Hunting Washington Forum

Equipment & Gear => Power Equipment & RV => Topic started by: jdb on April 10, 2017, 05:34:38 PM


Advertise Here
Title: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: jdb on April 10, 2017, 05:34:38 PM
How would a canyon stack up against a Tacoma?
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: gee_unit360 on April 10, 2017, 05:52:29 PM
Are you seriously asking that question...
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Timberstalker on April 10, 2017, 05:59:20 PM
In regards to what, specifically?
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Mfowl on April 10, 2017, 06:00:19 PM
I have a Tacoma and I had a canyon as a rental when I wrecked my Tacoma. This was a few years ago. I found the canyon to be small in the cab compared to my Tacoma. It was also less powerful, at least it seemed that way to me. It wasn't a bad truck by any means but I sure was happy to get my Tacoma back. I have not been in the newer canyons and t​hey have a different body style now, so perhaps they are roomier than the previous body style. If I were buying again, I would still choose the Tacoma.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Alchase on April 10, 2017, 06:18:48 PM
Of the 2017 mid-sized pickups, the Canyon rated the highest behind the Honda Ridgeline.
in order:

Ridgeline
Canyon
Colorado
Tacoma
Frontier

Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Duckslayer89 on April 10, 2017, 06:27:16 PM
Are you seriously asking that question...

 :yeah:
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: andrew_in_idaho on April 10, 2017, 06:32:38 PM
At least you can get a diesel in the canyon/Colorado


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: jjhunter on April 10, 2017, 06:40:43 PM
I just traded my '15 for a '17 on Saturday.  It's hard for me to get away from Toyota based on resale alone.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: ribka on April 10, 2017, 06:42:28 PM
Comparing a ridge line to a Tacoma ?😬



Of the 2017 mid-sized pickups, the Canyon rated the highest behind the Honda Ridgeline.
in order:

Ridgeline
Canyon
Colorado
Tacoma
Frontier
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: thinkingman on April 10, 2017, 07:19:06 PM
I would take a long bed Z71 Duramax over a Tacoma 10x out of 10.
The only advantage for the Toy is fanboy resale.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Duckslayer89 on April 10, 2017, 07:20:11 PM
I would take a long bed Z71 Duramax over a Tacoma 10x out of 10.
The only advantage for the Toy is fanboy resale.

Why not just get a full size if your buying a long bed midsize  :dunno:
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: bobcat on April 10, 2017, 07:30:48 PM
Hopefully the Canyons are good trucks as my dad just ordered one a couple weeks ago. So I'll let you know in a couple years. He didn't get the diesel though. That one would be pretty nice for someone who wants to tow a small trailer. Chevy has a nice new Colorado for 2017 they call the ZR2, it's their off road version with front and rear locking differentials and special high tech shocks. Pretty cool truck, better than anything Toyota has.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Alchase on April 10, 2017, 07:40:53 PM
Comparing a ridge line to a Tacoma ?😬



Of the 2017 mid-sized pickups, the Canyon rated the highest behind the Honda Ridgeline.
in order:

Ridgeline
Canyon
Colorado
Tacoma
Frontier

The only place the Tacoma beat the Ridgeline is towing. Tacoma has 6000 lb tow rating and the Ridgeline has 5000 lb tow rating.
Ridgeline has the second highest payload capacity, the Tacoma has the least of the five.
The Ridgeline also had the highest MPG of 23 28 mpg at 280 HP to the Tacoma's 18 mpg at 265 HP.
Ride, not even close. Ridgeline blew the doors of the Tacoma.
Ridgeline also smoked the Tacoma in the 0-60 by 1.3 seconds, Tacoma - 7.9 sec, Ridgeline - 6.6 sec.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Alchase on April 10, 2017, 07:54:56 PM
I corrected that to 23 estimated, but the Ridgeline as tested did better then estimated in the 75 mph highway-fuel-economy test, the Ridgeline overachieved its EPA number, with 28 mpg.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: 2labs on April 10, 2017, 08:03:13 PM
The ridge line isn't a pickup, it's a chickup :chuckle:
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Alchase on April 10, 2017, 08:05:26 PM
The ridge line isn't a pickup, it's a chickup :chuckle:

So what does that make the Tacoma?
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: 2labs on April 10, 2017, 08:06:31 PM
Tow vehicle?
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Alchase on April 10, 2017, 08:08:29 PM
LOL, the "only" category that the Tacoma beat the Ridgeline, Yet lost to the Colorado and the Canyon.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Dhoey07 on April 10, 2017, 08:31:14 PM
Tacoma will have a higher resale. Other differences are negligible IMO.

Only 18mpg isn't worth buying a mini truck
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: 2labs on April 10, 2017, 08:38:03 PM
Tacoma will have a higher resale. Other differences are negligible IMO.

Only 18mpg isn't worth buying a mini truck


1 ton 7.3 gets 20?
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Gobble Doc on April 10, 2017, 08:41:08 PM
I've wondered how good the new tacoma engines are. My 2003 has 394K and has never stranded me. Power window broke which wasn't cheap to fix..

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Dhoey07 on April 10, 2017, 08:41:22 PM
Tacoma will have a higher resale. Other differences are negligible IMO.

Only 18mpg isn't worth buying a mini truck


1 ton 7.3 gets 20?

1/2T dodge diesel gets mid 20's
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Duckslayer89 on April 10, 2017, 08:50:40 PM
I've wondered how good the new tacoma engines are. My 2003 has 394K and has never stranded me. Power window broke which wasn't cheap to fix..

Sent from my SCH-I535 using Tapatalk

I would buy a 3.4 liter 2003 over any of the new trucks. Would love if they just made that truck again. I really like my 2007 4.0 though so far it's been great 140k
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Wetwoodshunter on April 10, 2017, 09:00:05 PM
2002 Tacoma here with 32" tires. TRD package and 4wd can get you about anywhere. I've made quite a few trails with my truck on old roads that were overgrown, I couldn't  have done with a different truck. But towing its not the best option but can pull my 17' arima like it's nothing.

The ridge line has zero clearance, where I work we had 2 and you can bottom them out way to easy. Also they have a chip or at least used to where if they are on a steep grade they go into safe mode. They traded these in as quickly as they could and got Ram 2500's which is a world of a different truck.

Buddy had a canyon in 2010 he had it for 6 months and then went bigger. It couldn't tow like he wanted and never would have been his ideal truck like he thought. Tried to trade it to me across for my truck and I wouldn't do it.

If I were to get a new truck which will happen maybe when I hit 300k on my Tacoma so 5-7 more years at my rate I would probably go with a Ram 1500 with aeco diesel. If the new tacomas were still small they might be appealing but they lost all appeal now that they are huge.

My  :twocents:
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: WapitiTalk1 on April 10, 2017, 09:06:32 PM
Loved my 2011 Tacoma but traded her in on a 2015 Silverado Z71. Got tired of the wimpy performance and terrible gas mileage when I towed anything. The tacos and mid other mid size trucks are great for many reasons, just don't tow much...
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Happy Gilmore on April 10, 2017, 09:30:19 PM
Toyotas are well proven long lasting rigs. For this, resale is good. Look at all history of 4x4, v-6 powered resale at ten years old.

You cannot argue 90% of ten year old toyotas(or 20 year old) are far better off than comparable s-10's or ford rangers.

Which would you chose? A 1985 Toyota, Ford Ranger or Chevy S-10? Which is most desirable and worth the most money? Go!
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: andrew_in_idaho on April 11, 2017, 06:35:18 AM
Loved my 2011 Tacoma but traded her in on a 2015 Silverado Z71. Got tired of the wimpy performance and terrible gas mileage when I towed anything. The tacos and mid other mid size trucks are great for many reasons, just don't tow much...
Which is why GM put a little duramax in the Colorado/canyon now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Taco280AI on April 11, 2017, 07:56:15 AM
I hear the Canyon has electrical issues. Taco has transmission issues. Engine in the bottom end is a joke, but rev it up and it has good power. Lots to read on Tacomaworld 3rd gen section.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: thinkingman on April 11, 2017, 08:09:34 AM
Which of the midsize pus have rotten frames and failed rear suspensions which they refused the cover?
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: thinkingman on April 11, 2017, 08:11:39 AM
I would take a long bed Z71 Duramax over a Tacoma 10x out of 10.
The only advantage for the Toy is fanboy resale.

Why not just get a full size if your buying a long bed midsize  :dunno:
Parking/size.
Price.
Small diesel economy.

Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Happy Gilmore on April 11, 2017, 08:21:27 AM
I had not seen ads on the diesel canyon. That is very interesting. I like the I 4 plan. Is it an Izusu like the duramax heavy duty? If its an izusu I would be more inclined to lean that direction
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Sandberm on April 12, 2017, 09:20:48 AM
Does anybody have or know someone who has a diesel Canyon/Colorado? I finally saw one at the convience store the other day but wasnt able to talk to the owner to see what he thought.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Happy Gilmore on April 13, 2017, 11:40:35 AM
Just drove a duramax Colorado when I picked up my ford in Issaquah. It's definitely a four banger diesel. Pulls pretty nice up hills. Enough to pass fine. Definitely not a hot rod but, upper 20's mpg is attractive.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: mountainman on April 13, 2017, 02:24:53 PM
Off road the Tacoma eats up the Colorado and Canyons. Aproach angle is important in the elk woods!
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Happy Gilmore on April 13, 2017, 03:47:51 PM
Off road the Tacoma eats up the Colorado and Canyons. Aproach angle is important in the elk woods!

I dunno, the new empty space nose cone on the Taco could be fitted on the front of a B-52 and not look all that out of place. Or, you could use the space between the radiator and grill to pack out your deer??
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: KFhunter on April 13, 2017, 06:39:44 PM
Off road the Tacoma eats up the Colorado and Canyons. Aproach angle is important in the elk woods!

In stock trim with that air deflector yes, but easily remedied.


Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: mikeybuck on April 13, 2017, 08:19:59 PM
Does anybody have or know someone who has a diesel Canyon/Colorado? I finally saw one at the convience store the other day but wasnt able to talk to the owner to see what he thought.
my good buddy has one. Has almost 10k on it now. Not one single issue. His around town mpg is mid to high 20s and his freeway mileage is low 30s. Truck is leveled on 32s, 4x4, dcsb z71.
He said once the truck hit 8k miles, his mileage went up and he said it felt like it got more power.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Happy Gilmore on April 13, 2017, 10:51:38 PM
I've put 300k on a 06 and an 07 Taco TRD. They were my company rigs. I'd have to spend a lot more time in a diesel Canyon to make an opinion. I drove my buddies 16' Taco to the airport in so cal twice. I know I do not like the new motor at all compared to the miles I racked up on the older Tacos. Enough that I think I would lean to the diesel Canyon. With that being said, for the price of the diesel Canyon, I probably wouldn't buy one. Sticker was $46k. Tacos are $10k less. That's a lot of gas money.
Title: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: bobcat on April 13, 2017, 11:30:58 PM
The new ZR2 seems like a pretty capable off road rig. Is the Tacoma available with front and rear locking differentials?

https://www.chevrolet.com/colorado-zr2-off-road-truck

(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20170414%2Fa95b3a9913e05c3515868c6a75f89561.jpg&hash=716aad4a23db56383fabab749ab75ec4cd0c7816)

(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20170414%2Fc944cbef31a538dc593e7b51f70154e1.jpg&hash=b56ba46a0e774dab26a520fb44ccee2b2ad39ff8)

(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20170414%2F908905a48eab0525144dcf31fc615a1a.jpg&hash=af0ffc9089ac067d65c528346a90fe518975a945)
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Duckslayer89 on April 13, 2017, 11:46:53 PM
The new ZR2 seems like a pretty capable off road rig. Is the Tacoma available with front and rear locking differentials?

https://www.chevrolet.com/colorado-zr2-off-road-truck

(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20170414%2Fa95b3a9913e05c3515868c6a75f89561.jpg&hash=716aad4a23db56383fabab749ab75ec4cd0c7816)

(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20170414%2Fc944cbef31a538dc593e7b51f70154e1.jpg&hash=b56ba46a0e774dab26a520fb44ccee2b2ad39ff8)

(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20170414%2F908905a48eab0525144dcf31fc615a1a.jpg&hash=af0ffc9089ac067d65c528346a90fe518975a945)

I think you could add ARBs or E locker. Stock the Tacoma TRD comes with rear E locker but not a front locker.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Timberstalker on April 14, 2017, 05:34:56 AM
I don't care what chevy does. Their rigs will never last as long as the Toyota's continually do. Additionally, you will lose 20% the moment you drive the chevy off the lot.

Toyota wins.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Bofire on April 14, 2017, 09:57:25 AM
"starting at $40,995.00"
Carl
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: 3dvapor on April 14, 2017, 10:45:56 AM
Wow would love to have a diesel Tacoma.  That would be a perfect hunting machine.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: thinkingman on April 14, 2017, 11:00:46 AM
Off road the Tacoma eats up the Colorado and Canyons. Aproach angle is important in the elk woods!
You must mean AFTER you replace the rear springs that Toyota just can't quite seem to spec and supply....and that's if the frame isn't too rotten to bolt them ob
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: fish vacuum on April 14, 2017, 02:17:23 PM
Off road the Tacoma eats up the Colorado and Canyons. Aproach angle is important in the elk woods!
You must mean AFTER you replace the rear springs that Toyota just can't quite seem to spec and supply....and that's if the frame isn't too rotten to bolt them ob
I'd rather replace leaf springs than some of the other things a truck might need done. If I lived in a place with road salt then the frame rust might make my radar.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: shadowless_nite on April 15, 2017, 01:02:46 AM
Off road the Tacoma eats up the Colorado and Canyons. Aproach angle is important in the elk woods!
You must mean AFTER you replace the rear springs that Toyota just can't quite seem to spec and supply....and that's if the frame isn't too rotten to bolt them ob

Gripe all you want about rotting toyota frame. Do tell me how many rusted out tacomas you yourself have experienced??? In the first year of recall over early tacoma frame rust I saw maybe 4-5 full frame swaps and maybe 10 traded in. I worked at vancouver toyota during this recall. And at that time they were the largest and dealer in the region.

You would be hard pressed to find a vehicle manufacturer that handled that the way they did, offering 1.5x vehicle value on trade buy back or frame swap. Not to mention the current resale on these same tacomas was never even phased by this. Logic would lead one to think that if tacomas had such horrible issues or poor performance there would be horrible resale value. Regardless of bro tax and hype they hold their value for obvious reasons.

As for the ridgeline. While they may be rated well in tests for this and that on new models, we work on plenty of earlier ridgelines and I can tell you they are garbage. Crap parts, butt ugly and if there's one thing honda can't ever get right it's a automatic transmission. Not to mention these "heavy duty" station wagons don't have actual frames and utilize a unibody instead, try dragging that over uneven obstacles. I've seen nothing in any of the newer Hondas to believe they've made significant changes to remedy similar problems in the future models
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Duckslayer89 on April 15, 2017, 04:41:05 AM
Off road the Tacoma eats up the Colorado and Canyons. Aproach angle is important in the elk woods!
You must mean AFTER you replace the rear springs that Toyota just can't quite seem to spec and supply....and that's if the frame isn't too rotten to bolt them ob

Gripe all you want about rotting toyota frame. Do tell me how many rusted out tacomas you yourself have experienced??? In the first year of recall over early tacoma frame rust I saw maybe 4-5 full frame swaps and maybe 10 traded in. I worked at vancouver toyota during this recall. And at that time they were the largest and dealer in the region.

You would be hard pressed to find a vehicle manufacturer that handled that the way they did, offering 1.5x vehicle value on trade buy back or frame swap. Not to mention the current resale on these same tacomas was never even phased by this. Logic would lead one to think that if tacomas had such horrible issues or poor performance there would be horrible resale value. Regardless of bro tax and hype they hold their value for obvious reasons.

As for the ridgeline. While they may be rated well in tests for this and that on new models, we work on plenty of earlier ridgelines and I can tell you they are garbage. Crap parts, butt ugly and if there's one thing honda can't ever get right it's a automatic transmission. Not to mention these "heavy duty" station wagons don't have actual frames and utilize a unibody instead, try dragging that over uneven obstacles. I've seen nothing in any of the newer Hondas to believe they've made significant changes to remedy similar problems in the future models

I had the leaf spring recall on my truck. Couldn't believe how easy it was. Drove it up to dealer, free rental for the day, brand new 1600 dollar leafs installed. Truck washed and ready to go. No waiting for approval or inspection just did it.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Happy Gilmore on April 15, 2017, 09:53:21 PM
Wider, bigger etc...that isn't making a better rig for the woods. Maybe for the sand dunes. All things considered. My old 85 open diff. Big tire four banger light weight sr5 will still out wheel the new wide, big and heavy taco and Colorado...
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: mountainman on April 16, 2017, 03:31:02 AM
The new TRD Off Rd? With Crawl control, I kinda doubt it..
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: KFhunter on April 16, 2017, 10:27:27 AM
It would mine cause I wouldn't want to get a scratch on it  :chuckle:
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Alchase on April 16, 2017, 06:34:10 PM

As for the ridgeline. While they may be rated well in tests for this and that on new models, we work on plenty of earlier ridgelines and I can tell you they are garbage. Crap parts, butt ugly and if there's one thing honda can't ever get right it's a automatic transmission. Not to mention these "heavy duty" station wagons don't have actual frames and utilize a unibody instead, try dragging that over uneven obstacles. I've seen nothing in any of the newer Hondas to believe they've made significant changes to remedy similar problems in the future models

Apparently you did not read the reviews of the 2017 Midsized trucks very well. Have you driven a 2017 Ridgeline?
The Tacoma was also beaten by the Colorado and the Canyon. Actually you should be glad the other trucks have caught up with and past the Tacomas at least in initial quality. That can only lead to better and cheaper Tacomas. Competition is a good thing.
As for unibodies, I drove my unibody Jeep Cherokee LTD from Auburn Washington all the way to Moab Utah, wheeled for a week, then drove home, in comfort.
Tacomas are good trucks and for years there were only two mid-sized trucks to choose from the Tacoma and the Frontier. Now there are a few options that could fit the many different ways people use their trucks.

FYI Cars.com gives the Ridgeline 5 stars (out of 5) for customer Satisfaction and Reliability from 2008 - 2017,

The crazy fanboism does nothing for making a case.

Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Happy Gilmore on April 16, 2017, 07:00:23 PM
Hondas look like a, "push me pull me". Most of you probably have no idea what that is. Lol
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: KFhunter on April 16, 2017, 07:24:03 PM
Quote
FYI Cars.com gives the Ridgeline 5 stars (out of 5) for customer Satisfaction and Reliability from 2008 - 2017

I have no doubt that the Ridgeline is a good car.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Alchase on April 16, 2017, 07:43:49 PM
I just hope with all the competition, they can get some decent V6 power with MPGs in the high 20s.
Sucks to have a V6 and get less then 18 MPGs. My Ram got 15-16 on a good day.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Happy Gilmore on April 17, 2017, 12:45:59 PM
My two Taco's were both TRD Off Road Pre-runners. in about 300K miles on them combined they never saw over 19mpg on the best day driving like a saint. Most of the time average gravel/country road driving mixed with open interstate they got about 16-17mpg. Pull a small boat or the Casita and it would drop to 12-14mpg.

Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: jdb on April 17, 2017, 12:54:06 PM
My two Taco's were both TRD Off Road Pre-runners. in about 300K miles on them combined they never saw over 19mpg on the best day driving like a saint. Most of the time average gravel/country road driving mixed with open interstate they got about 16-17mpg. Pull a small boat or the Casita and it would drop to 12-14mpg.
so your the guy!! I've always wondered who bought the prerunners. My life dictates the need for 4x4, I see the prerunners out and bout a lot though.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Stickerbush on April 17, 2017, 02:08:10 PM
I heard the ridgelines have a shut off if you are going up any serious grade. Something about keeping the oil from dripping out?
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: KFhunter on April 17, 2017, 02:39:48 PM
Ridgelines are a car, they aren't meant to go AWD'n around in 4x4 country.


Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Happy Gilmore on April 18, 2017, 12:14:47 AM
My two Taco's were both TRD Off Road Pre-runners. in about 300K miles on them combined they never saw over 19mpg on the best day driving like a saint. Most of the time average gravel/country road driving mixed with open interstate they got about 16-17mpg. Pull a small boat or the Casita and it would drop to 12-14mpg.
so your the guy!! I've always wondered who bought the prerunners. My life dictates the need for 4x4, I see the prerunners out and bout a lot though.

Owner of the company dictates the purchases. Excellent choice. I put miles on gravel, construction sites, driving to remote mine sites all over the western US. Never got stuck once. Diesel trucks bury in nose heavy as hell. Yes, every diesel in our fleet was 4x4. Because diesels get stuck twice as easy due to weight distribution.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: shadowless_nite on April 18, 2017, 12:45:59 AM

As for the ridgeline. While they may be rated well in tests for this and that on new models, we work on plenty of earlier ridgelines and I can tell you they are garbage. Crap parts, butt ugly and if there's one thing honda can't ever get right it's a automatic transmission. Not to mention these "heavy duty" station wagons don't have actual frames and utilize a unibody instead, try dragging that over uneven obstacles. I've seen nothing in any of the newer Hondas to believe they've made significant changes to remedy similar problems in the future models

Apparently you did not read the reviews of the 2017 Midsized trucks very well. Have you driven a 2017 Ridgeline?
The Tacoma was also beaten by the Colorado and the Canyon. Actually you should be glad the other trucks have caught up with and past the Tacomas at least in initial quality. That can only lead to better and cheaper Tacomas. Competition is a good thing.
As for unibodies, I drove my unibody Jeep Cherokee LTD from Auburn Washington all the way to Moab Utah, wheeled for a week, then drove home, in comfort.
Tacomas are good trucks and for years there were only two mid-sized trucks to choose from the Tacoma and the Frontier. Now there are a few options that could fit the many different ways people use their trucks.

FYI Cars.com gives the Ridgeline 5 stars (out of 5) for customer Satisfaction and Reliability from 2008 - 2017,

The crazy fanboism does nothing for making a case.

Have you personally worked any Hondas yourself? Let alone ridgelines? I've worked on Hondas and toyotas both for a living for quite a few years now. And regardless of fanboism or car reviews ratings I can tell you that just because you read it was the best doesn't mean much. I have felt new and old ridglines, as well as new and old tacomas. I drive a 2000 tacoma with 320k sitting on the odometer. Would I think my tacoma rides better than a new ridgeline? Of course not without a doubt it probably rides a million times better. Almost any new truck rides pretty dang nice compared to old tin cans.

The ridgeline may not be my cup of tea or anyone elses. But if it floats some people's boats that's great, I'll consider it job security. Every man has his choice of truck but there are undoubtedly reasons why there is no hype over a ridgeline, no praise of honda for its truck or why they don't resale near as well.

All apples look good fresh on the tree, but not all apples have a shelf life, value and flavor as others do. With all the new mid size competition, I'm not interested in how they stack up now, I'm more interested in how the 2017s stack up 5 years from now with each other when warranties are over and components begin to wear.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Alchase on April 18, 2017, 09:58:19 AM
All apples look good fresh on the tree, but not all apples have a shelf life, value and flavor as others do. With all the new mid size competition, I'm not interested in how they stack up now, I'm more interested in how the 2017s stack up 5 years from now with each other when warranties are over and components begin to wear.

That is why I posted the last 10 years of reliability and satisfaction reports.
Funny every source I have read rates them extremely high in reliability.

Edmonds
Cars.com
Every car magazine rates  them very high for reliability and customer satisfaction.

The same places that give the Tacoma great resale value.
Give credit where it is due.

The only fanboism played out here is from the Tacoma crowd.

I have never owned either, LOL

Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Happy Gilmore on April 18, 2017, 02:52:07 PM
The owner of my last employer had a ridgeline for a salesmans driver. It didn't go to the shop often. I do know two of the five tacomas had rear ends replaced.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Happy Gilmore on April 18, 2017, 02:56:32 PM
Having driven a friends s-10 zr whatever....at 190k it was falling apart and made you feel drunk when going down the highway. He dumped it for the 2016 taco I drove a few times. It looked good but it drove and sounded like a tool box strapped to a skateboard going down a gravel road.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Alchase on April 18, 2017, 06:01:34 PM
Having driven a friends s-10 zr whatever....at 190k it was falling apart and made you feel drunk when going down the highway. He dumped it for the 2016 taco I drove a few times. It looked good but it drove and sounded like a tool box strapped to a skateboard going down a gravel road.

My 2007 Dakota wallowed  like a fat lady on a water bed, until I replaced the ball joints and end links.
Feels like a totally different truck now.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: fish vacuum on April 18, 2017, 08:03:08 PM
Having driven a friends s-10 zr whatever....at 190k it was falling apart and made you feel drunk when going down the highway. He dumped it for the 2016 taco I drove a few times. It looked good but it drove and sounded like a tool box strapped to a skateboard going down a gravel road.

My 2007 Dakota wallowed  like a fat lady on a water bed, until I replaced the ball joints and end links.
Feels like a totally different truck now.
A dodge with front end problems? You don't hear that every day.
Oh wait. Yes you do.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Alchase on April 18, 2017, 08:25:05 PM
Having driven a friends s-10 zr whatever....at 190k it was falling apart and made you feel drunk when going down the highway. He dumped it for the 2016 taco I drove a few times. It looked good but it drove and sounded like a tool box strapped to a skateboard going down a gravel road.

My 2007 Dakota wallowed  like a fat lady on a water bed, until I replaced the ball joints and end links.
Feels like a totally different truck now.
A dodge with front end problems? You don't hear that every day.
Oh wait. Yes you do.

The people who designed the linkage in the Dakota front end should be tarred and feathered.
What a horrible design.

Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Happy Gilmore on April 19, 2017, 07:40:01 AM
Aren't they all already at the scrap yard? Lol.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Sandberm on April 19, 2017, 07:56:01 AM
I have a 03 4wd s-10 with 177k miles and I really like it. The seating position is really comfortable. You sit "in it" rather then on top of it, if you understand what I mean. It drives nice, good vision. Also,... and this is just me and I realize I'm probably in the minority but... but I like having a tailgate that is low enough that I can take one step and climb in the back. I can load heavy things in the back easier too and I can reach over the siderails and grab stuff. How guys live(work) with lifted rigs is beyond me. And in all honesty, I use the 4wd on desert/mountain roads, muddy farm roads/snow/ice and I never find myself in a situation where I need extra clearance. I can weave around/over stuff and not ever scrape the bottom.

But its had some bugaboos...

-The door bushings are junk. When they wear out, air comes whistling in the cab and its very noisy  I changed them multiple times before going to Tacoma Screw and finding some heavy duty bushings, machining them a bit then rigging my own custom door hinge.

-Replaced driver side power window motor TWICE, passenger side once.

-In tank fuel pump went out at about 90k, left me stranded at the convience store

-Had to change radiator at 110k when it became clogged with the clay thats in dexcool

-Vacuum lines engage 4wd and ac vents. Vac lines originate off valve at top of tranny, when valve goes bad it lets tranny fluid into lines messing up ac/vent/defrost actuators.

-Intake gasket leaked for a LONG time. I finally changed it at 165k before things got deadly
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Alchase on April 19, 2017, 10:59:27 AM
Aren't they all already at the scrap yard? Lol.

This one has 140k miles on this 2007 SLT 4x4. 
I have replaced the brakes, front end as I said and tires.
Besides that, it has been a good truck for how much I put it to work.
The body and paint is in great condition.
3.7 is a dog getting up to 60 MPH but cruses well at 75 with low RPMs.
Mileage is your typical V6 suckage, usually at 16 MPG.
Functional, practical, without being hideous, LOL
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Happy Gilmore on April 19, 2017, 02:08:35 PM
Aren't they all already at the scrap yard? Lol.

This one has 140k miles on this 2007 SLT 4x4. 
I have replaced the brakes, front end as I said and tires.
Besides that, it has been a good truck for how much I put it to work.
The body and paint is in great condition.
3.7 is a dog getting up to 60 MPH but cruses well at 75 with low RPMs.
Mileage is your typical V6 suckage, usually at 16 MPG.
Functional, practical, without being hideous, LOL

I was just kidding. I cant tell you how bad I wanted a convertible 4x4 Dakota when they first came out.. hahahaa
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: jjhunter on April 21, 2017, 08:22:33 AM
'91, '94, '99, '02, '07, '13, '15 and now '17.    Hard to go away from the Toyota pickups!
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: blackpowderhunter on April 21, 2017, 09:08:25 AM
'91, '94, '99, '02, '07, '13, '15 and now '17.    Hard to go away from the Toyota pickups!
i'm like you but with less truck ADD! haha
93, 99, 01, 06
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Alchase on April 21, 2017, 08:07:51 PM
'91, '94, '99, '02, '07, '13, '15 and now '17.    Hard to go away from the Toyota pickups!

Nice looking truck!
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Taco280AI on April 22, 2017, 08:01:48 PM
'13
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1098.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fg364%2Fnwoutdoors%2FTacohunting.jpg&hash=dcb2572283a88688c79dbd087a37d258a501f043) (http://s1098.photobucket.com/user/nwoutdoors/media/Tacohunting.jpg.html)

'15
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1098.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fg364%2Fnwoutdoors%2F13637_o%2520-%2520Copy.jpg&hash=d1bc0288a79d9224b169bc26866a13a0425568f6) (http://s1098.photobucket.com/user/nwoutdoors/media/13637_o%20-%20Copy.jpg.html)

'17
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi1098.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fg364%2Fnwoutdoors%2FTaco%2520after.jpg&hash=3b2060639e24a04f2ea2a15f1123901d7a361e1c) (http://s1098.photobucket.com/user/nwoutdoors/media/Taco%20after.jpg.html)

If they had the bottom end power of the 4.0, top end of the 3.5... would be a great combo!




Had the '13, averaged 19mpg, had an engine pinging issue for some reason, then got rid of it due to moving to Germany. Got back, bought the '15, no engine pinging, averaged nearly 21mpg with it with the same driving habits! The '17 is averaging 21mpg, but my usual commute has a lot of 50mph driving. Deployed, got back, upgraded... Good thing I get my Tacoma's for so much off! The least I got off was $3600 on the '13 (with $500 off for military) and got the '17 for $4550 off (another $500 off for military).
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Alchase on April 25, 2017, 10:35:05 AM
Looks good in grey!
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Old Man Yager on April 25, 2017, 11:26:41 AM
1990 was the best truck I had, now I have a 2001 Tacoma, I love it even more than the 1990. Sold the 1990 to my son, and then he did this to it!! RIP Little Red 😢
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Skyvalhunter on April 25, 2017, 11:48:05 AM
Atleast your son survived the wreck
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Happy Gilmore on April 25, 2017, 11:58:02 PM
Atleast your son survived the wreck

judging by the mud, Id bet it wasn't a surprise. I stuffed my 85 once and tweaked the frame. At the time, I was working on and off during school breaks at Calahan's Auto Body in Seattle so I got it on the frame rack for no charge.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: KFhunter on April 26, 2017, 08:11:46 AM
I get so many complements on my Colorado it's starting to become annoying.  Might sell it and get an ugly yota so folks will quit interrupting my day.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Scheindogg on April 26, 2017, 08:46:39 AM
I get so many complements on my Colorado it's starting to become annoying.  Might sell it and get an ugly yota so folks will quit interrupting my day.

Sorry if I missed it but what year is your Colorado and have oh had any issues with it other than routine maintenance?

I LOVE the newer colorados but idk about their reliability
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Skyvalhunter on April 26, 2017, 09:20:07 AM
I get so many complements on my Colorado it's starting to become annoying.  Might sell it and get an ugly yota so folks will quit interrupting my day.
Don't worry give it time and your Colorado will be a road side ornament for everyone to comment on. :chuckle:
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: bullfisher on April 26, 2017, 11:16:31 AM
The new ZR2 seems like a pretty capable off road rig. Is the Tacoma available with front and rear locking differentials?

https://www.chevrolet.com/colorado-zr2-off-road-truck

(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20170414%2Fa95b3a9913e05c3515868c6a75f89561.jpg&hash=716aad4a23db56383fabab749ab75ec4cd0c7816)

(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20170414%2Fc944cbef31a538dc593e7b51f70154e1.jpg&hash=b56ba46a0e774dab26a520fb44ccee2b2ad39ff8)

(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fuploads.tapatalk-cdn.com%2F20170414%2F908905a48eab0525144dcf31fc615a1a.jpg&hash=af0ffc9089ac067d65c528346a90fe518975a945)

 :yeah:
The yoters have always made the best small pickups imo. But the new Canyon/Colorado with a 2.8l I4 duramax is awsome. Somebody tested one at 30mpg. With 369ft lbs of torque @ 2000rpm its quite a contender.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Happy Gilmore on April 26, 2017, 11:19:00 PM
I get so many complements on my Colorado it's starting to become annoying.  Might sell it and get an ugly yota so folks will quit interrupting my day.

The ones at the Dealer where I drove one with the Duramax had absolutely no underbody protection. I was shocked how exposed the underbody was unless they had taken off all the skid plates so you could see all the underside on the display rack.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Skyvalhunter on April 27, 2017, 05:16:43 AM
Plus you know the saying never by a vehicle model the first year it is in production
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: andrew_in_idaho on April 27, 2017, 06:15:37 AM
Plus you know the saying never by a vehicle model the first year it is in production
Good thing this is the 2nd year


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Skyvalhunter on April 27, 2017, 08:00:01 AM
or the 2nd year as it takes a few years to work the bugs out
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: DRobnsn on April 27, 2017, 11:18:41 AM
or the 2nd year as it takes a few years to work the bugs out

Unless its a Toyota, they work out the bugs before it goes to market....  :chuckle:
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: 724wd on April 27, 2017, 12:32:07 PM
or the 2nd year as it takes a few years to work the bugs out

Unless its a Toyota, they work out the bugs before it goes to market....  :chuckle:

oh REALLY?!?! 
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: DRobnsn on April 27, 2017, 03:21:25 PM
or the 2nd year as it takes a few years to work the bugs out

Unless its a Toyota, they work out the bugs before it goes to market....  :chuckle:

oh REALLY?!?!

Keyword, potential. Anything mechanical has the POTENTIAL to fail. I say good on them for being proactive in fixing it before it becomes an issue. I was somewhat kidding about the "bugs worked out" comment anyway.

Honestly I'd love to see one or all of the big 3 begin to hold a reliability record across the board like Toyota has had. 
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: 724wd on April 27, 2017, 03:42:30 PM
or the 2nd year as it takes a few years to work the bugs out

Unless its a Toyota, they work out the bugs before it goes to market....  :chuckle:

oh REALLY?!?!

Keyword, potential. Anything mechanical has the POTENTIAL to fail. I say good on them for being proactive in fixing it before it becomes an issue. I was somewhat kidding about the "bugs worked out" comment anyway.

Honestly I'd love to see one or all of the big 3 begin to hold a reliability record across the board like Toyota has had.

I know it was kinda in jest.  I just thought it was funny i saw the article maybe 2 minutes after reading your comment  ;)
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Miles on April 28, 2017, 05:31:40 AM
I had a mid 90's Toyota with the 22RE in the early 2000 timeframe.  That truck was nice when it came to off-road four wheeling.  After a road trip with a couple friends the lack of room and comfort was too much.  When we got back I sold the toy and bought a real truck.   

Honestly though... I can't even imagine doing multi-state hunts with a couple friends in a small truck.  Where do you guys put your gear?  I guess once you fill a full size quad cab with gear and hunting buddies it's hard to imagine downsizing.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Skyvalhunter on April 28, 2017, 05:46:56 AM
SO now you get stuck in your REAL truck? :chuckle:
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Miles on April 28, 2017, 05:54:25 AM
SO now you get stuck in your REAL truck? :chuckle:

Exactly...but I've got all my gear with me and hunting buddies to push.
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: zwickeyman on April 28, 2017, 06:30:48 AM
I bought a 2016 Colorado last November. Great looking truck and over all decent rig. The 6 speed autos are crap ( drivability wise) inho but the Toyotas 6 speed is no different. I drove both the Tacomas and the Colorados multiple times and I wish I would have gotten a Silverado ( coming from and old Tundra ) Too small and no low end power with the V6

I am averaging 15 MPG but its on a 4" lift with 33" tires and very heavy 18" Fuel wheels with the air dam removed
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Miles on April 28, 2017, 06:51:02 AM
IMO the fuel mileage isn't even that great.  Definitely not enough to give up all the other benefits of a full size.   I normally average 11 - 14 mpg pulling a 40' rv that weighs in at 15,000 lbs.  That's with a full size quad cab.   Unhooked I get 17+ city and 24+ hwy (75 mph). 
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Skyvalhunter on April 28, 2017, 07:04:07 AM
Is that a diesel?
Title: Re: gmc canyon vs Toyota Tacoma
Post by: Miles on April 28, 2017, 07:09:51 AM
Is that a diesel?

Yes.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal