds but the main beams an width like they could add up fast

After 350 seems like they all look alike anyhow.... big !
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: JPhelps on June 18, 2014, 07:48:33 PM
Long beams and 7 points per side. I see it.
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: rtspring on June 18, 2014, 07:51:02 PM
All day long
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: bowhunterforever on June 18, 2014, 07:51:28 PM
Looks big to me :drool:
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: Bean Counter on June 18, 2014, 07:53:46 PM
Wow, I suck at field judging.  :sry:

But if that's 385", I may have a shot at 400" this fall.
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: mtman on June 18, 2014, 07:57:03 PM
I see 385 on the sign to the lower right.
Title: 385"?? Really?
Post by: jackelope on June 18, 2014, 07:57:10 PM
Most people, myself included couldn't confidently tell the difference between a 385 bull and a 400 bull.
With that said, like what was said before. Long main beams and extra points.
.02
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: jdb on June 18, 2014, 08:00:17 PM
I don't see it
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: kentrek on June 18, 2014, 08:08:52 PM
Most people, myself included couldn't confidently tell the difference between a 385 bull and a 400 bull.

 :yeah: 
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: Pathfinder101 on June 18, 2014, 08:09:52 PM
The skull is making the rack look small.  If that is a huge old bull with an enormous skull, then I can see him in the 380s.   :dunno:
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: KFhunter on June 18, 2014, 08:15:11 PM
You just need a dude with long skinny arms to hold it and it'd be 400+
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: vandeman17 on June 18, 2014, 08:18:32 PM
I see it. I bet if you put it on a live animal for reference it would be more obvious.  :tup:
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: jackelope on June 18, 2014, 08:20:24 PM
That bull has good tine length, long main beams and all sorts of extra points up top. With all that added together, it's not a problem to see 385".  He's like a 9x9 or something.

(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.tapatalk.com%2Fd%2F14%2F06%2F19%2Fpa8udabe.jpg&hash=782ee90f0f9bfc38f9e17f4fd62ed31aa7617f40)

(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.tapatalk.com%2Fd%2F14%2F06%2F19%2Fusy4asa7.jpg&hash=49fae91647dfc78231b5d0f69112ae260cb5f854)
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: Bean Counter on June 18, 2014, 08:25:51 PM
Most people, myself included couldn't confidently tell the difference between a 385 bull and a 400 bull.

 :yeah: 

Would it be equally difficult to judge 370" from 385"? Same math of +/-15". I've looked at a lot of 360-370" that were killed last year and they just seemed so much bigger. I didn't think that a euro would change perspective so much.
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: jackelope on June 18, 2014, 08:36:49 PM
Yes. I'd say so. It would be for me.
I think I could confidently differentiate between a 350 bull and a 380 bull but I think if you put a 380 7x7 then a 400 7x7 I couldn't tell the difference. I consider myself average at best at judging bulls' scores. Maybe I'm wrong.
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: 6x6in6 on June 18, 2014, 08:50:47 PM
I could see it.
Little short on the 3rds but the extra junk up top and the crazy long mains would easily off set those 3rds.
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: Todd_ID on June 18, 2014, 08:55:56 PM
I'm not seeing too short of thirds, only a funky angle.  If the 1's and 2's are in the 18" range, then the 3's are only a couple less than them.  What makes this bull special is the 5's being crazy long and the 7, 8, and 9 points don't hurt much either.  :chuckle:  I can see 385 on that bull without needing any tape stretch.
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: Dan-o on June 18, 2014, 09:07:52 PM
I don't doubt that's an accurate measure.
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: Bean Counter on June 19, 2014, 01:51:15 AM
If it were my season now, I would have waited until the last day of the season to shoot this one, thinking he's a 330" ish.  if you could tell me know that I'd have a 385" bull down at the end of the season I'd be tickled, but this one doesn't really catch my eye. OTOH here's another Arizona elk from last year, that I would have shot opening day. I was told this bull scores about 360".

I guess I need to get a lot better at field judging. Or I just need to kill an elk I like the looks of rather than concerning myself with tape measures.
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: huntnnw on June 19, 2014, 03:07:45 AM
when you start with great fronts good 3rds and nice 4ths with big whale tails you got a good bull!!
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: kentrek on June 19, 2014, 03:35:05 AM

 Or I just need to kill an elk I like the looks of rather than concerning myself with tape measures.

 :yeah: score means very little....
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: Elknut1 on June 19, 2014, 05:06:40 AM
At first glance no. But many times photos just don't do them justice, need better photos.

  ElKNut1
Title: Re: 385"?? Really?
Post by: Jellymon on June 19, 2014, 05:30:02 AM
I don't trust "official scorers" measurements. When I shot my big Roosevelt in 2010 my taxi had a scorer from the books come in and measure it. He ended up with 299 7/8". When I got there he told me that he could make it over 300" if I wanted. :yike:
The scores in those books now mean nothing to me.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal