Post by: STIKNSTRINGBOW on November 05, 2015, 11:11:34 AM
I have tried to explain this to others before, way my father who was a WWII veteran and Seattle Police Officer for 40 years explained it to me as a young kid.
2nd Amendment had nothing to do with "sporting weapons"
Post by: cbond3318 on November 05, 2015, 11:14:52 AM
Post by: Karl Blanchard on November 05, 2015, 11:34:07 AM
The link is to a video of a man painting a tree. :dunno:Ya but he did pretty good :chuckle:
Post by: JimmyHoffa on November 05, 2015, 11:38:38 AM
Post by: 2labs on November 05, 2015, 11:39:56 AM
The link is to a video of a man painting a tree. :dunno:Ya but he did pretty good :chuckle:
Without a shot fired.
Post by: STIKNSTRINGBOW on November 05, 2015, 11:55:16 AM
I fixed it..
Post by: pianoman9701 on November 05, 2015, 02:13:38 PM
Post by: KFhunter on November 05, 2015, 02:38:10 PM
If you read the Federalist papers (#27-30, I believe), Alexander Hamilton makes it very clear that man not only has a "God-given" right to protect himself and his family from harm, but that an armed populace will repel the growth of tyranny. The 2nd Amendment has never, ever been about our ability or right to hunt. When someone asks you why you need an AR to hunt, you can simply reply that our Founding Fathers were quite clear about the fact that we need guns to protect ourselves and our rights. We should be able to bear arms which will be a match for those our government use in case they decide that our other rights are no longer necessary.
I want an A-10
Post by: huntnphool on November 05, 2015, 02:41:56 PM
If you read the Federalist papers (#27-30, I believe), Alexander Hamilton makes it very clear that man not only has a "God-given" right to protect himself and his family from harm, but that an armed populace will repel the growth of tyranny. The 2nd Amendment has never, ever been about our ability or right to hunt. When someone asks you why you need an AR to hunt, you can simply reply that our Founding Fathers were quite clear about the fact that we need guns to protect ourselves and our rights. We should be able to bear arms which will be a match for those our government use in case they decide that our other rights are no longer necessary.
+1
Post by: pianoman9701 on November 05, 2015, 02:49:48 PM
If you read the Federalist papers (#27-30, I believe), Alexander Hamilton makes it very clear that man not only has a "God-given" right to protect himself and his family from harm, but that an armed populace will repel the growth of tyranny. The 2nd Amendment has never, ever been about our ability or right to hunt. When someone asks you why you need an AR to hunt, you can simply reply that our Founding Fathers were quite clear about the fact that we need guns to protect ourselves and our rights. We should be able to bear arms which will be a match for those our government use in case they decide that our other rights are no longer necessary.
I want an A-10
That would be awesome!
Post by: Piscatory_5 on November 08, 2015, 07:41:11 PM
+1 . The sound of that 30mm cannon is pretty bad ass.If you read the Federalist papers (#27-30, I believe), Alexander Hamilton makes it very clear that man not only has a "God-given" right to protect himself and his family from harm, but that an armed populace will repel the growth of tyranny. The 2nd Amendment has never, ever been about our ability or right to hunt. When someone asks you why you need an AR to hunt, you can simply reply that our Founding Fathers were quite clear about the fact that we need guns to protect ourselves and our rights. We should be able to bear arms which will be a match for those our government use in case they decide that our other rights are no longer necessary.
I want an A-10