Hunting Washington Forum

Big Game Hunting => Bow Hunting => Topic started by: hogslayer on May 15, 2015, 05:08:48 PM


Advertise Here
Title: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: hogslayer on May 15, 2015, 05:08:48 PM
I know it's nice to have a side arm with you when your way back in the woods solo, but is it necessary?  It's nice to have one and not need it, rather than not have one and need it. But who has had an experience while hunting that needed to use a hand gun for self defense?
Title: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: jackelope on May 15, 2015, 05:11:09 PM
Many people bow hunted for many years without handguns. With that said I always have mine now that it is legal.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: grundy53 on May 15, 2015, 05:12:40 PM
Short answer, No. While it is definitely not "needed" most of the time I bet you you would be glad you had it if you ever found yourself in the unlikely situation that you did need it.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: rasbo on May 15, 2015, 05:13:12 PM
I have never used my handgun for defense,but when calling bears out of season for practice and a rush, I have pulled it while yelling at a bear to back off,that being said the ol better to have it rule I always standby
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: seth30 on May 15, 2015, 05:40:59 PM
I have used it once but all that was necessary was putting my hand on the but of the gun to get the person out of my bubble.  A very intense situation that I hope to never relive.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: ghosthunter on May 15, 2015, 05:42:52 PM
No

But I always have one. Most think of self defense but there other reasons to carry a handgun.
Many years ago I was deer hunting steep terrains . I spotted some deer belw and moved across a rock face covered in snow.
I had rain pants on. Well I slipped and down the face towards the 10ft drop of.
My rifle went flying.
I hit the snow chute and ripped down it at Mach speed. Slamming into a tree across the chute.
My hands were cut up from the sharpe talus and I was pined under the tree.
A rock I had knocked loose in the fall was bouncing down the chute towards me.
I managed to wiggle to the side and let it go by.
The only thing I had was my handgun strapped in the holster on my hip.
I fired three shots and my partner was able to locate me and help me off the mountain.
Carry a handgun. It's worth the weight.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: MLBowhunting on May 15, 2015, 05:51:44 PM
Sets what happened?
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: TommyH on May 15, 2015, 06:16:39 PM
I called two cougars in last year elk hunting, I had my pistol so I was not to worried(well  :chuckle:) less worried than the year before that when I had a cougar at 50 yards, and my bow strapped to my backpack, and it was the one day I didn't pack my pistol !  It's good to have, you never know what may happen.   :twocents:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: JJB11B on May 15, 2015, 06:45:56 PM
I feel naked without a sidearm so...I always have one...I never have to worry about it. I do change what firearm I am packing depending on where I go....
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: longwalker on May 15, 2015, 06:48:08 PM
Haven't carried one hunting in years and I've never carried one bow hunting. I spend the season packed into the wilderness solo. Two weeks , no people, no gun. Never do I sleep better
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: BABackcountryBwhntr on May 15, 2015, 06:54:25 PM
yes it is.. 100% , my wife had a huge tom follow here in the dark 2 years ago after she had shot a elk.... we took 2 shots at it.... it just looked at us and continued to walk w us step for step......  you better have one on you in Northern Idaho as well... unless you enjoy being near packs of wolves with just a bow.  :twocents:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: RadSav on May 15, 2015, 06:59:01 PM
Many people bow hunted for many years without handguns. With that said I always have mine now that it is legal.

We hunted for decades with no pistol and avoided any trouble.  Never felt as though I was ever in any self protection danger while bowhunting.

But - I believe things have changed.  We now have wolves again, we don't have room or money to keep people in jail that should be in jail, Facebook has brought animal rights whackadoodles together and some post bounties on hunters head, it seems as though we have more hot head pho-military morons, and our fast food/entitlement society has brought a whole new level of greed combined with a whole new disregard for self control.

Today I still feel safer in the woods without a gun than I do going to the grocery store.  And statically I believe we are.  But, why not carry if you got it?  My luck is 80% bad and 15% indifferent so I'm bound to find trouble at some point in life :chuckle:  When that happens Id rather go down with a fight!
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: turkeyfeather on May 15, 2015, 07:06:56 PM
I think of it as insurance. I may not ever need it and it may be a little bit of a pain but the day may come that I am glad I have it.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: mfswallace on May 15, 2015, 07:25:47 PM
I have never used my handgun for defense,but when calling bears out of season for practice and a rush, I have pulled it while yelling at a bear to back off,that being said the ol better to have it rule I always standby

No indictment on this "practice" but if you had to use it and killed a bear I wonder if it is considered poaching :dunno:

Any leo's care to shed some light to this kind of a scenario?
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: rasbo on May 15, 2015, 07:31:11 PM
I have never used my handgun for defense,but when calling bears out of season for practice and a rush, I have pulled it while yelling at a bear to back off,that being said the ol better to have it rule I always standby

No indictment on this "practice" but if you had to use it and killed a bear I wonder if it is considered poaching :dunno:

Any leo's care to shed some light to this kind of a scenario?
I cant do it anymore but Im sure I would be in trouble if I did shoot one toying with them,I have found that growling at them is bad juju lol I might add if I did get in trouble in that situation I would expect a ticket......
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: PlateauNDN on May 15, 2015, 07:37:21 PM
Safety reasons, some of the situations I've been in over the years would've probably turned ugly if not for the appearance of it on my leg.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: rtspring on May 15, 2015, 07:44:28 PM
Mine is 99 percent always with me, hunting 100 percent of the time.. 
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: hrd2fnd on May 15, 2015, 07:45:51 PM
Quote
Today I still feel safer in the woods without a gun than I do going to the grocery store.  And statically I believe we are.  But, why not carry if you got it?  My luck is 80% bad and 15% indifferent so I'm bound to find trouble at some point in life :chuckle:  When that happens Id rather go down with a fight!
                                                                           :yeah:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: mfswallace on May 15, 2015, 07:46:08 PM
I have never used my handgun for defense,but when calling bears out of season for practice and a rush, I have pulled it while yelling at a bear to back off,that being said the ol better to have it rule I always standby

No indictment on this "practice" but if you had to use it and killed a bear I wonder if it is considered poaching :dunno:

Any leo's care to shed some light to this kind of a scenario?
I cant do it anymore but Im sure I would be in trouble if I did shoot one toying with them,I have found that growling at them is bad juju lol I might add if I did get in trouble in that situation I would expect a ticket......

I'm curious because I've gotten to close to a big sow and her cubs a while taking pictures and at 20rds  :yike: I pulled my side arm while slowly backing away and telling her I was just leaving. Not exactly the same thing but I know it was my fault and wondered if I would get in trouble  if I had to pull the trigger. :o
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: dscubame on May 15, 2015, 07:53:51 PM
This would be a great Poll question and I would vote no.  In many places I find myself however I would not want to be without my bear spray.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Mudman on May 15, 2015, 08:03:18 PM
I dont.  People are more of a concern than animals.  I do carry bear spray in some areas.  Had run ins with bear and cougar that were unsettling but a gun probably would have just caused trouble.  Trying to explain why you felt threatened to a Leo after shooting an animal isnt my idea of a good experience.  I read an article few years ago about Yellowstone Park Rangers and their use of bear spray.  Many many times its been used with no fatal attacks.  Risk of being ran over from fleeing blind animal does happen.  Also it is easy to not miss with spray when charged.  It also teaches the animal to fear people.  Guns result in death, failure-miss-wound and angry more severe attacks are possible.  Warning shots can teach animals to not fear and of course the dinner bell effect.  Its a choice, whatever makes you feel safe.  Knowledge of animal behavior also a very overlooked safety tool.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: JimmyHoffa on May 15, 2015, 08:07:50 PM
I don't know Mudman.  When a neighbor worked at Olympic NP he had to use bear spray on a goat.  The goat killed a guy a couple weeks later.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: RadSav on May 15, 2015, 08:20:48 PM
My wife got to find out that bear spray has a reverse effect on whacked out drug addicts.  Just seemed to make him more mad and determined.  Sounds like the "...failure-miss-wound and angry more severe attacks are possible" narrative can be used for gun or bear spray.  Although if you really have to save your life what the heck is wrong with death.  Better his than yours!

If I have to pull a gun I'm not doing it to scare off an attacker man or animal.  If I pull it I intend to use it.  At that point I don't see where worrying about wounding is part of the discussion.  At that point it's life or death, both his and mine!
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Bob33 on May 15, 2015, 08:33:28 PM
My wife got to find out that bear spray has a reverse effect on whacked out drug addicts.  Just seemed to make him more mad and determined.  Sounds like the "...failure-miss-wound and angry more severe attacks are possible" narrative can be used for gun or bear spray.  Although if you really have to save your life what the heck is wrong with death.  Better his than yours!
There are multiple instances of (usually drug crazed) humans being shot more than 20 times and surviving.

On bears, spray is statistically more likely to stop a charge than a firearm.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: seth30 on May 15, 2015, 08:38:03 PM
Sets what happened?
I was bear hunting out in GMU 437 when a guy got in my bubble, and kept asking me over and over if I worked for the timber company.  I told him no repeatably and that I was bear hunting.  After he closed the gap from 12 inches to where I could feel his breath on my face I put my hand on the 357.  He backed off and walked back the way he came from.  I was shaking from the incident and still don't know what the deal was to this day.  I assume a eco terroist or pot grower :dunno:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Mudman on May 15, 2015, 08:38:59 PM
I don't know Mudman.  When a neighbor worked at Olympic NP he had to use bear spray on a goat.  The goat killed a guy a couple weeks later.
Ya I can see that being an issue.  Goats most stubborn animal.  I remember that on the news, if its the same one?  Rad was that bear or pepper spray?  Any Leo will tell ya tweakers often dont seem bothered and keep tweaking!  Crazy. Im not against it by no means.  I do think if you are carrying it should be 357 or larger.  Ive seen what a 45 does to a bear with 2 poor shots at 40ft and I wasnt impressed.  Didnt even brake bone?  Ammo?  I was helping him recover wounded bear.  The last bullet which also was a poor shot, 4th hit, resulted in a 30ft charge.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Jarhead Chase on May 15, 2015, 08:48:49 PM
I had some wolves following me last year while carrying out my deer in North Idaho. I fired 2 shots from my sidearm into the air and they backed off.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: RadSav on May 15, 2015, 09:33:43 PM
My wife got to find out that bear spray has a reverse effect on whacked out drug addicts.  Just seemed to make him more mad and determined.  Sounds like the "...failure-miss-wound and angry more severe attacks are possible" narrative can be used for gun or bear spray.  Although if you really have to save your life what the heck is wrong with death.  Better his than yours!
There are multiple instances of (usually drug crazed) humans being shot more than 20 times and surviving.

On bears, spray is statistically more likely to stop a charge than a firearm.

Outside the NE I'm not much concerned with four legged threats.  And even up there I'm probably safer without a gun in the woods than I am driving there in my car.


I do not see 40' as a threat situation with animals.  Unless a person has a gun I don't really see 40' as a threat with human encounters either.  At that point they are a potential threat worthy of being prepared, but not yet a self defense engagement range.  In Canada we get bluff charged by black bear on a semi regular basis.  More fun than terrifying.  Each time has been getting between a boar and a cub he was planning on eating.  He didn't want to attack us anymore than I wanted to shoot him.

My self defense history is all wounded bear related:
3 yards = double tap under chin with .45 - Oregon
Point blank = One shot to the head with .444 Marlin - Oregon
4-5 yards = One shot to the head with .45 - Washington

At under five yards I think I'll take my chances with a gun and leave the pepper spray for someone else.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: JimmyHoffa on May 15, 2015, 10:00:46 PM
My wife got to find out that bear spray has a reverse effect on whacked out drug addicts.  Just seemed to make him more mad and determined.  Sounds like the "...failure-miss-wound and angry more severe attacks are possible" narrative can be used for gun or bear spray.  Although if you really have to save your life what the heck is wrong with death.  Better his than yours!
There are multiple instances of (usually drug crazed) humans being shot more than 20 times and surviving.

On bears, spray is statistically more likely to stop a charge than a firearm.
I remember reading this a while back.  If I remember correctly (what are the chances of that  :chuckle:), the survey picked every firearm bear encounter and every spray encounter.  I think a bear spray usage encounter is straightforward enough--bear charges human, human sprays with actual bear spray (not human level pepper spray).  For the firearms, it was stuff like a guy wounded a bear.  Then went to the bushes to find said bear.  Then the bear jumped out and got him before he could get a second shot.  Or things like using a .223 or a 9 mm and having a bear encounter.  Quite a few guys I knew in Alaska used .243 for their deer rifles and didn't carry a sidearm--Ketchikan area, I'm not sure I could've done that.  Guess I'd like to see the .300 Win Mag and up comparison to bear spray.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Torrent50 on May 15, 2015, 10:37:35 PM
The shortest answer I can give is "It's not necessary until it is."
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: follow maggie on May 15, 2015, 10:45:53 PM
I've prevented myself from getting rolled up & robbed in the woods twice because I had a gun
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: stevemiller on May 15, 2015, 11:00:38 PM
 :yeah
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: hogslayer on May 15, 2015, 11:12:50 PM
Where i shot my elk this year i had a close encounter with a very testy coyote.  I was walking down to the water hole to fill up my bags, and looked over and this coyote was looking right at me.  I thought he would run off right away, but he had his nose in the air and was moving towards me.  I started backing up and made my way back to camp to retrieve my bow.  I get my release on and turn around and he is standing less than 20ft from me looking at an elk head and 4 game bags.  I nocked an arrow and picked up a rock.  Then i told him, you got one chance to leave or your dead.  He left.  Looking back i wish i would of just shot the thing.  I was being a cheap ass and didn't want to waste an arrow on him.  I have just been thinking if i really need to carry a gun in the back country for archery season.  After hearing Radsav talk about those close encounters with bears, it makes me think in a situation like that i would really wish i had a gun.  I still think that you would have a way higher chance needing to use it for people than animals. 
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: LeviD1 on May 15, 2015, 11:18:16 PM
My wife got to find out that bear spray has a reverse effect on whacked out drug addicts.  Just seemed to make him more mad and determined.  Sounds like the "...failure-miss-wound and angry more severe attacks are possible" narrative can be used for gun or bear spray.  Although if you really have to save your life what the heck is wrong with death.  Better his than yours!
There are multiple instances of (usually drug crazed) humans being shot more than 20 times and surviving.

On bears, spray is statistically more likely to stop a charge than a firearm.

Sounds to me like those guys should have carried a bigger gun..  :chuckle:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: RadSav on May 15, 2015, 11:51:17 PM
After hearing Radsav talk about those close encounters with bears, it makes me think in a situation like that i would really wish i had a gun.  I still think that you would have a way higher chance needing to use it for people than animals.

In Canada we put ourselves in those situations.  Exciting and maybe saves a cub or two.  Great chance to kill a bear if any of them had been boars I wanted to waste a tag on.

The three close bear encounters where I shot the bear two of those were when guiding and forcing the issue in hopes of recovering a clients bear after they made poor shots.  Third was my own bear that I shot poorly and I forced the issue because I was afraid I'd lose him in the oncoming rain.

So really I have never found myself in a self defense situation that I had not put myself into intentionally.  Every one of those could have been avoided if I chose to play it safe.  Even the wife's situation could have been avoided if she had been willing to ignore a bad family situation.  Sure things happen and a person should be prepared for those, but I rarely ever worry about those much when in the wild. 

On the other hand I trust very few two legged encounters.  Ask D-Rock if he'd rather be in the woods without a gun or on a Max train in Portland :chuckle:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Bean Counter on May 16, 2015, 02:00:24 AM
Couple years ago I was walking up a mountain in southern Arizona for the summer archery deer hunt. I had it in case I ran into drug smugglers. Boy was I surprised when the face I saw on that steep climb was a mountain lion at about 10 yards  :yike:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: turkeyfeather on May 16, 2015, 06:25:53 AM
Couple years ago I was walking up a mountain in southern Arizona for the summer archery deer hunt. I had it in case I ran into drug smugglers. Boy was I surprised when the face I saw on that steep climb was a mountain lion at about 10 yards  :yike:
That'll make ya mess your shorts won't it.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Stump on May 16, 2015, 07:45:10 AM
I also carry a first aid kit and have never used it.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: SGTDuffman on May 16, 2015, 09:46:25 AM
It's not necessary, but after the last time I came across a bear without one, I started carrying mine. I felt naked with nothing but a bow. It'd kill him, but not fast enough to keep him from tearing me up. Really bear spray would be a much better alternative for deterring wildlife, but 2 legged vermin require a less subtle approach. There was a bow hunter mauled by a black bear in the same area I was in last year, and I was glad I had mine. Like they say, it's better to have it and not need it, than need it and not have it.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Smoke on May 16, 2015, 10:07:53 AM
always carry one... never needed it for defense/survival, but ya never know... that being said, when gun hunting and ya walk up on yer game and find it's not quite dead yet, a kill shot with the handgun is a lot easier then using yer rifle...  btw... when hunting in snake country, first two rounds in the revolver are snake shot (have used those back east in the swamps)... if I need the regular bullets, just click the cylinder twice and ready to go
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: turkeyfeather on May 16, 2015, 10:43:03 AM
always carry one... never needed it for defense/survival, but ya never know... that being said, when gun hunting and ya walk up on yer game and find it's not quite dead yet, a kill shot with the handgun is a lot easier then using yer rifle...  btw... when hunting in snake country, first two rounds in the revolver are snake shot (have used those back east in the swamps)... if I need the regular bullets, just click the cylinder twice and ready to go
Isn't that illegal?  :dunno:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: rasbo on May 16, 2015, 10:55:51 AM
always carry one... never needed it for defense/survival, but ya never know... that being said, when gun hunting and ya walk up on yer game and find it's not quite dead yet, a kill shot with the handgun is a lot easier then using yer rifle...  btw... when hunting in snake country, first two rounds in the revolver are snake shot (have used those back east in the swamps)... if I need the regular bullets, just click the cylinder twice and ready to go
Isn't that illegal?  :dunno:
if its a legal caliber and modern I would think its ok,bowhunting negative,not sure about muzzy,perhaps a blkpowder pistol
Title: Time to check Bean Counters 'Man Card'
Post by: Bean Counter on May 16, 2015, 11:23:46 AM
Couple years ago I was walking up a mountain in southern Arizona for the summer archery deer hunt. I had it in case I ran into drug smugglers. Boy was I surprised when the face I saw on that steep climb was a mountain lion at about 10 yards  :yike:
That'll make ya mess your shorts won't it.

Honestly I just sort of stood there frozen. The surprise kind of kept me in limbo--trigger happy as I normally fancy myself. I didn't see a mountain lion--I saw a face looking right at me. Its like when you walk up to someone and you're studying the pattern between their eyes and mouth to see if your recognize them. He was out of sight before I realized I shoulda been poppin' caps. Its one of those steep, nasty mountains that I had to go to my 'happy place' to climb up, which certainly didn't help my state of awareness.

He ran up to the top of the hill. I looked down and realized I was standing near his lunch--a buried deer that he either killed there or drug up hill and buried with grass. I do (and say) some brash things, but decided to head down the mountain after a few minutes of glassing.

Yeah I know... puss  :chuckle:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Nice Racks on May 16, 2015, 11:41:59 AM
Never had to use it, but it was nice knowing I had it after two occasions.  One time I stood up after checking my camera, and saw a cougar about 50 yards behind me running away.  My feeling was it heard me and was coming in to check it out.  The other time I am glad I had one was just walking through the woods scouting and "something" made some type of "chopping" sound only around 30 yards away, the went crashing away. Could have been bigfoot, but was probably a bear. What ever it was; any gunslinger would have been impressed with my draw speed that day. That scared the crap out of me.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: HunterStrait on May 16, 2015, 12:26:28 PM
Me and my dad were walking up a well used hiking trail in the toucannon, and a cougar jumped up less than 30 feet away. Good god he/she ran the other way and not our direction. So yes, it is necessary since I've ran into way too many cougars in a 4 year period, in one area.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: christopheri on May 16, 2015, 01:31:02 PM
 I bow hunt on the west side and spend 10 to 12 days Elk hunting by myself. I always have bear spray handy but have never really felt the need to carry a side arm. I may rethink that now that we have more wolves showing up on the west side. :bash:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: boneaddict on May 16, 2015, 01:44:45 PM
Very rarely carry one.   I have used it on an attacking bear, but I had my camera, not my bow.   I have had multiple encounters with wolves with just my bow.   I can kill pretty fast with it if need be.  Two legged predators are worse.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: PolarBear on May 16, 2015, 01:59:50 PM
I've never carried one while bowhunting (30 years).  I figure that if a situation comes up and I can't launch an arrow fast enough then it was just my time to go. I just don't want the added gear to worry about or to mess with.  Keep it simple and minimal.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: T Pearce on May 16, 2015, 02:06:55 PM
If hunting archery, or just woods bumming I pack.

Modern firearm season, no. I feel the rifle is enough.

Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: dreamunelk on May 16, 2015, 02:40:39 PM
I've never carried one while bowhunting (30 years).  I figure that if a situation comes up and I can't launch an arrow fast enough then it was just my time to go. I just don't want the added gear to worry about or to mess with.  Keep it simple and minimal.

In a close situation an arrow with a razor sharp broad can do a lot of damage real fast!
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: PolarBear on May 16, 2015, 02:44:47 PM
Yep
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: jeffro on May 16, 2015, 02:56:58 PM
Considering I carry, all day, every day,
why wouldn't I have it while hunting.
Hi cap 45 for suburbia,
4" .44 mag for wilderness.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: pianoman9701 on May 16, 2015, 03:24:53 PM
I always carry, everywhere I go. It's like a parachute: the first time you need and don't have it'll likely be the last time. Wolves, tweekers, zombies. Pack a sidearm.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: JJD on May 16, 2015, 04:47:29 PM
Most big critters can cover 10 yds faster than most guys can draw and effectively shoot.  Probably double that if they see you first and have a head start.
I have read that a human attacker, in even reasonable shape, can cover 20 feet faster than most can draw and effectively fire.
The number one thing in a fight is the will to survive.  While you may not walk away unscathed, a handgun may scew the odds of surviving in your favor.



Title: Re: Time to check Bean Counters 'Man Card'
Post by: turkeyfeather on May 16, 2015, 05:39:29 PM
Couple years ago I was walking up a mountain in southern Arizona for the summer archery deer hunt. I had it in case I ran into drug smugglers. Boy was I surprised when the face I saw on that steep climb was a mountain lion at about 10 yards  :yike:
That'll make ya mess your shorts won't it.

Honestly I just sort of stood there frozen. The surprise kind of kept me in limbo--trigger happy as I normally fancy myself. I didn't see a mountain lion--I saw a face looking right at me. Its like when you walk up to someone and you're studying the pattern between their eyes and mouth to see if your recognize them. He was out of sight before I realized I shoulda been poppin' caps. Its one of those steep, nasty mountains that I had to go to my 'happy place' to climb up, which certainly didn't help my state of awareness.

He ran up to the top of the hill. I looked down and realized I was standing near his lunch--a buried deer that he either killed there or drug up hill and buried with grass. I do (and say) some brash things, but decided to head down the mountain after a few minutes of glassing.

Yeah I know... puss  :chuckle:
You held out longer than I likely would have.  :chuckle:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: stevemiller on May 16, 2015, 05:58:23 PM
Most big critters can cover 10 yds faster than most guys can draw and effectively shoot.  Probably double that if they see you first and have a head start.
I have read that a human attacker, in even reasonable shape, can cover 20 feet faster than most can draw and effectively fire.
The number one thing in a fight is the will to survive.  While you may not walk away unscathed, a handgun may scew the odds of surviving in your favor.
This is very true,Scenario time,Your pounced on by a big cat,your rolling around fighting it off best you can,You reach to your side and pull out your side arm you Put one in it, fights over,Now are you glad you had your side arm?Very hard to defend yourself in this case with a rifle at zero range.  :tup:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: turkeyfeather on May 16, 2015, 06:06:14 PM
Most big critters can cover 10 yds faster than most guys can draw and effectively shoot.  Probably double that if they see you first and have a head start.
I have read that a human attacker, in even reasonable shape, can cover 20 feet faster than most can draw and effectively fire.
The number one thing in a fight is the will to survive.  While you may not walk away unscathed, a handgun may scew the odds of surviving in your favor.
This is very true,Scenario time,Your pounced on by a big cat,your rolling around fighting it off best you can,You reach to your side and pull out your side arm you Put one in it, fights over,Now are you glad you had your side arm?Very hard to defend yourself in this case with a rifle at zero range.  :tup:
:tup:  And that is exactly why I carry even during the modern season.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: stevemiller on May 16, 2015, 06:08:10 PM
Most big critters can cover 10 yds faster than most guys can draw and effectively shoot.  Probably double that if they see you first and have a head start.
I have read that a human attacker, in even reasonable shape, can cover 20 feet faster than most can draw and effectively fire.
The number one thing in a fight is the will to survive.  While you may not walk away unscathed, a handgun may scew the odds of surviving in your favor.
This is very true,Scenario time,Your pounced on by a big cat,your rolling around fighting it off best you can,You reach to your side and pull out your side arm you Put one in it, fights over,Now are you glad you had your side arm?Very hard to defend yourself in this case with a rifle at zero range.  :tup:
:tup:  And that is exactly why I carry even during the modern season.
This is the main reason I carry as well,Whether Im hunting or just walking around with the kids.This and BIGFOOT that is.Ive heard that he fears handguns more than rifles.  :tup:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: turkeyfeather on May 16, 2015, 06:16:21 PM
Most big critters can cover 10 yds faster than most guys can draw and effectively shoot.  Probably double that if they see you first and have a head start.
I have read that a human attacker, in even reasonable shape, can cover 20 feet faster than most can draw and effectively fire.
The number one thing in a fight is the will to survive.  While you may not walk away unscathed, a handgun may scew the odds of surviving in your favor.
This is very true,Scenario time,Your pounced on by a big cat,your rolling around fighting it off best you can,You reach to your side and pull out your side arm you Put one in it, fights over,Now are you glad you had your side arm?Very hard to defend yourself in this case with a rifle at zero range.  :tup:
:tup:  And that is exactly why I carry even during the modern season.
This is the main reason I carry as well,Whether Im hunting or just walking around with the kids.This and BIGFOOT that is.Ive heard that he fears handguns more than rifles.  :tup:
Now that is information you just can't get anywhere.   :tup:  :chuckle:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: stevemiller on May 16, 2015, 06:19:52 PM
Only on the Hunting Washington Forum lol.Thats right everyone you heard it here first.


                                                                                                             BRIAN WILLIAMS: NBC LIVE
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Smossy on May 16, 2015, 07:55:21 PM
Bear spray. Read quite a few articles about how effective bear mace is over firearms. Theres pros and cons to either side but when bear spray can blind you and nearly shut down your respitory system long enough to get away from the situation without the resulting consiquences of the law or me spending the next 5-10 years in prison. Ill take the lesser slightly more risky rought.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: turkeyfeather on May 16, 2015, 08:07:02 PM
I agree that bear spray is effective. I still think lead is more effective and I always figure I will worry about legalities after I know my life is safe.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Torrent50 on May 16, 2015, 09:09:54 PM
Bear spray is effective, but if it gets up close and you are in a fight, it will likely incapacitate you as well.  There is no foolproof defense, except not to go into the woods.  We can all agree that isn't happening  Having a sidearm and being competent and confident in it's use is about as good as it gets in my mind.  If I end up on the ground rolling around in a fight for my life with some critter, either two-legged or four-legged, I hope I am able to find a chunk of a body that isn't mine and shove the damn thing against it and start pulling the trigger until it goes away.

Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: pianoman9701 on May 17, 2015, 05:03:55 PM
Bear spray. Read quite a few articles about how effective bear mace is over firearms. Theres pros and cons to either side but when bear spray can blind you and nearly shut down your respitory system long enough to get away from the situation without the resulting consiquences of the law or me spending the next 5-10 years in prison. Ill take the lesser slightly more risky rought.

Just in case you're wondering, this wouldn't be considered an excused absence!
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: TheHunt on May 17, 2015, 05:34:16 PM
I hunt alone and I carry.  I am more nervous about humans trying to hurt or kill me.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: jeffro on May 17, 2015, 05:48:27 PM
Bear spray. Read quite a few articles about how effective bear mace is over firearms. Theres pros and cons to either side but when bear spray can blind you and nearly shut down your respitory system long enough to get away from the situation without the resulting consiquences of the law or me spending the next 5-10 years in prison. Ill take the lesser slightly more risky rought.
are you being serious, or an elitist bow hunter?
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: stevemiller on May 17, 2015, 05:50:07 PM
Bear spray. Read quite a few articles about how effective bear mace is over firearms. Theres pros and cons to either side but when bear spray can blind you and nearly shut down your respitory system long enough to get away from the situation without the resulting consiquences of the law or me spending the next 5-10 years in prison. Ill take the lesser slightly more risky rought.
are you being serious, or an elitist bow hunter?
[/quote)


He is being serious,He is a great guy,a helpful guy and a great addition to this forum.He has his reasons for this post.  :tup:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: RadSav on May 17, 2015, 06:46:53 PM
Smossy...The Elitist Bowhunter!  Now that's funny :chuckle: :chuckle:

We love Smoochy around here.  Good kid :tup:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: SGTDuffman on May 17, 2015, 07:20:00 PM
Better to be judged by 12, than carried by 6...
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: WRKG4GD on May 17, 2015, 07:26:09 PM
Sig Sauer 2022 here.  All reasons stated.

Especially zombies.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Wea300mag on May 17, 2015, 07:39:57 PM
I always carry when hiking by myself. I look at it as insurance and it gives me piece of mind. I've also used it to detour an ornery bear before.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Goldeneye on May 17, 2015, 07:43:58 PM
Smossy...The Elitist Bowhunter!  Now that's funny :chuckle: :chuckle:

We love Smoochy around here.  Good kid :tup:


Wait a minute.  Smoochy?  Every nickname has a root of truth.  How did he earn Smoochy? 
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: ghosthunter on May 17, 2015, 07:59:27 PM
Smossy...The Elitist Bowhunter!  Now that's funny :chuckle: :chuckle:

We love Smoochy around here.  Good kid :tup:


Wait a minute.  Smoochy?  Every nickname has a root of truth.  How did he earn Smoochy?

A better question is how did RADSAV know that. Kinky bow hunters?
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: jasnt on May 17, 2015, 08:02:57 PM
Some times it's the two legged critters that are more dangerous than the four legged critters
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: cryder on May 19, 2015, 09:41:54 PM
JEEEEEZE ,just ask dude in jersey , he will clear all dought right away or your not listening correctly :bash:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: h2ofowlr on May 19, 2015, 09:49:08 PM
I always carry one.  I have ran across to many tweakers up in the woods over the years.  Along with pot grows and other stuff.  I just don't trust some of the people I have seen or ran into behind closed gates.
Came back to my rig a few years back and someone was trying to break into it.  Always nice to be prepared for the unexpected situation.  One carry's one as they hope nothing will ever happen.  Only takes one bad situation.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: buglebrush on May 20, 2015, 10:01:51 AM
Is a headlamp necessary?  No, but I am way more comfortable carrying both.  I have had to kill a bear point blank with my .44 too.   :twocents:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Mxracer532 on May 20, 2015, 11:06:28 AM
My wife got to find out that bear spray has a reverse effect on whacked out drug addicts.  Just seemed to make him more mad and determined.  Sounds like the "...failure-miss-wound and angry more severe attacks are possible" narrative can be used for gun or bear spray.  Although if you really have to save your life what the heck is wrong with death.  Better his than yours!
There are multiple instances of (usually drug crazed) humans being shot more than 20 times and surviving.

On bears, spray is statistically more likely to stop a charge than a firearm.
I remember reading this a while back.  If I remember correctly (what are the chances of that  :chuckle:), the survey picked every firearm bear encounter and every spray encounter.  I think a bear spray usage encounter is straightforward enough--bear charges human, human sprays with actual bear spray (not human level pepper spray).  For the firearms, it was stuff like a guy wounded a bear.  Then went to the bushes to find said bear.  Then the bear jumped out and got him before he could get a second shot.  Or things like using a .223 or a 9 mm and having a bear encounter. Quite a few guys I knew in Alaska used .243 for their deer rifles and didn't carry a sidearm--Ketchikan area, I'm not sure I could've done that.  Guess I'd like to see the .300 Win Mag and up comparison to bear spray.

I used a .243 on my Wenaha Spring bear last year. 95gn Berger put it down no problem.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Jonathan_S on May 20, 2015, 11:35:38 AM
I don't know Mudman.  When a neighbor worked at Olympic NP he had to use bear spray on a goat.  The goat killed a guy a couple weeks later.

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/Hiker-killed-by-mountain-goat-in-Olympic-Nat-l-887209.php
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Mongo Hunter on May 20, 2015, 11:56:57 AM
If I knew I was going to need it, I wouldn't go there. that's why I always have it no matter what.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Gringo31 on May 20, 2015, 12:37:20 PM
If I'm on a hike, I'll carry.


If I'm bowhunting I don't.  I don't get nightmares of a bear/cougar/wolf attacking me.  To me it's like being worried about being stuck by lightning.  I've hunted black bear in alaska with only my bow (much to my brother freaking out) but I did pack and have a backup shooter when chasing browns with my bow. 

Keep a cool head fellas!  THAT is your best weapon.....and I'm fortunate to only really spend time in tweeker free areas.  :chuckle:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Kittman on May 20, 2015, 12:52:50 PM
If you can carry and don't, why, might be a better question.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: headshot5 on May 20, 2015, 01:29:11 PM
Is carrying a sidearm necessary?  No. 

Is being a victim necessary?  No. 

Personally I pack a pistol if I'm not already packing a rifle.  I carry because I've seen some crazy stuff in the woods.     
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: CP on May 20, 2015, 01:32:47 PM
I’d rather hunt without a sidearm than walk the streets of Seattle without one.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: jasnt on May 20, 2015, 06:52:55 PM
My wife got to find out that bear spray has a reverse effect on whacked out drug addicts.  Just seemed to make him more mad and determined.  Sounds like the "...failure-miss-wound and angry more severe attacks are possible" narrative can be used for gun or bear spray.  Although if you really have to save your life what the heck is wrong with death.  Better his than yours!
There are multiple instances of (usually drug crazed) humans being shot more than 20 times and surviving.

On bears, spray is statistically more likely to stop a charge than a firearm.
I remember reading this a while back.  If I remember correctly (what are the chances of that  :chuckle:), the survey picked every firearm bear encounter and every spray encounter.  I think a bear spray usage encounter is straightforward enough--bear charges human, human sprays with actual bear spray (not human level pepper spray).  For the firearms, it was stuff like a guy wounded a bear.  Then went to the bushes to find said bear.  Then the bear jumped out and got him before he could get a second shot.  Or things like using a .223 or a 9 mm and having a bear encounter. Quite a few guys I knew in Alaska used .243 for their deer rifles and didn't carry a sidearm--Ketchikan area, I'm not sure I could've done that.  Guess I'd like to see the .300 Win Mag and up comparison to bear spray.

I used a .243 on my Wenaha Spring bear last year. 95gn Berger put it down no problem.
killed my bear last year with my 243
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Mudman on May 20, 2015, 06:58:02 PM
I don't know Mudman.  When a neighbor worked at Olympic NP he had to use bear spray on a goat.  The goat killed a guy a couple weeks later.

http://www.seattlepi.com/local/article/Hiker-killed-by-mountain-goat-in-Olympic-Nat-l-887209.php
Ya, thats it, thanks.  Man Moose and Goats are to be respected.  A sidearm is always an option for sure but I feel the need is greater when dealing with people compared to our local animals.  Sprays work for me yet things can change.  I can say a black bear confrontation ends with an arrow just like a bullet.  Alaska would be both gun and sprays!  A Grizz and Cougar are what makes my hair stand up-If it was still on top of my head! :chuckle:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: JimmyHoffa on May 20, 2015, 07:03:03 PM
My wife got to find out that bear spray has a reverse effect on whacked out drug addicts.  Just seemed to make him more mad and determined.  Sounds like the "...failure-miss-wound and angry more severe attacks are possible" narrative can be used for gun or bear spray.  Although if you really have to save your life what the heck is wrong with death.  Better his than yours!
There are multiple instances of (usually drug crazed) humans being shot more than 20 times and surviving.

On bears, spray is statistically more likely to stop a charge than a firearm.
I remember reading this a while back.  If I remember correctly (what are the chances of that  :chuckle:), the survey picked every firearm bear encounter and every spray encounter.  I think a bear spray usage encounter is straightforward enough--bear charges human, human sprays with actual bear spray (not human level pepper spray).  For the firearms, it was stuff like a guy wounded a bear.  Then went to the bushes to find said bear.  Then the bear jumped out and got him before he could get a second shot.  Or things like using a .223 or a 9 mm and having a bear encounter. Quite a few guys I knew in Alaska used .243 for their deer rifles and didn't carry a sidearm--Ketchikan area, I'm not sure I could've done that.  Guess I'd like to see the .300 Win Mag and up comparison to bear spray.

I used a .243 on my Wenaha Spring bear last year. 95gn Berger put it down no problem.
killed my bear last year with my 243
For black bears sure.  I use .25 cal-100 gr for black bear.  In brown bear territory if I didn't have a big rifle/shotgun, I'd at least have a big pistol.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: jasnt on May 20, 2015, 08:03:17 PM
Ya I like my 44mag for big bear areas!
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: JJB11B on May 21, 2015, 08:34:34 PM
I have to laugh at a friend of mine. He told me as I was heading out after a bear one day, "A 7mm short mag will not kill a bear" I just scratched my head and left. sad thing is he tagged out on deer and bear and I ate tag soup. :'(
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: RadSav on May 21, 2015, 09:02:33 PM
I have to laugh at a friend of mine. He told me as I was heading out after a bear one day, "A 7mm short mag will not kill a bear" I just scratched my head and left. sad thing is he tagged out on deer and bear and I ate tag soup. :'(

No gun can kill a bear if you never see one to shoot at.  So I guess he was right! :chuckle: 

Reminds me of the months leading up to killing my first bear.  The local hunting store owner had my mother demanding I not hunt alone.  He had convinced her I could not kill a bear with a bow and I'd surely end up dead if I tried.  After killing my first bear, alone with a bow and no backup gun of any kind, he told her I was just lucky and found a small passive bear.  He said the same thing on bear #2, #3, and #4.  On bear #5 he told my mother that maybe I was just unique.  To which, as my mother recalls, she responded with, "Oh he's unique alright!"  To this day I'm not sure if she was standing up for me or telling him I'm not right in the head. :chuckle:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: salmonchaser on May 21, 2015, 10:01:05 PM
Some one asked if you'll get in trouble shooting a bear in self defense; quite simply if you can present an explanation that shows you were in fear of great bodily harm or death, your golden.  A dead bear 50 yards from your brass, that's going to take some explaining. Retired from the high risk social service, recidivist interdiction industry I'm
Working my third career as a guide in Alaska and there I always carry. Best day we counted 22 grizzlys. I've pepper sprayed two, never shot one. Spray works instantaneously.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: RadSav on May 21, 2015, 10:05:12 PM
If you truly needed to shoot a bear in self defense I'm not sure you are too concerned with how much trouble you will be in.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: GT on May 22, 2015, 08:22:46 AM
Boy Scout Motto: Be Prepared. 
My Motto: You never know what evil lurks around the bend.
My Opinion: Carrying a sidearm is necessary when hunting.
Conventional Wisdom: Better to be safe than sorry.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: DOUBLELUNG on May 22, 2015, 09:50:22 AM
It's not necessary, in the sense that not having it wouldn't stop me from going bowhunting (or hiking, or whatever).  I do strongly believe the trailhead is the most dangerous spot in the woods.  I've had a couple of sketchy situations in the woods where I was glad to be armed, but have never drawn a pistol on anyone.  My mantra with concealed carry is to never do anything that I would not do unarmed, I think most scenarios where people get hurt or killed who are packing, is because they did something they would not do otherwise. 

I have had one wildlife encounter where I was glad to be packing.  I was working, not hunting, and a rutted up 2-3 year old bull moose got way to interested in me, alternating between threatening and courting.  I was in a hardwood second growth stand, the biggest tree for 200 yards was probably 4" diameter - not too great for climbing, and impossible to run through.  I had my back to the thicket on a log landing in the cut, .357 cocked and in hand aiming at his forehead.  I was absolutely confident I could kill him, but feared the consequences on my wildlife career aspirations.  I was going to kill him at six feet if need be, I wanted powder on his face!  He stood at 10' for what felt like forever, grumbling, blowing snot and hooking his paddles toward me, then turned and ran off.   

I do carry UDAP 10% capsaicin bear spray in grizzly country.  If I could only carry one, I'd take the bear spray every time, just my personal opinion.  For 2 and 4 legged attackers.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: jeffro on May 22, 2015, 12:29:30 PM
Bear spray. Read quite a few articles about how effective bear mace is over firearms. Theres pros and cons to either side but when bear spray can blind you and nearly shut down your respitory system long enough to get away from the situation without the resulting consiquences of the law or me spending the next 5-10 years in prison. Ill take the lesser slightly more risky rought.
are you being serious, or an elitist bow hunter?

Repost for edit:

I want to apologize if I hurt an ones feelings
As this was meant as a joke.
I understand the situation with Mr. Smossy, and truly apologize to him if he was offended.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: h20hunter on May 22, 2015, 01:09:02 PM
Jeffro....good on you for your last post.

Granted......Mr. Smossy is a complete bow snob.....DON'T EVEN begin to ask him about cameras! He has been known to tote around quite a bit of hardware on places like party boats while sneaking a sip of some agave juice from the missus canteen.

 :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: swashington2128 on May 22, 2015, 05:16:16 PM
Some great posts, I for one never go without one. I am more worried about the 2 legged critters but the four legged ones scare me too. Had to pull my side arm with a bear while scouting for early season deer a few years back. Having a black bear running directly at you has a way of making the day interesting. Thank god he decided the confrontation wasn't in his best interest. So yes I think a side arm is essential gear if.....you practice with it and have the skills to discharge a shot with skill. I have shot thousands of rounds through my 1911's and a glock 21 over the last few years and am confident I can put a two in the boiler room and one in the pilot house under stress. If you can't draw, acquire a target, release a safety, and then shoot accurately don't carry in or out of the woods.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: sidehil on May 24, 2015, 07:34:05 AM
I carried before it was legal after a cat that was eating a dead calf hissed at me from 30 feet and I was going to use my bow as a baseball bat. I had just enough time to nock one and it split. I carry a S&W Governor with home loaded 45 lc for archery and 410 while modern for deer. Its a hoot to use on grouse, the little red dot gets them every time:) Seen six cats now but never enough time to get a shot until it was in my face. My bro missed one last year at 30 yards walking right at him growling, its hard to fling a arrow when your the prey!
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: trophyhunt on May 24, 2015, 07:58:14 AM
I carried before it was legal after a cat that was eating a dead calf hissed at me from 30 feet and I was going to use my bow as a baseball bat. I had just enough time to nock one and it split. I carry a S&W Governor with home loaded 45 lc for archery and 410 while modern for deer. Its a hoot to use on grouse, the little red dot gets them every time:) Seen six cats now but never enough time to get a shot until it was in my face. My bro missed one last year at 30 yards walking right at him growling, its hard to fling a arrow when your the prey!
yikes.  I have also always carried, this year during my spring bear hunt I had a female bear stand up and start woofing at me.  She was only about 60 or so yards away and didn't seem very happy that I had killed her mate.  Sure I had my .300 win mag, but if she did charge, finding her in my scope with about 3 to 4 seconds to spare wasn't going to be a choice.  If she did charge, I had already planned on dropping the rifle and pulling my .45.  I just feel better having it on my side when out and about.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: PA BEN on May 24, 2015, 08:21:11 AM
I never had a problem with bears or cougars, but with the wolves yes. I never go into the woods without one.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: Smossy on May 24, 2015, 11:29:40 PM
Jeffro....good on you for your last post.

Granted......Mr. Smossy is a complete bow snob.....DON'T EVEN begin to ask him about cameras! He has been known to tote around quite a bit of hardware on places like party boats while sneaking a sip of some agave juice from the missus canteen.

 :chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
Lmao. Its sad you know me so well.

Bear spray. Read quite a few articles about how effective bear mace is over firearms. Theres pros and cons to either side but when bear spray can blind you and nearly shut down your respitory system long enough to get away from the situation without the resulting consiquences of the law or me spending the next 5-10 years in prison. Ill take the lesser slightly more risky rought.
are you being serious, or an elitist bow hunter?

Repost for edit:

I want to apologize if I hurt an ones feelings
As this was meant as a joke.
I understand the situation with Mr. Smossy, and truly apologize to him if he was offended.

No offense taken at all. Trust me, If I could carry a sidearm it would probably never leave my side; bowhunting or not.
But as it stands now, Bear mace and a sharp knife are my best two friends. Plus my girl is with me when I'm hunting 98% of the time and she usually has a rifle, at the least a .Sig P220 with two mags. I'm not too concerned about her missing either.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: AudiDat on June 09, 2015, 01:41:07 PM
2013 My Brother in law had to put a few .45 into a cougar that was pissed to find out him & his partner were not a Cow & calf calling.
It snuck up RIGHT behind them, his partner heard something creeping, and assumed it was an elk. he slowly drew & turned only to find a big cat coiled up just a couple of yards behind them. He let his arrow fly, was "fairly certain he hit it", the cat screamed at them, and stood fast. He screamed for my BIL to "Shoot that SOB!!!!". My brother drew his Glock and put a few rounds into it before it spun and ran one direction while the 2 hunters ran the other. All of this happened in a couple seconds and neither hunter had been so scared. They went back early the next morning to find a huge blood trail, but no cat.  :dunno:


ETA: I've seen them at range, and I've seen tracks that were clearly following me before, but I've never seen one up close.   I always almost always carried before, and I damn sure do now.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: jasnt on June 09, 2015, 04:58:25 PM
 :tup:
Durning this hunt I was very glad to have it!

http://hunting-washington.com/smf/index.php/topic,136550.msg1820561.html#msg1820561
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: AKBowman on June 11, 2015, 11:32:42 PM
On my last archery dall sheep hunt up in AK if I remember correctly we saw 9 separate grizzly bears on a 10 day hunt. Around day 6 or 7 we were making another grueling hole up to a pass when I looked down and saw a mature boar coming up the shoot putting his nose in our tracks as he came up the draw, first left them right. Mind you this was at around 80 yards.

I clapped really loud twice and he stood up on his back legs. I yelled at him and he lowered his head like he was trying to flatten to the ground then he took off straight down the hill over almost a sheer cliff. He took off so fast you could hear the short alpine brush whip. Those tales you hear about bears not being able to run down hill...they aren't true this bear basically sprinted straight down a cliff I wouldn't even come up let alone try to go down!

We saw the same sow with 3 older Cubs a number of times on the trip and they made me nervous as hell. We weren't packing side arms on that trip because of the weight. unless I'm just scouting and with someone i always pack.
Title: Re: Is carrying a side arm necessary?
Post by: huntnphool on June 12, 2015, 12:29:00 AM
Many people bow hunted for many years without handguns.

 And many kids for many years used to have to stay out of the house during the day, without parent supervision, until the street lights came on.

 And many people for many years used to leave their cars unlocked at night.

 Etc.

 Etc.
 
 Etc. ;)
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal