Hunting Washington Forum

Equipment & Gear => Archery Gear => Topic started by: PacificNWhunter on January 29, 2009, 08:19:13 AM


Advertise Here
Title: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: PacificNWhunter on January 29, 2009, 08:19:13 AM
Ok I know I am going to be opening a can of worms here. I'm wanting to get into bow hunting (yes I'm aware of the proposed regulation changes) and can't decide between getting a traditional bow or a compound. I've hunted for over 10 years and have had pretty good success. I'm confident in my skills to get close and take high percentage shots too. Even though I have been a rifle hunter I have never shot at a deer more then a 100 yards out. Usually I close the distance, or postions myself that allows me to be presented with a close shot.  Granted I have been hunting in the brush on the west side. Having never really spent a significant amount of time around bow hunters or time shooting a bow, I'm wondering what is going to be easiest to pick up. The few bowhunters I do know, they say to start with a compound, and eventually move to a trad. Personally I don't have a preference, I have never really had the opportunity to shoot a trad. I know peoples opinions are going to be 6 one way half dozen the other, but I just want opinions on what is going is to be the best jump off point. Compound or Traditional?
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: luvtohnt on January 29, 2009, 08:26:52 AM
They are both fun. I think that compounds have a little father effective range so this would mean a slight advantage to being successful. Although traditional gear is quite a bit cheaper to get started in, because you don't need all the fancy sights and such.  :twocents: I personally started with compound, never even started with rifle just went right to archery, and I love it. I have yet to kill anything but when I do I will be switching to traditional gear. I have even thought about learning to make my own arrows.

Brandon
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Intruder on January 29, 2009, 08:34:38 AM
I deliberated a ton on the same question.  For me it came down to time.  You can become an effective shooter much sooner with a compound.  Traditional shooting, from what I understand, really requires much more religious conviction to shooting often.  That doesn't mean you won't have to practice with a compound.... just that overall learning curve will be much shorter. 
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: PacificNWhunter on January 29, 2009, 08:41:25 AM
Setting aside the time to practice is not a big deal for me. I have a fair amount of free time.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: tonymoe on January 29, 2009, 08:49:43 AM
I would start with a compound bow and pick up a recurve later, you can always shoot the traditional bow in the mean time. the thing is, if you end up not having time to shoot, the compound is like riding a bike, traditional is opposite. If you really wanna shoot traditional style, than try a bare bones compound then go to full traditional set up. just another Idea. But at the end of the day the form of pulling back a bow and shooting it well is the main focus, so I tend to lean in the direction of full compound set-up :twocents:
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: DOUBLELUNG on January 29, 2009, 08:51:42 AM
I deliberated a ton on the same question.  For me it came down to time.  You can become an effective shooter much sooner with a compound.  Traditional shooting, from what I understand, really requires much more religious conviction to shooting often.  That doesn't mean you won't have to practice with a compound.... just that overall learning curve will be much shorter. 
Very accurate.  However, if you like to stalk in close in the thick stuff, trad is very attractive, and the ease and quickness of getting an instinctive shot off, may more than compensate for the added range with a compound.  If you have the opportunity and discipline to shoot every day, I would go trad.  I currently hunt with a compound because I can't seem to make the time to shoot every day.  However, I plan to switch when life gets a little simpler.  

Trad is like throwing a ball - no need for sights, you learn instinctively to put the arrow where you want it.  If you can take a shot or two every day, at different ranges (a tossed tennis ball is great), and that sounds better than getting a range with a range finder, clipping on a release, coming to full draw, aligning your eye with the peep sight with the sighting pins (and perhaps leveling the bubble level on your sight), determining the correct pin for the range, and clicking a trigger - trad might be the way to go for you.  An added bonus is the weight saving with trad.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: bowhuntin on January 29, 2009, 08:52:27 AM
Compound will be more accurate and you can also draw and hold it longer. With traditional you will not be able to shoot as far, nor will it be as accurate as a compound when comparing groups. Traditional bows are really light compared to compounds. If you decide to go the traditional route you will want to decide on arrow choice. Wood v carbon or aluminum.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: runamuk on January 29, 2009, 05:07:27 PM
I'll toss in my  :twocents:

I really want to shoot traditional, its what I shot back in high school.  My issue is I am an out of shape middle aged woman  :chuckle:
so with my limited money to spend I am opting for a compound that will allow me to start shooting at a low poundage and work up to legal hunting poundage. 
You probably have plenty of muscle for either type so less of an issue  ;).  I am going to have my bow set up bare bones and shoot instinctive then buy a traditional once I am in shape and shooting with decent accuracy.  I also don't intend to hunt until I feel confident in my abilities, I want to shoot a bow to shoot a bow its not so much about hunting for me ;)
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Hoytstaffshooter83 on January 30, 2009, 11:46:18 AM
It really varries on what you are looking for, traditional will require tons of practice, IMO so does a compund though.. but your range will be limited to around 30yrds.... with a compound and correct shooting 60 is doable no problem in the hands of the right archer.....both have positives and negatives.... with a compound you have more accuracy, more kinetic energy, let off.. and its takes mere seconds to anchor and get a shot off on game, it will be not much faster with traditional gear.... also you have no let off as stated above so you cant hold anywhere near as long.. it really comes down to what you want... higher chance of success? compound, more purity and sense of the hunt in terms of what you HAVE to do to get within range go traditional..... either way you cant go wrong and Id bet you wont pick up a hunting rifle anytime soon after being in the woods with a stick..
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: bow4elk on January 30, 2009, 11:57:25 AM
I love both sides of the coin and hunt with my compound primarily.  But, for pure enjoyement of shooting arrows, nothing beats time with my homemade takedown recurve.  Hands down more fun and relaxing - for me.  Everyone is differnet but there is no rules so feel free to follow your interests and do both.  Taking that first fork-horn blacktail buck with my homemade bow has not been topped yet in terms of personal satisfaction on a hunt.  But you certainly don't need to make your own bow to enjoy traditional archery.  I'd recommend buying a decent used recurve or longbow off eBay and experiment with shooting styles.  I can help you with some recommendations on bow type, draw weight, bow length, etc. if you want.  Just PM me.

In any case, get some good coaching to develop good shooting form and establish good habits.  Target panic can really hose you up and in my experience doing lots of coaching, I see bad traditional habits creep over time to render the shooter extremely frustrated with ANY bow.  PM me for coaching help, if needed.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Ray on January 30, 2009, 12:01:16 PM
There are couple of observations I have made. These are not rules they are opinions.

The compound bow seems to better suit blind and treestand hunting because sometimes you draw on a critter when it is behind an object and wait for it to cooperate. It will inevitably be harder to try and keep the string back on a stick bow for say 10 seconds waiting for an animal to cooperate. The compounds I usually see seem to be cumbersome and bulky for backpacking in style hunts. Of course it would not be impossible but imagine if you hiked in to the wilderness 6 miles with all your overnight gear and then fell down on a slippery brush filled slope and tweaked your compound bow out of tune? That is not likely to happen with a stick bow. There is no tuning there is just a string. Simplicity is value in these situations. A take down stick bow will fit right in most packs.

As stated above the effective ranges will differ. That could be a deciding factor. Also instinctive and quick reactionary shooting is not well suited for compound bows as much as it will be for a stick bow. I disagree with the tought that getting an accurate shot off will not be much faster with a stick bow. This really depends on the person. The long term costs of a stick bow setup will be cheaper.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Hoytstaffshooter83 on January 30, 2009, 01:36:52 PM
It takes a stick bow guy 2-4 seconds to pull back aim and shoot... a compound can be done in the 4-8 second range, and it always has been my feeling if you need to get a shot off that fast(2-5 with a compound) then its not a shot you should be taking in the first place, a calm animal gives you plenty of time regardless of weapon, also compounds IMO are not bulky or heavy, my bow with everyting weighs just over 5 lbs, also on long pack ins like my backcountry elk hunts in Idaho and Wa it fits on my pack and I never know it there, I have never hunted let alone really shot a recurve/longbow but I can assume taking game with one would feel just a little bit more rewarding
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: sisu on January 30, 2009, 03:01:52 PM
It takes a stick bow guy 2-4 seconds to pull back aim and shoot... a compound can be done in the 4-8 second range, and it always has been my feeling if you need to get a shot off that fast(2-5 with a compound) then its not a shot you should be taking in the first place,
Wow this an arrogant statement if I every heard one. I have a recurve bow, so you telling that if I release my arrow faster than you  shouldn't be taking the shot. That is the biggest pile of bovine scat I've ever heard. :chuckle:

Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Pathfinder101 on January 30, 2009, 03:11:44 PM
 :twocents:
Ill throw mine in too.  I hunt with a compound because it has a longer range, and it takes less practice to be accurate.  I shoot some traditional, but only for fun.  My boy and I are making him a traditional bow right now, and that is a lot of fun too.  If you shoot trad, you should be prepared to shoot a couple of arrows just about every day.  That "instinctive" shooting stuff is cool.  You don't know your mind/muscles/brain can work together like that until you start to do it...
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: boneaddict on January 30, 2009, 03:16:56 PM
Well Pacific.  I'll try to type my version.   It depends on what satisfies you.  Haveing killed a zillion animals withl rifle compound and Trad.  I can testify which is most satisfying.  The Trad bow kills. What drives you.  The kill or the hunt.  Speaking of advantages, you can just about have a guided missle with a compound bow.  I can shoot ONCE per year and put it away, walk out and put 5 arrows in a two inch group out to 50 yards with the compound.  Hit a pie pkate at 75 and so on.  A trad bow is going to take alot more work to be consistent to 30, and hen even 40 yards.  If technology floats your boat you see where I am headed with this.  I don't intend to insult apile of bowman on here, but theres a huge difference in skill, practice, and hunting abilities.  You don't get to stand there at full draw with 50% let off at 80 yards.  You have to sneak,draw and release at 40, 30, or 20.   or you can hunt with a rifle or muzzeloader.   A longbow is lighter than the compound, and is more quiet.  Thats about its only technical advantage.  Then again I hunt for alot of other reas0ons than to just shoot something.  Trad bow is about the most challenging hunt there is unless you go to spear.  Hell I forgot, they tend to be cheaper. :chuckle:  and I think they are prettier.  
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: dbllunger on January 30, 2009, 03:23:32 PM
I shoot a compound, and have to totally agree that it is much easier then a traditional.  Both are harder to shoot and kill with then a rifle. 
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: sisu on January 30, 2009, 03:56:42 PM
:twocents:
Ill throw mine in too.  I hunt with a compound because it has a longer range, and it takes less practice to be accurate.  I shoot some traditional, but only for fun.  My boy and I are making him a traditional bow right now, and that is a lot of fun too.  If you shoot trad, you should be prepared to shoot a couple of arrows just about every day.  That "instinctive" shooting stuff is cool.  You don't know your mind/muscles/brain can work together like that until you start to do it...

Personally I think the instinctive shooting with the bow has helped my shotgunning ability, but then i might be getting better with age like an old Gruyere...
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: runamuk on January 30, 2009, 04:03:17 PM
 and I think they are prettier.  

Thats why I was so against a compound at first  :chuckle: they just aren't pretty enough ;) but now I have a goal, and when I do get a Trad bow I will get a really pretty custom one ;)
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Ray on January 30, 2009, 05:14:34 PM
boneaddict,

I would agree with your assessments and direction. The compound bow is simply not a primitive weapon. Take a look at one next to a modern rifle and you can clearly see that a compound bow is more advanced with technological applications. I still recognize it as a stick slinger. Ultimately my desire to hunt with a bow is to challenge myself away from major advancements in technology first. The annual kill is not essential but definitely a goal. I am not a purist per say but that's the weapon which provides me with entertainment even if I am a failure. I can still feel as if I am having fun.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: bow4elk on January 30, 2009, 05:21:29 PM
I know many guys who, once they've tagged a few animals with the compound, quickly convert over to traditional archery and many get way deep into selfbows.  I'm in both camps but if I had to choose today the one bow I'd use the rest of my life, it would be a yew selfbow of my own handiwork.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Hoytstaffshooter83 on January 30, 2009, 06:39:14 PM
It takes a stick bow guy 2-4 seconds to pull back aim and shoot... a compound can be done in the 4-8 second range, and it always has been my feeling if you need to get a shot off that fast(2-5 with a compound) then its not a shot you should be taking in the first place,
Wow this an arrogant statement if I every heard one. I have a recurve bow, so you telling that if I release my arrow faster than you  shouldn't be taking the shot. That is the biggest pile of bovine scat I've ever heard. :chuckle:


Not at all, guys that shoot compounds state the quicker shot as a advantage, I believe that if the shot requires one to shoot as fast as you can with a tradtional bow then thats a shot that should not be taken period..... being able to shoot in 2 sec and NEEDING to shoot in 2 sec are entirely different.......
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Pathfinder101 on January 30, 2009, 10:31:33 PM
By he way, if no one has said it yet, my hat is off to anyone who hunts big game with a traditional bow.  And if you make your own, then my whole head is off to you.  I'll get there one day...
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: PacificNWhunter on February 03, 2009, 07:04:03 AM
Thanks for all the advice and offers to help. I am really interested in a traditional bow because to me it seem's like one of the purest forms of hunting. I'm still in a toss up right now, which I guess is ok. I did not get released from my Dr like I was supposed to yesterday and it looks like I'm going to be on "light" duty for another month with my wrist. Thanks again and I will keep you guys posted as time goes on.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: STIKNSTRINGBOW on February 03, 2009, 12:20:40 PM
I am a trad nut that started bowhunting with a compound, I actualy started hunting modern rifle, then went to handgun then muzzle, then archery. Now it is trad-only....you see where I am going. Anyhow the reason I am posting is I will be spending some time in the CF this year. If you would like to get together to sling some arrows I could bring a couple bows and you could check them out and see how they feel. I do have a compound I no longer use that you could check out also but I dont have a release anymore, If you could borrow one from somebody I could bring it also, but once you try Trad you get a whole different feel for the whole thing. Shoot me a PM and we can figure out a time and place.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: boneaddict on February 03, 2009, 12:28:46 PM
NICE OFFER!
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: boneaddict on February 03, 2009, 12:32:13 PM
by the way...looking foward of plastering lots of pics on here of my new baby when I get it.  The wood is in the hands of teh master as we speak.....
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: PacificNWhunter on February 03, 2009, 12:51:32 PM
I'll shoot you a PM as soon I as I am allowed to put pressure on my wrist again. Thought I was going to be back to normal starting this month, but the Dr saw something she did not like on the x-ray and wanted to wait one more month. THANKS for the offer, you rock.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: boneaddict on February 03, 2009, 12:54:06 PM
nothing like a bunch of one armed bowman out there. 8)
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: PacificNWhunter on February 03, 2009, 01:27:10 PM
 :IBCOOL:

We should start a club..
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: STIKNSTRINGBOW on February 03, 2009, 03:39:13 PM
I will probably be poking around the E-line sometime within the next couple weeks, I'll let you know. I have an old 76er in 25# if you want to start light, and the next lightest one I have is a 30# Tamejun but the riser on that is pretty heavy, Most of my bows are 40-45# but I use 55-70# for elk.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: highclimber on February 07, 2009, 04:43:49 PM
I would get both hunt trad early and compound late hunt.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: STIKNSTRINGBOW on February 07, 2009, 07:39:01 PM
interesting idea, but once you go trad it gets addicting  :archer:
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: jdb on February 08, 2009, 03:25:54 PM
why is it that most of the traditional guys shoot long bows and noone shoots a recuve? I relize that the long bow is more traditional but it seems like noone uses a recurve?
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: STIKNSTRINGBOW on February 08, 2009, 04:02:52 PM
I am not sure who you are seeing, At Traditional Bowhunters of Washington 3-D shoots its at least 8 recurves for every longbow. All the guys in my hunting circle (18 guys) use recurves. I own 26 recurves myself, nothing against longbows there is just more of them.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: jdb on February 08, 2009, 05:28:02 PM
by most I ment most on hear. soory after rereading my post it waswnt very clear.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: STIKNSTRINGBOW on February 08, 2009, 06:17:45 PM
No big deal, I dont know much about longbows, but I have shot them. More hand shock, but a quieter bow.3 Rivers sell a nice one (Tomahawk) but way too pricy for me.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Ray on February 08, 2009, 08:02:00 PM
It's just bows to me  :dunno: Shoot whatever you like.

I don't feel that recurve has less hand shock than a longbow.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: STIKNSTRINGBOW on February 08, 2009, 08:33:38 PM
It could have been the one I was shooting, Howard Hill 80#, as I said I am not too familiar with them just because I dont run across them as much. My 64# 1952 Grizzly Static tip has more hand shock than my 65# 1960 Grizzly recurve, every bow is different.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Hornseeker on February 09, 2009, 03:20:38 PM
StickandStringer... yeah... the HH style "True" LB's can be pretty shocky  :yike:compared to most recurves... nowadays... bowyers are learning how to make even true LB's less shocky, but there is a new breed of LB's out... the "hybrids" or "deflex-reflex" LB's like I build. Ray just got one, Doug has one and another on the way...  :)  These bows, when strung, are "nearly" D shaped and are definitely LB's, but they are the Least shockey bows I"ve ever shot and they shoot arrows as fast as any recurve... like you say though... very few will be under $500 and you can easily pay $1000 for one...

I like trad because shooting the bows is "fun" for me and the hunt is DEFINITELY NOT all about the kill... not that it is for all compounders either...I dont have a dad-gummed thing against compounds and have considered buying a new one to lay the smacker down on some meat-does this fall... just for something different... But man.. I LOVE to shoot my longbows or my recurves! My compound wasn't as fun and it didn't take long to master. Sure, I could have got better with it, but for what I was doing, I didn't feel like I needed to. 6 arrows in a paper plate at 50-60 yards was all i needed, especially when I was trying to hold shots to under 50...

the cool thing is...as fun as stickbow shooting is... if you take up the challenge...and have the time... you can put 6 arrows in a paper plate at 50 yards... OR even MORE! There are many stickbow shooters than can put 6 arrows in a row in a paper plate at 60 yards... its really an inspiration to see these guys shoot! I am good to about 40...but plan to get better this spring/summer!

Good Luck... either choice you will be happy! Bowhunting is Awesome!

Ernie
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: STIKNSTRINGBOW on February 09, 2009, 05:19:53 PM
I agree, I hunt Trad because I just like taking a walk in the woods to explore and got tired of carrying a "Cadillac Bumper" around. I hunt to kill, but that is secondary to just enjoying a day in the woods and talking to my own true God. I appreciate the look and feel of real wood and due to my style of hunting I usually get within 30 yards of my quarry. I hold Glenn St.Charles as a personal hero and have hunted with his son Joe. I wish I could have met Fred Bear and consider myself lucky to own several older Bear bows that I fling arrows around my back yard with. I have nothing against compounds and sometimes miss their range/accuracy but get more of a sense of satisfaction from hitting my target naturally than I did looking through a sight and pulling the trigger on my release.  :archer:
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Ray on February 09, 2009, 08:53:59 PM
Quote
they shoot arrows as fast as any recurve..

Very fast indeed. I was out shooting this weekend and the fellows who were with me were surprised. One of them noted twice how the bow was a flat shooter and the arrows were quick. Not really any noticeable trajectories out to 25 yards. I could be wrong on the range but that was what a lot of the targets were within. Just a few long shots..
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Bookworm on February 09, 2009, 09:49:57 PM
Hey Ray or Bone. I'm thinking about getting a stick bow  to get back to having fun when I'm bow shooting. Anymore it seems to be too much of a competition when my buddies and I are out shooting.  How long is Ernie's turnaround for one of his bows? I really like what I see on his website and am curious about how far out he is.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Hornseeker on February 10, 2009, 10:38:12 AM
BW,
I can answer that... :chuckle:

Right now, I am starting to catch up pretty good. Ive got 6 bows to build, which I'll finish by the end of March. That will get me started on anything new in April.. .lets be conservative..and say I can have a bow ordered now out the door in Mid Mayish... end of May at the latest...

Thanks for your interest,

Ernie
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Bookworm on February 10, 2009, 07:01:00 PM
Thanks for the info Ernie. I'm not ready yet but you do make some beautiful bows.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Jake T on February 14, 2009, 08:15:07 AM
i always look at it like this.  rifle has sights and a trigger.  so does a compound bow.  rifle was invented to increase the distance from the target and still be lethal.  so was the compound bow.  if you're going to shoot a compound bow...you might as well shoot a rifle.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: bearbait on February 14, 2009, 08:58:19 AM
I realize I am in a minority, but I shoot a compound INSTINCTIVLY, just like I shoot my recurves.  I even cant the bow.....  The best of both worlds!
My  :twocents:
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: bowhuntin on February 14, 2009, 09:16:02 AM
i always look at it like this.  rifle has sights and a trigger.  so does a compound bow.  rifle was invented to increase the distance from the target and still be lethal.  so was the compound bow.  if you're going to shoot a compound bow...you might as well shoot a rifle.

I couldn't disagree more. A rifle can shoot hundreds of yards, where as the compound can only shoot tens of yards. Then you have to compare the velocities of what is being shot and there is no comparison.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: boneaddict on February 14, 2009, 09:18:50 AM
Interesting point Jake

I think its just one notch higher up on the challenge belt.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: STIKNSTRINGBOW on February 14, 2009, 09:54:32 AM
I realize I am in a minority, but I shoot a compound INSTINCTIVLY, just like I shoot my recurves.  I even cant the bow.....  The best of both worlds!
My  :twocents:
                                          That is how I shot my first bow, a Glenn St.Charles Buckskin. It was a round wheel with a wooden riser. No sights with a plastic flipper style rest, and fingers. Then I went down to NW Archery and had them set me up with a Marten Lynx with Speedflight limbs and TM Hunter rest and Fineline sight and a Tru-flight release......wow what a difference at the range!!!! I was hitting the 3 1/2 inch circle out to 80 and 2 out of 5 in the black out to 100!!! I still only shot out to 40 in hunting situations (except for once from the road, but that is a different story) and eventually got tired of carrying around that heavy chunk of metal and expereiencing "equipment malfunctions" and went to using a recurve I bought at a garage sale. The whole experience changed for me and I get a lot more enjoyment out of Archery now, I am a Traditional Archer and I feel sorry for anyone who has not experienced the thrill of harvesting a big game animal with traditional equipment, it will change your whole outlook.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Hornseeker on February 19, 2009, 02:39:08 PM
You guys that shoot trad ought to consider shooting the "300 round" which is 12 ends of 5 arrows on a blue, 40 cm target at 20 yards. There are 5 scoring zones, 5/4/3/2/1 well...and zero of course... Total points possible is 300.. it is a good way to track your skeelz... can be very frustrating too!  :bash: Starting in December I shoot it about 1-2 times a week until spring hits and I can get outside and shoot 3d's or whatever.... 8)
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: @RCHER on February 19, 2009, 03:32:04 PM
I know where you're coming from Pacific. But yeah, that's a loaded question. Always will be. Not much to debate in my opinion. It's a bit like asking how to fly an airplane.

Just wheel down to a bow shop and try them out. Most folks can't golf worth a crap their first few times out either. But you can golf with an old alder stick or buy some fancy aluminium clubs at Kmart. Then tell us what fits you best. :chuckle:

But I do agree that although trad is a ton of fun, you may become more confident and productive, quicker with a compound setup. Start easy though. Probably don't need to jump in with the $1200, 70lb, pro target bow. Although sexy, they are also, like my wife, high...(had to look over my should quick) maintenance.

Congrats for diving into the archery pool. Let us know what you decide, for sure.   :brew:

Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: NWWABOWHNTR on February 19, 2009, 08:16:59 PM
I started 30+ years ago with a recurve,  then a Bear Whitetail compound,  no release and totally instinctive.  Over the past many years since I have the fastest IBo speed bows,  best sights,  several releases..... and I have taken 40+ deer and several elk (eastern boy transplanted here and loving it 20 years ago)  Now I am looking at going in reverse,  maybe a longbow or maybe a recurve.  One of the guys I hunt with is strictly traditional.... "he says he doesn't need training wheels"  :-)  Well after shooting friends bows,  I am hooked.  Not ready to completely give up my Bowtechs,  but I can see  me switching over maybe just for the fun of shooting traditional at 3D tourneys and just for fun.  I figure when I do it will only be time before I'll have a few pretty new Bowtechs for sale.  :-)
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: PacificNWhunter on February 20, 2009, 07:20:54 AM

But I do agree that although trad is a ton of fun, you may become more confident and productive, quicker with a compound setup. Start easy though. Probably don't need to jump in with the $1200, 70lb, pro target bow. Although sexy, they are also, like my wife, high...(had to look over my should quick) maintenance.

Ha ha...That cracks me up.

I think I am going to get a used compound and get a year under of bow hunting under my belt and then possibly trade in for a trad. I'll keep you all posted.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: @RCHER on February 20, 2009, 02:57:45 PM
Right on! You'll fall in love with it. I mentioned golf before. It's a lot like golf. The more you practice, the better you get, the more you like it, the more you practice...repeat...

No need to put down the wheel bow either. Just collect all kinds and enjoy them all.

I'm 40 now and my story reads a bit like NWWABOWHNTR's. I go through phases. Some of them seasonal. I'm a bit tech geeky and a nostalgic sort - if that says anything. So, I love the feeling of stalking through the wet timber with my BowTech (I call "The Sickness") just as much as point shooting fish, or birds with a stick bow. It's all about that magical flight of the arrow. :chuckle:

If it helps, give us a time frame and budget and maybe we can toss a few recommendations out there. Some of the old Martins, Brownings, Hoyts (others no doubt) are really nice, inexpensive and fast bows. Put some new goodies on em and you're off and runnin.

BTW, I've always wanted one of these, with the antler limb bolts:  http://www.schafersilvertipbows.com/ (http://www.schafersilvertipbows.com/)
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: PacificNWhunter on February 23, 2009, 08:05:35 AM
Those are some sweet looking bows @rcher, I really like the look of trads.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: @RCHER on February 23, 2009, 11:04:52 AM
No doubt, and we should all be so blessed to have such kind words written about us when we pass on. Paul Shafer musta been a helluva guy.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Hornseeker on February 27, 2009, 11:20:53 AM
Dave does make some great bows! And yeah, from all I've heard, Paul was one helluva guy! I have a couple friends that were friends with Paul and they have never had a bad thing to say about him...

Trad/Tech... I am totally Trad/Tech. I use carbon in my bows and shoot carbon arrows out of them... I am also working on an aluminum riser for my longbow right now!  :P Some info here.. more to come though!
www.sapphirearchery.com

By the way...there is a cool company called Trad Tech...I think its tradtech.com or something like that. They build some sweet, "techy" trad bow. Aluminum risers with interchageable ILF limbs... check it out.

E
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: RyanD on March 24, 2009, 06:59:22 PM
I enjoy archery no matter what type-I have enjoyed good success with my compound-I am slowly starting to hunt with traditional gear.  I have yet to get a traditional harvest but I am having a blast trying.  I can honestly say that I have had more fun shooting my recurve.  Here is my latest recurve.  Blacktail from Norm Johnson-he is a true craftsman and it shoots as good as it looks.  Would like to try one of Ernies bows someday too.. 
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: STIKNSTRINGBOW on March 25, 2009, 08:57:53 AM
WOW ! That is a sweet looking bow!! , I like my old bear bows but the new customs sure are works of art!!
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Hornseeker on March 26, 2009, 07:42:00 AM
Norms bows are at the top of the heap in craftsmanship... there is NO debate about that. Brandon Stahl of Rose Oak Creations www.roseoakcreations.com is a contender for beautifully crafted bows too... your own Washingtonian, Bill Howland of Brackenbury Bows is right up there also!
Here's one of Brandons...
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.roseoakcreations.com%2Fimages%2Fcustex12.jpg&hash=1690e558b4d51cd8a6bc36712a96021e0cf44c5b)

Here's one of Bills
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.brackenburybows.com%2FNT%252062%2520ZebraCarbon_small.jpg&hash=af80542985e670f3dbfb6864a2385d5eb438cad1)

One of mine..
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fv351%2Fhornseeker%2FJustBowPics%2FKirkdoners6.jpg&hash=ea5012c1472c191dff81bfdec7c9ca39f8cdfdaa)

Ryan...good ta seeya around man... I am getting ready to get that old camera out again... Would it be easy to switch the cam out in there with a digital????
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: RyanD on March 26, 2009, 02:23:20 PM
Beautiful bows Hornseeker!  Although I am not a fan of Osage but that doesn't take away from the craftsmanship.... I agree with all of the local bowyers being great I don't think you can go wrong with any of them.  Hopefully I will get to shoot one of yours sometime soon.  Sent ya a PM on the camera.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: bow-n-head on March 26, 2009, 04:48:21 PM
I started with a "compound barebow" tried a recurve, lucky enough to kill a deer with it, but I really sucked at it so now I shoot a compound in the unlimited catagory. What traditionalists around here call a "bow gun". What bothers me most of all is the division between traditionalists and compound shooters. Throw stones in glass houses and everyone pays the price.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: PacificNWhunter on March 27, 2009, 07:17:19 AM
Sweet looking trads
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: xXx Archery on March 28, 2009, 08:57:06 PM
i always look at it like this.  rifle has sights and a trigger.  so does a compound bow.  rifle was invented to increase the distance from the target and still be lethal.  so was the compound bow.  if you're going to shoot a compound bow...you might as well shoot a rifle.

I hope you walk to work...and not drive ..but I see you are using a computer...and not mail?...it is people like you that well help US all loss are right to hunt...it should not be Trad VS Comp..but Trad OR Comp...we need to ALL support each other..
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: STIKNSTRINGBOW on March 29, 2009, 12:40:00 AM
 :yeah: It does not matter what weapon you use as long as you use it in an honorable manner, Use what works for you according to your ability to ensure a clean, ethical kill. We all as sportsmen (and women) need to get along and worry about our image as a whole, not as A HOLES! 
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: xXx Archery on March 29, 2009, 05:37:06 PM
the point is we are all hunters. :) we need to stop picking sides. :dunno:..trad, comp,trophy,meat gun...so on and so on..if not we will be like the hound hunters and baiting for bears..... :'(
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: billythekidrock on March 29, 2009, 05:48:34 PM
the point is we are all hunters. :) we need to stop picking sides. :dunno:..trad, comp,trophy,meat gun...so on and so on..if not we will be like the hound hunters and baiting for bears..... :'(

 :yeah:
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: STIKNSTRINGBOW on March 31, 2009, 05:35:58 PM
I didn't find one piece of JakeT's comment "A HOLE". I took it at face value and understood it as his way to approach hunting weaponry. Much like someone saying they would only hunt trophies instead of taking merely a legal buck.
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                      I did not mean anybody in this discussion, only lending support to the quoted statement. I know most involved on this forum are not the ones giving us the bad image. I hunt with Trad equipment because that is what I like, I judge no one by the weapon they use, just the attitude displayed by their personality and actions.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Jake T on March 31, 2009, 07:38:24 PM
dang i should have checked this thread earlier so i could have saved a whole bunch of ticked off people the hassle.

i was just trying to promote some friendly rivalry.  like awesome cougars vs lame ass huskies.  as long as you are out there in the woods with good intentions and love of the sport, i'll hunt beside you anytime. 

i guess i should have used one of those cute smiley faces to convey the tone of my post a little better.  live and learn.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: bow-n-head on March 31, 2009, 07:44:19 PM
you really struck a nerv. I have had many arguments on the subject.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Jake T on March 31, 2009, 08:21:46 PM
like i said, just some friendly rivalry.   :brew:

here's the kicker...in 2 weeks when spring bear opens up, i'll be using my rifle. 
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: xXx Archery on March 31, 2009, 09:51:29 PM
I still hunt deer with a gun and I own a Archery shop....we are all hunter :hello:
hope you have a good and safe hunt
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Machias on April 01, 2009, 07:26:33 AM
You know what is funny, I have shot a compound for 31 years, I have taken 5 bears, an elk, a couple of turkeys and probably 35 whitetail and mulies.  One mulie I shot was at 44 yards, every single other animal I have taken was in the 12 to 35 yard range, most were in the lower to mid 20s.  Too me, it's not about how far I can shoot, it's always been about how close can I get.  Nice thing with archery season the seasons used to be so long that if you couldn't close the distance there was no pressure to start flinging arrows, I could always come back and try again another day. 
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: boneaddict on April 01, 2009, 08:58:06 AM
Quote
No need to put down the wheel bow either
  or the rifle for that matter or the smokepole. 

Going to love hunting this year withthis multiseason tag.  I like to hunt PERIOD
I find th emore traditional it is the more challenging thus the more rewarding.  Gotta have some patience though, and also the Trophy instinct inside of you might need to be modified.  I was hunting Trad bow during modern rifle season and had to let a much bigger buck go becasue I couldn't close the gap.  Rifle would have been a cakewalk  You'd have seen my face on here with another 190 class buck, but instead you saw a nice 180 class deer.  I might have been able to do it with compound though I doubt I would have taken the shot either.    To me taking the buck I got with the Trad bow was just that much more sweet.  Same with hunting the Alta hunt with it. 

I still stand by, I can walk out with my compound any given day of the week even after having not shot it for a long time and shoot pretty dang good.  The same can't be said for traditional.  For me anyhow, it takes a lot more dedication.
As for picking recurve versus longbow, just as someone stated above.  Its what feels right to you.  You could argue that just like argueing what truck is better Ford or Chevy or Dodge etc.  Nice to still have personal choice in this country.
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: PacificNWhunter on April 01, 2009, 09:26:31 AM
Well put Bone.

The main reason behind starting this thread, was to get an idea of what I could be more successful at as a newby to the archery world. I am drawn to bow hunting for the challenge. Not that I am a super successful rifle hunter with big bucks on the wall, actually I have never shot anything worth mounting. Until now I have been a rifle hunter and until I get very proficient with a bow, I will probably stay one. I want to switch to bow hunting because it is in my opinion the purest form of hunting. And honestly my opinion has not always been that way. Until a year ago I had no desire to hunt with a bow. I'm going to start out with a compound and hope to move onto a trad in the coming years. Is one better then the other? Who knows.... I think that despite what you use the important thing is to be in the woods, and enjoy the pursuit of the animal.

Thanks for all the input and discussions! I'm headed to the Dr this Friday to hopefully get my cast off so I can start shooting again.

Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Machias on April 01, 2009, 10:13:45 AM
Great attitude, good luck with the cast!
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: boneaddict on April 01, 2009, 10:17:53 AM
GOOD DEAL, good luck with the cast.  A compound will help with that as well.  Being able to adjust it from light to more poundage and teh letoff will help too.  I would probably recommend that path as thats what I did.  I had a compound and shot it for years before i took the final step to hunting with it.  Then went Trad. 
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: RyanD on April 01, 2009, 12:37:58 PM
I couldn't agree more with you guys.  I hunt with all three weapons (recurve, compund and rifle) and each has it's own time and place.  I just enjoy the hunt. :)
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: guardian on April 02, 2009, 07:38:40 PM
 :yeah:
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: Hornseeker on April 07, 2009, 10:19:52 AM
I'd hunt with hand grenades or patriot missiles if they had a fricken season!!!
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.super-smileys.com%2Fimages%2Fsmileys%2F1240.gif&hash=00b5a95b88bf301bd8d7b370e7799234f10763fd)

BUT...if I had to choose...It'd be with the LB... Luckily..I dont HAVE to feed myself by hunting...cause I'd starve if I had to do it with the LB... Then again... maybe the seriousness of the situation would make me a better killer???
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.super-smileys.com%2Fimages%2Fsmileys%2F787.gif&hash=8163cbccbedf194ed1cd6f6b2bf70745d05b3394)
Title: Re: Traditional vs Compound
Post by: boneaddict on April 12, 2009, 01:17:23 PM
Leopold writes:   "I have th eimpression that the American Sportsman is puzzled; he doesn't understand what is happening to him. Bigger and better gadgets are good for industry, so why not for outdoor recreation?  It has not dawned on him that outdoor recreations are essentially primitive, atavistic; that their value is a contrast-value; that excessive mechanization destroys contrasts by moving the factory to the woods or to the marsh."
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal