Hunting Washington Forum

Big Game Hunting => Other Big Game => Topic started by: bearpaw on April 11, 2017, 10:00:27 AM


Advertise Here
Title: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: bearpaw on April 11, 2017, 10:00:27 AM
I had heard there was a moose study involving the Kalispell Tribe.  :tup:

I'm very glad to see a moose study and found the results thus far quite interesting, the results are posted on the WDFW website. The predator impacts on collared cows in the northern study area are far greater than the southern area. I know moose are dieing but was surprised to see that ticks were impacting our moose as heavily as the predators. I do wish the moose study involved a more northern area, I'm certain the moose numbers are dropping moreso in several farther north areas. But this study is certainly far better than nothing, I hope they continue the study, as wolf numbers continue to increase we really need to have some research recording predation impacts on our moose.

I would really like to see the study expanded to an area with a high density of known wolf packs! For the record, it's not that I see wolves as the only predator of moose, the problem is that wolves are an additional predator we didn't used to have. I would hate to see the moose population do what it did in parts of Idaho or end up where it was before wolves were eradicated in Washington. Moose were able to multiply during the absence of wolves over the last 60 to 80 years.

http://wdfw.wa.gov/publications/01859/wdfw01859.pdf
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: bearpaw on April 11, 2017, 10:05:23 AM
Note the minimal predator impacts in the southern area verses farther north.
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: JKEEN33 on April 11, 2017, 10:12:01 AM
I had read the same thing about ticks and Moose in the NE US. Maine I believe it was. This was talking about ticks and young moose though. It said that they get so many of them that the younger moose could not survive. Interesting to see that it is here and on adult moose as well. As always, I hate ticks. :)
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: quadrafire on April 11, 2017, 10:19:30 AM
I'm having difficulty seeing the boundries on their study areas. Do they correspond to GMU's?
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: bearpaw on April 11, 2017, 11:24:08 AM
I enlarged the areas, it looks like Mt Spokane (south area) and southeast part of 49 Degrees north (north area).
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: bearpaw on April 11, 2017, 11:26:13 AM
I had read the same thing about ticks and Moose in the NE US. Maine I believe it was. This was talking about ticks and young moose though. It said that they get so many of them that the younger moose could not survive. Interesting to see that it is here and on adult moose as well. As always, I hate ticks. :)

There are moose areas in the west that have been impacted by ticks and other diseases. Some of those areas (which are not wolf impacted areas) are beginning to recover.
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: JKEEN33 on April 11, 2017, 12:32:04 PM
I had read the same thing about ticks and Moose in the NE US. Maine I believe it was. This was talking about ticks and young moose though. It said that they get so many of them that the younger moose could not survive. Interesting to see that it is here and on adult moose as well. As always, I hate ticks. :)

There are moose areas in the west that have been impacted by ticks and other diseases. Some of those areas (which are not wolf impacted areas) are beginning to recover.

I agree there are other issues related to moose decline. I was just never aware a moose could get enough ticks to kill it and this is the second time I've seen this reported as an issue now.

 I found a dead moose a few years back while turkey hunting. It was covered with some puss filled blisters. I didn't get to close to it, but did report it. Never heard anything back regarding this. Any idea what they could have been? I've never seen anything like it.

Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: Bob33 on April 12, 2017, 07:02:35 PM
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/10/07/ghosts-haunt-the-maine-and-new-hampshire-woods-this-time-of-year/?utm_term=.646445a29ea4 (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2015/10/07/ghosts-haunt-the-maine-and-new-hampshire-woods-this-time-of-year/?utm_term=.646445a29ea4)
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: Miles on April 13, 2017, 06:54:15 AM
I'm from New Hampshire and have also lived in Maine.  The moose population in the 90's was AMAZING.  You could go for an evening drive and see 20 moose from the main road without even getting off pavement.   Right now it's hard to find a moose in places that used to hold hundreds.  I can remember seeing moose covered in huge white ticks just before leaving that area in 2001.  I used to find moose beds full of blood while shed hunting.  The blood was from crushed ticks...

I've seen the same thing in Washington state in the 2004 - 2008 timeframe before I left for Germany.  While shed hunting around Mt Spokane I would find blood all over the snow and dead ticks.   I'm afraid WA is headed down the same path.  Wolves and other predators aside, it's those tiny little ticks that can reek havoc on populations.  Northern NH and Maine also had problems with a lung disease (or something like that).   I have friends who have found sick moose on their wintering grounds actually coughing and to sick to move.

I predict WA will significantly reduce moose tag numbers in the near future.  Once it starts it will go downhill fast.  Mark my words and we'll compare numbers in 4 - 5 years.

Washington also has something that Maine and NH do not.  Wolves, cougars, and an overall healthy predator population.
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: Skyvalhunter on April 13, 2017, 07:01:09 AM
I guess the best thing for ticks is a good cold snap which happened in eastern Wa
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: WAcoyotehunter on April 13, 2017, 07:14:09 AM
There is also a whitetail deer and elk survival study getting going.  With cats, wolves, and there prey all being collared, there should be some cool data generated

The tick problem is HORRIBLE.  I heard about a necropsy that revealed 70k ticks on one animal. 
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: quadrafire on April 13, 2017, 08:37:51 AM
Here's some info on the ticks.

http://nrri.d.umn.edu/moose/information/WinterTick.html
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: BeerBugler on April 13, 2017, 08:56:20 AM
I'm positive there has been a significant decrease in moose (and every other critter besides wolves and grizzlys) in the northern most units. I've spent every spring up there for the least 8 years and every year I see less deer, elk, bear, and moose. Last year, the only moose I saw was a fresh wolf kill calf. When I first started going I'd see a few moose every day. The year before last a warden told me they were finding black bears half eaten (wolves) on top of the snow in the middle of winter.
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: WAcoyotehunter on April 13, 2017, 09:19:46 AM
. The year before last a warden told me they were finding black bears half eaten (wolves) on top of the snow in the middle of winter.
I have heard of that happening, but after spending every winter working and running hounds all over NE Wa and N Idaho, I have never seen it. 
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: SpurInSpokane on April 13, 2017, 09:26:56 AM
Thanks to bearpaw for posting this study.
Reading through it, there were 3 main things I thought were interesting:

Anyway, will be interesting to see what they conclude, and hopefully the study can continue beyond three years.
Edit to add: Reminds me of a MeatEater podcast where they were discussing trying to time bear hunts in an area to coincide with calf drops, to specifically help calf mortality. I wish I could find the episode offhand; it may be episode 55, but I'm not certain.
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: JimmyHoffa on April 13, 2017, 09:33:38 AM
Are the ticks out of balance?  Did a predator kill off something keeping the ticks in line?  Some parts of the country that have lots of ground birds (turkeys/grouse) have low tick populations because the birds eat them.  Maybe more cats/yotes eating the birds?
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: WAcoyotehunter on April 13, 2017, 10:16:10 AM
Are the ticks out of balance?  Did a predator kill off something keeping the ticks in line?  Some parts of the country that have lots of ground birds (turkeys/grouse) have low tick populations because the birds eat them.  Maybe more cats/yotes eating the birds?
That's an interesting thought- I don't know if anyone has looked into that too much.

The prevailing thought is that the last 6-7 easy winters have helped increase the population.  We had a tough winter this year, hopefully that wiped them out.

I HATE ticks now... I got rocky mtn spotted fever from one last spring and felt like death warmed over for a week.
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: bearpaw on April 14, 2017, 03:34:30 AM
. The year before last a warden told me they were finding black bears half eaten (wolves) on top of the snow in the middle of winter.
I have heard of that happening, but after spending every winter working and running hounds all over NE Wa and N Idaho, I have never seen it.

I would have to agree, I've heard of it but never seen it, because I haven't witnessed it I don't think bear are a primary target of wolves but I don't know for sure. Another thing to consider is that even in areas where the elk population plunged in Idaho due to wolf impacts there are still quite a few bear. But I know a bio who has worked extensively on predator studies in ID/WY and he told me that they have literally found the remains of every animal in wolf poo.
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: WAcoyotehunter on April 14, 2017, 05:13:58 AM
I believe that.  I am sure they stumble upon dens and dig out bears occasionally.  My hounds have found dens a couple of times while freecast in the winter. 
Wolves are resourceful.  I suspect very few die of starvation barring an injury
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: Skyvalhunter on April 14, 2017, 05:43:49 AM
No but need to die of lead poisoning.
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: Falcon on April 14, 2017, 10:14:49 PM
No but need to die of lead poisoning.

You mean like yours😆
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: huntnnw on April 15, 2017, 03:09:50 AM
The tick issue is a real threat and I have seen lots of mouse over the last 5 years that I'm sure died from tick infestation. I've seen 3 just this year covered in ticks in 127. This issue is unheard of up north as the weather gets cold enough every year. That's the problem with lower 48 moose is the lack of super cold temps. This year I'm hoping it killed off ticks as we were cold for a long time
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: CaNINE on April 16, 2017, 07:15:42 AM
I have read somewhere that heavy snow years help reduce tick infestations. Since ticks typically attach themselves to the feet and lower legs of their hosts. If there is snow on the ground it helps minimize areas where the ticks can come in contact. I also recall reading that cold temps do not hurt the ticks. Not sure if this is accurate. If so, hopefully with the heavy snow we will see less infected moose this year.
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: CarbonHunter on April 16, 2017, 08:11:37 AM
I seen a story about the ticks killing the moose from Maine to Washington and they pointed to the lack of cold weather in winter. (Liberals blaming global warming)  It's mine understanding that this is also to blame for the pine beetles across the west. I know we were cold this year but were we cold enough?  I once heard that it would take a cold snap of -10 to -20 for 2 weeks to kill the pine beetles. Is this the same for the ticks or do they have a different temperature tolerance?
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: Jpmiller on April 16, 2017, 08:20:57 AM
If a tick is on a moose will the body heat and blood intake keep the tickets warm enough to survive a cold spell?
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: SpurInSpokane on April 18, 2017, 10:15:48 AM
If I'm reading this page right, the ticks DON'T die in frost, just become inactive: http://www.tickencounter.org/faq/seasonal_information (http://www.tickencounter.org/faq/seasonal_information)

Anyone else have a different take/source?
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: gutsnthegrass on April 18, 2017, 12:13:36 PM
The ticks last year were no joke.  My son shot a nice buck up on the camas prairie in Idaho.  I have never seen so many ticks!  They were on every square inch of that deer.  I feel like we put that deer out of its misery.  It was a very healthy, big bodied deer, but the ticks were out of control.
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: elkboy on April 18, 2017, 12:40:49 PM
Nice little review of the literature here, actually:
https://www.qdma.com/burning-questions-can-fire-reduce-tick-abundance/


Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: rosscrazyelk on April 30, 2017, 06:50:17 PM
I am curious about the results of this study. Just as I am the past 2 years in the hunting regs the state is asking our help to report all moose sightings.. I find it ironic after a wolf population takes hold they ask for help on moose sightings.
Title: Re: NE WA Moose Study
Post by: NRA4LIFE on April 30, 2017, 07:21:59 PM
As a barometer, I killed a very large, healthy cow northwest of Mount Spokane in November and I did not find a single tick on her.  I also seen a number of other moose close up that I thought also did not have any ticks on them.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal