Post by: bbarnes on March 24, 2009, 06:27:06 PM
shac comments <shaccomments@co.skamania.wa.us
Axel Swanson <swansona@co.cowlitz.wa.us
Brian Willoughby <brian_willoughby@cantwell.senate.gov
Casey Roeder <casey@skamania.org
Debbie Slack <slack@co.skamania.wa.us
Jim Adams <jima@nwinterp.org
Jim Sedell <jimsedell@yahoo.com
Lee Grose <bocc@co.lewis.wa.us
Maree Lerchen <maree@windermere.com
Mark Plotkin <mark@visitmtsthelens.com
Mark Smith <ecoparkman@mac.com
Mary Kay Nelson <Info@VisitRainier.com
Nancy Parkes <n.parkes@comcast.net
Page Phillips <page.phillips@mail.house.gov
Paul Pearce <pearce@co.skamania.wa.us
Sherie Weisser <dsweisser@gmail.com
Theresa Wagner <theresa_wagner@murray.senate.gov
Post by: Guns4Fun on March 24, 2009, 06:35:40 PM
I want to attend the meeting....where is it being held?
Post by: bbarnes on March 24, 2009, 06:37:36 PM
207 4th Ave. North, Third Floor, Room 305,
Kelso, WA 98626
Telephone:
360-577-3020
Post by: KillzElk on March 25, 2009, 04:05:37 PM
I read this article National park status considered for Mount St. Helens
by Scott Learn, The Oregonian
Thursday February 26, 2009
If you missed it here it is:
http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2009/02/mount_st_helens_national_park.html
Committee says no to Mount St. Helens national park
by Scott Learn, The Oregonian
Wednesday March 04, 2009
Link:
http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2009/03/committee_says_no_to_national.html
Post by: KillzElk on March 25, 2009, 04:09:31 PM
Thursday, March 5, 2009
Its time to stand up.....
http://tdn.com/articles/2009/03/06/area_news/doc49b099585c73b861331943.txt
OPB News
Mt. St. Helens: National Park Or National Monument?
http://news.opb.org/article/4441-mt-st-helens-national-park-or-national-monument/
Post by: KillzElk on March 25, 2009, 04:24:20 PM
Voiced concerns about limits on hunting :hunter:, fishing :fishin:,off-road vehicle travel :4w: ., Guns :mgun:, Camping:fire.: :cmp1: :cue: & :tree1:
Keep Mount St. Helens Out of the National Park System Posted March 5th, 2009
Read full post here: ...
http://www.nationalparkstraveler.com/2009/03/committee-keep-mount-st-helens-out-national-park-system
The economic study, prepared for the Mount St. Helens Advisory Committee by the Environmental Law Clinic at the
University of Washington, said, in part, that as a national park the mountain would be better funded and have a
higher national profile, thus attracting more visitors. BS BS :liar:.........
Post by: saudog on March 25, 2009, 05:41:07 PM
Hello All,
I am writing as a life long beneficiary of living in the shadow of one of the greatest wilderness and outdoor recreational areas in the state and in this country. Many of my fondest memories trace back to the Mt. St. Helens area and they include many diverse activities such as hiking, backcountry camping with my dad, car camping with my family, hunting, mt. biking, fishing, cross country skiing and snowmobiling from the winter parks. I grew up in Longview and now live up in Seattle. I am surrounded by National Parks, National Forests, and Wilderness areas from where I currently reside and from where I grew up. I understand the difference between these designations and relish the different opportunities that they all provide. Mt Rainier, The North Cascades, and the Olympics are always and were always within reach as well as all the great National Forests lands and Wilderness areas. Every weekend I have available I hit the road in search of outdoor adventure. Even from up here in Seattle, the road very often leads back to my old stomping grounds around Mt. St. Helens due to the many unique opportunities and undisturbed remoteness of the area. I relish the fact that there are no gated entries, no expensive park fees, no overflowing parking lots, and overall I just relish the fact that the area is kept wild but accessible due to its current status as a National Forest and Monument. I cannot make it to the upcoming meeting on March 30th but would like to voice my opinion as this is one of the most important issues in my life.
I have spent and still spend a lot of time in the National Parks and love what they have to offer. I also avoid these areas often due to the crowds and the restrictions that the designation carries with it. If you have been to the access points to Mt. Rainier you know exactly what I am talking about. Hiking and sight seeing is about all the National Parks have to offer. Many times, the few restricted campsites are full and you can’t even stay overnight if you want to go out backpacking. It scares me to death to think that the area that myself and many others have grown to love as it is may be in danger of changing dramatically by being designated a National Park. Never in a million years did I think I would have to plan months in advance to visit my own backyard.
I have also spent a lot of time in the Monument and can say it is as wild and undisturbed as ever. The plant life and animals are thriving in the area and that is in large part to the fact that people tend to leave it alone. If one were to compare the restrictions of a National Park like Mt. Rainier to the restrictions of the Monument area of Mt. St. Helens, one would see that the monument is actually as well or more protected than the National Park. I have been into the Mt. Margaret backcountry numerous times and not only is the area off limits to hunting due to the WDFW designation of the local hunting units, you are strictly prohibited from leaving the trail or disturbing the fragile ecosystem that has been and is still rebuilding itself. This is actually more protected than Mt. Rainier. If you put in for a “backcountry” camping permit in the many backcountry areas of Mt. Rainier, you can go hiking off trail and camp wherever you want. The same kinds of activities often occur in the Olympics. I have also heard that one of the proposals that would come with the designation of National Park may be to extend Highway 504 through the monument area. I can’t imagine how that would help protect the area or the wildlife but I would see that as very imposing on the backcountry just for the sake of convenience to human travel. I may be off on these particular details but extending any highways in that area for any reason should be taken off the board.
In closing, I see this proposal not as an attempt to protect the land or animals, but as an attempt to expose the area to more visitors and to restrict the opportunities for all kinds of recreation. The money argument should be thrown out the window as a non issue, whether the park status would or wouldn’t generate more income, as the land and its ability to thrive as well as provide enjoyment to all should be the real argument. There is nothing keeping people from coming far and wide to enjoy the majestic and undisturbed wilderness around Mt. St. Helens as it is. When my father and I are out there, all by our selves, as is almost always the case, we sit and wonder why more people can’t or don’t enjoy it. There is nothing keeping people out of the backcountry now, nor is there anything keeping people form enjoying the other sides of the mountain and its many opportunities. If people educate themselves on the area and its access points and trials, it is there for them as it is now. I for one am not for turning on a beacon, begging people to come look at the mountain while limiting peoples opportunities to a minimum, just in the sake of acquiring more money for the upkeep of roads or for generating dollars for the local economy. To me, the roads and trails are just fine; few and far between and a little rough going, just like Mother Nature would want it. Thank you for your time and feel free to reply with any questions or comments, as I would love to hear all sides to this argument.
Regards,
Saudog(my real name and number was included here)
Post by: lokidog on March 25, 2009, 09:24:35 PM
Nothing I have seen in the articles indicates that the park would be any larger than the existing monument, so how would this impact hunting? You are already prohibited from hunting in a Nat. Monument.
An increase in people would likely not be a good thing for the wildlife or the environment.
Now, here's the unless.... there is nothing that says hunting is always prohibited from national parks, a prohibition has to be written into the individual park's charter (for example, I believe Rocky Mtn Nat'l Park has no chartered prohibition even though they do not allow it). If there was some way to guarantee that hunting would be allowed, that additional roads would not be built, and the park service would not contract out some 500 room hotel, then I might be persuaded to go for the park.
Just my :twocents:
Post by: TONTO on March 25, 2009, 09:58:40 PM
First, I do not think this should become a national park unless.....
Nothing I have seen in the articles indicates that the park would be any larger than the existing monument, so how would this impact hunting? You are already prohibited from hunting in a Nat. Monument.
An increase in people would likely not be a good thing for the wildlife or the environment.
Now, here's the unless.... there is nothing that says hunting is always prohibited from national parks, a prohibition has to be written into the individual park's charter (for example, I believe Rocky Mtn Nat'l Park has no chartered prohibition even though they do not allow it). If there was some way to guarantee that hunting would be allowed, that additional roads would not be built, and the park service would not contract out some 500 room hotel, then I might be persuaded to go for the park.
Just my :twocents:
Actualy yes hunting is allowed in the national monument,just not the Lowitt Unit at this time.Portions of the Margret,Toutle and Lewis River units overlap the monument boundry.If it were to become a National Park this would end.The 500 room hotels are already proposed if it becomes a park or not. Then of course there are the wolves,they are coming anyway ,6 breeding pair in the southern cascades,I feel a National Park would just hurry this along.
Post by: lokidog on March 25, 2009, 10:26:26 PM
Thanks for the correction.
Post by: saudog on March 26, 2009, 08:26:13 AM
Post by: KillzElk on March 26, 2009, 11:21:17 AM
Judy Warnick
Address:
John L. O'Brien Building 403
Capitol Campus, Olympia, WA
98504-0600.
Phone: 360-786-7932.
E-mail: warnick.judy@leg.wa.gov
Members of the 61st Legislature 2009-2010
Name E-mail District Position Party
Rep. Gary Alexander alexander.gary@leg.wa.gov District 20 2 R
Rep. Glenn Anderson anderson.glenn@leg.wa.gov District 5 2 R
Rep. Jan Angel angel.jan@leg.wa.gov District 26 1 R
Rep. Sherry Appleton appleton.sherry@leg.wa.gov District 23 1 D
Rep. Mike Armstrong armstrong.mike@leg.wa.gov District 12 2 R
Rep. Barbara Bailey bailey.barbara@leg.wa.gov District 10 2 R
Senator Randi Becker becker.randi@leg.wa.gov District 2 0 R
Senator Don Benton benton.don@leg.wa.gov District 17 0 R
Senator Jean Berkey berkey.jean@leg.wa.gov District 38 0 D
Rep. Brian Blake blake.brian@leg.wa.gov District 19 2 D
Senator Dale Brandland brandland.dale@leg.wa.gov District 42 0 R
Senator Lisa Brown brown.lisa@leg.wa.gov District 3 0 D
Rep. Tom Campbell campbell.tom@leg.wa.gov District 2 2 R
Rep. Reuven Carlyle carlyle.reuven@leg.wa.gov District 36 1 D
Senator Mike Carrell carrell.michael@leg.wa.gov District 28 0 R
Rep. Bruce Chandler chandler.bruce@leg.wa.gov District 15 1 R
Rep. Maralyn Chase chase.maralyn@leg.wa.gov District 32 1 D
Rep. Frank Chopp chopp.frank@leg.wa.gov District 43 2 D
Rep. Judy Clibborn clibborn.judy@leg.wa.gov District 41 2 D
Rep. Eileen Cody cody.eileen@leg.wa.gov District 34 1 D
Rep. Cary Condotta condotta.cary@leg.wa.gov District 12 1 R
Rep. Steve Conway conway.steve@leg.wa.gov District 29 1 D
Rep. Don Cox cox.don@leg.wa.gov District 9 1 R
Rep. Larry Crouse crouse.larry@leg.wa.gov District 4 1 R
Rep. Bruce Dammeier dammeier.bruce@leg.wa.gov District 25 1 R
Rep. Jeannie Darneille darneille.j@leg.wa.gov District 27 2 D
Rep. Richard DeBolt debolt.richard@leg.wa.gov District 20 1 R
Senator Jerome Delvin delvin.jerome@leg.wa.gov District 8 0 R
Rep. Mary Lou Dickerson dickerson.marylou@leg.wa.gov District 36 2 D
Rep. John Driscoll driscoll.john@leg.wa.gov District 6 2 D
Rep. Hans Dunshee dunshee.hans@leg.wa.gov District 44 1 D
Rep. Deborah Eddy eddy.deborah@leg.wa.gov District 48 2 D
Senator Tracey Eide eide.tracey@leg.wa.gov District 30 0 D
Rep. Mark Ericks ericks.mark@leg.wa.gov District 1 2 D
Rep. Doug Ericksen ericksen.doug@leg.wa.gov District 42 1 R
Senator Darlene Fairley fairley.darlene@leg.wa.gov District 32 0 D
Rep. Fred Finn finn.fred@leg.wa.gov District 35 2 D
Rep. Dennis Flannigan flannigan.dennis@leg.wa.gov District 27 1 D
Senator Rosa Franklin franklin.rosa@leg.wa.gov District 29 0 D
Senator Karen Fraser fraser.karen@leg.wa.gov District 22 0 D
Rep. Roger Goodman goodman.roger@leg.wa.gov District 45 1 D
Rep. Laura Grant-Herriot grant-herriot.laura@leg.wa.gov District 16 2 D
Rep. Tami Green green.tami@leg.wa.gov District 28 2 D
Rep. Kathy Haigh haigh.kathy@leg.wa.gov District 35 1 D
Rep. Larry Haler haler.larry@leg.wa.gov District 8 2 R
Senator James Hargrove hargrove.jim@leg.wa.gov District 24 0 D
Rep. Bob Hasegawa hasegawa.bob@leg.wa.gov District 11 2 D
Senator Brian Hatfield hatfield.brian@leg.wa.gov District 19 0 D
Senator Mary MargaretHaugen haugen.marymargaret@leg.wa.gov District 10 0 D
Rep. Jaime Herrera herrera.jaime@leg.wa.gov District 18 1 R
Senator Mike Hewitt hewitt.mike@leg.wa.gov District 16 0 R
Rep. Bill Hinkle hinkle.bill@leg.wa.gov District 13 2 R
Senator Steve Hobbs hobbs.steve@leg.wa.gov District 44 0 D
Senator Janéa Holmquist holmquist.janea@leg.wa.gov District 13 0 R
Senator Jim Honeyford honeyford.jim@leg.wa.gov District 15 0 R
Rep. Mike Hope hope.mike@leg.wa.gov District 44 2 R
Rep. Sam Hunt hunt.sam@leg.wa.gov District 22 2 D
Rep. Ross Hunter hunter.ross@leg.wa.gov District 48 1 D
Rep. Christopher Hurst hurst.christopher@leg.wa.gov District 31 2 D
Rep. Jim Jacks jacks.jim@leg.wa.gov District 49 1 D
Senator Ken Jacobsen jacobsen.ken@leg.wa.gov District 46 0 D
Senator Fred Jarrett jarrett.fred@leg.wa.gov District 41 0 D
Rep. Norm Johnson johnson.norm@leg.wa.gov District 14 1 R
Rep. Ruth Kagi kagi.ruth@leg.wa.gov District 32 2 D
Senator Jim Kastama kastama.jim@leg.wa.gov District 25 0 D
Senator Claudia Kauffman kauffman.claudia@leg.wa.gov District 47 0 D
Senator Karen Keiser keiser.karen@leg.wa.gov District 33 0 D
Rep. Troy Kelley kelley.troy@leg.wa.gov District 28 1 D
Rep. Phyllis Gutierrez Kenney kenney.phyllis@leg.wa.gov District 46 2 D
Rep. Lynn Kessler kessler.lynn@leg.wa.gov District 24 2 D
Senator Derek Kilmer kilmer.derek@leg.wa.gov District 26 0 D
Senator Curtis King king.curtis@leg.wa.gov District 14 0 R
Rep. Steve Kirby kirby.steve@leg.wa.gov District 29 2 D
Senator Adam Kline kline.adam@leg.wa.gov District 37 0 D
Rep. Brad Klippert klippert.brad@leg.wa.gov District 8 1 R
Senator Jeanne Kohl-Welles kohl- welles.jeanne@leg.wa.gov District 36 0 D
Rep. Joel Kretz kretz.joel@leg.wa.gov District 7 2 R
Rep. Dan Kristiansen kristiansen.dan@leg.wa.gov District 39 1 R
Rep. Marko Liias liias.marko@leg.wa.gov District 21 2 D
Rep. Kelli Linville linville.kelli@leg.wa.gov District 42 2 D
Senator Chris Marr marr.chris@leg.wa.gov District 6 0 D
Rep. Marcie Maxwell maxwell.marcie@leg.wa.gov District 41 1 D
Senator Rosemary McAuliffe mcauliffe.rosemary@leg.wa.gov District 1 0 D
Senator Bob McCaslin mccaslin.bob@leg.wa.gov District 4 0 R
Rep. John McCoy mccoy.john@leg.wa.gov District 38 1 D
Rep. Jim McCune mccune.jim@leg.wa.gov District 2 1 R
Senator Joe McDermott mcdermott.joe@leg.wa.gov District 34 0 D
Rep. Mark Miloscia miloscia.mark@leg.wa.gov District 30 1 D
Rep. Jim Moeller moeller.jim@leg.wa.gov District 49 2 D
Rep. Dawn Morrell morrell.dawn@leg.wa.gov District 25 2 D
Rep. Jeff Morris morris.jeff@leg.wa.gov District 40 2 D
Senator Bob Morton morton.bob@leg.wa.gov District 7 0 R
Senator Ed Murray murray.edward@leg.wa.gov District 43 0 D
Rep. Sharon Nelson nelson.sharon@leg.wa.gov District 34 2 D
Rep. Al O'Brien obrien.al@leg.wa.gov District 1 1 D
Senator Eric Oemig oemig.eric@leg.wa.gov District 45 0 D
Rep. Ed Orcutt orcutt.ed@leg.wa.gov District 18 2 R
Rep. Timm Ormsby ormsby.timm@leg.wa.gov District 3 2 D
Rep. Tina Orwall orwall.tina@leg.wa.gov District 33 1 D
Rep. Kevin Parker parker.kevin@leg.wa.gov District 6 1 R
Senator Linda Evans Parlette parlette.linda@leg.wa.gov District 12 0 R
Rep. Kirk Pearson pearson.kirk@leg.wa.gov District 39 2 R
Rep. Jamie Pedersen pedersen.jamie@leg.wa.gov District 43 1 D
Rep. Eric Pettigrew pettigrew.eric@leg.wa.gov District 37 2 D
Senator Cheryl Pflug pflug.cheryl@leg.wa.gov District 5 0 R
Senator Margarita Prentice prentice.margarita@leg.wa.gov District 11 0 D
Senator Craig Pridemore pridemore.craig@leg.wa.gov District 49 0 D
Rep. Skip Priest priest.skip@leg.wa.gov District 30 2 R
Rep. Tim Probst probst.tim@leg.wa.gov District 17 1 D
Rep. Dave Quall quall.dave@leg.wa.gov District 40 1 D
Senator Kevin Ranker ranker.kevin@leg.wa.gov District 40 0 D
Senator Debbie Regala regala.debbie@leg.wa.gov District 27 0 D
Rep. Dan Roach roach.dan@leg.wa.gov District 31 1 R
Senator Pam Roach roach.pam@leg.wa.gov District 31 0 R
Rep. Mary Helen Roberts roberts.maryhelen@leg.wa.gov District 21 1 D
Senator Phil Rockefeller rockefeller.phil@leg.wa.gov District 23 0 D
Rep. Jay Rodne rodne.jay@leg.wa.gov District 5 1 R
Rep. Christine Rolfes rolfes.christine@leg.wa.gov District 23 2 D
Rep. Charles Ross ross.charles@leg.wa.gov District 14 2 R
Rep. Sharon Tomiko Santos santos.sharontomiko@leg.wa.gov District 37 1 D
Rep. Joe Schmick schmick.joe@leg.wa.gov District 9 2 R
Senator Mark Schoesler schoesler.mark@leg.wa.gov District 9 0 R
Rep. Larry Seaquist seaquist.larry@leg.wa.gov District 26 2 D
Rep. Mike Sells sells.mike@leg.wa.gov District 38 2 D
Rep. Matt Shea shea.matt@leg.wa.gov District 4 2 R
Senator Tim Sheldon sheldon.timothy@leg.wa.gov District 35 0 D
Senator Paull Shin shin.paull@leg.wa.gov District 21 0 D
Rep. Shelly Short short.shelly@leg.wa.gov District 7 1 R
Rep. Geoff Simpson simpson.geoff@leg.wa.gov District 47 1 D
Rep. Norma Smith smith.norma@leg.wa.gov District 10 1 R
Rep. Larry Springer springer.larry@leg.wa.gov District 45 2 D
Senator Val Stevens stevens.val@leg.wa.gov District 39 0 R
Rep. Pat Sullivan sullivan.pat@leg.wa.gov District 47 2 D
Senator Dan Swecker swecker.dan@leg.wa.gov District 20 0 R
Rep. Dean Takko takko.dean@leg.wa.gov District 19 1 D
Senator Rodney Tom tom.rodney@leg.wa.gov District 48 0 D
Rep. Dave Upthegrove upthegrove.dave@leg.wa.gov District 33 2 D
Rep. Kevin Van De Wege vandewege.kevin@leg.wa.gov District 24 1 D
Rep. Deb Wallace wallace.deb@leg.wa.gov District 17 2 D
Rep. Maureen Walsh walsh.maureen@leg.wa.gov District 16 1 R
Rep. Judy Warnick warnick.judy@leg.wa.gov District 13 1 R
Rep. Scott White white.scott@leg.wa.gov District 46 1 D
Rep. Brendan Williams williams.brendan@leg.wa.gov District 22 1 D
Rep. Alex Wood wood.alex@leg.wa.gov District 3 1 D
Senator Joseph Zarelli zarelli.joseph@leg.wa.gov District 18 0 R
Post by: bucklucky on March 26, 2009, 12:02:36 PM
Post by: KillzElk on March 26, 2009, 12:53:35 PM
All Members E-mail List fro Wasigton State Legislature this should make it easy for everyone..
Sorry about the confusion ... Send it to all of them they should get the hit maybe?
Here is a list Copy & paste below......
warnick.judy@leg.wa.gov
alexander.gary@leg.wa.gov
anderson.glenn@leg.wa.gov
angel.jan@leg.wa.gov
appleton.sherry@leg.wa.gov
armstrong.mike@leg.wa.gov
bailey.barbara@leg.wa.gov
becker.randi@leg.wa.gov
benton.don@leg.wa.gov
berkey.jean@leg.wa.gov
blake.brian@leg.wa.gov
brandland.dale@leg.wa.gov
brown.lisa@leg.wa.gov
campbell.tom@leg.wa.gov
carlyle.reuven@leg.wa.gov
carrell.michael@leg.wa.gov
chandler.bruce@leg.wa.gov
chase.maralyn@leg.wa.gov
chopp.frank@leg.wa.gov
clibborn.judy@leg.wa.gov
cody.eileen@leg.wa.gov
condotta.cary@leg.wa.gov
conway.steve@leg.wa.gov
cox.don@leg.wa.gov
crouse.larry@leg.wa.gov
dammeier.bruce@leg.wa.gov
darneille.j@leg.wa.gov
debolt.richard@leg.wa.gov
delvin.jerome@leg.wa.gov
dickerson.marylou@leg.wa.gov
driscoll.john@leg.wa.gov
dunshee.hans@leg.wa.gov
eddy.deborah@leg.wa.gov
eide.tracey@leg.wa.gov
ericks.mark@leg.wa.gov
ericksen.doug@leg.wa.gov
fairley.darlene@leg.wa.gov
finn.fred@leg.wa.gov
flannigan.dennis@leg.wa.gov
franklin.rosa@leg.wa.gov
fraser.karen@leg.wa.gov
goodman.roger@leg.wa.gov
grant-herriot.laura@leg.wa.gov
green.tami@leg.wa.gov
haigh.kathy@leg.wa.gov
haler.larry@leg.wa.gov
hargrove.jim@leg.wa.gov
hatfield.brian@leg.wa.gov
hasegawa.bob@leg.wa.gov
haugen.marymargaret@leg.wa.gov
herrera.jaime@leg.wa.gov
hewitt.mike@leg.wa.gov
hinkle.bill@leg.wa.gov
hobbs.steve@leg.wa.gov
holmquist.janea@leg.wa.gov
honeyford.jim@leg.wa.gov
hope.mike@leg.wa.gov
hunt.sam@leg.wa.gov
hunter.ross@leg.wa.gov
hurst.christopher@leg.wa.gov
jacks.jim@leg.wa.gov
jacobsen.ken@leg.wa.gov
jarrett.fred@leg.wa.gov
johnson.norm@leg.wa.gov
kagi.ruth@leg.wa.gov
kastama.jim@leg.wa.gov
kauffman.claudia@leg.wa.gov
keiser.karen@leg.wa.gov
kelley.troy@leg.wa.gov
kenney.phyllis@leg.wa.gov
kessler.lynn@leg.wa.gov
kilmer.derek@leg.wa.gov
king.curtis@leg.wa.gov
kirby.steve@leg.wa.gov
kline.adam@leg.wa.gov
klippert.brad@leg.wa.gov
welles.jeanne@leg.wa.gov
kretz.joel@leg.wa.gov
kristiansen.dan@leg.wa.gov
liias.marko@leg.wa.gov
linville.kelli@leg.wa.gov
marr.chris@leg.wa.gov
maxwell.marcie@leg.wa.gov
mcauliffe.rosemary@leg.wa.gov
mccaslin.bob@leg.wa.gov
mccoy.john@leg.wa.gov
mccune.jim@leg.wa.gov
mcdermott.joe@leg.wa.gov
miloscia.mark@leg.wa.gov
moeller.jim@leg.wa.gov
morrell.dawn@leg.wa.gov
morris.jeff@leg.wa.gov
morton.bob@leg.wa.gov
nelson.sharon@leg.wa.gov
oemig.eric@leg.wa.gov
orcutt.ed@leg.wa.gov
ormsby.timm@leg.wa.gov
orwall.tina@leg.wa.gov
parker.kevin@leg.wa.gov
parlette.linda@leg.wa.gov
pearson.kirk@leg.wa.gov
pedersen.jamie@leg.wa.gov
pettigrew.eric@leg.wa.gov
pflug.cheryl@leg.wa.gov
prentice.margarita@leg.wa.gov
pridemore.craig@leg.wa.gov
priest.skip@leg.wa.gov
probst.tim@leg.wa.gov
quall.dave@leg.wa.gov
ranker.kevin@leg.wa.gov
regala.debbie@leg.wa.gov
roach.dan@leg.wa.gov
roach.pam@leg.wa.gov
roberts.maryhelen@leg.wa.gov
rockefeller.phil@leg.wa.gov
rodne.jay@leg.wa.gov
rolfes.christine@leg.wa.gov
ross.charles@leg.wa.gov
santos.sharontomiko@leg.wa.gov
schmick.joe@leg.wa.gov
schoesler.mark@leg.wa.gov
seaquist.larry@leg.wa.gov
sells.mike@leg.wa.gov
shea.matt@leg.wa.gov
sheldon.timothy@leg.wa.gov
shin.paull@leg.wa.gov
short.shelly@leg.wa.gov
simpson.geoff@leg.wa.gov
smith.norma@leg.wa.gov
springer.larry@leg.wa.gov
stevens.val@leg.wa.gov
sullivan.pat@leg.wa.gov
swecker.dan@leg.wa.gov
takko.dean@leg.wa.gov
tom.rodney@leg.wa.gov
upthegrove.dave@leg.wa.gov
vandewege.kevin@leg.wa.gov
wallace.deb@leg.wa.gov
warnick.judy@leg.wa.gov
white.scott@leg.wa.gov
williams.brendan@leg.wa.gov
wood.alex@leg.wa.gov
zarelli.joseph@leg.wa.gov
Post by: Elkaholic daWg on March 27, 2009, 08:51:06 AM
I have posted this info on 3 other forums I visit also.
Post by: whacker1 on March 27, 2009, 09:12:20 AM
Post by: KillzElk on March 30, 2009, 12:03:40 AM
Post by: KillzElk on March 31, 2009, 09:13:50 AM
Thank You bbarnes for making the trip to every meeting in Wa. to help everyone in the Wa area out.. All that you were not there would have liked the statement bbarnes had for the panel very priceless Paul Pierce stands silent after Angry Bash ...
Anyways see the full article here...
Mount St. Helens panel hears from public on draft plan Monday, March 30, 2009
Link:
http://www.tdn.com/articles/2009/03/31/top_story/doc49d16007f408c282374700.txt
Or read below...
The Congressional Mount St. Helens Advisory Committee braced for plenty of criticism during public comment on their recent draft recommendations Monday. Instead, most speakers agreed the volcano should remain run by the U.S. Forest Service with better funding and upkeep.
Monday was the first of two public comment sessions to get reaction to the committee’s draft recommendations for the future of the volcano and the 110,000-acre Mount St. Helens National Volcanic Monument. Chief among the recommendations is that the mountain remain under Forest Service management instead of becoming the state’s fifth national park.
Fifteen of the 24 speakers specifically supported Forest Service management compared to two who said they favored the National Park Service. Others did not give a specific preference.
Forest Service supporters said they want to maintain and expand recreational access and feel national park status will bring a whole new set of restrictions. They also supported increased and more stable funding for the monument, similar to National Park levels.
Bruce Barnes, of the Mount St. Helens Rescue group, said he avoids national parks because of the fees, restrictions and the long waiting period to get campground reservations.
“It scares me to death to think the area ... may be in danger of changing dramatically by being designated a national park,” the Vancouver resident said. “Never in a million years did I think I would have to plan months in advance to visit my own backyard.”
Thomas Mueller, who grew up in Germany, said it’s a blessing to have so much open land to explore in America. The Castle Rock resident and avid mountain biker has been to both Mount Rainier National Park and Mount St. Helens and said he vastly prefers the Forest Service model.
“Rainier is almost like a guided tour,” he said. “If something like that happens to Mount St. Helens, I’d be very sad.”
Representatives from Weyerhaeuser Co. and Longview Timber also favor Forest Service management, saying they prefer the Forest Service’s fewer restrictions on adjacent timber land.
Sean Smith, northwest regional director of the National Parks Conservation Association, said he understands there are strong feelings on either side. He added, though, that most communities faced with the same decision end up opting for the national park status and its increased funding and economic opportunities.
Smith also said there are a range of national park designations that could allow some hunting and fishing.
Several speakers urged the group to specifically address the adjacent High Lakes area to keep it from being further developed.
The “biggest mistake” made when the monument was created was that the High Lakes area wasn’t included, said Darcy Mitchem of Toutle. “We get very few do-overs in life, here’s your chance,” she said.
The committee also has received about 34 e-mail comments from individuals, most of them favoring Forest Service management, said co-chairman Paul Pearce, a Skamania County commissioner. In addition, about 640 e-mails supporting national park status have been generated from a link on the National Parks Conservation Association Web page.
About 50 people attended Monday’s session, fewer than organizers expected. Cowlitz County Commissioner Axel Swanson, one of the committee co-chairmen, said he takes that to mean “we got it partially right.”
Pearce added that even those who support the national parks can agree with the committee’s recommendations of increased visitor access, overnight accommodations and funding.
The second public comment session is 6 to 9 p.m. April 13 in the Camas Police Department Community Room, 2100 NE Third St., Camas. Written comments can be submitted to the committee’s Web site, www.skamaniacounty.org/SHAC.htm
The final report — to be written May 14 in Longview — will be sent to U.S. Reps. Brian Baird and Norm Dicks and U.S. Sens. Maria Cantwell and Patty Murray for consideration.
Related articles:
Public access to High Lakes may require major public funding (March 20)
http://www.tdn.com/articles/2009/03/20/this_day/doc49c2c364e563f168529464.txt
Mount St. Helens National Park supporters aren't backing down (March 5)
http://www.tdn.com/articles/2009/03/05/area_news/doc49b099585c73b861331943.txt
The vision for Mount St. Helens (March 2)
http://www.tdn.com/articles/2009/03/02/top_story/doc49ab8d8a97d82576849264.txt
Post by: saudog on March 31, 2009, 09:23:06 AM
Bruce Barnes, of the Mount St. Helens Rescue group, said he avoids national parks because of the fees, restrictions and the long waiting period to get campground reservations.
“It scares me to death to think the area ... may be in danger of changing dramatically by being designated a national park,” the Vancouver resident said. “Never in a million years did I think I would have to plan months in advance to visit my own backyard.”
Post by: bbarnes on March 31, 2009, 05:09:25 PM
Post by: Elkaholic daWg on March 31, 2009, 09:47:14 PM
Can't get a lot easier than this...................... :brew:
SAWS Action Alert: Mt St Helens Advisory Committee - Future of the Mounument
From: SAWS - Washington (daveh-wa@snowmobile-alliance.org)
Sent: Tue 3/31/09 4:44 PM
To: SAWS-WA@SnowmobileAlliance.org
SAWS Members,
Today I received the request below from Carl Schmalenberger, the President of the Mt St Helens Tracriders, with a request for help from our SAWS members.
Please write a short letter to state that you support the Mt St Helens Monument remaining under Forest Service management, and that you do not support a proposal to have the monument moved under control and management of the National Park Service.
We certainly do not want to see Mt St Helens become the next Yellowstone National Park saga attempting an outright ban on snowmobile use.
Comments may be emailed to SHACComments@co.skamania.wa.us
Refer to the request below from Carl and below that a copy of the Mt St Helens Advisory Committee Press Release.
Thank you in advance for responding to this request.
Dave Hurwitz
Chairman - Snowmobile Alliance of Western States
______________________________________________________________________
Dave,
FYI, An update on the Mt St Helens Advisory Committee.
Could you forward this to the SAWS members and urge them to send a short email with there comments?
The committee has received about 34 emails from individuals (most favoring the forest service) and about 640 form letters from a link generated from the National Parks Conservation Association web page.
It appears that the committee is taking in to account that the 640 comments are one form letter.
I was dissapointed with the local turn out at the first public comment meeting.
There were about 20 speakers ( 15 for forest service and 2 for parks)
There is one more next month ( place and time in the press release).
I realize it can be hard to make a meeting in person, but lets see if we can get an increase in
email comments for keeping Mt St Helens in the forest service.
Let everyone know it just takes a minute to send a brief email in there own words supporting
the forest service.
The attatched press release is the rough draft of the committees recomendations.
Thanks for your efforts and the time it takes.
I have a hard enough time keeping up with our local issues.
Give me a call if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Carl Schmalenberger
President
Mt St Helens Tracriders
Post by: bbarnes on March 31, 2009, 09:57:00 PM
Post by: TONTO on March 31, 2009, 11:01:17 PM
Post by: bbarnes on March 31, 2009, 11:05:19 PM
Post by: Elkaholic daWg on April 01, 2009, 10:58:41 AM
Mt St Helens Advisory Committee - Future of the Monument
From: BRC Alert (noreply@sharetrails.org)
Sent: Wed 4/01/09 10:26 AM
BLUERIBBON COALITION PARTNER ACTION ALERT!
Dear BRC Action Alert Subscriber,
Attention Washington, Oregon and Idaho Recreationists!
Our partners over at the Snowmobile Alliance of Western States (SAWS) just sent us an important "CALL TO ACTION" over a serious threat to motorized recreation in Washington. Please do what ever you can to help and pass this information along to everyone you know.
I have pasted a copy of the email below; please take a couple of minutes to read over the information.
Thanks in advance for your involvement,
Ric Foster
Public Lands Department Manager
BlueRibbon Coalition
208-237-1008 ext 107
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: SAWS Action Alert: Mt St Helens Advisory Committee - Future of the Monument
From: "SAWS Idaho" <ScottC-ID@snowmobile-alliance.org>
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:05:20 -0600
To: <SAWS-ID@SnowmobileAlliance.org>, <SAWS-UT@SnowmobileAlliance.org>, <SAWS-CO@SnowmobileAlliance.org>, <SAWS-WY@SnowmobileAlliance.org>
SAWS Members,
Today I received the request below from Carl Schmalenberger, the President of the Mt St Helens Tracriders, with a request for help from our SAWS members.
Please write a short letter to state that you support the Mt St Helens Monument remaining under Forest Service management, and that you do not support a proposal to have the monument moved under control and management of the National Park Service.
We certainly do not want to see Mt St Helens become the next Yellowstone National Park saga attempting an outright ban on snowmobile use.
Comments may be emailed to SHACComments@co.skamania.wa.us
Refer to the request below from Carl and below that a copy of the Mt St Helens Advisory Committee Press Release.
Thank you in advance for responding to this request.
Dave Hurwitz
Chairman - Snowmobile Alliance of Western States
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dave,
FYI, An update on the Mt St Helens Advisory Committee.
Could you forward this to the SAWS members and urge them to send a short email with there comments?
The committee has received about 34 emails from individuals (most favoring the forest service) and about 640 form letters from a link generated from the National Parks Conservation Association web page.
It appears that the committee is taking in to account that the 640 comments are one form letter.
I was disappointed with the local turn out at the first public comment meeting.
There were about 20 speakers (15 for forest service and 2 for parks)
There is one more next month (place and time in the press release).
I realize it can be hard to make a meeting in person, but lets see if we can get an increase in email comments for keeping Mt St Helens in the forest service.
Let everyone know it just takes a minute to send a brief email in there own words supporting the forest service.
The attached press release is the rough draft of the committee's recommendations.
Thanks for your efforts and the time it takes.
I have a hard enough time keeping up with our local issues.
Give me a call if you have any questions.
Thanks,
Carl Schmalenberger
President
Mt St Helens Tracriders
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mt St Helens Advisory Committee
Press Release
For Immediate Release
Draft Recommendations on the Future of the Monument
The congressionally impaneled advisory committee met in an open public retreat session on February 27th & 28th in Longview to work through draft recommendations on the future of the monument. This followed a year of public meetings held in locations throughout SW Washington. These recommendations are designed to be released to the public for public comment before the committee adopts final recommendations for presentation to our Congressional delegation.
The Committee has agreed to the following meeting schedule:
Monday March 30th for Public Comment in Kelso in the Commissioners Hearing Room from 6-9pm.
Monday April 13th for Public Comment in the Camas Police Department Community Room, 2100 NE 3rd St., Camas, WA from 6-9pm.
Thursday May 14th all day at the Cowlitz County Regional Conference Center for drafting final recommendations. Open to the public. No Public Comment.
Comments may also be emailed to SHACComments@co.skamania.wa.us
The draft recommendations are listed as follow :
ACCESS
Properly fund maintenance of all trails, roads and facilities
Improve and expand access
o Fund and build 504 all-weather road extension from Coldwater to US12
o Fund and build 503 spur all-weather road from Cougar to Carson
o Upgrade FS Road 25 to all-weather road, Level 5 Standard
INFRASTRUCTURE
Reinvest in Coldwater Ridge as an overnight destination to include science, interpretation, education, visitor services, food and university partnerships
Insure visitor and emergency communication capability around the Monument
Develop and fund an Emergency Response Plan
Provide adequate, non-federal utility service where needed in the Monument
Shift responsibility for the Spirit Lake tunnel to the Corp of Engineers
RECREATION
Recreational opportunities should be broadened to embrace a diverse and responsible use of the forest
Adequately fund and maintain recreational facilities
Create camping facilities using Lower Falls as a template
Recommend more recreational activities including camping and fishing in the Restricted Area that are compatible with the Act by creating a Scientific and Recreational Advisory Committee to vet recreational opportunities and suggestions in the Restricted Area for the managing agency
Designate seasonal recreational activity locations for motorized and non-motorized participants
CONSERVATION
The Restricted Area should be left to unimpeded recovery maintaining the geological and ecological processes as well as the integrity of the features
Visitor impacts and carrying capacity of the Restricted Area will be consistent with the goals of the Act
No road building in the Monument
Support coordinated partnerships with all stakeholders to control invasive species
Maintain habitat protection
Encourage partnerships with voluntary organizations
SCIENCE
Expand science funding with specific emphasis on more direct public education and broader interpretive and applied science programs
Dedicate the Monument Scientist to science
Provide an expanded science experience for visitors
Promote the Monument as a scientific laboratory
o Involve the universities and community colleges
o Develop new technologies
INDUSTRY
Continue to develop relationships with industrial land owners bordering the Monument
Encourage relationships with emerging technologies and industry in remote sensing, robotics, nanotechnology and renewable energy
Create an R&D laboratory setting for technology applications in harsh environments
Continue to address recreation and tourism as industrial components
TOURISM
Develop destination resorts in and around the Monument
Develop a year-round regionally coordinated marketing plan
Fully fund the managing agency's interpretive programs
Develop a regional tourism network (Destination Marketing Organization)
Develop a user-friendly, unified (state and federal) fee system
Develop products and services that will enhance visitors' experience
Establish and fund a Special Use Permit process for the Monument
MANAGEMENT MODEL
Retain Forest Service management
o Create an administrative unit consisting of existing Federal lands west of and including the 25 Road with no expansion of the Monument boundary
o The Monument itself must be a line item funded from the Mandatory portion of the Forest Service budget
o This model should be used as a template for "Special Places" within the National Forest Service system, as the current model has failed
o Require an annual meeting with stakeholder groups
THE FOLLOWING ITEMS WILL BE GIVEN FURTHER CONSIDERATION FOLLOWING PUBLIC COMMENT:
Congressional oversight
Ongoing role for the Advisory Committee
Cooperative Agency Status
Partnership agreements with state, local, federal entities and other stakeholders to include an annual meeting
Cooperation of counties on comprehensive planning on private lands adjacent to the Monument
Co Chairs
Lewis County Commissioner Lee Grose 360-740-1120
Cowlitz County Commissioner Axel Swanson 360-577-3020
Skamania County Commissioner Paul Pearce, 509-427-3700
Post by: Cascade_Sherpa on April 02, 2009, 09:24:48 AM
Post by: saudog on April 02, 2009, 10:44:40 AM
Post by: Cascade_Sherpa on April 10, 2009, 03:53:14 PM
I see 3 different threads on this page regarding elk starving in the area and some group of MORONS comes up with this Idea :bdid:
I have posted this info on 3 other forums I visit also.
Thats because the tree huggers want to see wolves introduced into their "new park" at St. Helens.