Hunting Washington Forum

Big Game Hunting => Out Of State Hunting => Topic started by: Stein on June 24, 2014, 09:51:09 AM


Advertise Here
Title: Montana fee proposals
Post by: Stein on June 24, 2014, 09:51:09 AM
Comments due today, the tag I have been buying is going up 416% which puts me out of that hunt.

http://fwp.mt.gov/hunting/licenses/licensingAdvisoryCouncil.html (http://fwp.mt.gov/hunting/licenses/licensingAdvisoryCouncil.html)

Link to proposal:

http://fwp.mt.gov/hunting/licenses/licensingAdvisoryCouncil/resources.html (http://fwp.mt.gov/hunting/licenses/licensingAdvisoryCouncil/resources.html)

Basically, nonresident tags are going up, some by quite a bit.  There are no nonresidents on the committee, so stick it to the nonresidents seems to be the theme.  I get the shortfall, but the golden egg theory is going to fall apart at some point for them.
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: snowpack on June 24, 2014, 10:00:17 AM
Sad how all the different Fish and Games around the west think that below average license and fee costs are a bad thing. 
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: Stein on June 24, 2014, 10:08:33 AM
Yeah, if everyone jacks them up 50% they consider themselves "competitive."  We are really transitioning to a rich man's sport.  MT is considering capping their nonresident elk tags at $999 to avoid crossing over the $1k barrier.

Imagine what would happen if you had to pay $50 to park at the local city park or $100 to launch a boat.  For some reason, we just keep paying.

MT's estimates for the tag I get are for it to drop from 1,000 people to 600 with the increase.  That's 40% of the people that won't be able to afford it just in the first year.
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: Ridgerunner on June 24, 2014, 10:35:54 AM
$625 for a deer tag there?  It was only $340 three years ago .
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: NRA4LIFE on June 24, 2014, 10:40:24 AM
Ridge,

You're correct.  It jumped from $340 to $563 (I think) in one season.  Now to $625.  Those meat bison hunts are starting to look pretty attractive.
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: Stein on June 24, 2014, 10:42:37 AM
Elk tag is proposed to be $809 vs. $596 in Colorado. :dunno:  I need to start researching CO for next year apparently.

Bison hunt is going up $500.
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: grundy53 on June 24, 2014, 10:43:28 AM
Wow! I thought they were high already! Heck my grandmother and uncles live their and I hunt Idaho instead.

sent from my typewriter

Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: buckfvr29 on June 24, 2014, 10:59:36 AM
I hate trying to sort out the language that they use. So, if it passes, will I qualify for a discounted license because I and both of my parents were born in MT? The "come home to hunt" and the "non resident relative of a resident" requirements are confusing. It's a bit frustrating that because I don't have a close enough relative there, I don't qualify, even though I have 2 cousins there with fairly large ranches, and ALL of my aunts/uncles live there. Not trying to make it all about me but like most, I'm looking for any break that I can get.
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: Bob33 on June 24, 2014, 11:03:13 AM
I already dropped out this year when they changed the fees to apply.

The good news is that the reduced number of people still playing the game will have better odds of drawing.
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: vandeman17 on June 24, 2014, 11:03:37 AM
If that happens then I will ex Montana off my list of hunting destinations.
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: grundy53 on June 24, 2014, 11:03:44 AM
The funny part is they are always running commercials on the outdoor channel trying to get people to come hunt there. Then they do this....

sent from my typewriter

Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: bobcat on June 24, 2014, 11:08:08 AM
The rumor is that Wyoming will be increasing their fees next year as well.
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: Magnum_Willys on June 24, 2014, 11:16:41 AM
The proposals actually dropped fees for non-resident deer and elk hunters. 

"Cap the price of the nonresident big game combination license and
the nonresident deer combination license, including purchase of the new base hunting
license and application fees, at $999 and $625 respectively."

......These were set to increase with inflation.

Revise the refund policy to allow nonresidents who are unsuccessful in
drawing a permit to receive a 95% refund of the big game combination license at the time of
the drawing.

......a change from 80%

It was bad news for the bison/ram/goat tag fee costs but the refund was good news.
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: trophyhunt on June 24, 2014, 11:29:33 AM
The rumor is that Wyoming will be increasing their fees next year as well.
hope not, ill be waiting all my points and years applying.
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: Stein on June 24, 2014, 11:45:06 AM
The proposals actually dropped fees for non-resident deer and elk hunters. 

"Cap the price of the nonresident big game combination license and
the nonresident deer combination license, including purchase of the new base hunting
license and application fees, at $999 and $625 respectively."

......These were set to increase with inflation.


2013 fee for combo is $971 and deer is $575.  Still have a surplus of 2200 combo tags due to the price increase to$971.
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: chiefeng on September 28, 2014, 11:04:49 AM
Out of state hunting licenses generate 2/3 of the FPW's revenue they are already losing nonresident hunters so lets charge them more.  you would think maybe they would lower prices and get the hunters back. Doesn't National me everyone in the USofA  we all pay taxes the fund the national forest and wildlife preserves.
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: DoubleJ on September 28, 2014, 11:15:51 AM
Wait.  I thought there were western montana whitetail doe hunts where you could buy like 7 tags for $70 each or something like that.  Help me understand
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: 300rum on September 28, 2014, 11:26:15 AM
Montana is just so much father ahead of Washington in overall quality of animals, access, just everything.  When they raised the prices a few years ago it allowed most people to go every year instead of every other. 

What I don't like is them sticking it to the sportsman and in particular the out-of-state sportsman.  The percentage increase should stay the same between resident and non-resident.  I think that states should start taxing the looki-loos and "granola hikers" too, why shouldn't they pay more? 
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: go4steelhd on September 28, 2014, 11:53:58 AM
Oregon is planing an increase in 2016 and every two years after that if approved. Once one state makes there move the rest follow. At some point hunters will throw there hands up and give up. :bash:
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: KimberRich on September 30, 2014, 09:15:06 AM
Wait.  I thought there were western montana whitetail doe hunts where you could buy like 7 tags for $70 each or something like that.  Help me understand

There used to be until disease and other things reduced populations enough that MFWP reduced the B tags.  A lot of regions had little or no B tags this year.
There were still some units that had "Surplus" tags come available in August like years past but I'm not sure if they capped the limit at 1 per person or if you could still buy multiple tags.  Maybe someone else on here knows if they reduced the actual purchase limit.

Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: KimberRich on September 30, 2014, 09:22:05 AM
The proposals actually dropped fees for non-resident deer and elk hunters. 

"Cap the price of the nonresident big game combination license and
the nonresident deer combination license, including purchase of the new base hunting
license and application fees, at $999 and $625 respectively."

......These were set to increase with inflation.

Revise the refund policy to allow nonresidents who are unsuccessful in
drawing a permit to receive a 95% refund of the big game combination license at the time of
the drawing.

......a change from 80%

It was bad news for the bison/ram/goat tag fee costs but the refund was good news.

This is confusing.  In years past when it was actually a drawing to get a Big Game Combo, I would get all my $$ back except a ~$10 processing fee if I was unsuccessful.  I'm confused on where the 80% comes in?  Are you talking about sheep/goat/??

Obviously at this point with all the excess Deer/Elk licenses, refunds are not a huge issue.
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: vandeman17 on September 30, 2014, 09:37:15 AM
The proposals actually dropped fees for non-resident deer and elk hunters. 

"Cap the price of the nonresident big game combination license and
the nonresident deer combination license, including purchase of the new base hunting
license and application fees, at $999 and $625 respectively."

......These were set to increase with inflation.

Revise the refund policy to allow nonresidents who are unsuccessful in
drawing a permit to receive a 95% refund of the big game combination license at the time of
the drawing.

......a change from 80%

It was bad news for the bison/ram/goat tag fee costs but the refund was good news.

This is confusing.  In years past when it was actually a drawing to get a Big Game Combo, I would get all my $$ back except a ~$10 processing fee if I was unsuccessful.  I'm confused on where the 80% comes in?  Are you talking about sheep/goat/??

Obviously at this point with all the excess Deer/Elk licenses, refunds are not a huge issue.

I believe the 80% is if you are to keep one of your tags and return the other if not drawn for a special permit. We have been doing that for elk since they don't do ghost points and we just want to build points. Put in for lowest draw odds in state and then when not drawn, get 80% of elk tag fee back.
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: KimberRich on September 30, 2014, 09:58:42 AM
The proposals actually dropped fees for non-resident deer and elk hunters. 

"Cap the price of the nonresident big game combination license and
the nonresident deer combination license, including purchase of the new base hunting
license and application fees, at $999 and $625 respectively."

......These were set to increase with inflation.

Revise the refund policy to allow nonresidents who are unsuccessful in
drawing a permit to receive a 95% refund of the big game combination license at the time of
the drawing.

......a change from 80%

It was bad news for the bison/ram/goat tag fee costs but the refund was good news.

This is confusing.  In years past when it was actually a drawing to get a Big Game Combo, I would get all my $$ back except a ~$10 processing fee if I was unsuccessful.  I'm confused on where the 80% comes in?  Are you talking about sheep/goat/??

Obviously at this point with all the excess Deer/Elk licenses, refunds are not a huge issue.

I believe the 80% is if you are to keep one of your tags and return the other if not drawn for a special permit. We have been doing that for elk since they don't do ghost points and we just want to build points. Put in for lowest draw odds in state and then when not drawn, get 80% of elk tag fee back.

Ok that makes sense.  Thanks Vandeman!
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: Stein on October 21, 2014, 09:00:58 AM
I hate trying to sort out the language that they use. So, if it passes, will I qualify for a discounted license because I and both of my parents were born in MT? The "come home to hunt" and the "non resident relative of a resident" requirements are confusing. It's a bit frustrating that because I don't have a close enough relative there, I don't qualify, even though I have 2 cousins there with fairly large ranches, and ALL of my aunts/uncles live there. Not trying to make it all about me but like most, I'm looking for any break that I can get.

I have two nonresident native tags in my pocket and the price is going up something like 500% next year.  For that tag, you need proof of your birth in Montana, having held a resident fishing or hunting license in MT and proof of an immediate relative still living in MT.  I submit an e-mail showing proof of having held a resident fishing license in MT as well as a birth certificate and copy of my dad's driver's license showing a MT address.  Not the easiest tag to apply for, but a bargain (in the past anyway).

I admit the price is incredible, but the 500% increase in one year is tough to swallow.  My "discount" tag next year will be almost the same price as a full bore OTC Colorado nonresident tag without all of the paperwork hassle.
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: Taco280AI on October 21, 2014, 09:11:49 AM
States are just going to keep more people from hunting with these crazy increases
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: steeleywhopper on October 21, 2014, 09:25:20 AM
Good bye Montana....just when you get your elk spot dialed in they put the screws to ya. F-off!
Title: Re: Montana fee proposals
Post by: chiefeng on December 06, 2014, 04:49:55 AM
While buying my son nonresident tag in lewistown the game department lady told me they sold out all their nonres deer tags and guys where. Buying  combo liscenes just to deer hunt that's a 1000 dollar deer tag crazy.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal