Hunting Washington Forum

Big Game Hunting => Deer Hunting => Topic started by: NOCK NOCK on October 21, 2017, 03:32:55 PM


Advertise Here
Title: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: NOCK NOCK on October 21, 2017, 03:32:55 PM
Some believe Multi season permits put extra pressure on the critters. They are also a money grab for WDFW.
Should the availability of these permits be continued, or stopped?

You may vote 2 times, PLEASE only 1 for elk, and 1 for deer

Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: Whitenuckles on October 21, 2017, 03:38:15 PM
 I love being able to spend more time in the woods looking for that right animal. As for pressuring the animals, I don't think it matters. Look at other states that allow multiple seasons to everyone, the hunting and animals numbers are better.  :twocents:
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: JDHasty on October 21, 2017, 04:01:51 PM
I like the deer MS tag.  I mostly hunt w/my bow irrespective of the season and it gives me a bit more flexibility which as the kids get older is becoming more of a necessity than a luxury. 
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: rougheye on October 21, 2017, 04:22:48 PM
Bad ,and bad
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: andr3wxmma on October 21, 2017, 04:26:54 PM
I think they can be good in moderation.
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: Mfowl on October 21, 2017, 04:28:46 PM
I like the MS tags. More options for permit apps and more hunting opportunity when you don't get drawn for a special permit.
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: bfranklin81 on October 21, 2017, 10:01:53 PM
As a relatively new hunter, I appreciate the opportunity to hunt multiple seasons. This is my third year of hunting and my second with a multiseason deer tag. I hunted the modern firearm season my first year and ended the season mostly frustrated with an empty freezer. Last year, I tripled my time in the woods by hunting early and late muzzleloader and modern firearm seasons. That extra experience was huge for me and I managed to tag my first deer during the late muzzy season. This year, I have added archery to  the equation and have been able to spend even more time in the woods and had some great encounters with both deer and elk. I haven't punched a tag yet this year, but there is still time to make it happen. For me, the multiseason tag has helped to accelerate the learning process and allowed me to be a more patient hunter. Without it, I might be lucky to get 2 or 3 days to hunt deer and maybe another 2 days for elk due to my work schedule.
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: fishnfur on October 21, 2017, 10:12:06 PM
I don't think the MS deer tag affects Blacktails at all.  Their response to more pressure is becoming more invisible. 

I haven't seen an elk since July.  It wasn't MS elk hunters that made them scarce, but dang!  Where'd they go.  The seasons for elk are pretty short.  I say keep it the way it is.

Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: KM1986 on October 22, 2017, 06:51:04 PM
Multi-season tags are cool, but having to basically buy four tags to still only kill one animal is bs.
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: JDHasty on October 22, 2017, 09:04:59 PM
I don't think the MS deer tag affects Blacktails at all.  Their response to more pressure is becoming more invisible. 

I haven't seen an elk since July.  It wasn't MS elk hunters that made them scarce, but dang!  Where'd they go.  The seasons for elk are pretty short.  I say keep it the way it is.

Very true

Here is something else to chew on:  Most locals on two islands I have access on and in south Kitsap haven't been seeing deer numbers they normally do all summer.  I took a look in August and was fairly unconcerned, they obviously went nocturnal to get away from the heat. 

I checked the steep trails they use very early in the morning to go down and lick salt off the beach before bedding down.  They were as cut up by tracks as they always have been.  Someday, maybe if the stars align right, I will get hunting access to some of these properties.  The rub is they are view properties with sky high prices and the owners are becoming more and more software writer types who just don't allow hunting access.  I will take old islanders, hippies and artists any day over the new breed of island residents when it comes to gaining hunting access.

South Kitsap has been the same way this year.  The deer there have been nocturnal all summer, but have been back out during the day this week.       
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: Mallardmasher on October 22, 2017, 09:21:05 PM
I voted for them to go away, you should be a master of the weapon you choose. Some when drawn for the permit, have never touched the other user groups tools, but now they are hunting with them, with very little knowledge of them........Is this fair to the critters....I think not
The only reason I go in for the multi elk and deer is so I can chase deer with my bow during more season, this year with a muzzy, because of Roto-cuff surgery. But mainly, I put in for Elk, So I can put in for Dayton or other Blues elk tags, if not drawn for multi, I buy a ghost point, so I can hunt western Washington. Up to 27 points, and I will be damned if I can get a multi elk tag, so ghost points just keep adding up. To many to burn on a lesser area. IMO
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: PolarBear on October 22, 2017, 10:11:57 PM
And some of us have more than mastered every weapon.   :rolleyes:  This is my 3rd year in a row drawing a MS deer tag.  I love it!  My schedule gets so screwed up this time of year that is is nice to be able to miss a few weekends if I need to and also have plenty of time to be picky and spend all of modern hunting with my daughter and concentrating on her knowing that I have until the end of the year to get my buck..
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: pope on October 23, 2017, 05:21:46 AM
Works for me, for deer. I can't take vacation time and often my weekends are preoccupied with activities with the girls. Let's see, this weekend included a birthday party for my youngest, with 5 of her buddies sleeping over, 3 oil changes, a zombie dance at Maris Farm for our 2nd daughter, two hours of algebra tutoring, 1.5 hours of standing in the rain Saturday night after a mishap/fender-bender with my wife's Nissan (nobody is hurt), and watching my nephew play football in the Rams-Cardinals game in London. I don't buy the MS deer tag so I can hunt for hundreds of hours. I buy it because even being a weekend warrior is challenging to schedule.

One change I would like to see: require East or West for deer, just like with elk. I hate seeing all of the failed mule deer hunters showing up to hunt land they have never scouted. Last year a guy shot a blacktail buck near where I spend most of my time, and he had absolutely no plan for how to get the animal out of the woods.

While we're discussing seasons, how about a special season for traditional bows? There is an enormous difference between the range of a recurve or longbow and a compound. We distinguish between rifle and black powder, why not two types of archery seasons? I know when this could be done, without upsetting any of the current seasons: November 1st through the 14th.
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: trophyhunt on October 23, 2017, 06:20:10 AM
Deer should just be sold over the counter, elk could be increased a bit in numbers sold.  I love both the permits.
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: lewy on October 23, 2017, 06:23:57 AM
I also enjoy the extra time in the field, don't f up a good thing. If you don't like it don't buy it
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: pianoman9701 on October 23, 2017, 06:37:06 AM
WA is unusual in not allowing hunters to participate in multiple weapon seasons. The multi-season tags can help make up for that. With declining hunter numbers, I don't see how MS hurts ungulate numbers. I believe the biggest pressure on ungulate numbers is disease and predators.
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: trophyhunt on October 23, 2017, 07:02:01 AM
WA is unusual in not allowing hunters to participate in multiple weapon seasons. The multi-season tags can help make up for that. With declining hunter numbers, I don't see how MS hurts ungulate numbers. I believe the biggest pressure on ungulate numbers is disease and predators.
Predators for sure!!  I just spent a week in republic and didn't see a single legal buck, except for in town.  I think mule deer season should be shut down for about 5 years and they should pay us for coyote, cougar and bear pelts!!! 
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: skeeter 20i on October 23, 2017, 07:33:22 AM
I think poor resource management has done more to hurt the deer/elk herds then the MS tags.  Everything from logging practices to predator control has all combined to make some very poor conditions. 
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: vandeman17 on October 23, 2017, 08:21:26 AM
Its still just one animal per day so I don't mind it. I never have bought the MS permit myself but have no problem with people who do.

Like what was said earlier, other states general tags are for all methods and they have longer seasons too. The one thing most have over WA is the ratio of animals/land/hunters.  :twocents:
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: Sitka_Blacktail on October 23, 2017, 09:15:04 AM
I also enjoy the extra time in the field, don't f up a good thing. If you don't like it don't buy it

Used to be everyone got the extra time in the field if they wanted it. And at no cost. We'd hunt early archery, switch to modern season, then do late muzzy season or archery again. Then management decided it would be better for the herds to divide hunting up by area and weapon so there wouldn't be so many hunters in the field at one time.  Recently the Dept decided to slip hunting multiple weapons back in but at a price.  It was pretty limited at first, but they have gradually been expanding it. This was done to have another way to extract money from hunters. By keeping it limited and a draw, they created buzz and want and could charge a pretty hefty fee for the privilege most states allow over the counter for much cheaper if any extra cost. Now that they have a demand built up, they have gradually been increasing the number of multi season tags. Testing the market I'd call it. Seeing how many the can sell at current prices. Since this is for making money, (It certainly isn't for management purposes) they only have three options if they want to make more money. They either increase the price of a multi season tag, or they sell more multi season tags, or both. They are doing it gradually to maximize the money. I suspect if hunter numbers drop, they will raise prices and increase the number of multi season tags to make up for falling revenue. The problem being, by increasing costs (along with the increasing cost to gain access) they are gradually making it too expensive for new hunters to join the ranks so revenue will keep dropping and they will have to keep looking for more money streams. They may eventually go to over the counter for multi season tags. Then we will have a situation where we had something, they took it away and created a market for it, then brought it back at a price.

It's already a push for me to hunt out of State as a non resident or hunt here as a resident.  Idaho license and tag for deer? $456.50, muzzy permit $20, archey permit $20 Total..... $496.50. If I want to hunt all seasons but with a modern season that goes from Oct 10-Dec 1, I really don't feel the need to hunt with a bow or Muzzy there. There is lots of public land to hunt. Washington deer? license and tag $44.90, Access fee $250,  multi season tag $139.10. Total $434.

So for $62.50 more, if I hunt all weapons or 22.50 more if I don't, I can hunt Idaho with way more game and way more access and longer more flexible seasons, and have a lot more chance at a trophy sized animal if that's what I want.  I save on gas hunting there too as I do a lot less driving. Usually pick a spot and set up a camp and hunt the surrounding area. Here I do a lot more driving around. As an added bonus, In Idaho I can drive the roads and some trails on my Quad. I don't even pull it out of the garage when hunting locally here. I sometimes take it with me when I hunt the NE corner in the late season.  To be honest, it's more enjoyable hunting in Idaho. Less hunters and pressure. At least where I hunt.

The more I hunt in Idaho, the less money I spend here. And that's the way I'm leaning now.
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: PolarBear on October 23, 2017, 09:28:12 AM
This is probably our last year hunting WA.  Idaho and Montana are going to be it from now on (like everyone else).
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: boneaddict on October 23, 2017, 09:31:32 AM
Other than the fact they turned it into a money grab instead of a tool that could be used to manage a resource/time in the field etc .....

Basically,  you used to be able to hunt with all methods.  The herd supposedly needed managed so they cut this.
Now the herd is 10x worse than it was when they did this change but in the meantime, they came up with a way to charge you to hunt all three methods.   Now think about it.  there are more multiseason tags than people willing to pay for them.   
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: pianoman9701 on October 23, 2017, 09:34:16 AM
Not for elk. I've missed 5 in a row.
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: JimmyHoffa on October 23, 2017, 09:39:28 AM
I don't think there are enough of them out there to make much of a difference.  They still restrict people to the general seasons.  Kind of nice occasionally having hunting seasons more like states that want you to shoot things.
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: kselkhunter on October 23, 2017, 09:43:38 AM
Agreed.  Not enough MS tags to really cause an impact.  There were almost 150,000 deer tags purchased last year, with only 6347 people buying the additional MS deer tag.  There were over 103,000 elk tags purchased, and only the 1000 allowed to buy the MS elk tag.   

Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: blackveltbowhunter on October 23, 2017, 09:44:17 AM
I skewed the poll and don"t know how to change it. I voted yes, because my reading comprehension skills were rusty this am. I am in favor of keeping the Multi as is. With possible minor tweaks.

I agree with Sitka at times it seems we are boiling frogs. However I like to have options, and the multi gives us those options. It all depends on your priorities. And priorities can change from year to year. I know of guys who buy multiple private passes a year, plus multi season, and shoot a spike buck and are happy as can be. Other guys may do the same because they want the opportunity to chase big blacktails and we are one of the few states where that is possible. Other guys look at it and think its crazy. Myself, I chose to get a multi last year for permit options, and it payed off. This year I chose to apply my money elsewhere and selected a rifle tag hunting  public land keeping my cost as low as possible in state. Putting that money toward out of state tags and additional hunts.   
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: Buzz2401 on October 23, 2017, 09:45:27 AM
I like them but I don't like the crazy price they are charging and I really don't like the way they are selling the leftovers.  Make people put in the money for it ahead of time then if they draw they are committed.  No selling leftovers in the way they do it now.  We do need better predator control for sure but our elk herds on the east side are doing well and Mule deer populations are down across the country.  Until they figure out how to stop hoof rot the westside is gonna be in poor shape for elk.
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: Blacktail Sniper on October 23, 2017, 09:47:35 AM
I also enjoy the extra time in the field, don't f up a good thing. If you don't like it don't buy it

Used to be everyone got the extra time in the field if they wanted it. And at no cost. We'd hunt early archery, switch to modern season, then do late muzzy season or archery again. Then management decided it would be better for the herds to divide hunting up by area and weapon so there wouldn't be so many hunters in the field at one time.  Recently the Dept decided to slip hunting multiple weapons back in but at a price.  It was pretty limited at first, but they have gradually been expanding it. This was done to have another way to extract money from hunters. By keeping it limited and a draw, they created buzz and want and could charge a pretty hefty fee for the privilege most states allow over the counter for much cheaper if any extra cost. Now that they have a demand built up, they have gradually been increasing the number of multi season tags. Testing the market I'd call it. Seeing how many the can sell at current prices. Since this is for making money, (It certainly isn't for management purposes) they only have three options if they want to make more money. They either increase the price of a multi season tag, or they sell more multi season tags, or both. They are doing it gradually to maximize the money. I suspect if hunter numbers drop, they will raise prices and increase the number of multi season tags to make up for falling revenue. The problem being, by increasing costs (along with the increasing cost to gain access) they are gradually making it too expensive for new hunters to join the ranks so revenue will keep dropping and they will have to keep looking for more money streams. They may eventually go to over the counter for multi season tags. Then we will have a situation where we had something, they took it away and created a market for it, then brought it back at a price.

It's already a push for me to hunt out of State as a non resident or hunt here as a resident.  Idaho license and tag for deer? $456.50, muzzy permit $20, archey permit $20 Total..... $496.50. If I want to hunt all seasons but with a modern season that goes from Oct 10-Dec 1, I really don't feel the need to hunt with a bow or Muzzy there. There is lots of public land to hunt. Washington deer? license and tag $44.90, Access fee $250,  multi season tag $139.10. Total $434.

So for $62.50 more, if I hunt all weapons or 22.50 more if I don't, I can hunt Idaho with way more game and way more access and longer more flexible seasons, and have a lot more chance at a trophy sized animal if that's what I want.  I save on gas hunting there too as I do a lot less driving. Usually pick a spot and set up a camp and hunt the surrounding area. Here I do a lot more driving around. As an added bonus, In Idaho I can drive the roads and some trails on my Quad. I don't even pull it out of the garage when hunting locally here. I sometimes take it with me when I hunt the NE corner in the late season.  To be honest, it's more enjoyable hunting in Idaho. Less hunters and pressure. At least where I hunt.

The more I hunt in Idaho, the less money I spend here. And that's the way I'm leaning now.

Been hunting here since 1976, and it has not been free to switch between seasons since I started hunting. 

True, there was just a deer or elk tag, but it was modern firearm by default.  If you wanted to hunt archery or black powder, you had to buy a "bow and arrow permit" or a "muzzleloading rifle permit" which were, in 1977 - $6.00 each, which was $1.00 more than a deer tag....
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: NoBark on October 23, 2017, 10:00:44 AM
So we went to the Choose your weapon scenario to reduce crowding especially Modern firearm season.  Then the legislature told the DFW to go find your own money and the MS tag came our raising money for DFW AND raising the crowding problem as well.   

I understand they need money, but the impact hasn't been good in my opinion.   I would dare say the number of Muzzy or Archery guys joining the rifle crowd is a very small percentage of total rifle hunters BUT, flip it and you find a huge increase in Modern tag holders joining the Archery guys for the late hunt.   The late season in by far the archers best chance at deer, and the hunter numbers have gone through the rood since the MS tag came into play.   

If I could change one thing, it would be to make the MS deer tag valid for the early archery and Modern seasons only and let the people who choose archery have the late season back to themselves. It would give MS tag holders two shots at deer and alleviate the crowding in the late archery seasons.  My two cents,.
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: Whitenuckles on October 23, 2017, 10:37:45 AM
I skewed the poll and don"t know how to change it. I voted yes, because my reading comprehension skills were rusty this am. I am in favor of keeping the Multi as is. With possible minor tweaks.

I agree with Sitka at times it seems we are boiling frogs. However I like to have options, and the multi gives us those options. It all depends on your priorities. And priorities can change from year to year. I know of guys who buy multiple private passes a year, plus multi season, and shoot a spike buck and are happy as can be. Other guys may do the same because they want the opportunity to chase big blacktails and we are one of the few states where that is possible. Other guys look at it and think its crazy. Myself, I chose to get a multi last year for permit options, and it payed off. This year I chose to apply my money elsewhere and selected a rifle tag hunting  public land keeping my cost as low as possible in state. Putting that money toward out of state tags and additional hunts.
I screwed up to. I accidentally voted yes, wanted to vote NO!
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: JimmyHoffa on October 23, 2017, 10:52:21 AM
Multiseason permits do make the mix a bit more interesting.  I know I prefer to go muzzy, but the special permits I want are only good for modern tags (or multi).  So, most years don't draw multi so have to get a modern tag.
WDFW allows a 'lesser weapon' in the general seasons, they could probably allow lesser weapon tags to apply for special permits--let muzzy apply for mod tags.  :dunno:
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: JDHasty on October 23, 2017, 11:24:57 AM
I skewed the poll and don"t know how to change it. I voted yes, because my reading comprehension skills were rusty this am. I am in favor of keeping the Multi as is. With possible minor tweaks.

I agree with Sitka at times it seems we are boiling frogs. However I like to have options, and the multi gives us those options. It all depends on your priorities. And priorities can change from year to year. I know of guys who buy multiple private passes a year, plus multi season, and shoot a spike buck and are happy as can be. Other guys may do the same because they want the opportunity to chase big blacktails and we are one of the few states where that is possible. Other guys look at it and think its crazy. Myself, I chose to get a multi last year for permit options, and it payed off. This year I chose to apply my money elsewhere and selected a rifle tag hunting  public land keeping my cost as low as possible in state. Putting that money toward out of state tags and additional hunts.
I screwed up to. I accidentally voted yes, wanted to vote NO!

I haven't voted.  I could not discern what a yes vote stands for and what a no vote stands for given the wording in the ask.  I see it has been clarified now.   
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: boneaddict on October 23, 2017, 11:45:29 AM
One item I do appreciate about them, and the reason I often blow 180 bucks.....if you have the multi season permit you can apply for special permits in the different weapons class.   For instance, I apply for latemodern hunts versus archery, but usually hunt archery.   
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: Special T on October 23, 2017, 12:13:42 PM
Perhaps more useful info is necessary...

I've never had a MS but... If you have one so you still take a week off for hunting, provided you did before? Does your hunting become more weekend warrior since you have more weekends to spread it over?

How does the number of days in the feild change?

If most MS hunters only hunt weekends or 3 day ones... is this really that much more pressure?

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk

Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: boneaddict on October 23, 2017, 01:42:09 PM
Generally I pay the 180 dollars so I can apply for hunts I never get drawn for, then kill my buck the first day I hunt.  This year I saved 180 because the deer herd is in such bad shape, all I wasted my money on was points.
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: NOCK NOCK on October 23, 2017, 02:55:21 PM
Other than the fact they turned it into a money grab instead of a tool that could be used to manage a resource/time in the field etc .....

Basically,  you used to be able to hunt with all methods.  The herd supposedly needed managed so they cut this.
Now the herd is 10x worse than it was when they did this change but in the meantime, they came up with a way to charge you to hunt all three methods.   Now think about it.  there are more multiseason tags than people willing to pay for them.



Agreed,

The whole point in this poll is because the Mule deer herds are in bad shape, we mostly all can agree on that.
The most viable, and realistic option that we have at helping the herds is "people control"
Wolves Management=not a chance this will change.
Predator control= Yes cats and yotes need more population control......But lots on here keep referring to bears as having a large impact on deer population. Simply not true, research it. (example in link)
https://wildlife.utah.gov/predators-mule-deer.html



So we went to the Choose your weapon scenario to reduce crowding especially Modern firearm season.  Then the legislature told the DFW to go find your own money and the MS tag came our raising money for DFW AND raising the crowding problem as well.   

I understand they need money, but the impact hasn't been good in my opinion.   I would dare say the number of Muzzy or Archery guys joining the rifle crowd is a very small percentage of total rifle hunters BUT, flip it and you find a huge increase in Modern tag holders joining the Archery guys for the late hunt.   The late season in by far the archers best chance at deer, and the hunter numbers have gone through the rood since the MS tag came into play.   

If I could change one thing, it would be to make the MS deer tag valid for the early archery and Modern seasons only and let the people who choose archery have the late season back to themselves. It would give MS tag holders two shots at deer and alleviate the crowding in the late archery seasons.  My two cents,.

 :tup:
I also have seen a huge increase in the amount of archery folks due to the MS.

Even if its a small percentage of "extra" hunters during any given weapon season, its still added pressure on the critters, and there are without a doubt, deer killed every year that would not have been had that particular hunter been restricted to one weapon choice.

If we TRULY want tp help out the herds, we need to take a close look in the mirror, people control is the best way to achieve healthy herds. Eliminating the MS tags would still give all hunters their time/chance to hunt (as opposed to shutting down areas, draw only hunting, odd/even hunting, etc.)  Eliminating the MS permits would also help to provide hunters with something we all want......less competition in the field at the same time.

There are better/other ways for WDFW to increase funds. ie; pay an extra fee to be able to apply for a special permit in any category, add 1 or 2 more raffle permits, and have a small cap on them...Limit 10,





Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: Sitka_Blacktail on October 23, 2017, 04:03:41 PM

Been hunting here since 1976, and it has not been free to switch between seasons since I started hunting. 

True, there was just a deer or elk tag, but it was modern firearm by default.  If you wanted to hunt archery or black powder, you had to buy a "bow and arrow permit" or a "muzzleloading rifle permit" which were, in 1977 - $6.00 each, which was $1.00 more than a deer tag....

I started hunting in 1964 and bow hunting in !970. I don't remember a bow permit being required then, it was long enough ago I may have forgotten. But even as you show a bow permit was required in 1977, it was six bucks.  Even better that same bow permit was also good for elk too. Same with black powder permits.  It was cheap to hunt all the seasons whatever the case. With the way things are going now in the State's and timberland holder's quest to make more money off of hunting, hunter numbers will continue to dwindle and hunters as a whole will lose more political clout.  I'm sorry to see things go this way myself.
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: GrampasGuns on October 23, 2017, 06:21:10 PM
This was the last year I buy a MS.

This program is bankrupt of any reason, or rhyme.

When the system constantly has 2-3k left over permits each year, and to not just offer a MS without paying the $6 app, is equatable to theft in my opinion.

People who want them wont get drawn, and people who don't care wont buy one.

Pointless.
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: Smokepole on October 24, 2017, 12:21:53 PM
I voted no.  Hunted a new area this year and learning the country, so I decided to increase my chances.  Turned out I needed a little extra time, since I spent a good portion of muzzleloader deer dragging my son's buck.  That and some poor shooting.  Next year I'll just go back to muzz.  The mule deer are pretty thin right now.  They could use a break.
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: Elkaholic daWg on October 25, 2017, 05:23:10 AM
I believe you should be able to hunt all weapons east and west with the purchase of a simple big game tag.
As in my younger days.......Sell them OTC!
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: wt on October 26, 2017, 01:51:38 PM
No,and no. Only because it would wreck my marriage.lol. otherwise yes!
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: Smokepole on October 26, 2017, 03:29:02 PM
I meant to vote yes, for now until the deer herds recover.  I read the poll wrong and voted incorrectly.
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: archerykraze on October 27, 2017, 07:31:29 AM
Used to hunt either Archery or Muzzle for the lack of hunter competition. Might see 1 other hunter during archery season and a half dozen during Muzzle. The last two years been a lot more people showing up with MS Tags who are normally modern tag holders. This has pushed the deer into the thicker timber earlier with increased hunting pressure. I do believe we are applying too much pressure on the animals, heck they are already being chased nonstop by the predators the state wont let us properly control. I've changed my early season tactics and still manage to fill my tag, just got to adapt to the greedy state's changes I guess, but I'd like to see the MS Tag go away and maybe replace it with a 1-2 week long spring bear hunt tag that is a separate general season tag which I'm sure most would buy. Good Luck Everyone!
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: shorthair-on-point on October 27, 2017, 07:50:04 AM
I agree with many of the others. I have experienced a great deal more pressure in my area (which is all private ground in which none of these people have permission by the way). The animals are definitely more stressed. If they are going to keep it they need to do something to relieve the hunting pressure. Maybe permit the multi season tag by GMU.
Title: Re: Multi season permits, good or bad?
Post by: NOCK NOCK on October 27, 2017, 07:53:14 AM
Used to hunt either Archery or Muzzle for the lack of hunter competition. Might see 1 other hunter during archery season and a half dozen during Muzzle. The last two years been a lot more people showing up with MS Tags who are normally modern tag holders. This has pushed the deer into the thicker timber earlier with increased hunting pressure. I do believe we are applying too much pressure on the animals, heck they are already being chased nonstop by the predators the state wont let us properly control. I've changed my early season tactics and still manage to fill my tag, just got to adapt to the greedy state's changes I guess, but I'd like to see the MS Tag go away and maybe replace it with a 1-2 week long spring bear hunt tag that is a separate general season tag which I'm sure most would buy. Good Luck Everyone!


Bingo,

 waaay more pressure now during archery/muzzy.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal