Hunting Washington Forum
Community => Advocacy, Agencies, Access => Topic started by: Bean Counter on November 12, 2014, 12:56:29 PM
-
Published November 12, 2014
Law-abiding Californians may not need to justify their need to carry concealed weapons, after the same three-judge panel that struck down restrictions on the permits earlier this year ruled Wednesday that it is too late for new opponents to join the fight against the ruling.
The decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals would bar other law enforcement officials, including state Attorney General Kamala Harris, from appealing its ruling in a case originally brought by an independent journalist who sued the San Diego County Sheriff’s Department over its policy of requiring a specific reason for being allowed to carry a concealed weapon in public.
San Diego County Sheriff Bill Gore has said he will not fight the ruling, meaning there is no one with standing left to challenge the decision made in February.
...
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/11/12/new-court-decision-likely-ends-california-restrictions-on-conceal-carry-permits/ (http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/11/12/new-court-decision-likely-ends-california-restrictions-on-conceal-carry-permits/)
-
Outstanding news
-
Holy crap! Who turned the west coast upside down?
-
:yeah:
-
They need to focus on OR next. Multnomah Co. still asks why you need a concealed firearm.
-
They need to focus on OR next. Multnomah Co. still asks why you need a concealed firearm.
Since the 9th parents over the Oregon districts this should be an easy feat for even a wimpy law firm. Stare decisis, baby :tup:
-
When living in IN I heard they asked why there also. After leaving I learned they honored my WA permit.
I remember telling the wife as we rolled into IL on our way though headed for the PNW. No stopping for anything.
-
They need to focus on OR next. Multnomah Co. still asks why you need a concealed firearm.
Fortunately there are great people in Grant County. I need to renew mine soon.