Hunting Washington Forum

Equipment & Gear => Guns and Ammo => Topic started by: salish on December 20, 2022, 10:37:02 AM


Advertise Here
Title: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: salish on December 20, 2022, 10:37:02 AM
I would appreciate peoples thoughts on this. I've been using a .38 Special snubnose as a bedside gun for home defense, but I'm thinking about switching to a more powerful option. I have a S&W Model 65 3" .357 Magnum, and I use Federal 125gr Hydrashock JHP's in it, the proverbial one-shot-stopper. But I also have a S&W .44 Special Hand Ejector - an older revolver from the 1930's but in perfect condition. I have a lot of "Keith style" rounds my dad loaded with the 250gr cast lead bullet. Chrono tests last year show these loads developing 900-1000fps, with 925fps being the average. It's a good round, but I doubt it expands much.

How would you guys rate these two calibers/revolvers against one another as a home defense gun? I'm also a 1911 guy and the model I am most endeared with is the Colt Lightweight Commander, in 45acp. But I just don't feel comfortable having my handgun in "cocked & locked" mode by my bed.

Thank you.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: boneaddict on December 20, 2022, 10:40:06 AM
bigger isnt always better.   .38 is a great in-house gun.  .357 would be my next choice.   
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: salish on December 20, 2022, 10:45:56 AM
bigger isnt always better.   .38 is a great in-house gun.  .357 would be my next choice.

Regular .38 Specials in my Model 65 Smith? My snubby isn't rated for +P.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: fishngamereaper on December 20, 2022, 10:47:24 AM
Stick with the 38.
Stopping power without over penetration.
Miss your target in your house where's the bullet going to stop. Sheetrock walls don't do much in stopping high power rounds.

You could use the 357 with 38 rounds as well.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: Tenkara on December 20, 2022, 10:49:04 AM
Hydra shock +p in my s&w 642. Don't feel like I need anything bigger.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: salish on December 20, 2022, 10:50:42 AM
Hydra shock +p in my s&w 642. Don't feel like I need anything bigger.

My S&W snubnose is an older model not rated for +P.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: CP on December 20, 2022, 10:51:10 AM
I’m thinking that barrel length is a bigger consideration than caliber.  A snub nose would be my last choice for home defense.  3” would be better but 6” would be even better yet. 
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: storyteller on December 20, 2022, 10:52:54 AM
Take  a look at Glaser safety slug, designed to penetrate and  not  go thru the  wall, worth  reading,  used by sky marshalls  and  close neighbors
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: salish on December 20, 2022, 10:55:16 AM
I’m thinking that barrel length is a bigger consideration than caliber.  A snub nose would be my last choice for home defense.  3” would be better but 6” would be even better yet.

Thanks, but why would a 6" tube be better than 3"? Velocity?
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: salish on December 20, 2022, 10:56:48 AM
Stick with the 38.
Stopping power without over penetration.
Miss your target in your house where's the bullet going to stop. Sheetrock walls don't do much in stopping high power rounds.

You could use the 357 with 38 rounds as well.

Good point, but we have an old home with old style lath and plaster. I don't see a 125gr HP going through our walls.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: CP on December 20, 2022, 10:57:19 AM
I’m thinking that barrel length is a bigger consideration than caliber.  A snub nose would be my last choice for home defense.  3” would be better but 6” would be even better yet.

Thanks, but why would a 6" tube be better than 3"? Velocity?

No, sight radius, longer is easier to control and actually hit your target. 
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: boneaddict on December 20, 2022, 10:57:51 AM
control for round 2
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: salish on December 20, 2022, 11:00:44 AM
Take  a look at Glaser safety slug, designed to penetrate and  not  go thru the  wall, worth  reading,  used by sky marshalls  and  close neighbors

Are they still making these? I have a few in .38 Special (and some in .45 ACP and .44 Magnum) that my father bought 35 years ago. I used to pack these in my S&W Airweight Bodyguard, but I've read so many unflattering posts in forums about these I stopped carrying them.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: salish on December 20, 2022, 11:04:30 AM
I’m thinking that barrel length is a bigger consideration than caliber.  A snub nose would be my last choice for home defense.  3” would be better but 6” would be even better yet.

Thanks, but why would a 6" tube be better than 3"? Velocity?

No, sight radius, longer is easier to control and actually hit your target.

Thanks. I'm with you on this, but for different conditions. I do have a K38 and a Model 19 with 6" barrels, but I would want a shorter barrel for ease of use and a little easier to wield. At close quarters in a darkened house at night with a flashlight in one hand I think a longer barrel would be a potential deficit.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: salish on December 20, 2022, 11:05:17 AM
control for round 2

Good point, thanks.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: Igor on December 20, 2022, 11:09:37 AM
My current choice for self-defense is a S&W 342PD .38 Special.  I certainly don't have any mis-givings about the short barrel (2 1/4"), and at 10.8 oz it is the perfect choice for concealed carry.  I also have two snubby .357s, but with 125 gr JHPs, I feel that the .38 Special is totally adequate.  If I had to choose between .357 mag and .44 Special, I would go for the .44 Special.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: CP on December 20, 2022, 11:22:46 AM
You should also consider round count, more is better.

My first choice for home defense is a 12 gauge (low round count, but it has other advantages).    Backup would be a Glock 20. 
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: fly-by on December 20, 2022, 12:22:15 PM
I'm also a 1911 guy and the model I am most endeared with is the Colt Lightweight Commander, in 45acp. But I just don't feel comfortable having my handgun in "cocked & locked" mode by my bed.


Not sure why the 1911 would be less safe than a revolver.  Seems like the best choice of the three.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: salish on December 20, 2022, 12:29:29 PM
I'm also a 1911 guy and the model I am most endeared with is the Colt Lightweight Commander, in 45acp. But I just don't feel comfortable having my handgun in "cocked & locked" mode by my bed.


Not sure why the 1911 would be less safe than a revolver.  Seems like the best choice of the three.

I know, I know, but for some weird reason it has always made me feel uncomfortable. And I've been shooting handguns all my life, including the 1911. In fact, I qualified for my police department's pistol team with a 1911 in the late 1970's, so my apprehensions really don't make sense.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: b23 on December 20, 2022, 12:38:33 PM
bigger isnt always better.   .38 is a great in-house gun.  .357 would be my next choice.
:yeah:
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: Fidelk on December 20, 2022, 12:49:08 PM
I’m thinking that barrel length is a bigger consideration than caliber.  A snub nose would be my last choice for home defense.  3” would be better but 6” would be even better yet.

Thanks, but why would a 6" tube be better than 3"? Velocity?

No, sight radius, longer is easier to control and actually hit your target.

Thanks. I'm with you on this, but for different conditions. I do have a K38 and a Model 19 with 6" barrels, but I would want a shorter barrel for ease of use and a little easier to wield. At close quarters in a darkened house at night with a flashlight in one hand I think a longer barrel would be a potential deficit.

I have a Model 19 with a 4" barrel....Perfection......Also a Glock 17 and a Sig P220 all loaded and ready. Can't hit an intruder with those, once I'm empty, I'm going back to bed. You might have noticed that all three of those do not have a manual safety to disengage.......making them POSSIBLY a better choice than a 1911.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: Farmer72 on December 20, 2022, 12:57:19 PM
I’m thinking that barrel length is a bigger consideration than caliber.  A snub nose would be my last choice for home defense.  3” would be better but 6” would be even better yet.

Thanks, but why would a 6" tube be better than 3"? Velocity?

No, sight radius, longer is easier to control and actually hit your target.

Thanks. I'm with you on this, but for different conditions. I do have a K38 and a Model 19 with 6" barrels, but I would want a shorter barrel for ease of use and a little easier to wield. At close quarters in a darkened house at night with a flashlight in one hand I think a longer barrel would be a potential deficit.

I have a Model 19 with a 4" barrel....Perfection......Also a Glock 17 and a Sig P220 all loaded and ready. Can't hit an intruder with those, once I'm empty, I'm going back to bed. You might have noticed that all three of those do not have a manual safety to disengage.......making them POSSIBLY a better choice than a 1911.

I am a big proponate of no manual safety for a defense firearm. One less thing to have to think about and remember to take off. With that I have one of my Glocks as a nightstand pistol.

With the 3 you mentioned I thing I would go the S&W 65 route and use 38+p. The extra weight would be nicer for possible follow up shots than the light 38. As for the 44 special I just think there are less options for defensive ammo.

Just my  :twocents:
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: salish on December 20, 2022, 01:22:15 PM
I’m thinking that barrel length is a bigger consideration than caliber.  A snub nose would be my last choice for home defense.  3” would be better but 6” would be even better yet.

Thanks, but why would a 6" tube be better than 3"? Velocity?

Thank you.

No, sight radius, longer is easier to control and actually hit your target.

Thanks. I'm with you on this, but for different conditions. I do have a K38 and a Model 19 with 6" barrels, but I would want a shorter barrel for ease of use and a little easier to wield. At close quarters in a darkened house at night with a flashlight in one hand I think a longer barrel would be a potential deficit.

I have a Model 19 with a 4" barrel....Perfection......Also a Glock 17 and a Sig P220 all loaded and ready. Can't hit an intruder with those, once I'm empty, I'm going back to bed. You might have noticed that all three of those do not have a manual safety to disengage.......making them POSSIBLY a better choice than a 1911.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: salish on December 20, 2022, 01:23:17 PM
I’m thinking that barrel length is a bigger consideration than caliber.  A snub nose would be my last choice for home defense.  3” would be better but 6” would be even better yet.

Thanks, but why would a 6" tube be better than 3"? Velocity?

No, sight radius, longer is easier to control and actually hit your target.

Thanks. I'm with you on this, but for different conditions. I do have a K38 and a Model 19 with 6" barrels, but I would want a shorter barrel for ease of use and a little easier to wield. At close quarters in a darkened house at night with a flashlight in one hand I think a longer barrel would be a potential deficit.

I have a Model 19 with a 4" barrel....Perfection......Also a Glock 17 and a Sig P220 all loaded and ready. Can't hit an intruder with those, once I'm empty, I'm going back to bed. You might have noticed that all three of those do not have a manual safety to disengage.......making them POSSIBLY a better choice than a 1911.

I am a big proponate of no manual safety for a defense firearm. One less thing to have to think about and remember to take off. With that I have one of my Glocks as a nightstand pistol.

With the 3 you mentioned I thing I would go the S&W 65 route and use 38+p. The extra weight would be nicer for possible follow up shots than the light 38. As for the 44 special I just think there are less options for defensive ammo.

Just my  :twocents:

Thanks Farmer72.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: boneaddict on December 20, 2022, 01:26:37 PM
Do you want to know what gun my Dad slept with "under his pillow"  and is likely one of the best home defense......  Ruger single six 22 mag.   

I can guarantee you if you are lucky enough to still hear it, its loud enough to make you go in reverse.  Likely the little hole between your eyes will all be said and done.   Every shot placed within a dime,  simple, no fuss, lots of ammo


bare in mind, he owned many of the cool calibers as well.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: salish on December 20, 2022, 01:31:09 PM
Do you want to know what gun my Dad slept with "under his pillow"  and is likely one of the best home defense......  Ruger single six 22 mag.   

I can guarantee you if you are lucky enough to still hear it, its loud enough to make you go in reverse.  Likely the little hole between your eyes will all be said and done.   Every shot placed within a dime,  simple, no fuss, lots of ammo


bare in mind, he owned many of the cool calibers as well.

Well stated. I have a Colt SAA with a spare .22 Mag cylinder. Nice handling little revolver. My father was a veteran homicide detective and he often said people should not turn up their noses on the little .22
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: Fidelk on December 20, 2022, 01:38:36 PM
The only problem with a .22 LR or .22 Mag is that they are rimfire rounds with primer in the rim. I would trust a centerfire pistol with an actual primer for reliability. Which I got from hearing a discussion of .22 LR vs. .25 ACP......the .25 ACP was preferred for the primer reason.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: salish on December 20, 2022, 01:40:21 PM
The only problem with a .22 LR or .22 Mag is that they are rimfire rounds with primer in the rim. I would trust a centerfire pistol with an actual primer for reliability. Which I got from hearing a discussion of .22 LR vs. .25 ACP......the .25 ACP was preferred for the primer reason.

True, duds occur much more often in rimfire cartridges.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: boneaddict on December 20, 2022, 01:42:08 PM
I dont think I have ever had a dud 22mag round.   Lots of LR duds though.   I always figured it was the age of or how I have treated them.   Interesting thought
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: salish on December 20, 2022, 01:45:00 PM
I dont think I have ever had a dud 22mag round.   Lots of LR duds though.   I always figured it was the age of or how I have treated them.   Interesting thought

Same here, but I've used my .22 mag cylinder very sparingly. I get more LR duds with the cheaper shells, but even the more costly have their share. I've used some pretty high end target stuff in my rifles and never experienced a dud.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: b23 on December 20, 2022, 02:45:57 PM
Do you want to know what gun my Dad slept with "under his pillow"  and is likely one of the best home defense......  Ruger single six 22 mag.   

I can guarantee you if you are lucky enough to still hear it, its loud enough to make you go in reverse.  Likely the little hole between your eyes will all be said and done.   Every shot placed within a dime,  simple, no fuss, lots of ammo


bare in mind, he owned many of the cool calibers as well.

Must be a dad thing because my dad has the same gun as well as a few others but if you were to ask him which one is his favorite, he would quickly tell you without hesitation, his Ruger single six convertible.  I've shot his plenty and they are about the loudest damn thing I've ever shot.  You want to have very good ear protection in place when you shoot 22mags in them.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: buckfvr on December 20, 2022, 04:28:21 PM
PMR 30 (.22 mag) on one side of the bed 9mm on the other.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: Fidelk on December 20, 2022, 04:41:51 PM
Overall, I think a Glock 18 with 33 round mags is the best option.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: Ridgeratt on December 20, 2022, 04:50:34 PM
Overall, I think a Glock 18 with 33 round mags is the best option.


You need 33 rounds? Thats impressive! Dang once again I'm under gunned.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: Fidelk on December 20, 2022, 05:19:34 PM
Overall, I think a Glock 18 with 33 round mags is the best option.


You need 33 rounds? Thats impressive! Dang once again I'm under gunned.

Don't forget......some bozo has just woked you up. They need a harsh message.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: Ridgeratt on December 20, 2022, 05:26:21 PM
So you have been awakened and your just shooting? What if it was your kid coming in slightly confused? You are shootin with your eyes closed or just laying down a random burst.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: GWP on December 20, 2022, 07:15:04 PM
Which one do you shoot the best? Not aim and shoot off of a rest, but instinctive?
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: metlhead on December 20, 2022, 07:24:04 PM
If you are online asking questions, I suppose your .38 has been doing a great job. Keep at it.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: jdb on December 20, 2022, 08:01:40 PM
I’m thinking that barrel length is a bigger consideration than caliber.  A snub nose would be my last choice for home defense.  3” would be better but 6” would be even better yet.

Thanks, but why would a 6" tube be better than 3"? Velocity?

No, sight radius, longer is easier to control and actually hit your target.

Thanks. I'm with you on this, but for different conditions. I do have a K38 and a Model 19 with 6" barrels, but I would want a shorter barrel for ease of use and a little easier to wield. At close quarters in a darkened house at night with a flashlight in one hand I think a longer barrel would be a potential deficit.

I have a Model 19 with a 4" barrel....Perfection......Also a Glock 17 and a Sig P220 all loaded and ready. Can't hit an intruder with those, once I'm empty, I'm going back to bed. You might have noticed that all three of those do not have a manual safety to disengage.......making them POSSIBLY a better choice than a 1911.

I am a big proponate of no manual safety for a defense firearm. One less thing to have to think about and remember to take off. With that I have one of my Glocks as a nightstand pistol.

With the 3 you mentioned I thing I would go the S&W 65 route and use 38+p. The extra weight would be nicer for possible follow up shots than the light 38. As for the 44 special I just think there are less options for defensive ammo.

Just my  :twocents:
what he said
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: jrebel on December 20, 2022, 09:47:42 PM
Ruger LCR 357 loaded with 38 rounds......my everyday carry.  Ten extra rounds in speed strips on my belt. 

As for the house.....same pistol, but I'm grabbing the double barrel coach gun for the win.   :tup:
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: pianoman9701 on December 21, 2022, 07:58:56 AM
You should also consider round count, more is better.

My first choice for home defense is a 12 gauge (low round count, but it has other advantages).    Backup would be a Glock 20.
14 in my Springfield XD 45. Keep in mind that most home invasions are with two or more invaders. If they carry semis, you're under-gunned with a wheel gun. Practice and get a flashlight on it, a really bright one.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: Fidelk on December 21, 2022, 08:16:02 AM
So you have been awakened and your just shooting? What if it was your kid coming in slightly confused? You are shootin with your eyes closed or just laying down a random burst.

Well first I have to wake up enough to find the gun, then I have to find my glasses........so suppression fire is essential during the early phase of the home invasion. Just being practical and going with real world scenarios here. 
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: slavenoid on December 21, 2022, 08:40:15 AM
If your preparing to win a gunfight 38 snub noise is a poor choice.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: salish on December 21, 2022, 09:35:50 AM
THANKS everyone. I value your opinions and appreciate your advice.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: Cougartail on December 21, 2022, 09:38:11 AM
There was a home invasion in Yakima a few years back. One shot from a shotgun ended it. The homeowner blew grey matter out one guys head and the other 2 ran.

They were found in a Walmart bathroom cleaning up. Both crying and one emptying his bowels.

People who make hits win gunfights. People who have forewarning make hits in home envasions..

I sleep like a baby with my 38 snubnose revolver
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: HighlandLofts on December 21, 2022, 10:08:07 AM
I'd go with 357 over either of the other choices you have.
And triple tap if you ever have to use it.
Two in the chest and one in the head.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: Igor on January 03, 2023, 03:58:10 PM
I do like the .357 mag as a defensive caliber.  I have two snubbies that I find myself carrying on occasion.  The recoil is substantial with standard self-defense ammo, but I recently found a case of Winchester Ranger .38Spl +P+ 110 gr. ammo.  The recoil in the .357s is much more manageable with this ammo.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: salish on January 04, 2023, 09:16:17 AM
I do like the .357 mag as a defensive caliber.  I have two snubbies that I find myself carrying on occasion.  The recoil is substantial with standard self-defense ammo, but I recently found a case of Winchester Ranger .38Spl +P+ 110 gr. ammo.  The recoil in the .357s is much more manageable with this ammo.

Thank you Igor and Highland.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: follow maggie on January 04, 2023, 09:53:51 AM
I’d steer clear of the .44 for home defense. It might just be me & my skinny wrists, but managing the recoil of that takes a few seconds. At best I could manage a couple seconds in an emergency, and seconds are precious in a fight.

In my opinion sight radius doesn’t matter because you aren’t aiming at paper on the range. You’re instinctively shooting at a man size target within the confines of the walls of your house. You need to be able to put rounds where you’re looking. Choose whichever gun you do that best with.
Title: Re: Defensive Handgun .357mag vs. .44 Special
Post by: salish on January 04, 2023, 10:12:23 AM
I’d steer clear of the .44 for home defense. It might just be me & my skinny wrists, but managing the recoil of that takes a few seconds. At best I could manage a couple seconds in an emergency, and seconds are precious in a fight.

In my opinion sight radius doesn’t matter because you aren’t aiming at paper on the range. You’re instinctively shooting at a man size target within the confines of the walls of your house. You need to be able to put rounds where you’re looking. Choose whichever gun you do that best with.

Great advice, thanks.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal