Hunting Washington Forum

Big Game Hunting => Elk Hunting => Topic started by: higunner on January 31, 2015, 09:12:03 AM


Advertise Here
Title: Margaret changes
Post by: higunner on January 31, 2015, 09:12:03 AM
Has anyone heard the rumor about the Margeret possibly getting divided into two halves, western portion general and eastern portion permit only?
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: gotcha on January 31, 2015, 04:53:27 PM
Yup  better keep eastern permit.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Big6bull on January 31, 2015, 08:41:35 PM
I would love it to split and they both still be permit.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Bullkllr on January 31, 2015, 08:53:43 PM
Opening the western part to general season would play nicely into the hands of the private landowners east of Weyco, for sure.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Todd_ID on February 01, 2015, 12:25:53 AM
Haven't heard about a split but do know Margaret will be a general hunt this year for all weapons.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Ghost Hunter on February 01, 2015, 07:20:20 AM
Haven't heard about a split but do know Margaret will be a general hunt this year for all weapons.

That's a shame.  Not that I wouldn't like to hunt it again.  Probably not under those conditions.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: STIKNSTRINGBOW on February 01, 2015, 08:00:31 AM
Haven't heard about a split but do know Margaret will be a general hunt this year for all weapons.

That's a shame.  Not that I wouldn't like to hunt it again.  Probably not under those conditions.

I agree, expect a zoo, but it will give some of those displaced by fee access a place to go though... will be a good first couple seasons with the bull/cow ratio it has, but in a couple years will be just like any other unit.  :'(
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: SI Eagle on February 01, 2015, 08:33:04 AM
Where did you hear this? There are so few permits for Bull why would they take that tag out of the pool? There are plenty of elk in there, you just have to get out of your rig and hunt. Sounds pretty dumb to me.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: gotcha on February 01, 2015, 11:53:37 AM
Backcountry will never be general. They would never do that to the monument.  The westside. That is another story.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: grundy53 on February 01, 2015, 11:58:31 AM
I'm pretty sure if  Todd says it's going to happen then it's gonna happen.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: kentrek on February 02, 2015, 03:36:20 AM
 :yike: you've got to be kidding me....guess Il be finding a new area to out in for regular bull tag

Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Ghost Hunter on February 07, 2015, 03:30:33 PM
Backcountry will never be general. They would never do that to the monument.  The westside. That is another story.
:dunno:The proposal says otherwise......sad :bdid:
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: bobcat on February 07, 2015, 04:04:24 PM
They did change the boundary of the Margaret unit....

Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Firedogg on February 07, 2015, 07:15:14 PM
That will push more elk over the boundaries into Winston.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: 280ackley on February 07, 2015, 07:56:18 PM
Sooo, what other unit has a boundary change to include the land east of the USFS line?
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Whitpirate on February 07, 2015, 08:24:32 PM
Opening the western part to general season would play nicely into the hands of the private landowners east of Weyco, for sure.

Oh you mean that giant chunk that a certain rich individual bought about 3 years ago?

*yawn* Big surprise... WDFW for bid.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: moocher97 on February 09, 2015, 09:35:39 PM
After hunting the Margeret last year with the bow and hearing reports from this year I don't think ill ever apply for it again. the hoof rot is getting TOO bad. they should have made it general a few years ago to get rid of the hoof rot elk spreading it around. The numbers of elk from this year and even comparing it to 5 years ago are crazy!!! the area has potential which its shown but it needs to start over.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: higunner on February 09, 2015, 09:36:54 PM
I heard there will be changes to 24 or so GMU's
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: 2MANY on February 10, 2015, 07:51:49 AM
Great.
Now all those applicants will be putting in for other units.
The point creep continues.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: skidynastar33 on February 10, 2015, 10:51:25 AM
They are proposing this, now is the comment period then the commission decides in early April. It shouldn't be set in stone now otherwise the whole comment period is bs. Do if you don't want this like me. Go to Wdfw website and comment. Why give Weyerhaeuser and noble tree farm control of the wildlife so they can just charge us to hunt them?!
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: jackmaster on February 10, 2015, 11:01:38 AM
Just dumb if you ask me... its gone be a friggin warzone
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: gotcha on February 10, 2015, 01:15:51 PM
Beyond dumb.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: grundy53 on February 10, 2015, 03:10:37 PM
Hopefully it will take some pressure off of other units.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: jackmaster on February 10, 2015, 03:56:22 PM
Hopefully it will take some pressure off of other units.
oh it will do that alright, it might be worth just to go sit around up there and watch the carnage...lol.. probably mostly hunters blastin the sheet outta each other :chuckle:
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Bullkllr on February 10, 2015, 05:44:05 PM
They did change the boundary of the Margaret unit....

 :yeah:

And they created a new elk area in the east end.

Elk Area No. 5066 Norway Pass (Lewis and Skamania counties):
That part
of GMU 522 beginning at the US Forest Service
(USFS)
Trail 211 (Lakes
Trail) and USFS Trail 230 (Coldwater Trail) junction; N to Minnie
Peak; W to the USFS property boundary in the SE 1/4 of Section 20,
T10N, R5E; N along the USFS property boundary to the Green River; E up
the Green River to the USFS Rd 2612; E on the USFS Rd 2612 to USFS Rd
26; S on USFS Rd 26 to USFS Trail 1 (Boundary Trail); W on USFS Trail
1 to USFS Trail 214 (Whittier Trail); N on USFS Trail 214 to USFS
Trail 211 (Lakes Trail); W on USFS Trail 211 to the USFS Trail 211,
Trail 230 junction and point of beginning.

Only proposed permits are in the new elk area. All other parts of 524 are listed as general season areas.

So, yeah- it's a real deal.


Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Bullkllr on February 10, 2015, 05:58:52 PM
Sooo, what other unit has a boundary change to include the land east of the USFS line?

Loowit
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: skidynastar33 on February 10, 2015, 06:37:41 PM
So how much is Weyerhaeuser going to charge? $400,500,800??! Or is mr Agnew that owns the other land? Or at helens noble tree farm? Wonder who got money put there pockets to get this through. How is this going to help the average hunter?
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: bobcat on February 10, 2015, 07:18:30 PM
Well, last year the St Helens access permit was $150, and they were offering 15,000 but only sold 4,000. So I would think that the price would stay the same or possibly go down. It will be very interesting to see how many more they sell this year, due to Margaret being open for early archery, early muzzleloader, and modern firearm seasons. Not only that, but Coweeman and Winston will be open for early muzzleloader, and they never have  been before. So that will be another reason people will be buying the Weyerhaeuser access pass.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Bob33 on February 10, 2015, 07:22:45 PM
So how much is Weyerhaeuser going to charge? $400,500,800?
:yike:

That's quite a jump. I don't think they'll sell very many at four hundred million a pop. ;)
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: kentrek on February 10, 2015, 07:26:27 PM
Well, last year the St Helens access permit was $150, and they were offering 15,000 but only sold 4,000. So I would think that the price would stay the same or possibly go down. It will be very interesting to see how many more they sell this year, due to Margaret being open for early archery, early muzzleloader, and modern firearm seasons. Not only that, but Coweeman and Winston will be open for early muzzleloader, and they never have  been before. So that will be another reason people will be buying the Weyerhaeuser access pass.

pretty convenient for Weyerhaeuser
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: HntnFsh on February 10, 2015, 07:34:32 PM
So how much is Weyerhaeuser going to charge? $400,500,800?
:yike:

That's quite a jump. I don't think they'll sell very many at four hundred million a pop. ;)
 

The four hundred million probably isn't a deal breaker. But that dang $500,800 is just over the top. A mans gotta draw the line somewhere! :chuckle:
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Bullkllr on February 10, 2015, 07:42:41 PM
Well, last year the St Helens access permit was $150, and they were offering 15,000 but only sold 4,000. So I would think that the price would stay the same or possibly go down. It will be very interesting to see how many more they sell this year, due to Margaret being open for early archery, early muzzleloader, and modern firearm seasons. Not only that, but Coweeman and Winston will be open for early muzzleloader, and they never have  been before. So that will be another reason people will be buying the Weyerhaeuser access pass.

pretty convenient for Weyerhaeuser

A little too convenient if you ask me.

While I see some good things from having the unit go general, I can't say the timing of this doesn't bother me. Sounds like a great way for Weyerhaueser to sell more permits. Why were Coweeman and Winston not open for general early muzzle-loader when the populations were high? My guess is they would have sold plenty of permits last year if the elk numbers were near 10 year ago levels.

Sounds like a great way for landowners near the monument to charge more for their access. Many people saw this coming when the sales were made. Just took awhile to convince the WDFW?...I'd love to know how that went down.

This seriously puts a crimp on options for western tag holders to put in for.

I don't like it. At all.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: elk247 on February 10, 2015, 07:52:07 PM
So how much is Weyerhaeuser going to charge? $400,500,800??! Or is mr Agnew that owns the other land? Or at helens noble tree farm? Wonder who got money put there pockets to get this through. How is this going to help the average hunter?
Kentrek and they guys that hunt this unit; does this fall in line with the lodge that was being built to cater towards out of state elk hunters, or is that in the quality part? Now they can buy OTC tags? It helps the average elk hunter by being able to buy an otc tag if you have a way or means to access the unit. If you dont then it wont help you much,  but then why would you choose this unit anyway? This might have to do with the hoof rot or political influence. Time will tell. Private tree farm access permits are here to stay. Its just a sad reality. Its also a sad reality that this amazing elk unit is getting sicker every year.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Bullkllr on February 10, 2015, 08:01:28 PM
So how much is Weyerhaeuser going to charge? $400,500,800??! Or is mr Agnew that owns the other land? Or at helens noble tree farm? Wonder who got money put there pockets to get this through. How is this going to help the average hunter?
Kentrek and they guys that hunt this unit; does this fall in line with the lodge that was being built to cater towards out of state elk hunters, or is that in the quality part? Now they can buy OTC tags? It helps the average elk hunter by being able to buy an otc tag if you have a way or means to access the unit. If you dont then it wont help you much,  but then why would you choose this unit anyway? This might have to do with the hoof rot or political influence. Time will tell. Private tree farm access permits are here to stay. Its just a sad reality. Its also a sad reality that this amazing elk unit is getting sicker every year.

Everything west of the monument is proposed as OTC. Yes, that includes the private land  you mentioned above (aka "where the healthy elk in the unit live").
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: skidynastar33 on February 10, 2015, 08:05:14 PM
$500,$800,$1000 haha
I bet margeret gets its own area from weyerhouser. The whole thing smells fishy
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: bobcat on February 10, 2015, 08:07:13 PM
$500,$800,$1000 haha
I bet margeret gets its own area from weyerhouser. The whole thing smells fishy

It could. They might make it a lease area instead of a permit. (or multiple lease areas)
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Big6bull on February 10, 2015, 09:25:25 PM
More opertunities? For what and for who? Just Put another notch on washington a list of great elk gmu's. Going down the drain.  :bash:

Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: HntnFsh on February 11, 2015, 05:53:15 AM
I think it sucks. But Margaret has been going down the drain for years. A lot of people are going to be in for a rude awakening when they go up there to kill their bull. That's the pick of the litter. And come home wondering where they all went. I know a lot of people the last few years that came out of there empty handed, or with spikes!
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Bullkllr on February 11, 2015, 06:35:30 AM
Why not do the same with Toutle?

Oh, that's right...there's all that state land so no Weyco permit is absolutely required and no deep pockets private landowners wanting to sell high-priced access on the best part.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: skidynastar33 on February 11, 2015, 07:31:13 AM
Why not do the same with Toutle?

Oh, that's right...there's all that state land so no Weyco permit is absolutely required and no deep pockets private landowners wanting to sell high-priced access on the best part.

Yep but they could split the unit if they got enough motivation $$$$$$$$$
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: SI Eagle on February 11, 2015, 08:05:24 AM
So 17 points for a bull tag and more units taken away? Doesn't make sense. Why not just issue more permits. My dad is 75 and no way he could hunt the east end of the unit.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: fireweed on February 11, 2015, 08:42:59 AM
$500,$800,$1000 haha
I bet margeret gets its own area from weyerhouser. The whole thing smells fishy
EXACTLY--Margaret gets divided off for I bet $400 to $500, but Weyco has already sold the best parts of that unit (Agnew/Noble farms and Erickson). 

The USFS is still trying to purchase the part in Skamania county (High Lakes) but has not been able to get rated highly enough on the grant process.  They are not giving up yet, but the process is long and needs support.   
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: fireweed on February 11, 2015, 08:52:16 AM
Why not do the same with Toutle?

Oh, that's right...there's all that state land so no Weyco permit is absolutely required and no deep pockets private landowners wanting to sell high-priced access on the best part.

Yep but they could split the unit if they got enough motivation $$$$$$$$$

The public has absolutely no legal access to that DNR land by vehicle.  There is nothing stopping Weyco from charging hunters to go through their land to that landlocked DNR land.  As they continue to ratchet up the restrictions, the permits become more "accepted", and the WDFW, state legislature doesn't fight back, paying just to get to public land will be next.    Weyco  will say that they can't afford to have unknown vehicles on their haul road, that it is a safely issue, liability issue, garbage dumping, metal thieves, people stealing ferns and moss, rock collectors, you name the justification...and we will all be paying Weyco to go to state land. 
MARK MY WORDS!  If the state doesn't get serious about securing access its the next logical step for Weyerhaeuser to make a buck.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Torrent50 on February 11, 2015, 12:35:12 PM
Why not do the same with Toutle?

Oh, that's right...there's all that state land so no Weyco permit is absolutely required and no deep pockets private landowners wanting to sell high-priced access on the best part.

Yep but they could split the unit if they got enough motivation $$$$$$$$$



The public has absolutely no legal access to that DNR land by vehicle.  There is nothing stopping Weyco from charging hunters to go through their land to that landlocked DNR land.  As they continue to ratchet up the restrictions, the permits become more "accepted", and the WDFW, state legislature doesn't fight back, paying just to get to public land will be next.    Weyco  will say that they can't afford to have unknown vehicles on their haul road, that it is a safely issue, liability issue, garbage dumping, metal thieves, people stealing ferns and moss, rock collectors, you name the justification...and we will all be paying Weyco to go to state land. 
MARK MY WORDS!  If the state doesn't get serious about securing access its the next logical step for Weyerhaeuser to make a buck.

There are currently other areas of State land that would have access blocked by Weyco permit areas, but they put their gates to their permit areas further up the road and left access to the State land completely open.  I realize that the general consensus is that Weyco is an evil empire, but just thought I would mention they didn't block access to public land when they could have in some areas at least.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: fireweed on February 11, 2015, 07:15:07 PM
STUPID STUPID STUPID
The WDFW proposal actually takes land from the Margaret and adds land to the Loowit Unit which is CLOSED TO HUNTING (except for ths elk tag). And they call this a  "new elk opportunity"? 
What they are proposing closes deer, bear, cougar, coyote, grouse etc. on Public land that has been open to  hunting for years.   
Better to change nothing with the elk tags if they are closing hunting on vast areas of USFS land.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: BABackcountryBwhntr on February 12, 2015, 03:50:58 PM
After hunting the Margeret last year with the bow and hearing reports from this year I don't think ill ever apply for it again. the hoof rot is getting TOO bad. they should have made it general a few years ago to get rid of the hoof rot elk spreading it around. The numbers of elk from this year and even comparing it to 5 years ago are crazy!!! the area has potential which its shown but it needs to start over.


weird, my buddy had the tag, killed a 250 class bull and saw 19 other bulls in a week? sounds like it was still pretty good to me?
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: trophyhunt on February 12, 2015, 03:59:24 PM
$500,$800,$1000 haha
I bet margeret gets its own area from weyerhouser. The whole thing smells fishy
EXACTLY--Margaret gets divided off for I bet $400 to $500, but Weyco has already sold the best parts of that unit (Agnew/Noble farms and Erickson). 

The USFS is still trying to purchase the part in Skamania county (High Lakes) but has not been able to get rated highly enough on the grant process.  They are not giving up yet, but the process is long and needs support.
Are you talking about the 4,000 acres with elk lake? 
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Bullkllr on February 12, 2015, 04:01:28 PM
After hunting the Margeret last year with the bow and hearing reports from this year I don't think ill ever apply for it again. the hoof rot is getting TOO bad. they should have made it general a few years ago to get rid of the hoof rot elk spreading it around. The numbers of elk from this year and even comparing it to 5 years ago are crazy!!! the area has potential which its shown but it needs to start over.


weird, my buddy had the tag, killed a 250 class bull and saw 19 other bulls in a week? sounds like it was still pretty good to me?

Glad your buddy got a good bull. Results the last few years have been pretty mixed. Lots of tags unfilled, others doing quite well.

Not too long ago, seeing 19 bulls in a week in the Margaret would have been dismal.
Saw 19 bulls per herd maybe...or 19 bulls answered your call at the same time...or almost ran over 19 bulls with the truck...or saw 19 bulls poke their heads in the tent door, or 19 bulls actually tried to mate with a Montana decoy maybe...that's more like the way it was.

Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: HntnFsh on February 12, 2015, 06:02:07 PM
After hunting the Margeret last year with the bow and hearing reports from this year I don't think ill ever apply for it again. the hoof rot is getting TOO bad. they should have made it general a few years ago to get rid of the hoof rot elk spreading it around. The numbers of elk from this year and even comparing it to 5 years ago are crazy!!! the area has potential which its shown but it needs to start over.


weird, my buddy had the tag, killed a 250 class bull and saw 19 other bulls in a week? sounds like it was still pretty good to me?

Glad your buddy got a good bull. Results the last few years have been pretty mixed. Lots of tags unfilled, others doing quite well.

Not too long ago, seeing 19 bulls in a week in the Margaret would have been dismal.
Saw 19 bulls per herd maybe...or 19 bulls answered your call at the same time...or almost ran over 19 bulls with the truck...or saw 19 bulls poke their heads in the tent door, or 19 bulls actually tried to mate with a Montana decoy maybe...that's more like the way it was.

Thats a heck of a funny way of putting it.  :chuckle:  But man it was insane about 7 or 8 years ago when my son and I had our muzzy tags. Seeing 30 branch bulls a day was pretty common. If half a dozen decent bulls went into a hell hole you just shrugged your shoulder and went and found some others! No big deal!
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Bullkllr on February 12, 2015, 06:09:29 PM
I have a picture somewhere (not a very good one) of a herd with around 300 animals, about 1/2 of which are branch bulls, taken during the season. The ground literally shook when they spooked.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: fireweed on February 12, 2015, 06:19:01 PM
$500,$800,$1000 haha
I bet margeret gets its own area from weyerhouser. The whole thing smells fishy
EXACTLY--Margaret gets divided off for I bet $400 to $500, but Weyco has already sold the best parts of that unit (Agnew/Noble farms and Erickson). 

The USFS is still trying to purchase the part in Skamania county (High Lakes) but has not been able to get rated highly enough on the grant process.  They are not giving up yet, but the process is long and needs support.
Are you talking about the 4,000 acres with elk lake?

Yes, but I think what the USFS is going for isn't quite that large.  Elk Forest Hanaford (Fawn is just on the Cowlitz Co. Side so it isn't included)  The Gifford Pinchot boundary is the Cowlitz/Skamania line so technically these properties are "inholdings" withing the nat. Forest that is how the USFS can justify acquisition, and old trails to the Mt. Margaret used to go there.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Alan K on February 12, 2015, 06:49:39 PM
Agnew must be greasing palms at the WDFW.  He can just buy governor's tags out of state now and have a premium hunt on his own land every year, not to mention sell a handful of hunts for 10-15k+. . . This makes me want to puke.   :puke:

The thought when they moved Margaret to the Bull category was to drum up application dollars since there aren't very many good options there, so however much he's paying them off with must cover years of lost applications fees.   :dunno:

I don't buy that Weyerhaeuser would be doing much behind the scenes on this, even if they were to bump sales of their Longview permit by 1k to a total of roughly 3500 5000, and increase the price by $200, that's still less than a just over $1M over last year's sales.  Their revenues are in the billions, I doubt that 'chump change' would be worth the risk of the black eye of being caught bribing a government agency.  Not to mention what that publicity would do to their stock price, which is all that really seems to matter to them.

Who knows though.  Big money has a lot of power behind the scenes. . .

EDIT: Just reading back I saw someone mentioned that 4k permits had sold.  Last I had checked it was 2500 but I didn't really check once late summer came around.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: bobcat on February 12, 2015, 07:15:39 PM
I wasn't sure about the 4,000 permits being sold. I was thinking they had sold around 3,000 before the deadline at the end of September, and then they offered another 1,000 for sale, but I don't remember how many of those actually sold.

The total number must have been somewhere between 3 and 4 thousand.

Here's a newspaper article I just found:

http://tdn.com/lifestyles/modern-rifle-deer-season-seeing-fewer-hunters-in-weyerhaeuser-s/article_fc9afc86-5018-11e4-b08e-bf91c524f8d8.html (http://tdn.com/lifestyles/modern-rifle-deer-season-seeing-fewer-hunters-in-weyerhaeuser-s/article_fc9afc86-5018-11e4-b08e-bf91c524f8d8.html)
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: BABackcountryBwhntr on February 14, 2015, 08:49:32 AM
The st helens permit was 15000.... I bought one and used in 2 days the entire year.. once in the margret and once in the winston.
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: higunner on February 28, 2015, 06:54:09 AM
What GMU will all of the private property around the lakes be considered?
Title: Re: Margaret changes
Post by: Bullkllr on February 28, 2015, 07:55:28 AM
What GMU will all of the private property around the lakes be considered?

It's in the general season 524 part. Finally got what they wanted.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal