Post by: WAcoyotehunter on September 21, 2017, 06:47:19 AM
I saw an article about this in TWS periodical, but figured I would post the original research. Somewhat clear slant.
Although, I do think most people that sit down to write a hunting story online do so after killing an animal, I suspect >75% of my stories (generally rambling without an obvious start/finish... ) have more to do with fun or interesting parts of a hunt. Most of the time, I wouldn't post a story that gets into the minutia, but would share the successful part. I save the minutia for stories around a campfire or over a beer.
Post by: Jonathan_S on September 21, 2017, 07:09:23 AM
Post by: 7mmfan on September 21, 2017, 07:14:00 AM
The social media aspect is also a challenge. We all want to appear successful, especially when it comes down to hunting. Call it male ego, or what have you, but its been engrained in us since the beginning of time that successful hunters are providers and more desirable.
I believe a little humbleness goes a lot further most of the time, and I've been trying to practice that.
Post by: Special T on September 21, 2017, 10:46:36 AM
Cool new use of technology to get an insight as to how a group of people feel on a subject. This studies method will translate to lots of other subjects.
A lot can be learned from this study but it's limitation fall into the self reporting nature of forums, and the nature of those whom write the posts. One other area is the vast difference in hunting carnivore and insulates. I'm not sure the researcher really appreciate the difference in how hunters view the 2 categories. Lumping bear and cougar with coyotes and wolves has its issues. The ability to run holds on black bears and cougar is the only "non consumptive" (potentially) form of hunting where a hunter could enjoy the hunt, it mostly be sucessful and not kill anything.
The best part of hunting wolves and coyotes is killing them. The kind of happiness is way different than a nice hunt harvesting a big boar or Tom. 2c