Post by: Bob33 on September 06, 2016, 12:41:07 PM
Kenny Steck, his wife Hannah and six family members were hiking in Southeastern Alaska May 13 when he encountered the predator while filling up water bottles. Steck, an experienced outdoorsman, had left his bear repellent back at camp. The massive animal then came charging at him.
‘It was a feeling of complete hopelessness and helplessness, really. I felt like I couldn't do anything to make it stop or make the outcome change,’ he told ABC News today.”
Kenny Steck’s story is unfortunately all too common in Alaska, and many of these stories don’t end in a survivor’s tale.
Ecosystems demand balance and the more man tries to manage that balance, the more man needs to control that balance. In other words, when man intervenes to protect certain species and habitat, it requires more active management of other species. In Alaska, predator control programs are designed to reduce predation by apex predators such as wolves and bears. State law requires wildlife management agencies in Alaska to maintain populations of moose, caribou, and deer that are a needed food source for Alaskans.
This is nothing new. Wildlife management principles are at work right now in every state in our country. Deer populations have to be managed to reduce Lyme disease, vehicle collisions, and damage to agriculture. Few realize the contributions that hunters make by gladly paying license and permit fees to serve as population control agents under state management and regulation.
And the beneficial effects of wildlife management are not limited to rural areas. Excess deer populations in suburban areas put too much pressure on natural sources of food, leading to starvation in the herd. Excessive populations of geese can menace children in parks and create unsanitary conditions with their droppings -- nearly a pound per bird per day. That’s why suburban Maryland park authorities recently euthanized more than 300 geese, and donated the meat to shelters for the homeless. The science behind wildlife management is at work in all of our communities.
But Alaska is unlike the rest of our country. Beyond its few cities, the land and conditions are severe, and mere survival requires effort and resources well beyond what most residents of the lower 48 could summon. For those who find themselves in circumstances beyond their survival skills, help is often hours away – if it can be summoned at all.
That’s why it’s shocking that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) has recently decided to approve new, unprecedented regulations that ban nearly all predator management on national wildlife refuges in Alaska. Going into effect on September 4, 2016, these new rules limit or prohibit hunting practices related to predators (wolves and bears), directly conflicting with Alaska state regulations that dictate these practices. The new FWS rules closely resemble regulations adopted last year by the National Park Service for hunting on National Preserves in Alaska.
This is the most recent example in a long-standing pattern of federal overreach. Out-of-touch federal bureaucrats have spent the years of the Obama Administration handing down mandates to dictate how Alaskans should manage Alaskan wildlife. The FWS is calling the new mandate a “natural diversity” principle of wildlife management, but make no mistake, the negative impact of this method is enormous. It allows no action by Alaskan officials to prevent a predator population from overwhelming a prey population living on Refuge land. By corollary, humans will also be at risk from excessive predator populations that overwhelm the carrying capacity of the land and seek out new territory in closer proximity to humans.
In announcing the new rules, FWS Director Dan Ashe proclaimed, “Over the past several years, the Alaska Board of Game has unleashed a withering attack on bears and wolves that is wholly at odds with America’s long tradition of ethical, sportsmanlike, fair-chase hunting, in something they call “intensive predator management.”
Ashe’s claim that Alaska is attacking bears and wolves is ridiculous, as the state seeks only to protect its people and its wildlife through balanced wildlife management. Ashe also directly targeted hunting advocacy groups like ours who have long supported sustainable, balanced wildlife management practices.
Alaskans require an intense management of predators to protect their people and other wildlife. But unfortunately far away bureaucrats have decided to supersede their discretion. And after September 4 the people of Alaska will be at greater hazard, much like Kenny Steck's family, by decisions made in Washington, DC.
https://www.safariclub.org/what-we-do/freedom-to-hunt/first-for-hunters-blog/first-for-hunters/2016/09/01/let-alaskans-manage-alaskan-wildlife
Post by: Special T on September 06, 2016, 01:23:43 PM
Post by: Cougartail on September 06, 2016, 01:34:44 PM
It's unfortunate that no state seems to have the balls to confront federal overreach. I guess they are all too addicted to the milk coming from the Federal teet
Remember, much of the money coming from the Federal teet was first collected from businesses and people of that state. They are in a hostage situation. Do as I say or you won't get your money back.
Post by: jackmaster on September 06, 2016, 01:50:55 PM
Post by: Special T on September 06, 2016, 03:32:55 PM
This really is the rub isn't it... if the tax $ was funneled through the state they would have the leverage.It's unfortunate that no state seems to have the balls to confront federal overreach. I guess they are all too addicted to the milk coming from the Federal teet
Remember, much of the money coming from the Federal teet was first collected from businesses and people of that state. They are in a hostage situation. Do as I say or you won't get your money back.
Post by: timberfaller on September 07, 2016, 09:09:39 PM
Post by: grade-creek-rd on September 08, 2016, 09:46:16 AM
Grade
Post by: bigtex on September 08, 2016, 07:22:33 PM
It's very hard to get a Federal prosecution, especially when the jury will be comprised of Alaska residents!Here's a little interesting thing about the federal court system. You are only eligible for a jury trial for felonies and Class A misdemeanors. Class B, C and federal infractions are ineligible for jury trials and are only tried as bench trials. Violating park service, national wildlife refuge, and national forest regs are Class B misdemeanors, thus no jury trials. Additionally, a public defender may (at the discretion of the judge) be appointed for those lesser offenses but only if the government is seeking jail time.
Grade
So for example if you go onto a refuge and violated a regulation (illegal gear or take) you are not entitled to a jury trial and the only way you could get a public defender is if the government wants to seek jail time, and if the judge wants to appoint one. In comparison, a public defender must be appointed for any federal Class A misdemeanor case if they are financially eligible for one.