Hunting Washington Forum
Equipment & Gear => Guns and Ammo => Topic started by: silverdalesauer on February 26, 2021, 01:41:45 PM
-
Just like the previous topic I posted on "Best All Around Carry Pistol for Versatile Use" I've run into another question much like it. This one comes from someone wondering what would be the best all around rifle to own (if you could only own one) for the following purposes:
- coyote/small game hunting
- deer hunting
- shooting sports (target)
- home defense (optional)
I've added home defense just because I know that there's multiple options with an AR-style rifle that many friends use to both hunt with and serve as a back up for home defense. But, at the same time, I'm more of a shotgun guy who'd prefer to use a pump-shot gun for the home defense. So, it's not absolutely necessary.
Thoughts?
-
I’ve always thought a light weight accurate 7mm would be the the rifle to own if only having one. I don’t even own a 7mm currently. A 270 Winchester would be hard to beat also. I have many rifles but a 300 win mag and a 25-06 are pretty much all I use
-
Used to be 30-06 , load them up or load them down for what ever you wanted to hunt. Ammo you could get anywhere. Times have changed.
-
I have a 7mm rem mag I love it.
-
:yeah:
Or the trusty old .308!
Best survival/apocalypse gun... .22 long rifle or similar rimfire, but .22 ammo is everywhere. I would carry a .22 in that instance cuz I could carry 1000 rnds easily. Try that with even a .223...
-
22mag
-
I have a 7mm rem mag I love it.
This was the route I went a few years back and still think it’s the right answer.
If home defense was truly in the equation I would go with the Maxim Defense PDW, animals would still die, I’d just have to get closer.
-
:yeah:
Or the trusty old .308!
Best survival/apocalypse gun... .22 long rifle or similar rimfire, but .22 ammo is everywhere. I would carry a .22 in that instance cuz I could carry 1000 rnds easily. Try that with even a .223...
Gotta + 1 to the 308 ,great caliber.
I have to add 243 also, everything you said could be done with a 243 and very easy recoil.
With that said ,my first bolt action rifle was a 270 and it put meat on the table Alot for me.
I currently been playin with the 7mm mag past few years ,it seems to get the job done.
-
Based on your above description (coyote, deer, shooting sport) I would have to think a .243 would fit that bill just fine. Flat shooting, not overkill on yotes if you want to save the hides, enough to kill a deer and can definitely bang steel at distance. As for home defense....not optimal unless you get it in an AR10 platform.
If you don't care about the hides on yotes and you want to hunt bigger game than deer.....options are countless. 6.5, .270, 7mm, 06, 300,...........If you don't want to step into a magnum caliber I would strongly consider the 6.5 or .270. You can get the 6.5 creed in an AR10 platform if you want to add home defense to the menu. I'm personally not a fan of hunting with AR platforms. They are heavy, loud and clunky.....I know people will disagree with that last statement that is why I preface it as my opinion.
-
6.5 AR 10
-
6.5 AR 10
:yeah:
The AR10 6.5 Creed does check a lot of boxes and everyone should have at least one.
-
270
-
.243 with 3x9 scope is a great choice. Set it up and done, kill everything deer sized or smaller.
Then a medium to mag size rifle for a second choice, to cover deer and elk, bear.
Then AR platform.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
-
270, I still to this day find ammo at random gas stations in the middle of no where.
-
Used to be 30-06 , load them up or load them down for what ever you wanted to hunt. Ammo you could get anywhere. Times have changed.
:yeah:
Or .308 load up or down.
-
.06 .270 7mm mag. And well the .22 has killed more game than all of them combined. :tup:
-
.06 .270 7mm mag. And well the .22 has killed more game than all of them combined. :tup:
Very true about the old .22. I have a hair on 3X3 muley rack my grandmother harvested in Colorado in 1900 with a Stephens Crackshot .22.
-
It seems to me to be an impossible question to answer. I know you wrote deer but for me any rifle I am going to have for a big game animal is going to have to work for elk, deer, bear and cougar. IMO there is not such a gun that would also be suitable for small game. I guess if you don't mind blowing a bobcat or coyote to uselessness you could make the compromise but I won't go there.
For years I used a 7mm Rem mag for big game but more recently I have packed a 300 Win Short mag. I would not think of using these for small game. As far as shooting sports I guess you could use what ever but I should think most would want something that was affordable to shoot. That ought to fit in well with small game but crossing over to big game too. I can't see it.
-
There are so many, once you realize that most cartridges pretty much overlap in usefulness. Any perceived differences in ballistic qualities are usually limited by the shooter’s ability more than anything else.
It’s hard to beat the .308 or 30-06 for ubiquity. They do everything well with tolerable recoil and (in normal times) cost of ammunition. Someone who wants an adequate rifle to do everything probably isn’t going to mind tearing up hides on coyotes or want magnum recoil from something capable of taking an elk at 600 yards.
-
As mentioned, two rifles sounds like a better concept: 1) small game rifle such as 22lr or 22mag, and 2) big game and coyotes/bobcat
If you really can only have one for all those purposes? 35 Whelen. :) 158gr or 180gr pistol bullets (they're lower velocity loads for pistol bullets) for small game, coyote, bobcat. Then step up to a big game load for everything else. Can load from180gr up to 310gr bullets for everything from deer to grizzly.
Or just get a multi-barrel combined. Like the Double Badger in 243win and 410ga. Or one of the old Baikal's if you can find one. Those came in lots of varieties of combinations. There is a cool 257 Roberts over 12ga Baikal on Gunbroker right now that would be fun. But they did 308/12, etc. combos. Some of the old Savage 24 and Savage 42 combos are good too if you can find them.
-
.260 Rem
-
I've seen a lot of references to the 30-06 and 7mm Rem Mag here and I have to agree, especially for more big game hunting focused applications.
You can learn more about those cartridges below if you're interested.
https://thebiggamehuntingblog.com/7mm-rem-mag-vs-30-06/
https://thebiggamehuntingblog.com/6-5-creedmoor-vs-30-06/
-
.243 or .270 would be hard to beat.
-
AR-16 .308 if we are talking home defense and target sports as an option.
-
Best all around "rifle" is one that fits you and feels comfortable. Lot of great options, I'd stick with a bolt action.
-
.243 or .270 would be hard to beat.
The .270 is, indeed, hard to beat. I consider it one of the best calibers for deer-sized game. It is a little light for elk, IMO. However, I have a friend who has hunted Roosevelt elk on the peninsula with his .270 for many, many years, and has been very successful. I might choose the .30-'06 over the .270. The '06 is extremely versatile when it comes to reloading. Can't really go wrong with either caliber.
-
Its not there yet but in 5 years I think you will see 300 Prc being mentioned a lot in answers. 215 gr @ 3000 fps, 1000 yd capable, shootable without brake or lightweight with brake. The main advantage over these others mentioned is it can do targets or game to 1000 yds.
Edit - obviously I didn’t read the whole question!
-
I own one hunting rifle and it’s a 30-06. Never needed anything else.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
-
Funny, I have 7 or 8 hunting rifles and do not own a 30-06. However, if I were to choose only one, that would probably be it.
-
Funny, I have 7 or 8 hunting rifles and do not own a 30-06. However, if I were to choose only one, that would probably be it.
I also don't own a 30-06, but if pressed for a single rifle might go there.
Tons of factory ammo across a very wide spectrum, and I'm guessing better ammo availability at small town stores than about any other caliber. ..... present times excepted.
-
7MM 08
-
I Love my
.243 Savage LR heavy rifle
7MM mag Christianson Mesa Long Range
Both are lights out guns
-
I'm gonna say 308
Some of this can be said with 30-06 and others.
Ability to load 110 grain or military Fmj for varmint and such that will punch a small hole.
Same ability to take bigger game with a 150 or 165 grain.
If you don't reload and want options.
That's what I would go with.
-
Based on what you said, .243 or .308
-
I have always been a 270 or 308 fan. My now go to rifle is the Tikka 270WSM. I have killed bear and elk no problem with 140 grain accubonds. Will kill anything you put the crosshairs on
-
I don't want to derail an excellent discussion, and turn it into an argument, but I've always been curious why someone would chose .308 Winchester over the .30-'06. A comparison of both might be a positive contribution here.
-
The .300 win mag or .300 PRC ends this discussion. Seriously
-
I don't want to derail an excellent discussion, and turn it into an argument, but I've always been curious why someone would chose .308 Winchester over the .30-'06. A comparison of both might be a positive contribution here.
I've never owned a 308 and I've had, and still have, more than a couple 30/06 rifles, but I'd guess the reason why is the 308 recoils less, and still pretty much works just as well as the 30/06.
-
I've always been curious why someone would cho(o)se .308 Winchester over the .30-'06.
If they have no intent of shooting past 300 yards, or even to it.
You could play that game with quite a few cartridges.
Why choose a 308 when you could have a 30-06?
Why choose a 30-06 when you could get a 300 Win Mag?
Why choose a 300 Win Mag when you could get a 300 PRC?
And best yet, why choose any of those when you could get a 280AI? :tup:
-
You could play that game with quite a few cartridges.
Why choose a 308 when you could have a 30-06?
Why choose a 30-06 when you could get a 300 Win Mag?
Why choose a 300 Win Mag when you could get a 300 PRC?
And best yet, why choose any of those when you could get a 280AI? :tup:
Well, it wasn't meant as "playing a game", as you put it. It was meant as a serious question, comparing two very similar calibers. If you want to "play a game" then just add "Wby" to the end of any caliber you care to discuss, and most likely .280AI won't even be in the discussion.
-
You could play that game with quite a few cartridges.
Why choose a 308 when you could have a 30-06?
Why choose a 30-06 when you could get a 300 Win Mag?
Why choose a 300 Win Mag when you could get a 300 PRC?
And best yet, why choose any of those when you could get a 280AI? :tup:
Well, it wasn't meant as "playing a game", as you put it. It was meant as a serious question, comparing two very similar calibers. If you want to "play a game" then just add "Wby" to the end of any caliber you care to discuss, and most likely .280AI won't even be in the discussion.
I guess I should have used the sarcasm font in parts of my post :rolleyes:
But I gave you a serious answer as well, which also eluded you.
-
You could play that game with quite a few cartridges.
Why choose a 308 when you could have a 30-06?
Why choose a 30-06 when you could get a 300 Win Mag?
Why choose a 300 Win Mag when you could get a 300 PRC?
And best yet, why choose any of those when you could get a 280AI? :tup:
Well, it wasn't meant as "playing a game", as you put it. It was meant as a serious question, comparing two very similar calibers. If you want to "play a game" then just add "Wby" to the end of any caliber you care to discuss, and most likely .280AI won't even be in the discussion.
I guess I should have used the sarcasm font in parts of my post :rolleyes:
But I gave you a serious answer as well, which also eluded you.
It didn't elude me......I just don't think that adding a boutique cartridge to the discussion adds much.
-
You could play that game with quite a few cartridges.
Why choose a 308 when you could have a 30-06?
Why choose a 30-06 when you could get a 300 Win Mag?
Why choose a 300 Win Mag when you could get a 300 PRC?
And best yet, why choose any of those when you could get a 280AI? :tup:
Well, it wasn't meant as "playing a game", as you put it. It was meant as a serious question, comparing two very similar calibers. If you want to "play a game" then just add "Wby" to the end of any caliber you care to discuss, and most likely .280AI won't even be in the discussion.
I guess I should have used the sarcasm font in parts of my post :rolleyes:
But I gave you a serious answer as well, which also eluded you.
It didn't elude me......I just don't think that adding a boutique cartridge to the discussion adds much.
You sure about that?
I've always been curious why someone would cho(o)se .308 Winchester over the .30-'06.
If they have no intent of shooting past 300 yards, or even to it.
That is in reference to the 308, which was already under discussion by you and nothing I added. So serious answer given. Why not, if you never shoot 300 or 200 yards, go with a 308?
-
One thing I'll add, is that right now, the best rifle might be the one you can buy ammo for. A rifle with no ammo is obviously useless. So if I were in the market I'd first look at what cartridges can still be purchased, and for a reasonable price. That might be the most important thing to consider. You'll want plenty of ammo to practice with and sight in the rifle to start with. And the cartridge it's chambered in really matters much less than we think. They all do pretty much the same thing, the only real difference being some recoil more than others.
-
You could play that game with quite a few cartridges.
Why choose a 308 when you could have a 30-06?
Why choose a 30-06 when you could get a 300 Win Mag?
Why choose a 300 Win Mag when you could get a 300 PRC?
And best yet, why choose any of those when you could get a 280AI? :tup:
Well, it wasn't meant as "playing a game", as you put it. It was meant as a serious question, comparing two very similar calibers. If you want to "play a game" then just add "Wby" to the end of any caliber you care to discuss, and most likely .280AI won't even be in the discussion.
I guess I should have used the sarcasm font in parts of my post :rolleyes:
But I gave you a serious answer as well, which also eluded you.
It didn't elude me......I just don't think that adding a boutique cartridge to the discussion adds much.
You sure about that?
I've always been curious why someone would cho(o)se .308 Winchester over the .30-'06.
If they have no intent of shooting past 300 yards, or even to it.
That is in reference to the 308, which was already under discussion by you and nothing I added. So serious answer given. Why not, if you never shoot 300 or 200 yards, go with a 308?
Precisely.
-
There’s no flies on either the .308 or 30-06. Of course there is a legitimate reason to go with the .308, it’s that you can’t get the finest hunting rifle ever made, the M99 savage, in 30-06. :chuckle:
-
Put up a poll. Again though, .300 win or PRC. Haven’t heard anyone say why not!
-
308 has the short action and less weight.
But if you aren't invested in 308 I think 7-08 is the way to go.
3006 is just plain fun at the range though.
-
You could play that game with quite a few cartridges.
Why choose a 308 when you could have a 30-06?
Why choose a 30-06 when you could get a 300 Win Mag?
Why choose a 300 Win Mag when you could get a 300 PRC?
And best yet, why choose any of those when you could get a 280AI? :tup:
Well, it wasn't meant as "playing a game", as you put it. It was meant as a serious question, comparing two very similar calibers. If you want to "play a game" then just add "Wby" to the end of any caliber you care to discuss, and most likely .280AI won't even be in the discussion.
I guess I should have used the sarcasm font in parts of my post :rolleyes:
But I gave you a serious answer as well, which also eluded you.
It didn't elude me......I just don't think that adding a boutique cartridge to the discussion adds much.
You sure about that?
I've always been curious why someone would cho(o)se .308 Winchester over the .30-'06.
If they have no intent of shooting past 300 yards, or even to it.
That is in reference to the 308, which was already under discussion by you and nothing I added. So serious answer given. Why not, if you never shoot 300 or 200 yards, go with a 308?
Precisely.
So why the curiosity of choosing the 308 over an -06? In short range applications it makes perfect sense.
-
Said it before, all those Army sniper confirmed K’s can’t be wrong. Love my .308.
-
I don't want to derail an excellent discussion, and turn it into an argument, but I've always been curious why someone would chose .308 Winchester over the .30-'06. A comparison of both might be a positive contribution here.
Brass and reloading components was cheaper pre covid19.
Case capacity is smaller than the 06 .
Ammo on the shelf today I assume is about the same,nothing.
Recoil with 308 is a bit lighter ,150 grain is where the 308 shines.
The rifle I bought ended up turning into my son's rifle.
He went from 243 to 308 pretty easy with keeping accuracy.
I don't own an 06 now ,but did have one before I started reloading .
Long range there is better calibers than a 308 like the 06.
But for shots under 200 yards 308 does pack a punch.
Really not much difference between the two ,just a few hundred FPS . My son's loads with a 150 grain come in on the cronograph at 2850.
-
Just some additional stats on the .308.
https://blog.cheaperthandirt.com/308-great/#:~:text=Despite%20the%20military%20dropping%207.62%20for%20its%20main,specialized%20military%20units%20who%20required%20long-range%20precision%20rounds.
-
I don't want to derail an excellent discussion, and turn it into an argument, but I've always been curious why someone would chose .308 Winchester over the .30-'06. A comparison of both might be a positive contribution here.
Brass and reloading components was cheaper pre covid19.
Case capacity is smaller than the 06 .
Ammo on the shelf today I assume is about the same,nothing.
Recoil with 308 is a bit lighter ,150 grain is where the 308 shines.
The rifle I bought ended up turning into my son's rifle.
He went from 243 to 308 pretty easy with keeping accuracy.
I don't own an 06 now ,but did have one before I started reloading .
Long range there is better calibers than a 308 like the 06.
But for shots under 200 yards 308 does pack a punch.
Really not much difference between the two ,just a few hundred FPS . My son's loads with a 150 grain come in on the cronograph at 2850.
You make a great case for the .308. One of the interesting aspects of that caliber is the lighter recoil. I have known a few hunters who were very recoil-sensitive, and felt-recoil is a very real consideration when choosing a hunting rifle.
-
I can ring steel all day long @ 300 yards with my Weatherby VG 2 .308 shooting good ammo (https://www.underwoodammo.com/308-winchester-match-grade-165-grain-nosler-accubond-spitzer.html). Haven’t had a critter walk away with this round/rifle out to 375 yards. Ya, I’m more of a bow Hunter but can’t argue with the effectiveness of the .308 for boomstick seasons(s).
Go get some 😎
-
6.5 Grendel AR 15
If you can find ammo.
-
Its not there yet but in 5 years I think you will see 300 Prc being mentioned a lot in answers. 215 gr @ 3000 fps, 1000 yd capable, shootable without brake or lightweight with brake. The main advantage over these others mentioned is it can do targets or game to 1000 yds.
Edit - obviously I didn’t read the whole question!
Are you saying 7mmRM is not capable of being used at 1000 yards?
-
Said it before, all those Army sniper confirmed K’s can’t be wrong. Love my .308.
Yep.👍
As I have .300winmag as my forum name.🤣
But my back up is a .308.😉
-
6.5 Grendel AR 15
If you can find ammo.
I belive you can resize 7.62x39 cases to grendel specs. I personally think its a great round.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
-
As a south paw shooter i was going to limit myself to one bolt gun. I had my mind set on a 300 win mag. After a short talk with the guys at Kesslerings they walked me over to the ammo shelf. I had like 30 choices verses 5. 06 has 30rnds of greek surplus for $8 up to the nickle cased trophy bonded bearclay for $30. ( this was a few snows ago) to this day i still have ball ammo and my favored balistic tip.
I think you can make the case for several different choices is you allow 2 calibers but im not sure how you can go wrong with the price availability variety of the 06 feed it a 110 pill or as heavy as you dare for moose or somethi g more dangerious.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G930A using Tapatalk
-
Are you saying 7mmRM is not capable of being used at 1000 yards?
[/quote]
Hard to fault the 7mag with 195 bergers. On smaller game prob better than 300prc, slight edge to prc on elk but splitting hairs for sure.
-
Since you mention deer as the largest big game I would consider the 270 Winchester. If you plan to ever hunt larger game I would consider the most powerful 30 caliber you can confidently shoot without flinching. A flinch will pretty much negate any advantage of a more powerful cartridge.
My favorite all around big game cartridge is the 300 WSM.
-
Said it before, all those Army sniper confirmed K’s can’t be wrong. Love my .308.
We have the 30-06 to thank for the opportunity to make those .308 shots. :chuckle:
Ballistically, they are very similar, my 30-06 hunting load probably chronos pretty close to a .308 since my barrel likes them a bit slower than max.
Short action could be helpful in some situations, but it's really a toss up. 30-06 gives you a bit heavier bullet options but not much.
Ammo is available and everybody and their brother makes a huge range of .308 bullets, known powder combinations, what's not to like for normal range shots?
Plus, the old cranky guys at the range tend to take it easy on you when they see you are shooting 30-06 and don't make fun of you behind your back like the trendy new stuff. :chuckle:
Tons of great options out there, pick something that has the punch to knock down the biggest thing you want to shoot and get good at shooting it. I think a lot of guys are way over gunned these days, judging from the targets at the range at hunter sight in day, they aren't even getting the advantages of faster, heavier bullets.
-
I own one hunting rifle and it’s a 30-06. Never needed anything else.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
:yeah: I dont even ever shoot my 30-06 anymore but I killed everything with one growing up in montana. I have a real soft spot for the 30-06. The different loads available even as factory ammo is enormous. We even had some down to 65 grain factory bullets back in the day. I have shot my 300 win mag the most hunting the last few years. You will have to get a 22lr for small game if you want to salvage much :chuckle:. I still think the 30-06 is the most versatile big game hunting rifle. I would also be very comfortable having a 30-06 for home defense
-
Just like the previous topic I posted on "Best All Around Carry Pistol for Versatile Use" I've run into another question much like it. This one comes from someone wondering what would be the best all around rifle to own (if you could only own one) for the following purposes:
- coyote/small game hunting
- deer hunting
- shooting sports (target)
- home defense (optional)
I've added home defense just because I know that there's multiple options with an AR-style rifle that many friends use to both hunt with and serve as a back up for home defense. But, at the same time, I'm more of a shotgun guy who'd prefer to use a pump-shot gun for the home defense. So, it's not absolutely necessary.
Thoughts?
Anyone that asks a question like this is unlikely to be looking at competitive target sports. If down the road they decide to compete in some discipline, that sport will dictate their second firearm choice.
For informal plinking/target, coyotes and deer a .243 will cover those basis nicely. Throwing in home defense is a monkey wrench. A rifle for the original parameters will likely have sighting equipment ill suited to inside the home distances in the dark. If home defense must be considered in this scenario, I would suggest a Remington pump action .243 with a scope in a QD mount so the open sights could be utilized. I'd also add a light on a rail.
FWIW- I would add a light under the barrel of the shotgun. A light mounted under the barrel will allow you to point and shoot a shotgun as if it were daylight with the barrel easily visible for reference pointing.
-
A gun for every occasion is always the right answer in my book :tup: :tup:
.223 for coyote
.22 LR for small game
darn near any centerfire for deer
-
I don't want to derail an excellent discussion, and turn it into an argument, but I've always been curious why someone would chose .308 Winchester over the .30-'06. A comparison of both might be a positive contribution here.
I've never owned a 308 and I've had, and still have, more than a couple 30/06 rifles, but I'd guess the reason why is the 308 recoils less, and still pretty much works just as well as the 30/06.
Weight.
-
I don't want to derail an excellent discussion, and turn it into an argument, but I've always been curious why someone would chose .308 Winchester over the .30-'06. A comparison of both might be a positive contribution here.
I've never owned a 308 and I've had, and still have, more than a couple 30/06 rifles, but I'd guess the reason why is the 308 recoils less, and still pretty much works just as well as the 30/06.
Weight.
I would guess that the difference in weight between the two calibers in the same rifle isn't much of a consideration. A Winchester Featherweight in .30-'06 weighs 4 oz. more than the same rifle in .308.
-
7mm, hands down. everyone else who thinks differently is flat wrong and should not be taken seriously for any other issue...ever
-
Toyota Tacoma.
Flawless and anyone who disagrees is a moron and will be subjected to the Cancel Culture!
-
I don't want to derail an excellent discussion, and turn it into an argument, but I've always been curious why someone would chose .308 Winchester over the .30-'06. A comparison of both might be a positive contribution here.
I've never owned a 308 and I've had, and still have, more than a couple 30/06 rifles, but I'd guess the reason why is the 308 recoils less, and still pretty much works just as well as the 30/06.
Weight.
I would guess that the difference in weight between the two calibers in the same rifle isn't much of a consideration. A Winchester Featherweight in .30-'06 weighs 4 oz. more than the same rifle in .308.
Depends on the manufacturer and trim, I suppose. Difference between .30-'06 weighs nearly a half pound more than the same rifle in .308 for the Ruger Hawkeye Hunter. If you go to the Compact, which they don't offer in the .30-'06, you are looking at about a pound and a half savings.
-
Toyota Tacoma.
Flawless and anyone who disagrees is a moron and will be subjected to the Cancel Culture!
Wow just wow. You need help man. Your obsession about this is unhealthy
-
Toyota Tacoma.
Flawless and anyone who disagrees is a moron and will be subjected to the Cancel Culture!
:chuckle: :chuckle: :chuckle:
-
Toyota Tacoma.
Flawless and anyone who disagrees is a moron and will be subjected to the Cancel Culture!
Wow just wow. You need help man. Your obsession about this is unhealthy
:chuckle:
-
I would guess that the difference in weight between the two calibers in the same rifle isn't much of a consideration. A Winchester Featherweight in .30-'06 weighs 4 oz. more than the same rifle in .308.
It depends on the rifle.
I've seen zero difference and I've seen a half pound difference.
-
I would guess that the difference in weight between the two calibers in the same rifle isn't much of a consideration. A Winchester Featherweight in .30-'06 weighs 4 oz. more than the same rifle in .308.
It depends on the rifle.
I've seen zero difference and I've seen a half pound difference.
Yep. My original point was a response to the post that someone might pick a .308 over a .30-'06 due to the difference in weight. My opinion is that, in general the weight savings is minimal, but there are exceptions.
-
7MM 08
:yeah:
-
7MM 08
:yeah:
Here’s some discussion on just that.
https://gunnewsdaily.com/7mm-08-vs-308/#:~:text=There%20are%207mm%20rounds%20with%20more%20grains%20of,but%20the%20.308%20is%20generally%20the%20heavier%20bullet.
-
Here’s some discussion on just that.
https://gunnewsdaily.com/7mm-08-vs-308/#:~:text=There%20are%207mm%20rounds%20with%20more%20grains%20of,but%20the%20.308%20is%20generally%20the%20heavier%20bullet.
Not a bad write-up but doesn't go over wind drift.
-
I was recently trying to decide the best "all around" caliber for a hunting rifle. Since I already have a Magnum and a 30-06, I chose a 270 Winchester. But the reality is there are 12-20 great options with only minimal differences in real world results. In my opinion the focus should probably be on what features are most desired in a rifle. In my case I wasn't considering home defense, so a bolt gun made the most sense for me. If that had been a consideration, I may have considered a semi auto or lever action.
For myself weight, barrel length, all weather protection, detachable magazine and a standard readily available cartridge were all on the wish list. A threaded barrel to allow a brake ( really not needed) and possibly a suppressor were a plus as well. Once you narrow down the operating system and features, the cartridge choices will likely be 2-4 standout choices as well.
-
So, I have to ditch all my rifles but one🤔 If legality was not an issue, my 10/22. Light, cheap, handy, and kills everything. Following the rules, it would be my M94 .375. Same reasons as the Ruger, and it just feels nice to carry.
-
If we're doing the one gun deal, I am going with a Winchester 1873 in .45 Colt.
-
7MM 08
:yeah:
7mm-08 in a BLR SS Takedown model would be my dream gun.
I think I'll start looking now!
-
If I had no guns, and got to choose one, it'd be a drilling that I encountered one evening in Germany, 7x64/20/22mag. Beautiful gun, quite heavy, and probably worth more than I made that year. I think it would cover any critter around here.