Hunting Washington Forum
Equipment & Gear => Guns and Ammo => Topic started by: Tracker0721 on April 06, 2020, 08:48:51 AM
-
So I’m looking at a new rifle, really thinking about a 300 win mag and from anyone with experience on it, is a light rifle really a good idea in 300 win mag? I was looking at the tikka superlite but I like to shoot a lot and I found a Remington long range that seems more of what I’d need. Weight difference is 2lbs. For hiking up and over the mountains I feel the tikka would be nice but at the same time does the 2lbs make recoil a PITA while practicing at the range? And I have a good 20lbs I’m trying to lose but yeah. I’d like for by fall or next spring to be at my goal weight and have a great rifle for chasing bears or whatever else. Goal is to go for a hunt in Alaska for moose next year and I don’t think a guide would appreciate me showing up with my 30-30 haha
And I know the tikka has a mag that only allows factory rounds to be loaded but seeing that it produced .5 moa for guys with factory Hornady I’m fine with that. I don’t play with seating depth anyways when I reload.
-
Limbsaver will absorb some of the felt recoil. But with that I'm not a huge fan of light weight rifle's in big calibers. If its uncomfortable to shot eventually you'll start flinching, which is going to kill your accuracy. A couple lbs makes a difference in felt recoil. And if it doesn't make a big difference in pack weight then go heavier.
-
i personally enjoy shooting and I am more accurate with heavier rifles. Im probably wrong but I dont think there are any benefits to light weight rifles when it comes to actually shooting them. Just lighter to pack around the mountains.
If you can shoot a light weight rifle just as well as a heavy one more power to ya and I'd probably go with the lighter option.
:twocents:
-
My adult kid has a 300win that is a cheap Mossberg Patriot. The gun is super light, and actually has a great trigger (similar to the savages) on it. You know your shooting it, but it really is not terrible. I won't want to do it off a bench all day, but again not terrible.
-
If you get a light rifle, put a muzzle brake on it. It will be lound but the felt recoil will be managed. At the end of the day they are loud with or without a brake so might as well have on...IMO.
Also...how light is light? I have a 15lb gun that sucks to carry. My 300 win mag runs around 9 lbs. pretty significant difference. I'm not sure I would want a 6 lbs 300 win mag.
-
If you are shooting a moose you won't feel the recoil ! For long range you need a brake. With a brake you need to be wearing hearing protection.
The heavier the rifle, the bigger the brake the easier to shoot and easier to spot your own hits. You don't need any of that hunting moose in alaska. Get the light rifle imo.
-
My tikka shot a little better for me when I put a sleeve full of ammo on the stock adding weight there
-
If you get a light rifle, put a muzzle brake on it. It will be lound but the felt recoil will be managed. At the end of the day they are loud with or without a brake so might as well have on...IMO.
Or put a suppressor on it
-
I had a Remington 700 Long Range. That thing was an awesome rifle but it was sooooo heavy. Mine was over 12 pounds scoped with a reasonable sized scope of mediocre quality.
Tikka's advertised weight is 5.9-6 pounds for a superlite. Remington says 9 pounds on the 700LR.
:dunno:
-
It needed the weight in the rear for me
-
I have a Browning X Bolt in 300 WSM. I suspect the weight isn't much more than a Tikka. I can shoot it without flinching but it takes some concentration. A good trigger makes a big difference. Shooting lighter weight bullets (150 and 165 grain in .30 caliber) helps some. Muzzle breaks do reduce recoil but increase the decibels. I won't ever shoot a gun with a break without hearing projection. I did once and my ears rang for weeks.
-
What scope are you putting on it?
Recoil is a function of total rifle weight. There is a pound of difference between a heavy NightForce scope and a lightweight Swarovski or one of the lighter Leupold models. And a range of other brands in between. Also whether you will use a buttstock ammo holder, bipod, etc.
That 6-6.5lb Tikka or a similar weight Browning X-Bolt can quickly get to 8lbs-9lbs depending on what all you're adding to it.
I'm not a fan of muzzle brakes for personal preference, so none of my rifles have one. My long range X-bolt setup is 9.3lbs with scope in 7mmRM and it's a *censored*cat for recoil...I'd personally be fine with a 300WM in 9lb total weight w/o brake. My 35 Whelen is 8.2lbs with scope, and it is my upper tolerance limit for recoil when shooting 250gr rounds....
Beartooth bullets has a handy recoil calculator that provide recoil energy and velocity, and Chuck Hawks has a comparison table for recoil amongst cartridges to give you a quick comparison for what you're used to with recoil.
-
I really like my Kimber mountain ascent
Shoots great and super light
Highly recommended
-
I shoot off hand quite a bit and find I cannot steady a light rifle as well as a heavier one. Of course none of these are long range platforms that you want to shoot from a rest anyway. I might be the only person who has put an aftermarket stock on a Ruger American to make it heavier.
-
I personally wouldn't want a Tikka in 300 Win. Mag. Just too light and it will not be fun to shoot. If you want the Tikka get it in 270 Win. or something similar. That's still plenty for moose especially if you use a good bullet like a Barnes 140 grain.
-
I have 2 lr set ups over 12lb and one @ 15lb+. Since Im closer to 66 than 65, this is the year I decided to address the weight issue for a woods rifle. I bought this years Savage model 110 lightweight Storm and it comes in at 6lb 9 ounces scoped. I got 6.5 creedmoor since I already have everything for it. It shoots sub moa with factory ammo. Now, this rifle I am excited about and look forward to a few of the spots I will take it that I would not go with my 12 lbers. Recoil is not even notable....noticeable ? yes, but worth mentioning as in notable ?, no. So ya its not a 6-800 yard deer/elk rifle but I have that covered and will of course use that if the hunt calls for it. If you can have more than one hunt rifle, as far as Im concerned, the light weight, lower recoil chamberings offer a fine alternative to the 10lb and up rifles.
-
I’m looking into tikka 300 win also. I think a lightweight gun would make the mountains way easier. I currently have a ruger m77 markii. Shoots awesome and i love the caliber.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
I personally wouldn't want a Tikka in 300 Win. Mag. Just too light and it will not be fun to shoot. If you want the Tikka get it in 270 Win. or something similar. That's still plenty for moose especially if you use a good bullet like a Barnes 140 grain.
I have a Tikka T3 lite in 300WSM. I have a limb saver pad on and I don't mind shooting it at all. I'm not a big guy either at 5'8" 175lbs
-
I have a Cooper Backcountry in 6.5x284 with a Leupold VX6 on it that weighs a total of 7.09 lbs. It is great to pack but tough to hold steady.
-
I have 2 lr set ups over 12lb and one @ 15lb+. Since Im closer to 66 than 65, this is the year I decided to address the weight issue for a woods rifle. I bought this years Savage model 110 lightweight Storm and it comes in at 6lb 9 ounces scoped. I got 6.5 creedmoor since I already have everything for it. It shoots sub moa with factory ammo. Now, this rifle I am excited about and look forward to a few of the spots I will take it that I would not go with my 12 lbers. Recoil is not even notable....noticeable ? yes, but worth mentioning as in notable ?, no. So ya its not a 6-800 yard deer/elk rifle but I have that covered and will of course use that if the hunt calls for it. If you can have more than one hunt rifle, as far as Im concerned, the light weight, lower recoil chamberings offer a fine alternative to the 10lb and up rifles.
I'm in the same boat. Ordered a Savage 110 ultralite in 6.5 PRC, which I'm still waiting for. Plan on topping it with a VX5 HD 3-15X44 CDS. Hoping to be around 7.5 lbs. for the entire package.
-
My guess is that you will eventually be happy with whichever option you go with. But since you said you wanted to trim up a bit anyway, have you considered rucking? That way, you can get stronger and carry the heavier rifle, which seems to me like a best case scenario.
-
There are several 300 rifles in classified for sale. There is always 300s for sale.
There is a reason for that. Just sayin. :sry:
-
Depends on whether you are going to hunt a lot with it, or just shoot it a lot. I have a Tikka T3 Lite in 300 Winchester Magnum, and I love it. My Dad has one in 7mm Remington, that is a sub 1/2" rifle. Neither gets shot a lot after load development was done. Dad's in his 80's, and has always said that, when it comes to hunting rifles; "you're gonna pack it alot more than you're gonna shoot it". Personally, I think if recoil is an issue, one should either shoot enough that it doesn't bother you anymore, or drop down to something smaller. I'll never have a hunting rifle with a brake. Get what you can shoot the best with, and then practice.
-
There are several 300 rifles in classified for sale. There is always 300s for sale.
There is a reason for that. Just sayin. :sry:
:yeah:
-
There are several 300 rifles in classified for sale. There is always 300s for sale.
There is a reason for that. Just sayin. :sry:
Because men are no longer men? :sry: :chuckle:
-
Im not a fan of overly light rifles. My 300 wm is just over 10 lb and to me is about right.
I am out hunting to shoot and kill an animal as my main goal, so ill take a little extra weight in my rifle to know i have complete confidence in the shot wether its near or far.
Theres other places to cut weight. :twocents:
That said i wouldnt want to carry a 12+ lb rifle everywhere either.
-
Everyone is different but to me a 10# rifle is about all I want to lug around. 9-10 is the sweet spot for magnums for me.
-
There are several 300 rifles in classified for sale. There is always 300s for sale.
There is a reason for that. Just sayin. :sry:
Because men are no longer men? :sry: :chuckle:
Packin a big magnum on your shoulder doesnt mean youre packin a big magnum in your pants. :sry: :chuckle:
-
+1 for the Tikka .300 WM with the Limbsaver recoil pad. Everyone has a preference. The kick is not bothersome for me at all and I’m an average Joe build. I use a 165 grain bullet, but the 180’s don’t bug me either. My shoulders appreciate the lighter weight if I’m hiking all day. That said- I also have the Tikka .270 shooting a 150 grain bullet. Both guns get the job done. Both are incredibly accurate. Can’t go wrong with either. As said earlier, practice makes a big difference.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
You can download a 300 magnum caliber to 30-06 (or less) recoil levels. It's much harder to safely upload a 30-06 to 300 magnum ballistic levels.
-
I shoot a light weight 300 without a break no issues :twocents:
-
I have Tikka T3X in 300WM love it alot, had Sendero SF2 before and got so tired of hauling that thing, sold, and bought Tikka. I would say its better to carry something lighter when you hunt and get a little more punch in your shoulder when you shoot then carry something heavy and who knows when you'll pull the trigger. Even the kick is not that big of a diff. Go with Tikka.Good luck.
-
So I’m looking at a new rifle, really thinking about a 300 win mag and from anyone with experience on it, is a light rifle really a good idea in 300 win mag? I was looking at the tikka superlite but I like to shoot a lot and I found a Remington long range that seems more of what I’d need. Weight difference is 2lbs. For hiking up and over the mountains I feel the tikka would be nice but at the same time does the 2lbs make recoil a PITA while practicing at the range? And I have a good 20lbs I’m trying to lose but yeah. I’d like for by fall or next spring to be at my goal weight and have a great rifle for chasing bears or whatever else. Goal is to go for a hunt in Alaska for moose next year and I don’t think a guide would appreciate me showing up with my 30-30 haha
And I know the tikka has a mag that only allows factory rounds to be loaded but seeing that it produced .5 moa for guys with factory Hornady I’m fine with that. I don’t play with seating depth anyways when I reload.
I bet your guide would rather have you show up with a 30/30 that you are extremely proficient with then a 300WM that you suck with because you don’t enjoy shooting because of the recoil. Lots of people do well with magnums, I bet more don’t. It’s all about what your realistic needs are. Shooting a light rifle well is different then shooting a heavier rifle, lots of people struggle with lightweights because they seem to highlight deficiencies in form more. I’ve killed stuff with magnums and none of them would have been any less dead if it had been the 270, 7mm/08 etc. I’ve owned multiple Kimbers the first owners all claimed had issues, they didn’t, they’re just a little trickier to shoot well. It’s your money, but placement trumps headstamp every time.
-
There are several 300 rifles in classified for sale. There is always 300s for sale.
There is a reason for that. Just sayin. :sry:
Because men are no longer men? :sry: :chuckle:
Packin a big magnum on your shoulder doesnt mean youre packin a big magnum in your pants. :sry: :chuckle:
Strange way to judge a man's toughness, but you do you!
-
I had a 300 Win, M70 Extreme Weather before. Shot well, but didn't enjoy shooting it. Got rid of it.
Why not just a T3x 30-06?
-
Son took a moose at 15 with his 325WSM. Nice beautiful x-bolt rifle, very light easy to carry. Kicks soooo much harder than my braked 338 Lapua or his braked 338-378 that its not fun to shoot at all.
-
I've went full circle, raised on my Dad's Pre'64 Featherweight .270 actually not a Featherweight by today's standards... then about everything out there it seems like... Rifles Inc Strata 4 1/2 lb 7STW with brake could punch 1 hole three shot groups off the bench if allowed to cool between 2nd and 3rd shot, the problem was shooting off hand-real whitetail hunting I couldn't hit anything with it-too light, Melvin Forbes ULA was the most balanced of the Lightweights that I shot, but now days my lightest is a Cooper Back Country. I now mainly shoot rifles in the 9 lb range, packing isn't the only thing to consider, sometimes opportunity arises and you don't have a rest, yet if practiced, can be a very ethical shot if you can hold your gun steady! :)
One of my favorites now days is a Remington 700KS with safety that locks bolt(older model) in .300 Weatherby with Leupold 4.5x14x40..... handles nicely and kills with authority, and doesn't weigh a ton....
-
I have two Sako Finlights, one in 300 WM, and the other in 7mm mag. Love these rifles.
All my other rifles became safe queens after firing my Finlight the first time.
-
The 1-4 # difference is not a damn thing if you can’t pack yourself / gear in! If you’re so worried about a couple pounds in a hunting situation- you better shoot the smallest buck you see period , cuz if that couple # is a big deal you’re screwed haha. Just get comfortable with what you shoot and get confident and you’re good.
-
The 1-4 # difference is not a damn thing if you can’t pack yourself / gear in! If you’re so worried about a couple pounds in a hunting situation- you better shoot the smallest buck you see period , cuz if that couple # is a big deal you’re screwed haha. Just get comfortable with what you shoot and get confident and you’re good.
If I had that attitude with all my gear I could needlessly be packing an extra 30lbs into the backcountry. It adds up quick and does make a difference.
-
There are several 300 rifles in classified for sale. There is always 300s for sale.
There is a reason for that. Just sayin. :sry:
:yeah:
-
The 1-4 # difference is not a damn thing if you can’t pack yourself / gear in! If you’re so worried about a couple pounds in a hunting situation- you better shoot the smallest buck you see period , cuz if that couple # is a big deal you’re screwed haha. Just get comfortable with what you shoot and get confident and you’re good.
If I had that attitude with all my gear I could needlessly be packing an extra 30lbs into the backcountry. It adds up quick and does make a difference.
Oh I get it don’t get me wrong. I pack in and hike in pretty deep. I understand all the other gear issues - I was just responding to the rifle question.
My main is 9.8oz
-
I'm all about hunting with light rifles in calibers that don't punish me. So, for the 308 on down, the lighter the better. Above that, I like weight! I admit I'm a recoil wimp so why punish myself on the bench when I'm working up a load. I'm also not a fan of muzzle breaks because of the noise. In the thickets of Western Washington I've seldom had time to stop, put on the earmuffs, then shoot. It's more like "Antlers-BANG!".
-
There are several 300 rifles in classified for sale. There is always 300s for sale.
There is a reason for that. Just sayin. :sry:
What’s wrong with the 300? Serious question
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
There are several 300 rifles in classified for sale. There is always 300s for sale.
There is a reason for that. Just sayin. :sry:
What’s wrong with the 300? Serious question
Not a darn thing.
My point is a lot of guys buy them and sell them. Because they can’t take the recoil or get tired of it.
If you like it shoot it.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
There are several 300 rifles in classified for sale. There is always 300s for sale.
There is a reason for that. Just sayin. :sry:
What’s wrong with the 300? Serious question
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Probably nothing. I think they are just manufactured more than the other calibers, so it would stand to reason they would outnumber other calibers for resale. Just try getting bullets for reloading....about 100x the options for them than the next few calibers.
-
There are several 300 rifles in classified for sale. There is always 300s for sale.
There is a reason for that. Just sayin. :sry:
What’s wrong with the 300? Serious question
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
It is a fantastic caliber.
Some people do not care for the "kick" or "recoil" that some rifles are producing.
There are a ton of variables that determine how a rifle handles. Caliber is only one of them. When shot out of a well balanced rifle, the 300 WM will produce a lesser amount of felt recoil that a 30-06 shot from most of you over counter cheap plastic or resin stocked rifles.
-
I really like light rifles. They are accurate enough for the way I hunt. I have never shot over 400 yds. I have a browning a-bolt .338 mag that I bought in 1988. It weighs 8.2 lbs with scope loaded. I have probably shot over 3000 rounds through it. I took it to Africa 4 times in 1990’s so did a lot of shooting before those trips plus a lot of deer and elk hunting. Not as accurate as it used to be so a few years ago I bought a tikka .338 win mag. It weighs 7.5 lbs with light weight leupold scope. I put a limb saver pad on it and I don’t think it is bad to shoot. I have shot several deer ,elk and a couple BC moose with it. Point is light weight rifles are great for packing and if you practice they shoot good. When hunting you will pack your gun much more than shooting it.
-
There are several 300 rifles in classified for sale. There is always 300s for sale.
There is a reason for that. Just sayin. :sry:
What’s wrong with the 300? Serious question
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Absolutely nothing, unless you just read yet another hunting/shooting article talking about the Magic Powers of the latest 6.5mm. The 300 is a workhorse up to and including military sniper work.
-
This is great! Thank you guys. So I had a 300 winnie but traded it to a member here for a chainsaw. I first got to experience the 300 in the army while prepping for sniper school (never got to go) but that rifle was nearly 15 pounds. I carried the M14 on patrol and that beauty was pretty hefty too. My experience with light rifles of high caliber is null though hence why wondering if that recoil increase is worth the weight reduction. Reading through though I’m thinking I’ll go tikka (superlite stainless) and if the rifles weight is an issue I’ll get a different stock and boom. More weight. I had a tikka t3 with the limb saver and 2-7 Leupold and that was a great combo but I gave it to my dad for his birthday.
-
No issues with my Tikka 300, hell my wife shoots it very well
-
I’ve got a Tikka in .270WSM and .300WSM and a Sako A-7 in .300 winmag when sighting in or shooting ya the .270 WSM is the pleasure to shoot BUT when hunting I couldn’t tell how loud it is or what the recoil feels like and all three are light mountain rifles . But the style of hunting blacktail and bear hunting we do you won’t enjoy lugging around a boat anchor
-
14 miles in the pasayten with a 15lb 300 win mag made me go light :chuckle:
-
FWIW,
I bought my 300 win mag (Remington 798) and it had a 22 or 24" lightweight barrel and wood stock. Recoil was too much for me. I put a slip on recoil pad on the butt of the stock, still too much recoil. I think it weighed around 8-10lbs. I went to the other extreme and had it rebarreled with a 26" full bull barrel. Then put a heavy boyds thumb hole stock on it. Now it weighs about 18 lbs with scope and bipod. And now it shoots like a dream! No muzzle brake, but with 1.2" diameter at the muzzle end the shockwave goes all forward and is very plesant to the shooter.
Just don't ask me to pack it very far, and definitely don't ask me to fire it from a standing position.
I had trouble with a bear on my property and borrowed a 7mm mag from a family member. That rifle was a Remington 700 with a wood stock and 24" medium/heavy profile barrel. Weighed around 10-12lbs.
Morale of the story: I wish I'd have built my 300 win mag with a lighter barrel and kept it a more hunting-suited weight. My current opinion is that a 9-12lb rifle with a removable brake would be perfect. Put the brake on and wear good earmuffs for range shooting. For hunting, remove the brake and verify that POI is still good. I would remove the brake for hunting because of the higher chances of shooting without earplugs in and I don't want to blow out my eardrums.
-
Savage 111 Trophy Hunter in 300 WM...about 9lbs loaded, with scope, sling, buttstock cheek rest with a pouch with ammo and so forth. Pretty much the perfect weight. Doesn't kick too hard, and lightweight enough to walk long distances.
-
But do we REALLY feel recoil when hunting?
-
I have a Tikka SL in 7 mag shooting 168’s that is capable of sub 1/2 moa & have never thought the recoil was bad. Put a Limbsaver pad on it if your gonna run the factory stock or upgrade to a Mesa/AG carbon fiber & you will be fine. Great triggers & same barrels as the more expensive Sako Finnlight. All that said, LW rifles are harder to shoot accurately especially as the distance increases & you have significant muzzle jump. I say go Tikka with the choices you gave us. :twocents: or buy the CA Ridgeline in the classifieds & cure both issues with one fell swoop. :dunno: :chuckle:
-
But do we REALLY feel recoil when hunting?
It isn't about recoil for a shot during hunting. It's all the recoil during sighting in, load development, practicing that the person will remember, even subconsciously, that matters.
-
So you guys got me wondering what my Tikka t3lite 300WSM actually weighs so I weighed it in it's heaviest condition that I'd use it in. Most of the time I don't have my bipod attached, it depends on where I'm at. 9.10 lbs and zero issue with kick. :dunno:
-
So you guys got me wondering what my Tikka t3lite 300WSM actually weighs so I weighed it in it's heaviest condition that I'd use it in. Most of the time I don't have my bipod attached, it depends on where I'm at. 9.10 lbs and zero issue with kick. :dunno:
Is there typically a difference in recoil between a 300WSM and 300WM?
-
Yes I would say there is a difference in recoil. I happen to have both calibers in the same gun,bought the wsm then a buddy needed money , and sold me 300wm both Winchester model 70 same exact gun. There is noticeable difference wsm less recoil by a distance.
-
Yes I would say there is a difference in recoil. I happen to have both calibers in the same gun,bought the wsm then a buddy needed money , and sold me 300wm both Winchester model 70 same exact gun. There is noticeable difference wsm less recoil by a distance.
Shooting approximately the same load? I wonder why that would be?
-
Yes I would say there is a difference in recoil. I happen to have both calibers in the same gun,bought the wsm then a buddy needed money , and sold me 300wm both Winchester model 70 same exact gun. There is noticeable difference wsm less recoil by a distance.
Shooting approximately the same load? I wonder why that would be?
Less horsepower... Less powder capacity and lower velocity for a given bullet weight. :twocents:
-
Yes I would say there is a difference in recoil. I happen to have both calibers in the same gun,bought the wsm then a buddy needed money , and sold me 300wm both Winchester model 70 same exact gun. There is noticeable difference wsm less recoil by a distance.
Shooting approximately the same load? I wonder why that would be?
Less horsepower... Less powder capacity and lower velocity for a given bullet weight. :twocents:
Exactly. Some people seem to think the two are ballstic twins. They're not. More powder, more velocity, same bullet weight = more recoil.
-
My understanding is that the WSM can generate the same velocity as the Win Mag using slightly less powder due to the shorter, fatter case of the WSM being more efficient.
My limited experience with both is that the WSM does have slightly less recoil, everything else being equal.
-
My understanding is that the WSM can generate the same velocity as the Win Mag using slightly less powder due to the shorter, fatter case of the WSM being more efficient.
My limited experience with both is that the WSM does have slightly less recoil, everything else being equal.
In the lighter weight bullets. As bullets get bigger, the Win Mag starts distancing itself from the WSM.
-
https://www.snipercountry.com/300-wsm-vs-300-win-mag/
Here's a great read comparing the two.
-
https://www.snipercountry.com/300-wsm-vs-300-win-mag/
Here's a great read comparing the two.
Its not really an apples to apples comparison when you look at the bullet choices between the 2. The wsm has more lighter bullets than the wm in that comparison.
A better comparison would be to compare the same bullets in both. :twocents:
-
https://www.snipercountry.com/300-wsm-vs-300-win-mag/
Here's a great read comparing the two.
Its not really an apples to apples comparison when you look at the bullet choices between the 2. The wsm has more lighter bullets than the wm in that comparison.
A better comparison would be to compare the same bullets in both. :twocents:
:yeah:
-
https://www.snipercountry.com/300-wsm-vs-300-win-mag/
Here's a great read comparing the two.
Its not really an apples to apples comparison when you look at the bullet choices between the 2. The wsm has more lighter bullets than the wm in that comparison.
A better comparison would be to compare the same bullets in both. :twocents:
I agree! But you're still splitting hairs in my opinion. We need someone who reloads for both calibers to make rounds for each using the same bullet and powder charge and see what the results are. I'd be very curious.
-
Do you think that data doesn't exist? It's not even close between the win mag and the shortmag
-
Do you think that data doesn't exist? It's not even close between the win mag and the shortmag
As far as what? Recoil? Ballistics? Do you have a link to the data so I can see it. From everything I can find they are very very similar.
-
Do you think that data doesn't exist? It's not even close between the win mag and the shortmag
As far as what? Recoil? Ballistics? Do you have a link to the data so I can see it. From everything I can find they are very very similar.
It's really very simple. As I said before, more powder equals more velocity. The 300 Win. Mag. is a bigger case than the 300 WSM, and therefore holds more powder. So, that gives more velocity with the same weight bullet. Which also means more recoil.
It's exactly the same as comparing the 30/06 to the 300 Win. Mag. 30/06 has less powder capacity, therefore less velocity, and less recoil.
-
If I had to throw one of the 2 away. I would throw the 300wm away. Which I won't because I only have "2" guns. I reload for both, and I am sold on 300 wsm great round.
-
But do we REALLY feel recoil when hunting?
Absolutely never.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
There are several 300 rifles in classified for sale. There is always 300s for sale.
There is a reason for that. Just sayin. :sry:
What’s wrong with the 300? Serious question
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Absolutely nothing, unless you just read yet another hunting/shooting article talking about the Magic Powers of the latest 6.5mm. The 300 is a workhorse up to and including military sniper work.
I was going to say it’s performed well on the 5 big game animals I’ve ever taken with it.. i felt like the caliber is top of the line for my needs.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Nothing wrong with 300WM just really like 300WSM.
-
Nothing wrong with 300WM just really like 300WSM.
Opposite for me :chuckle:
#realmagnumswearbelts
That should get this one going. :yike:
Sorry for the threadjack
-
There has never been a horse that can't be rode, and a man that can't be throwed.
-
Nothing wrong with 300WM just really like 300WSM.
Opposite for me :chuckle:
#realmagnumswearbelts
That should get this one going. :yike:
Sorry for the threadjack
Yeah, but would you want a light 300 win mag? That's what this thread is about.
-
Nothing wrong with 300WM just really like 300WSM.
Opposite for me :chuckle:
#realmagnumswearbelts
That should get this one going. :yike:
Sorry for the threadjack
Yeah, but would you want a light 300 win mag? That's what this thread is about.
Ive already posted my opinion on rifle weight in this thread. :dunno:
-
Back to the Ops question, here is some helpful information comparing cartridges and rifle weights for same weight bullet.
300 WM, 180gr bullet, 3100fps velocity
7lb total weight rifle = 37.35 ft-lbs of recoil energy, 18.53 fps recoil velocity
9lb total weight rifle = 29.05 ft-lbs of recoil energy, 14.41 fps recoil velocity
30-06, 180gr bullet, 2800fps velocity
7lb total weight rifle = 30.02 ft-lbs recoil energy, 16.51 fps recoil velocity
9lbs total weight rifle = 23.35 ft-lbs recoil energy, 12.92fps recoil velocity
308, 180gr bullet, 2600fps velocity
7lb total weight rifle = 21.29 ft-lbs recoil energy, 13.99 fps recoil velocity
9lbs total weight rifle = 16.56 ft-lbs recoil energy, 10.88 fps recoil velocity
A good Limbsaver pad can close much of the difference in felt recoil between those examples. But even with the best recoil pad, a 300WM in a 7lb total weight rifle (including scope/etc.) is going to still kick some. 9lb rifle? Not as bad.
Stock design also comes into play regarding felt recoil. Some are better than others.
-
I have a Tikka T3 Superlite in 30-06. I have a limbsaver pad which helps quite a bit. I shoot 150 grain Barnes TTSX and think you could hunt your moose with that (and just about everything else) no problem.
I think 300 win mags with a brake are brutal how loud they are, so I would stay clear of that setup. Plus, everyone will hate you at the range. Even with hearing protection they are crazy loud.
-
Pansies. I’ve been hunting with this since I was nine. :tup:
-
Lots of dry fire will really help with flinch. Plus it gives time for barrel to cool to really dial in that cold bore zero. 10 dry fires per shot and if the flinch persists go 20. Each dry fire should be treated as if you are shooting a target
-
Lots of dry fire will really help with flinch. Plus it gives time for barrel to cool to really dial in that cold bore zero. 10 dry fires per shot and if the flinch persists go 20. Each dry fire should be treated as if you are shooting a target
Good advice. It definitely works. I've done it myself, and I taught my daughter to do the same thing. Helps her a lot.
-
Lots of dry fire will really help with flinch. Plus it gives time for barrel to cool to really dial in that cold bore zero. 10 dry fires per shot and if the flinch persists go 20. Each dry fire should be treated as if you are shooting a target
Good advice. It definitely works. I've done it myself, and I taught my daughter to do the same thing. Helps her a lot.
When I started practicing shots out past 400 yards, I did a lot of dry firing. It helped immensely. Then began shooting a very lightweight rifle, and found the similarities between shooting an ultralight rifle, and long range with my other rifle to be very close. The dry firing helps a lot.
-
light weight rifles MUST have light trigger pull.
-
The 1-4 # difference is not a damn thing if you can’t pack yourself / gear in! If you’re so worried about a couple pounds in a hunting situation- you better shoot the smallest buck you see period , cuz if that couple # is a big deal you’re screwed haha. Just get comfortable with what you shoot and get confident and you’re good.
If I had that attitude with all my gear I could needlessly be packing an extra 30lbs into the backcountry. It adds up quick and does make a difference.
I'm going to agree.
I really don't see how anyone can haul around those 9 pound rifles in rough terrain. A couple extra pounds on shoulder is definitely noticeable after a few miles.