Hunting Washington Forum
Big Game Hunting => Bow Hunting => Topic started by: Robm78 on November 21, 2017, 09:16:30 AM
-
I just felt like complaining somewhere...lol
I just read that if the gate is Weyerhauser, you have to pay $200+ per person to drive......Ok....that just sucks but hey, I'll walk....nope, thats $50!!!!!
-
How much would you charge to let the public walk and drive on your private property?
-
How much would you charge to let the public walk and drive on your private property?
Wow...you condone this? Well, I dont even have a response for you.
-
How much would you charge to let the public walk and drive on your private property?
Wow...you condone this? Well, I dont even have a response for you.
:chuckle:
-
Also, you pay if it's Hancock, Rayonier, Green Diamond, Inland Empire Paper, etc.
The majority of private timberland in Washington now requires an access fee.
-
I'm just gonna come out and say it, I'm relatively new to hunting, live in eastern Wa. and had no idea until I joined this message board that timber companies charged money to hunt on their? land.
I put a question mark after the "their" for a reason.
Question. Do the timber companies own this land or do they lease it from the public?
-
I'm just gonna come out and say it, I'm relatively new to hunting, live in eastern Wa. and had no idea until I joined this message board that timber companies charged money to hunt on their? land.
I put a question mark after the "their" for a reason.
Question. Do the timber companies own this land or do they lease it from the public?
They own it.
Sent from my SM-G950U using Tapatalk
-
People need to realize that it is PRIVATE PROPERTY.
They should be thankful for the opportunity......if it remains one.
-
How much would you charge to let the public walk and drive on your private property?
Wow...you condone this? Well, I dont even have a response for you.
Figured after your "rant", that would be your response.
Go buy your own land and never worry about buying access to others.
-
They own the land, but they do get huge tax breaks. :twocents:
-
How much would you charge to let the public walk and drive on your private property?
Wow...you condone this? Well, I dont even have a response for you.
Don't hunt it. Simple as that. Look into leasing fees elswhere. Yes, they do get tax breaks but frankly, it's as cheap of access as you will ever find.
-
I'll never understand why people complain about this. It's private property. At least they give you the option to access it at all. Am I missing something? Man...what would it be like if they didn't give access at all?
It's private property.....
-
And, for better or worse, one benefit is the limited number of permits does help some on the crowding in the more popular areas...
-
:yeah:
A couple hundred bucks to drive in doesn't seem like a bad deal to me, especially if you look into prices of leasing your own place or buying your own private property. $50 to walk in is a bargain!
-
They own the land, but they do get huge tax breaks. :twocents:
And?
-
They own the land, but they do get huge tax breaks. :twocents:
And?
And what? :dunno:
-
It's private property and they can do what they want, but we still have a right to complain. Originally the huge tax breaks were given to these companies with the understanding that the public would always have access to these lands. Of course the problem was they never put it in writing.
-
The public does still have access, just for a small fee. I don't see the issue. If you own your own land, you get to make the rules. :dunno:
-
The public does still have access, just for a small fee. I don't see the issue. If you own your own land, you get to make the rules. :dunno:
Well, not exactly true. It's debatable whether the fee is "small," but besides that, the only people that get access are those who are online with a high speed internet connection at the designated time, and are able to purchase a permit before they are all gone, which sometimes is only about 3 minutes.
-
They own the land, but they do get huge tax breaks. :twocents:
And?
And what? :dunno:
The designated forest land tax program has no implications on public access. Many thousands of landowners across the state utilize the same program (albeit on a smaller scale), and they do not have to grant access to others. Sounds like you already many know this, just wanted to offer more info for others to better understand the issue! :)
-
I don't see the issue. If you own your own land, you get to make the rules. :dunno:
Well, not exactly true. It's debatable whether the fee is "small," but besides that, the only people that get access are those who are online with a high speed internet connection at the designated time, and are able to purchase a permit before they are all gone, which sometimes is only about 3 minutes.
How would you like it if other people dictated to you what you can and can't do with your property?
-
If you add up all the access fees, it is a drop in the bucket. They are not making money on access fees. I would bet they spend more than that on garbage, security and damage 3X. :twocents:
-
I know some land managers, owners. The fees they charge barley cover the clean up costs associated with allowing people on the land. They do it to provide an opportunity for those willing to pay to play....but, some of these opportunities are on the verge of becoming non existent...they are tired of how people treat the land
..
-
The public does still have access, just for a small fee. I don't see the issue. If you own your own land, you get to make the rules. :dunno:
Well, not exactly true. It's debatable whether the fee is "small," but besides that, the only people that get access are those who are online with a high speed internet connection at the designated time, and are able to purchase a permit before they are all gone, which sometimes is only about 3 minutes.
I know it is a sore subject for those of us that have been around long enough to remember how it was.
It is debatable on what is a small fee, but something to consider is that spread it out over the lenght of the permit and it is less than what a lot of pepole pay for a cup of coffee a day.
Some areas include camping at no extra charge and firewood cutting as well.
The quick selling out of areas like Vail is a pain, but I think it fair to say, those who do not have high speed internet probably know someone who does. Is it a pain...yes, but certainly doable.
As has been said, at least there is the opportunity to get out in the timberlands, it could certainly be shut down with no chance to access it, and no recourse to fight it.
Think places like Capitol Forrest are over run now...??
-
At least they allow access to a lot of landlocked state land. In montana you cant access state land many times EVEN if a piece of state land touches it on the corner. No “corner crossing” allowed. Crazy.
-
Not surprised. $200 is a steal for access to private land for the season.
-
They own the land, but they do get huge tax breaks. :twocents:
True, but the original purchase agreements also stated that Weyco would provide access to the public since the state was selling them public land for $1 per acre and giving them massive tax credits. Weyco managed the property for years on behalf of the state and got the majority of the timber proceeds for managing the state land. They then in turn took the profit, bought the property and agreed to huge tax breaks as part of always allowing public access. Im torn because there are things to like and hate about pay to play land, but I firmly believe that the state should not continue to honor the tax breaks.....and I'm a Weyco shareholder.
-
Is any private timberland subsidized by the government ? If is, then there should be a no charge, or very low admission onto said lands.
-
I'll never understand why people complain about this. It's private property. At least they give you the option to access it at all. Am I missing something? Man...what would it be like if they didn't give access at all?
It's private property.....
:yeah:
-
Not surprised. $200 is a steal for access to private land for the season.
Yeah, I paid $350 for a Vail key. This is my last year though due to the amount of *censored*es and poaching.
-
If you want to get a cost example, here in Oklahoma, I pay $40 a year to access the Honobia Creek and Three Rivers WMAs. They are Wharehouser and Rayonier land.
The two units are about the size from the Columbia to the National Park boundary and from the coast to Hood canal.
-
I'm not a big fan of timber company charging access fees , But it is private property.But I think what it boils down to is at the end of the day people will access even if they do have to trespass , so why not just charge a access fee and make a little money anyway ,These timber company's know this and might as well make money,instead of loseing money trying to enforce keeping people out,I don't think they care much about hunting or access , But this is the problem they face in which we benefit through access.
-
I guess everyone could just stop hunting timber lands an d let the elk become a nuisance. Or go hunt out after state and pay almost as much.
-
I bought access in 2 states this year< and think it was well worth it.
-
I don't see the issue. If you own your own land, you get to make the rules. :dunno:
Well, not exactly true. It's debatable whether the fee is "small," but besides that, the only people that get access are those who are online with a high speed internet connection at the designated time, and are able to purchase a permit before they are all gone, which sometimes is only about 3 minutes.
How would you like it if other people dictated to you what you can and can't do with your property?
The government already dictates what a person can and can't do with their property...........all properties.
-
Not surprised. $200 is a steal for access to private land for the season.
Yeah, I paid $350 for a Vail key. This is my last year though due to the amount of *censored*es and poaching.
Not such a steal when you want to hunt one unit for deer and another for elk. Hard enough for most to buy one permit let alone two and when they buy two permits, that just means there are less people hunting when there is a limit on the # of permits sold. With less people hunting, it actually interfere's with WDF&G's management. Maybe someone bought a permit for an area they want to hunt muzzleloader early season in, and still have a tag but that unit isn't open for late season? They still have a license and tag, but are shut out of late season for lack of an access permit.
Personally, I wouldn't mind the fee if I could hunt any Weyerhauser property with a permit. But being locked into one unit really isn't worth it from what I see. I've bought the permit for two years, but next year I am saving the money and hunting out of state. That's two licenses and deer and elk tags (my son and I) Washington won't be selling next year, plus draw fees.
-
Not surprised. $200 is a steal for access to private land for the season.
Yeah, I paid $350 for a Vail key. This is my last year though due to the amount of *censored*es and poaching.
Not such a steal when you want to hunt one unit for deer and another for elk. Hard enough for most to buy one permit let alone two and when they buy two permits, that just means there are less people hunting when there is a limit on the # of permits sold. With less people hunting, it actually interfere's with WDF&G's management. Maybe someone bought a permit for an area they want to hunt muzzleloader early season in, and still have a tag but that unit isn't open for late season? They still have a license and tag, but are shut out of late season for lack of an access permit.
Personally, I wouldn't mind the fee if I could hunt any Weyerhauser property with a permit. But being locked into one unit really isn't worth it from what I see. I've bought the permit for two years, but next year I am saving the money and hunting out of state. That's two licenses and deer and elk tags (my son and I) Washington won't be selling next year, plus draw fees.
:yeah: I came to the same conclusion, save the money and hunt in MT, ID or WY. For what I pay, I can have much better opportunities.
For what it is worth, farmers have tax breaks on their land as well as churches and a host of others that don't allow free access for recreation. I get why people are upset for having to pay not insignificant amounts for what used to be free, but it is what it is.
-
Were it not for people going in and dumping appliances and roofing shingles, there probably wouldn't be any gates or fees.
-
Thought I stumbled into a topic From 2014. Are we still debating this issue? Pay for access is a done deal and here to stay. Either pay the fee or hunt public ground. Either way get off the road and you’ll be fine. ( except for wolves and hoof rot) also it’s a timber tax deferral that is paid at the time for harvest, you pay minimal taxes for the years growing the timber then pay a sizable chunk upon harvest :sry:
-
i still think its a bunch of *censored* they own the trees not the land the land is own bye us the united states all tax payers pay for this now we all bitch know when they know they can get more cash out of us its kind of how the tribes feel im sure and know its hitting all us if we dont watch it it will be all sold to china to pay the goverments det and so called private land owners cant pay the workers them enough but give them keys to hunt so called private land when we got to walk threw the gates or ride us the tax payers and yes there paying there *censored* too but come on make it all the same you hike in ten miles and it takes 20min or so to drive not stoping at all clear cuts in some spots lookig for some hoof disease elk that nobody can fix is *censored* we talk to some private land owner workers they said there not coming back to hunt im glad to here that thay dont have generation of all the hard hitting hunters that hunted in them woods lot of us do so f.... ill bye one permit and walk in from the top in to a walk in only thats been that way for a while and they cant find elk rd hunters but we all been paying lets fix the elk cancer and forget whos getting rich and fix the proublem ive heard wfg screwed up again and destroyed 10 more or so percent of the elk in st helens then they wanted its less then 70 precent know and was a good stack of elk im sure they will blame it on winter kill and hoof disease maybe to much on my mind
-
i still think its a bunch of *censored* they own the trees not the land the land is own bye us the united states all tax payers pay for this now we all bitch know when they know they can get more cash out of us its kind of how the tribes feel im sure and know its hitting all us if we dont watch it it will be all sold to china to pay the goverments det and so called private land owners cant pay the workers them enough but give them keys to hunt so called private land when we got to walk threw the gates or ride us the tax payers and yes there paying there *censored* too but come on make it all the same you hike in ten miles and it takes 20min or so to drive not stoping at all clear cuts in some spots lookig for some hoof disease elk that nobody can fix is *censored* we talk to some private land owner workers they said there not coming back to hunt im glad to here that thay dont have generation of all the hard hitting hunters that hunted in them woods lot of us do so f.... ill bye one permit and walk in from the top in to a walk in only thats been that way for a while and they cant find elk rd hunters but we all been paying lets fix the elk cancer and forget whos getting rich and fix the proublem ive heard wfg screwed up again and destroyed 10 more or so percent of the elk in st helens then they wanted its less then 70 precent know and was a good stack of elk im sure they will blame it on winter kill and hoof disease maybe to much on my mind
HUH !
-
This is why we need to fight to keep all the public land we currently have out of private hands and acquire as much new public land as possible. Folks may disagree with how the forest service manages the land but hunting and fishing opportunities are free and endless and if the land were privately managed the focus would be about removing resources to make money. Hunting and fishing opportunities would be expensive or disappear altogether. If the national forest were transferred to the state they would not have enough money to manage it and they would slowly sell it off to the private sector. Sportsman need to do everything in their power to prevent this from happening.
-
HUH !
:chuckle:
-
This is why we need to fight to keep all the public land we currently have out of private hands and acquire as much new public land as possible. Folks may disagree with how the forest service manages the land but hunting and fishing opportunities are free and endless and if the land were privately managed the focus would be about removing resources to make money. Hunting and fishing opportunities would be expensive or disappear altogether. If the national forest were transferred to the state they would not have enough money to manage it and they would slowly sell it off to the private sector. Sportsman need to do everything in their power to prevent this from happening.
THIS!!!!
-
I'll never understand why people complain about this. It's private property. At least they give you the option to access it at all. Am I missing something? Man...what would it be like if they didn't give access at all?
It's private property.....
:yeah: :yeah: ITS PRIVATE LAND!! If you have a few hundred acres that holds some quality hunting let us all know so we can come hunt for free, since you against charging a fee and all :tup:
-
To the OP, if you were looking at an area that was $200, you got a steal, cause I paid $250. :chuckle: Buuutttt....You get 2 cords of firewood, gallons of berries, mushrooms, some good fishing spots (if you are in areas with river access), access to more privatized camping areas and the chance to see those guys from that show Ax Men. :chuckle: Like everyone has said, they bought it, it's their's, nothing we can do about it but, either pay or hunt somewhere else. Sitka BT and some others made good points; it is frustrating that some "areas" are secluded to specific hunt times, so if you have said tag and you have to wait to hunt an open unit within the paid area, it can be frustrating; but once again, we look back at, it is our choice and job to pre plan. I am on year 2 buying into drive passes, and also believe that limit access provides advantages and disadvantages. Who's got a couple million $$ that would like to spread some holiday cheer for the Hunt WA group, and buy some private land. We shall call it: Hunt-WA's No Tell'um Timber Land. I'll go to Home Depot and start cutting keys and get some slick hang tags with a logo and pictures that make us look legit. I know there's a few of you retired Amazon/Microsoft/Boeing millionaires on here, come on... don't hold out on us... like my wife does on me! "Make Hunting In WA Great Again!" -Not that it's terrible or anything....
-
i still think its a bunch of *censored* they own the trees not the land the land is own bye us the united states all tax payers pay for this now we all bitch know when they know they can get more cash out of us its kind of how the tribes feel im sure and know its hitting all us if we dont watch it it will be all sold to china to pay the goverments det and so called private land owners cant pay the workers them enough but give them keys to hunt so called private land when we got to walk threw the gates or ride us the tax payers and yes there paying there *censored* too but come on make it all the same you hike in ten miles and it takes 20min or so to drive not stoping at all clear cuts in some spots lookig for some hoof disease elk that nobody can fix is *censored* we talk to some private land owner workers they said there not coming back to hunt im glad to here that thay dont have generation of all the hard hitting hunters that hunted in them woods lot of us do so f.... ill bye one permit and walk in from the top in to a walk in only thats been that way for a while and they cant find elk rd hunters but we all been paying lets fix the elk cancer and forget whos getting rich and fix the proublem ive heard wfg screwed up again and destroyed 10 more or so percent of the elk in st helens then they wanted its less then 70 precent know and was a good stack of elk im sure they will blame it on winter kill and hoof disease maybe to much on my mind
HUH !
That hurt my head just trying to read it!
Wish Cryder would step in and respond.
-
i still think its a bunch of *censored* they own the trees not the land the land is own bye us the united states all tax payers pay for this now we all bitch know when they know they can get more cash out of us its kind of how the tribes feel im sure and know its hitting all us if we dont watch it it will be all sold to china to pay the goverments det and so called private land owners cant pay the workers them enough but give them keys to hunt so called private land when we got to walk threw the gates or ride us the tax payers and yes there paying there *censored* too but come on make it all the same you hike in ten miles and it takes 20min or so to drive not stoping at all clear cuts in some spots lookig for some hoof disease elk that nobody can fix is *censored* we talk to some private land owner workers they said there not coming back to hunt im glad to here that thay dont have generation of all the hard hitting hunters that hunted in them woods lot of us do so f.... ill bye one permit and walk in from the top in to a walk in only thats been that way for a while and they cant find elk rd hunters but we all been paying lets fix the elk cancer and forget whos getting rich and fix the proublem ive heard wfg screwed up again and destroyed 10 more or so percent of the elk in st helens then they wanted its less then 70 precent know and was a good stack of elk im sure they will blame it on winter kill and hoof disease maybe to much on my mind
HUH !
That hurt my head just trying to read it!
Wish Cryder would step in and respond.
Or translate...
-
The biggest problem with these fees that I can see, and one that I face in many many of the areas I hunt in my neck of the woods, is when private timber holdings have landlocked access to public lands. Timber companies are stewards of the land, and are required to operate under very specific guidelines to protect Timber, Fish, and Wildlife for future generations. I believe DNR should require easements through timber property to access public land holdings. Remember, it may be PRIVATE property that the timber companies own but they CAN NOT OPERATE without DNR permission (permits)!
To further this concept: I don't think it should be legal or acceptable for the State of Washington to condone PUBLIC property (be it lakes or forest lands) being landlocked PERIOD. There should ALWAYS be an easement access. Time and time again I see housing developments popping up and land-locking public parcels and completely shutting off access. It is BS for us to pay for those lands only to have them closed off to public access.
That's my rant.
-
How much land are we talking about that is landlocked?
-
@Fireweed is really good at discussing this subject. He has posted in the past lots of good info on the subject. Here is a quote from Fireweed about access that I think is appropriate for this discussion. I'll quote him because he can discuss this stuff way better than I...... :
Did weyco stop harvesting and selling trees? Why should they loose their tax break? It's as simple as a land use fee, it off sets the cost of maintenance to their land caused by the RECREATIONAL users.
The gentlemen in the article said he was "forced" to by a tag because he drew a cow tag. I call BS, do your homework. It wasn't a secrete, it was posted in every hunting regs. Weyco even agreed to lengthen the purchase date to allow procrastinator and or half assed protestors who said they weren't gonna buy a permit purchase a pass.
The real problem here is keeping the access fee down. At $150 a year that's very affordable and breaks down to $12.50 per month. If users really cared about having a place to recreate, they would put their energy into making sure a long term deal between the state and weyco would get signed to keep the fee around the $150 mark and not turn into all land leases. The alternative is they close all their land to public access and nobody gets to hunt. Don't forget, they own almost the entire west side!
The tax break isn't for harvesting and selling trees. The reason for the tax break as outlined in state law is "so that present and future generations will enjoy the benefits which forest areas provide..." Here it is (again) http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=84.33.010 (http://apps.leg.wa.gov/rcw/default.aspx?cite=84.33.010) Raw materials is just one of those many listed benefits. Providing recreational spaces is another.
Why should the government give them--or any business--special treatment for operating a business as usual? You make and sell wigits so you automatically get a tax break? If the government and the legislature (and in this case the citizens of the state) voted in tax breaks special for you, it is because wigit-making has public benefits attached to it beyond what other businesses make and sell. In this case the "benefits which forest areas provide" are beyond growing and selling trees. Recreation is among those benefits, therefore a portion of the tax break compensates for recreational access. Charging the public to access the land while still enjoying the full tax benefit is no different that charging the state for wildlife habitat or for each logging job. If they just charged for vehicles, I could see a justification, but they are charging for all entry. Its simply Double-dipping.
P.S. the 5% excise tax on harvest only covers the property tax on the trees. It is inaccurate according to law to state that the excise tax replaces the property tax on the land. The above legislative link at the bottom.
-
In some cases it is a lot. Also, there are instances of public bodies of water that have become landlocked as well.
-
In some cases it is a lot. Also, there are instances of public bodies of water that have become landlocked as well.
I have seen a few small areas completely locked up by Weyerhaeuser, mostly in my areas they lock up the only short access to state and federal areas. You can still get to them but it requires mapping and lots of research to figure out the connecting areas for 2 areas I am familiar with.
Also, had to mention your user name cracked me up!
-
i still think its a bunch of *censored* they own the trees not the land the land is own bye us the united states all tax payers pay for this now we all bitch know when they know they can get more cash out of us its kind of how the tribes feel im sure and know its hitting all us if we dont watch it it will be all sold to china to pay the goverments det and so called private land owners cant pay the workers them enough but give them keys to hunt so called private land when we got to walk threw the gates or ride us the tax payers and yes there paying there *censored* too but come on make it all the same you hike in ten miles and it takes 20min or so to drive not stoping at all clear cuts in some spots lookig for some hoof disease elk that nobody can fix is *censored* we talk to some private land owner workers they said there not coming back to hunt im glad to here that thay dont have generation of all the hard hitting hunters that hunted in them woods lot of us do so f.... ill bye one permit and walk in from the top in to a walk in only thats been that way for a while and they cant find elk rd hunters but we all been paying lets fix the elk cancer and forget whos getting rich and fix the proublem ive heard wfg screwed up again and destroyed 10 more or so percent of the elk in st helens then they wanted its less then 70 precent know and was a good stack of elk im sure they will blame it on winter kill and hoof disease maybe to much on my mind
HUH !
That hurt my head just trying to read it!
Wish Cryder would step in and respond.
Mine too....
-
Lmao!!! Is that cryders off spring!!!! By the way,,, i think weyco permits are fantastic. They are the only ones around here that know to manage there land.
-
After seeing all the trash out there, I’m surprised we’re allowed anywhere in the woods at all! Ridiculous out there!
I actually like the idea of pay to play. Cuts down on the people who aren’t serious about being out there in the first place! I do feel bad for the folks that can’t afford the cost, but there is plenty of free access state and federal lands still out there..
-
Sad but true $250 to hunt a formerly free area where I grew up.
-
They own the land, but they do get huge tax breaks. :twocents:
- No kidding - All this land grabbing on the backs of Gov't corruption
-
The public does still have access, just for a small fee. I don't see the issue. If you own your own land, you get to make the rules. :dunno:
Well, not exactly true. It's debatable whether the fee is "small," but besides that, the only people that get access are those who are online with a high speed internet connection at the designated time, and are able to purchase a permit before they are all gone, which sometimes is only about 3 minutes.
Ridiculous - My old man barely knows how to google! Timber companies buncha sick elitists.