Post by: Stalkin Prey on April 19, 2018, 02:13:46 PM
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: SkookumHntr on April 19, 2018, 02:22:42 PM
Post by: EyeTooth on April 19, 2018, 03:06:24 PM
Post by: Bob33 on April 19, 2018, 04:07:09 PM
Post by: Stein on April 19, 2018, 05:21:19 PM
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Post by: dreamunelk on April 19, 2018, 05:51:34 PM
Post by: elkchaser54 on April 21, 2018, 10:01:32 AM
Post by: Oh Mah on April 21, 2018, 10:11:12 AM
QUOTE: (The state just needs to move to a system where in order for your TAG to be valid when punched you must register it online as harvested. So these numbers are accurate)
Post by: teanawayslayer on April 21, 2018, 10:15:24 AM
It is statistically accurate. My understanding is hunter reporting is not what you would expect it to be. Unfortunately many do not report and there are the ones who just lie. I think that is said. Harvest reporting is the best tool they have. So when hunters complain who is really at fault.if used properly it is a great tool. I reported on all my tags and still had a admin fee. :dunno:. Pisses me off. Donate thousands to them every year and charge me a fee.
Post by: The scout on April 21, 2018, 11:24:26 AM
Post by: Peewee on April 22, 2018, 03:14:24 PM
Post by: dreamunelk on April 22, 2018, 03:51:44 PM
I also suggest you find out what you did not report on. A guy I know thought he reported and found out the clerk at Cabelas sold him a useless tag that he forgot about. Clerk sold him a damage tag. He is kind of naive when it comes to Washington so he took the clerks word for it. He has learned his lesson about listening to Cabelas staff.
Post by: Deerelk37 on May 06, 2018, 10:21:37 AM
Post by: Bob33 on May 06, 2018, 12:22:19 PM
I wouldn’t mind a better system for mandatory reporting. My father law said in Wisconsin you had X amount of time to go to a check station to get your animal tagged and a butcher could not accept without such tag. Total number of licenses and amount of kill tags issued would be more accurate than a 10$ fee. The fee only to me shows that on the $’s are cared about, not animal populations.That would work for tags that are filled, but I suspect the vast majority of tags that aren't reported are for unfilled or unused tags.
Post by: Humptulips on May 06, 2018, 02:03:06 PM
For those that reported and got charged for failure to report. I suggest you start sending some emails! Sounds to me that maybe we start requesting a confirmation email or number when reporting. I doubt it is intentional as some imply. Maybe a glitch in the system. I hear a new system is coming. We should start asking for this feature. I have to admit the thought of a new system scares me. Sometimes I am pessimistic and think things can only get worse with change.
I also suggest you find out what you did not report on. A guy I know thought he reported and found out the clerk at Cabelas sold him a useless tag that he forgot about. Clerk sold him a damage tag. He is kind of naive when it comes to Washington so he took the clerks word for it. He has learned his lesson about listening to Cabelas staff.
You should be getting a confirmation number when you report. I do.
Post by: Deerelk37 on May 06, 2018, 02:15:36 PM
I wouldn’t mind a better system for mandatory reporting. My father law said in Wisconsin you had X amount of time to go to a check station to get your animal tagged and a butcher could not accept without such tag. Total number of licenses and amount of kill tags issued would be more accurate than a 10$ fee. The fee only to me shows that on the $’s are cared about, not animal populations.That would work for tags that are filled, but I suspect the vast majority of tags that aren't reported are for unfilled or unused tags.
That’s ok. My thought is at least we have a better gauge on the actual number of harvested animals. The only ones not included would be those who self-butcher. Which I assume is a small %. Then just charge the 10$ or 15$ (since there would be less unreported kills) for anyone who does not report. Whether the tag is unused or I unfilled will be irrelevant. They are the same to me, no animal was harvested from their truck or couch. I don’t care how many people actually had time to go hunting. I just want an accurate take of animals taken. Trend reports would mean more that way. As it is now you can’t trust any number. I could fill my tag every year and just pay the 10$. No system is perfect but it could definitely improve
Post by: snake on May 13, 2018, 06:34:07 PM
The state just needs to move to a system where in order for your TAG to be valid when punched you must register it online as harvested. So these numbers are accurate
yeah, more rules thats what we need. :chuckle: