Hunting Washington Forum
Equipment & Gear => Scopes and Optics => Topic started by: Jpmiller on January 15, 2020, 06:41:10 AM
-
So I'm getting close to buying myself a new scope and I'm pretty sure I'm going Leupold (real good luck with their stuff) but I'm stuck on what magnification. I realistically don't see myself shooting past 300 yards at an animal or 400 at a range. I'm drawn to higher magnifications because why spend 500 dollars when you can spend a thousand but I don't think I really need it. It's replacing a 4-12 and I've never thought I needed more, but I also don't think I've shot at full power in the field. Is this a less is more scenario or does it make sense to you guys to have the extra magnification? Thanks.
-
12 power is already way more than necessary for 300-400 yards :twocents:
What are you upgrading from and what's your budget?
-
Makes zero sense to me to go with a high magnification scope for what you described. Heck I shoot my higher power scopes on half power often at farther ranges than you mentioned so I can spot hits better when shooting solo.
A VX-3i in 3.5-10x50 would fit the bill quite nicely.
Devils advocate here though, just because you have a bit more magnification doesn't mean you have to use it. You can still shoot a 14x scope on 10x :chuckle:
-
The VX5HD 3-15 is a great scope with really good optics, I don't think you could go wrong with one of those.
-
The VX5HD 3-15 is a great scope with really good optics, I don't think you could go wrong with one of those.
I packed one around this past hunting season and it is a great little scope with a lot of nice features.
-
The VX5HD 3-15 is a great scope with really good optics, I don't think you could go wrong with one of those.
I packed one around this past hunting season and it is a great little scope with a lot of nice features.
I've got one on the way. I think its gonna be a great optic for anything I'm gonna need it to do on a hunting gun.
-
I understand there are leupold diehards, but having both leupold and Vortex I am more satisfied with the Vortex and as far as price did not pay for the Name and both carry a lifetime unconditional warranty. Have yet to use any scope using full power over 9 on a 3 x 9 except at range to get 1 hole 5 shot groups with the vortex 6 x 20.
-
I can’t imagine going back to 9 or 10 power after using 4-24 power but the 3.5-10 certainly worked great for me for decades. I could get by with 15 but 18 is the sweet spot. My son has the 6-18 and his next will be 4-24. For hunting its tough to spot hits much beyond 18 to 21 power depending upon rifle. I have a 7-42 power and love it but it doesn’t go above 24 much in the field.
-
I'm replacing an old 4-12 Nikon that was about a hundred bucks twenty years ago. I was thinking the 3i 3.5-10 but I have a really hard time not constantly trying to go one step better, which leads to two steps better.....
They have it with and without the CDS, if I'm not shooting past 300 do I need the CDS? I feel like I want one cause the cool kids have it but I've never found myself feeling I needed anything like it. My shot distances in the field have never been more than 200 yards and I've always felt very confident to 300 without.
-
If your dead set on a leupold then I would look no further than the VX5 3.5-15 with cds. I agree with the sentiment that having more magnification & dialing options doesn’t mean you have to use them but you can’t use something that’s not there. :twocents: :dunno:
-
The VX5HD 3-15 is a great scope with really good optics, I don't think you could go wrong with one of those.
:yeah:
15 is plenty for 300 yards even with bad eyesight. I am left eye dominant, shoot rifles right handed and wear glasses and it's no problem at all.
-
10 or 12 power should be enough. Remember the higher you go the smaller your FOV gets... can really impact your ability to stay on running targets... get good binos for the "looking" part of your hunting, you don't need to see them blink out there to shoot em...
-
With in 250 yards red dot will work fine (of course if you don’t have astigmatism) or 4x fix scope.
-
I'm replacing an old 4-12 Nikon that was about a hundred bucks twenty years ago. I was thinking the 3i 3.5-10 but I have a really hard time not constantly trying to go one step better, which leads to two steps better.....
They have it with and without the CDS, if I'm not shooting past 300 do I need the CDS? I feel like I want one cause the cool kids have it but I've never found myself feeling I needed anything like it. My shot distances in the field have never been more than 200 yards and I've always felt very confident to 300 without.
Gonna show my age and say if you know the old fashion Kentucky windage nope, one reason still using 3 x 9 and without all the extra bells and whistles, no BDC, no special turrets, just good ole know your rifle and ammo, which takes a whole lot of shooting.
-
Keep it simple. You've never shot at game beyond 200, don't plan on doing it past 300. There's no need for CDS, no need for a ballistic reticle, no need for extra size and weight. Go with a simple 3-9, 3.5-10, 2.5-8, 2-7, or even a fixed 6x. I used a fixed 6x for several years because most of the time when hunting I kept my variable scopes around there anyway. And it took game just fine, even a bedded buck at 293 yards.
Go down the rabbit hole if you want, there's always a more powerful scope you can get, always a more expensive one, and where you actually land, who knows. Or just buy something simple, yet trusted and reliable, for your sub 200 yard hunting shots.
-
I'm replacing an old 4-12 Nikon that was about a hundred bucks twenty years ago. I was thinking the 3i 3.5-10 but I have a really hard time not constantly trying to go one step better, which leads to two steps better.....
They have it with and without the CDS, if I'm not shooting past 300 do I need the CDS? I feel like I want one cause the cool kids have it but I've never found myself feeling I needed anything like it. My shot distances in the field have never been more than 200 yards and I've always felt very confident to 300 without.
Gonna show my age and say if you know the old fashion Kentucky windage nope, one reason still using 3 x 9 and without all the extra bells and whistles, no BDC, no special turrets, just good ole know your rifle and ammo, which takes a whole lot of shooting.
Fear the man with 1 gun!!!!!
-
Another scope I'd recommend, though not a Leupold, is the Vortex Razor HD LH 3-15x42. I have three of these on different rifles and they're a great scope for the money and their optical quality is very good. They're a 1in tube scope but it doesn't sound like the OP needs the extra MOA of a 30mm tube. They're a very light scope and the HSR-4 is a great hold over reticle.
Even though the OP doesn't think he'll be shooting real long distance, I always like a scope with some kind of parallax adjustment and the VX5 3-15 as well as the Vortex Razor HD LH 3-15 have that.
-
I had an extremely abbreviated hunting season last year and was still around a vortex scope and spotter that both had issues. I feel like that's an anomaly but enough to keep me away from throwing money at them for a while.
I've never installed or done more than check to make sure screws are tight on a scope. Is the install something I could do fairly easy or should I hire it out?
-
An issue with a Vortex optic is not an anomaly. I use them plenty but I know "their place" and I'm phasing them out of the "needs to work or I'm screwed" category of equipment. Unlimited lifetime warranty doesn't help when I'm in the mountains :twocents:
-
An issue with a Vortex optic is not an anomaly. I use them plenty but I know "their place" and I'm phasing them out of the "needs to work or I'm screwed" category of equipment. Unlimited lifetime warranty doesn't help when I'm in the mountains :twocents:
yep. Every piece I've owned (6) has failed. Never again. I was reminded of this last summer when I helped setup a kimber for a buddy. He topped it with razor LH. Thing had aluminum shavings floating around in it and ended up not holding zero. We were joking at the range one day because we used one of the shavings as a wind hold for a few shots before it drifted to a different part of the sight picture :chuckle:
-
12 power is already way more than necessary for 300-400 yards :twocents:
What are you upgrading from and what's your budget?
Way more ????? If you want to see details, more is better, if you shoot horns, mag doesnt matter......everyones eyes and vision requirements are different , so its totally personal. Try before you buy if you can.
-
Bushnell Elite 4200 2.5-10. Thousands of pounds of meat has gone into my freezers in the last 20 years using these scopes. I have newer/fancier scopes but if i had to choose only one this would be it.Super tough and bright optics-and waterproof/fog-proof,first one i ever bought was in 1999(Bausch and Lomb then) still works perfect and still goes hunting every year in the rain and snow and fog.
-
12 power is already way more than necessary for 300-400 yards :twocents:
What are you upgrading from and what's your budget?
Way more ????? If you want to see details, more is better, if you shoot horns, mag doesnt matter......everyones eyes and vision requirements are different , so its totally personal. Try before you buy if you can.
Yes everybody has different eyes but nobody should be identifying their target with a rifle scope.
-
I'm against the high power argument on this thread, as the OP really doesn't even need 10x, but in fairness I don't think the poster was talking about finding and identifying game with his scope. More so after a buck is spotted, zoom in to get a better look at his rack.
-
12 power is already way more than necessary for 300-400 yards :twocents:
What are you upgrading from and what's your budget?
Way more ????? If you want to see details, more is better, if you shoot horns, mag doesnt matter......everyones eyes and vision requirements are different , so its totally personal. Try before you buy if you can.
Yes everybody has different eyes but nobody should be identifying their target with a rifle scope.
No one suggested that........
-
Oh I'm definitely a glass with binos guy no worries there. I think the only time I've really ever had the magnification dialed up at all has been at the range. I'm pretty certain I don't need more magnification than a 10 so unless I come across a screaming deal I'll try to stick to a lower power version. I just gave Wyoming a bunch of money so a cheaper option will probably help me out with the wife even though she is way too accommodating when it comes to me spending money :chuckle: life is rough.
How hard is a scope install? It seems pretty straightforward but never having done it I don't know what I don't know.
-
If you just bolt it on, it's 15 minutes. If you lap it up, probably an hour. Either way I would have, borrow or buy a torque screwdriver or small wrench that can go to the recommended torque for the rings you are using. Blue loctite is also a great idea.
-
Not hard at all Jp, but its definitely an important step and should be done correctly. Rings have come along ways and most quality rings will specifically tell you to NOT lap. I mount a few dozen scopes a year and have gone both ways and I just don't bother with it anymore. Level the gun, adjust scope to proper eye relief, level the optic, torque to manufacturers specs in the proper scew sequence per manufacturer and you are good to go.
-
Leupold VX5 3.5-15x is a pretty nice scope that'll do everything for hunting, I just picked one up myself.
-
The little brass leveling kits can be found for reasonable prices on midwsy, brownells etc. That and a torque driver and a gun vise should set you straight for mounting your scope.
-
12 power is already way more than necessary for 300-400 yards :twocents:
What are you upgrading from and what's your budget?
Way more ????? If you want to see details, more is better, if you shoot horns, mag doesnt matter......everyones eyes and vision requirements are different , so its totally personal. Try before you buy if you can.
Yes everybody has different eyes but nobody should be identifying their target with a rifle scope.
No one suggested that........
:tup: good stuff. Still kinda reads that way to me but glad I'm wrong.
-
Midway had a deal on the vx-3i 3.5-10 but they also had a deal on the 4.5-14 CDS model lol so I think I'm going to grab the 4.5-14 and just end up with more scope than I need lol thanks all for.the advice and input, it's all much appreciated.
-
Midway had a deal on the vx-3i 3.5-10 but they also had a deal on the 4.5-14 CDS model lol so I think I'm going to grab the 4.5-14 and just end up with more scope than I need lol thanks all for.the advice and input, it's all much appreciated.
great choice! I think you'll be happy with that optic.
-
Not hard at all Jp, but its definitely an important step and should be done correctly. Rings have come along ways and most quality rings will specifically tell you to NOT lap. I mount a few dozen scopes a year and have gone both ways and I just don't bother with it anymore. Level the gun, adjust scope to proper eye relief, level the optic, torque to manufacturers specs in the proper scew sequence per manufacturer and you are good to go.
:yeah:
Here is a pretty good article - Precision Scope Mounting for the Working Rifle.
https://www.longrangehunting.com/articles/precision-scope-mounting-for-the-working-rifle.1227/
-
You'll be happy with it. I upgraded from. Vx2 3-9x40 to the vx3i 4.5-14x40 two years ago. The extra magnification has been a huge benefit for me in shooting in the 300-400 yard range. I killed my elk at 360 this year and felt good with my setup. Whole waiting for my shot I realized I was only on 8 power. Dialed it to 14 and felt like I could pick the hair I was aiming at.
-
As the great Bill Jorden wrote years ago "a variable scope is only as useful as its lowest setting" take into account the closest, fastest opportunity to make meat in the nastiest weather that you're likely to encounter and make your choice.
-
Does anybody have any experience with the Leupold VX freedom 4 to 12? Does it hold zero and have the glass quality that leupold is known for? I know it is definitely in the budget class compared to their other leupold scopes but I am looking for something that will be effective but won’t break the bank if my son ends up falling on it. He’s moving up from his 243 to a 6.5 creedmore this year. He won’t be taking any shots further than 300 yards. If he needs to shoot further than that he can just suck it up and slide in behind my 7mm mag.
-
Does anybody have any experience with the Leupold VX freedom 4 to 12? Does it hold zero and have the glass quality that leupold is known for? I know it is definitely in the budget class compared to their other leupold scopes but I am looking for something that will be effective but won’t break the bank if my son ends up falling on it. He’s moving up from his 243 to a 6.5 creedmore this year. He won’t be taking any shots further than 300 yards. If he needs to shoot further than that he can just suck it up and slide in behind my 7mm mag.
I just got a vx freedom 3-9x33 a few days ago, the real lightweight one, mounted it on my .22wmr. About to go play with it today. I have a couple of the now discontinued vx2 lightweight scopes on a .243 and a .308. This vx freedom seemed to be the closest thing currently available to those older models, which im very fond of. I like them better than much more expensive scopes i have or had. Damn good scopes for the money, if a guy just wants something simple, light weight, low magnification. The vx2s on my 2 lightweight guns have been great. Figure the freedom on my .22wmr will be good for its purpose. Close range bobcat / yote gun in the winter, whistle pig destroyer in the summer.
-
The VX5HD 3-15 is a great scope with really good optics, I don't think you could go wrong with one of those.
:yeah:
I love mine. I see you are from Wilkeson. If you hunt around home the 3x will be nice in the timber and the 15 power is plenty to shoot way beyond your needs. Light scope, crystal clear optics and a zero lock on the dial. I went with the 3-15x44 with the Wind Plex reticle. The best prices I’ve found lately have been through Muley Crazy in Kanab Utah.
-
As the great Bill Jorden wrote years ago "a variable scope is only as useful as its lowest setting" take into account the closest, fastest opportunity to make meat in the nastiest weather that you're likely to encounter and make your choice.
A 2 to 7 power scope or 3 to 9 with a small objective doesn't have any strategic advantage over a 4-12 with a larger objective :twocents:
-
Does anybody have any experience with the Leupold VX freedom 4 to 12? Does it hold zero and have the glass quality that leupold is known for? I know it is definitely in the budget class compared to their other leupold scopes but I am looking for something that will be effective but won’t break the bank if my son ends up falling on it. He’s moving up from his 243 to a 6.5 creedmore this year. He won’t be taking any shots further than 300 yards. If he needs to shoot further than that he can just suck it up and slide in behind my 7mm mag.
I just got a vx freedom 3-9x33 a few days ago, the real lightweight one, mounted it on my .22wmr. About to go play with it today. I have a couple of the now discontinued vx2 lightweight scopes on a .243 and a .308. This vx freedom seemed to be the closest thing currently available to those older models, which im very fond of. I like them better than much more expensive scopes i have or had. Damn good scopes for the money, if a guy just wants something simple, light weight, low magnification. The vx2s on my 2 lightweight guns have been great. Figure the freedom on my .22wmr will be good for its purpose. Close range bobcat / yote gun in the winter, whistle pig destroyer in the summer.
what light is that?
-
Its a green coyote light.
-
As the great Bill Jorden wrote years ago "a variable scope is only as useful as its lowest setting" take into account the closest, fastest opportunity to make meat in the nastiest weather that you're likely to encounter and make your choice.
A 2 to 7 power scope or 3 to 9 with a small objective doesn't have any strategic advantage over a 4-12 with a larger objective :twocents:
I disageee. Going down to 2x can be better than 4x. Depends on the situation you put yourself in.
-
Had a similar need and just ordered this yesterday. I like the 2.5 low end and the ability to crank to 10x and use mil dots on the rare occasions when necessary. Also just over $200 bucks with code
https://www.natchezss.com/nikon-monarch-3-rifle-scope-2-5-10x42mm-sfp-mil-dot-40-3-10-1-4-matte.html
-
Got the scope in the mail today and put it on the rifle. I've got a buddy who has mounted a few who is going to double check my work, he's an engineer so he is an expert on everything :chuckle:
Excited to shoot it, thanks for all the input gents!
-
Looks good....not to big, not to small. Should balance well.
-
In my humble opinion, that is exactly what a hunting rifle should look like. Walnut and a gold ring will never go out of style.
When the season is over, you can just gaze at it lovingly.
-
My thoughts as well. :tup:
-
In my humble opinion, that is exactly what a hunting rifle should look like. Walnut and a gold ring will never go out of style.
When the season is over, you can just gaze at it lovingly.
Nonsense. This is 2020. Deer are evolved. If your rifle doesnt look like this and weigh 15 lbs, with a 30x scope, it cant kill a deer. It is impossible to get any closer than 700 yards to a buck.
-
In my humble opinion, that is exactly what a hunting rifle should look like. Walnut and a gold ring will never go out of style.
When the season is over, you can just gaze at it lovingly.
Nonsense. This is 2020. Deer are evolved. If your rifle doesnt look like this and weigh 15 lbs, with a 30x scope, it cant kill a deer.
32x
-
Dang it where was this stage advice before? My new scope doesn't go anywhere near that high, I'll never kill anything with it
-
As I confess to having scopes with high end mag of 24. 25, and 32, I also confess to be enroute to coming full circle refinding the beauty in simplicity.....
-
I personally don’t have any use for a hunting scope below 5-6 power. To me it looks further away through very low scopes than without. :chuckle:
I do practice hand eye coordination and target acquisition though so the limited field of view isn’t a hinderance.