Hunting Washington Forum

Community => Advocacy, Agencies, Access => Topic started by: csaaphill on November 27, 2017, 10:29:46 PM

Title: Supreme court wouldn't hear asault weapons ban
Post by: csaaphill on November 27, 2017, 10:29:46 PM: :bash:
just when you thought it was safe to go buy a assault rifle again a Conservative (Neal Gorsuch being included) wouldn't hear MD's assault weapons ban law suit.
http://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/361969-supreme-court-refuses-to-take-up-marylands-assault-weapons-ban
The Supreme Court refused Monday to hear an appeal from gun owners and dealers in Maryland challenging the state’s ban on military-style rifles and detachable magazines.

The Maryland General Assembly enacted the ban in 2013 after a gunman killed 20 children and 6 adults at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn.
Title: Re: Supreme court wouldn't hear asault weapons ban
Post by: Lucky1 on November 27, 2017, 11:14:26 PM: The article didn’t say what the vote count was to exclude the case. The judge quoted in the article wrote the majority opinion. I wonder what the count was and how they each voted.
Title: Re: Supreme court wouldn't hear asault weapons ban
Post by: Britt-dog on November 28, 2017, 06:37:55 AM: I believe it was 5-2.
Title: Re: Supreme court wouldn't hear asault weapons ban
Post by: Katmai Guy on November 28, 2017, 08:45:27 AM: Quote from: csaaphill on November 27, 2017, 10:29:46 PM
:bash:
just when you thought it was safe to go buy a assault rifle again a Conservative (Neal Gorsuch being included) wouldn't hear MD's assault weapons ban law suit.
http://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/361969-supreme-court-refuses-to-take-up-marylands-assault-weapons-ban
The Supreme Court refused Monday to hear an appeal from gun owners and dealers in Maryland challenging the state’s ban on military-style rifles and detachable magazines.

The Maryland General Assembly enacted the ban in 2013 after a gunman killed 20 children and 6 adults at an elementary school in Newtown, Conn.

Go buy one, there's always going to be a lawsuit or proposed ban somewhere. Unless you live in Maryland, sorry. :dunno:
Title: Re: Supreme court wouldn't hear asault weapons ban
Post by: csaaphill on November 28, 2017, 08:43:33 PM: Still all this just sucks should never have to leave a city/state or other to practice what is supposed to be uninfringeable.
Title: Re: Supreme court wouldn't hear asault weapons ban
Post by: csaaphill on November 28, 2017, 08:49:12 PM: Just proves that a long train of abuses, and usurpations will continue. :bash:
Title: Re: Supreme court wouldn't hear asault weapons ban
Post by: Stein on November 28, 2017, 08:52:33 PM: Heller affirmed that regulating access to weapons with primarily a military use was allowable so I'm not too surprised. All rights have some type of limits associated with them and I expect something to trigger a case someday to help clarify what is allowed to be banned and what isn't as I have no doubt that will be tested in some of our favorite states.
Title: Re: Supreme court wouldn't hear asault weapons ban
Post by: Oh Mah on November 28, 2017, 08:56:09 PM: What firearm was ever made that didn't fit this description?Even a musket was built for military.
Title: Re: Supreme court wouldn't hear asault weapons ban
Post by: csaaphill on November 28, 2017, 09:08:01 PM: Quote from: Stein on November 28, 2017, 08:52:33 PM
Heller affirmed that regulating access to weapons with primarily a military use was allowable so I'm not too surprised. All rights have some type of limits associated with them and I expect something to trigger a case someday to help clarify what is allowed to be banned and what isn't as I have no doubt that will be tested in some of our favorite states.
That's why when Heller was first announced I wasn't all dancing in the streets as everyone else were. Scalia by not saying it was an absolute right and that municipalities or states had no right by majority or otherwise to regulate didn't really do us a favor. It was a compromise decision: Gave us the right but gave them the right to infringe.