Hunting Washington Forum
Community => Advocacy, Agencies, Access => Topic started by: Ghost Hunter on March 01, 2023, 01:15:23 PM
-
Good or bad?
https://nwsportsmanmag.com/retired-fisheries-deer-biologists-named-to-wdfw-commission/?fbclid=IwAR0UphGdJj1xmCqzjKF98LZA6zsUYGJ2NPOXW1DtSOm7IoaGpk79wrO2kZs
-
Woody good for sure.
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
-
I was just about to start a thread on this. I received an email notification a little while ago that I was not selected to the commission. I haven’t had time to research any of the names, but from a quick glance it looks like that Baker is back in and Thorburn is out.
-
NEWS RELEASE
Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission
1111 Washington St. SE Olympia, WA 98501
https://wdfw.wa.gov/about/commission
March 1, 2023
Contact: Commission office, 360-902-2267
Governor Inslee's media office: media@gov.wa.gov, 360-902-4136
Two new members appointed, Baker re-appointed to Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission
OLYMPIA – Washington Gov. Jay Inslee has appointed three members to the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission.
The Commission is a nine-person citizen panel appointed by the governor to set policy for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW). The Commission is comprised of three members from western Washington, three from eastern Washington, and three "at-large" members who may reside anywhere in the state. No two Commission members can reside in the same county.
Steve Parker is appointed to an eastern Washington position. He is a retired fisheries biologist who spent much of his 45-year career with the Yakama Nation and lives in Yakima County.
"I am excited to serve in this position," Parker said. "I've devoted my professional career to fish and wildlife conservation and it is an honor to continue to do so in this new role and apply my experience to new issues."
Woodrow "Woody" Myers, Jr. is appointed to an at-large Washington position. He lives in Spokane County and retired from WDFW as an ungulate research biologist where he worked for 40 years.
"The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife is a pivotal player in activities that affect the quality of life of Washingtonians," Myers said. "It is truly a privilege to be appointed, and I am eager to get started on the critical work of the Commission. I look forward to furthering the use of science to set policy directing fish and wildlife management in our state."
In addition, Barbara Baker was re-appointed to the Commission to a western Washington position. Baker was first appointed to an at-large position to the Commission in January 2017. She is an attorney who lives in Thurston County who retired from a long career in the state Legislature to devote time and energy to fulfill the requirements of this important appointment. She served as Vice Chair of the Commission from January 2019 to March 2022 and Chair since 2022.
"I greatly appreciate the opportunity to continue to serve on the Fish and Wildlife Commission," Baker said. "I am honored to continue working with the people of Washington to conserve fish and wildlife species for generations to come. I also want to personally welcome the new commissioners — we have an important job, and I am thrilled to have a whole Commission to move us into the new year."
"Our Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission shoulders many complex and sometimes controversial issues, and as the climate changes, their responsibilities only increase," Gov. Jay Inslee said. "I am proud to welcome these three commissioners who will work hard to help our state protect and sustain its unique and cherished fish and wildlife."
The two seats were previously filled by Dr. Don McIsaac who served as the Fish Committee Chair and held a western Washington position, and Dr. Kim Thorburn, who served as the Wildlife Committee Chair and held an eastern Washington position. Both outgoing commissioners have served on the Fish and Wildlife Commission since 2017.
"I would like to thank Don McIsaac and Kim Thorburn for their professionalism and service these past years," Baker said. "I know I and my fellow commissioners have appreciated their perspectives and in-depth knowledge of fish and wildlife issues across the state. We will miss working with them."
Commissioners are appointed to six-year terms; appointees are subject to confirmation by the state Senate, which is currently in session. However, members are official upon appointment and serve as voting members on the Commission while awaiting Senate confirmation.
The Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission is a panel appointed by the governor that sets policy for the WDFW. WDFW works to preserve, protect and perpetuate fish, wildlife and ecosystems while providing sustainable fish and wildlife recreational and commercial opportunities.
-
Seem ok :dunno: :dunno:
-
Isn't baker the ring leader against hunter.
I can't remember.
-
Bummer we lost Thorburn.
Even if both these new commissioners are pro hunting, we're still outnumbered. I'd imagine Inslee isn't doing that by accident, keeping it just skewed to the antis. Now when he goes to fight the new lawsuit he can just say he appointed two pro conservation commissioners and doesn't understand why he's being sued.
-
:yeah: that is unfortunate
I have spoken with Woody in person numerous times, he was an eastern WA WDFW biologist. He did an interesting study on mule deer in an area I hunt, what he told me about that study made 100% sense, I think he did a very good objective study. I've also talked whitetail deer with him, he has a very good understanding of ungulates in eastern WA. He also worked for WDFW when we had hound hunting but I don't remember if any of his work or recommendations were in that arena. I do not know his position on predator hunting or wolves, it seems he worked in our area before wolves were an issue. I think he's a good guy and it is a huge plus to have an experienced ungulate biologist on the commission. I don't know how independent he can be from the current direction of the commission and the governor, but he certainly has the potential to have a very positive impact for hunters in Washington.
-
Bummer we lost Thorburn.
Even if both these new commissioners are pro hunting, we're still outnumbered. I'd imagine Inslee isn't doing that by accident, keeping it just skewed to the antis. Now when he goes to fight the new lawsuit he can just say he appointed two pro conservation commissioners and doesn't understand why he's being sued.
It's quite clear why he's being sued and the reason is still in play - the commission is not balanced. Replacing one or two pro-sporting commissioners with two more doesn't change the imbalance.
-
Bummer we lost Thorburn.
Even if both these new commissioners are pro hunting, we're still outnumbered. I'd imagine Inslee isn't doing that by accident, keeping it just skewed to the antis. Now when he goes to fight the new lawsuit he can just say he appointed two pro conservation commissioners and doesn't understand why he's being sued.
It's quite clear why he's being sued and the reason is still in play - the commission is not balanced. Replacing one or two pro-sporting commissioners with two more doesn't change the imbalance.
Exactly. Replacing thornburn and mcisaac with these two doesn’t change anything.
-
The two most pro hunting and fishing commissioners, have been replaced.
End of story. :bdid:
-
Having sat in numerous meetings with Steve Parker over the years, one can only hope he is more objective than when he worked for the Tribe. I can tell you he did his job well, advocating for ever increasing harvest opportunities for the Yakama Tribe, and all treaty tribes. Conservation wasn't a high priority, but harvest certainly was.
He does have a wealth of knowledge on Columbia River fisheries issues, and maybe that will be beneficial in the long run, unless of course the Tribe pressured Dimsly into nominating him?
Time will tell......
-
Well the HHC endorsed Parker and it sounds like Woody will be a pro-hunting/fishing guy. The quote from Woody's application is a little troubling...hopefully just buzz words to up his chances at being selected?
I am a retired wildlife biologist, having worked for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife for nearly 40 years. It is, in my opinion, a crucial time for the state’s fish and wildlife resources as the impacts from a growing human population, climate change, and other factors continue to reduce habitat quality upon which these resources depend. The decisions that are made today will affect these resources far into the future. Thus, it is important that the Fish and Wildlife Commission be staffed with knowledgeable people who will make science-based decisions to help ensure these resources and their habitats continue for future generations. My experience in wildlife science would help this decision-making process.
As a lifelong hunter and fisher, I realize the value of connecting to fish and wildlife through recreation. I also realize that most citizens of the state do not hunt or fish but do appreciate and value wildlife in other ways. It is important that future management decisions be made that respect all of these values. My experience both as a recreationalist and a scientist who worked with various interest groups could help the Fish and Wildlife Commission make those respectful decisions.
–FROM WOODY MYERS’ FISH AND WILDLIFE COMMISSION APPOINTMENT APPLICATION
-
Good that we didn’t lose any ground although thornburn and mcisaac were great commissioners. Hopefully those two will get appointed next time.
-
Time will tell but I think we lost 2 of our strongest advocates, and are being replaced with others. I hope these 2 are rock stars but they have big shoes to fill.
-
Bummer we lost Thorburn.
Even if both these new commissioners are pro hunting, we're still outnumbered. I'd imagine Inslee isn't doing that by accident, keeping it just skewed to the antis. Now when he goes to fight the new lawsuit he can just say he appointed two pro conservation commissioners and doesn't understand why he's being sued.
It's quite clear why he's being sued and the reason is still in play - the commission is not balanced. Replacing one or two pro-sporting commissioners with two more doesn't change the imbalance.
:bash: :bash: :bash:
-
Woody good for sure.
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
I have heard that he was a great ungulate bio, and plenty of people sang his praises on that. I think what we would like to know is his stance on predator control. We could make the assumption based off his intrest in mule deer and hunting them. Do we have any kind of signal or experience that reinforces that assumption?
-
I would say climate change should be the lowest priority for any hunting or fishing rule changes or seasons. Actually don’t even think it should be in the conversation. They claim science based but we all know better.
-
What is needed is new commissioners that are willing to stop tap dancing around all the anti-hunting wackiness and call BS on some of these issues. Like Spring Bear Hunting. There is not one single logical explanation as to why it was ended. Period. Except because Lorna and Melanie wanted it to end. And their uninformed cronies followed them.
Losing Kim Thorburn is a hard blow. She advocated for hunter and hunting on every front. She followed what the State biologists told her, and used that info to form her decisions. Thanks for your service on the Commission Kim!
Gary
-
What is needed is new commissioners that are willing to stop tap dancing around all the anti-hunting wackiness and call BS on some of these issues. Like Spring Bear Hunting. There is not one single logical explanation as to why it was ended. Period. Except because Lorna and Melanie wanted it to end. And their uninformed cronies followed them.
Losing Kim Thorburn is a hard blow. She advocated for hunter and hunting on every front. She followed what the State biologists told her, and used that info to form her decisions. Thanks for your service on the Commission Kim!
Gary
It goes a lot deeper than these 2. they are just the vocal sacrificial mouth pieces to push the WWF and W4A agenda to ruin hunting in this state
-
With Thorburn gone it seems to me like it opens the opportunity for one of the more animal loving Commissioners to chair the Wildlife Committee. This could be a loss even though we traded maybe likeminded Commissioners.
-
It's absolutely a loss. Inslee knows exactly what he's doing and they're several years ahead of us in planning and probably already have the end date of hunting in this state circled on their calendars.
-
We need to keep up the fight. Here’s what anti-hunting group, Washington Wildlife First has to say:
Breaking News: Governor Inslee Fills Wildlife Commission vacancies
Greetings:
We have great news to share! Yesterday, Governor Inslee announced his picks to fill the three vacancies on the Washington Fish and Wildlife Commission. The Governor reappointed Commission Chair Barbara Baker, a staunch advocate for Washington's wildlife, and refused to renew the term of Commissioner Kim Thorburn, who has been a faithful ally of extreme hunting groups whose primary goal is to "maximize" hunting opportunities.
To replace Thorburn and Commissioner Don McIsaac, who did not seek reappointment when his term expired in December, the Governor tapped two scientists from eastern Washington: Woodrow "Woody" Myers, a retired Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife ungulate biologist, and Steven Parker, a former fisheries biologist for the Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation. In addition to their strong scientific backgrounds, Myers and Parker have committed to prioritizing the preservation of Washington's fish and wildlife in the face of the threats posed by climate change and habitat loss, as well as to ensuring that the Department fulfills its responsibility as a public trustee serving all current and future Washingtonians. You can read more about these appointments in our press release.
These appointments mark the culmination of several months of work by Washington Wildlife First, our coalition partners, and all our supporters. With your help, we have taken another big step toward a Fish and Wildlife Commission that values science, prioritizes conservation, and truly represents the values of all Washingtonians.
Please join us in taking a moment to celebrate this victory, before we turn back to the hard work that lies ahead of supporting this Commission as it works to bring lasting reform to Washington's wildlife management.
Sincerely,
Sam Bruegger
Executive Director, Washington Wildlife First
-
I wouldn't trust Washington Wildlife First's take on this- they are happy to spin anything to their benefit. I doubt they were nearly as effective in lobbying their candidates as they make this sound.
In all honesty at the commission level this is most likely a break even. Even with their statements about climate change, their careers make me think we could have ended up with much less friendly options. Thorburn was great, but it's a pipedream to think we would see someone like that appointed again right now. We simply weren't going to see a majority of pro-hunters on the commission, but we've got a shot at playing in the middle still on some issues.
I do think the question is now- who is taking over the wildlife committee? That's the play to watch.
-
I think we definitely lost some ground here... 2 proven advocates for us are gone and replaced with two who are unknown at best. They might have been great biologists, but that doesn't mean they are on our side....
At the same time I think this Inslee played a solid hand with the lawsuit.. the Commision is stacked but he just placed two retired biologist on the board, hard to argue they aren't qualified to make wildlife decisions. It won't take long to see where they stand as soon as the voting starts.
-
I think we definitely lost some ground here... 2 proven advocates for us are gone and replaced with two who are unknown at best. They might have been great biologists, but that doesn't mean they are on our side....
At the same time I think this Inslee played a solid hand with the lawsuit.. the Commision is stacked but he just placed two retired biologist on the board, hard to argue they aren't qualified to make wildlife decisions. It won't take long to see where they stand as soon as the voting starts.
Inslee hasn't replaced any of the 5 anti-hunters. He's still in violation of state law.
-
I think we definitely lost some ground here... 2 proven advocates for us are gone and replaced with two who are unknown at best. They might have been great biologists, but that doesn't mean they are on our side....
At the same time I think this Inslee played a solid hand with the lawsuit.. the Commision is stacked but he just placed two retired biologist on the board, hard to argue they aren't qualified to make wildlife decisions. It won't take long to see where they stand as soon as the voting starts.
Inslee hasn't replaced any of the 5 anti-hunters. He's still in violation of state law.
Correct.
But in light of the lawsuit.
He will be more careful who he appoints now.
-
The lawsuit doesn't mean squat to insleez and his corner man ag bob. If anything, it makes him/them more vindictive in the end.
-
The lawsuit doesn't mean squat to insleez and his corner man ag bob. If anything, it makes him/them more vindictive in the end.
Certainly, we gain nothing by doing nothing. Wouldn't you agree?
-
Of course.
But let's not pretend they're losing sleep over it.
-
I have shot trap with Woody Meyers I do think he will be fair and beneficial as to the other appointment I don't know anything about the person.
But I do have a question on Lorna Smith. Can we get current up to date photo of her on the WDFW website. Good night the photo she has posted looks like her sorority photo.
-
Woody Myers is a very solid biologist and a great person. I think he'll make a fantastic commissioner, and be a good voice for hunters.
-
I have already shared my opinion of the “lawsuit” and I don’t have any pictures of Lorna. :sry:
That said it’s hard to overstate the good commissioners we have lost the last couple years so I’ll focus on grading Inslee’s recent replacements:
Linville B
Lemkeul D
Koontz F (gone)
Ragan F
Smith F
Rowland F-
Even if the two newest are ok, the predator starvationists can do whatever they want.
-
Of course.
But let's not pretend they're losing sleep over it.
:yeah:
Being sued is part of being an elected official. In fact Inslee had been sued 84 times in the past two years alone.
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
-
I have already shared my opinion of the “lawsuit” and I don’t have any pictures of Lorna. :sry:
That said it’s hard to overstate the good commissioners we have lost the last couple years so I’ll focus on grading Inslee’s recent replacements:
Linville B
Lemkeul D
Koontz F (gone)
Ragan F
Smith F
Rowland F-
Even if the two newest are ok, the predator starvationists can do whatever they want.
I Think a B rank is generous for Linville. IMO she is a consensus seeker and is too squishy of a voter. She can only really be counted on for the hard line votes.
Jim Anderson gets an A in my book
Mc Issac and Thorburn were A+ advocates and it kind of came down to 1 vote for me. They both voted to keep the coyote derby. It was politically and visually a looser but they stuck with the arguments and didnt let up.
-
...and refused to renew the term of Commissioner Kim Thorburn, who has been a faithful ally of extreme hunting groups whose primary goal is to "maximize" hunting opportunities.
What in the wide world of sports is an "extreme hunting group"? LMAO...
The crap these people make up and thrive on is a nightmare to us mere mortals... :o
Gary
-
...and refused to renew the term of Commissioner Kim Thorburn, who has been a faithful ally of extreme hunting groups whose primary goal is to "maximize" hunting opportunities.
What in the wide world of sports is an "extreme hunting group"? LMAO...
The crap these people make up and thrive on is a nightmare to us mere mortals... :o
Gary
You are dropped off in the middle of desert with a gun, a knife and as much ammo as you can carry. No food or water. :tup:
-
...and refused to renew the term of Commissioner Kim Thorburn, who has been a faithful ally of extreme hunting groups whose primary goal is to "maximize" hunting opportunities.
What in the wide world of sports is an "extreme hunting group"? LMAO...
The crap these people make up and thrive on is a nightmare to us mere mortals... :o
Gary
You are dropped off in the middle of desert with a gun, a knife and as much ammo as you can carry. No food or water. :tup:
:chuckle:
I can think of a few members that could meet that descriptioin!
-
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2023/mar/05/questions-and-answers-with-steve-parker-washington/
Not very impressed.
-
Tip toeing the interview which is sounding pretty squishy.
-
not impressed at all. total cop-out not answering the spring bear question. saying he hadnt heard any of the arguments does not inspire confidence.
-
I found this encouraging:
"The commission is a policy-making body that directs the priorities and activities of department staff. The communication is in both directions; the commission is dependent on the department’s technical analyses to provide the scientific foundations for commission action. The commission combines this with applicable law and stakeholder priorities to arrive at decisions that, first, provide necessary and adequate protections to the state’s fish and wildlife resources and, second, provides the resource “owners,” for lack of a better term, with the use and enjoyment of those resources they have come to expect."
But before I got to the end I realized the overall tone seemed to keep siding with Baker and Smith strongly on the table.
-
"Stakeholder priorities" sure sounds like something Smith would say. And we all know who her stakeholders are...not us
-
I found this encouraging:
"The commission is a policy-making body that directs the priorities and activities of department staff. The communication is in both directions; the commission is dependent on the department’s technical analyses to provide the scientific foundations for commission action. The commission combines this with applicable law and stakeholder priorities to arrive at decisions that, first, provide necessary and adequate protections to the state’s fish and wildlife resources and, second, provides the resource “owners,” for lack of a better term, with the use and enjoyment of those resources they have come to expect."
But before I got to the end I realized the overall tone seemed to keep siding with Baker and Smith strongly on the table.
Technical analysis that they then ignore in favor of their bunny hugging "stakeholders"..... :bash:
-
not impressed at all. total cop-out not answering the spring bear question. saying he hadnt heard any of the arguments does not inspire confidence.
Woody Myers said the same thing other than he said he was a ware of the vote. :dunno:
-
In case you folks want to see what Woody Myers said as well…
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2023/mar/05/questions-and-answers-with-woody-myers-washingtons/
-
In case you folks want to see what Woody Myers said as well…
https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2023/mar/05/questions-and-answers-with-woody-myers-washingtons/
I had to refresh page a few times.
I think they want me to pay for content.
Got most of it ,without paying. :chuckle:
-
Better responses from Woody for sure...
What is the role of the commission, in your view, and how should it interface with WDFW staff?
The commission sets policy that guides agency direction of resource management. In general, I believe the commission should focus on landscape and state -level issues including but not limited to policy guiding management of threatened habitats and fish and wildlife populations and other populations of concern including species at the top of tropic levels, and interactions with other governments. The commission is legally bound to ensure the preservation, protection and perpetuation of the state’s fish and wildlife resources and maximize recreation of those resources.
The decision to end the spring bear hunt was a controversial and divisive one. If you had been a commissioner, how would you have approached that decision, and what would your vote have been?
I am aware of the controversy of the commission’s decision to end the spring bear hunt. As a scientist, I do not rely on information from popular publications, social media or rumor to make informed decisions. Thus, I do not have all the pertinent information I need to respond to this question
What role do hunters and anglers have in fish and wildlife management? How, if at all, has that role changed?
Hunters and anglers need to be celebrated in North America as they have been in Europe because hunters and anglers were among the first conservationists and environmentalists. Without their concern for our natural resources and the actions they took nearly a 100 years ago or so, the wildlife and fish and their habitats that we take for granted may not exist today. Hunters and anglers continue to play a major role in fish and wildlife management by helping fund state fish and wildlife agencies through taxes on the equipment they use in recreation, taxes that they requested. At this point in time, hunting and fishing are primarily forms of recreation although hunting is occasionally used as a management technique to address wildlife damage or disease issues; hunting and fishing harvests provide biologists and managers with meaningful data collection opportunities as well.
-
Better responses from Woody for sure...
What is the role of the commission, in your view, and how should it interface with WDFW staff?
The commission sets policy that guides agency direction of resource management. In general, I believe the commission should focus on landscape and state -level issues including but not limited to policy guiding management of threatened habitats and fish and wildlife populations and other populations of concern including species at the top of tropic levels, and interactions with other governments. The commission is legally bound to ensure the preservation, protection and perpetuation of the state’s fish and wildlife resources and maximize recreation of those resources.
The decision to end the spring bear hunt was a controversial and divisive one. If you had been a commissioner, how would you have approached that decision, and what would your vote have been?
I am aware of the controversy of the commission’s decision to end the spring bear hunt. As a scientist, I do not rely on information from popular publications, social media or rumor to make informed decisions. Thus, I do not have all the pertinent information I need to respond to this question
What role do hunters and anglers have in fish and wildlife management? How, if at all, has that role changed?
Hunters and anglers need to be celebrated in North America as they have been in Europe because hunters and anglers were among the first conservationists and environmentalists. Without their concern for our natural resources and the actions they took nearly a 100 years ago or so, the wildlife and fish and their habitats that we take for granted may not exist today. Hunters and anglers continue to play a major role in fish and wildlife management by helping fund state fish and wildlife agencies through taxes on the equipment they use in recreation, taxes that they requested. At this point in time, hunting and fishing are primarily forms of recreation although hunting is occasionally used as a management technique to address wildlife damage or disease issues; hunting and fishing harvests provide biologists and managers with meaningful data collection opportunities as well.
He seems like a good guy.
I like the fact that he is or was a biologists.
Seems as though he might be able to see through some of the BS.
-
not impressed at all. total cop-out not answering the spring bear question. saying he hadnt heard any of the arguments does not inspire confidence.
I thought his answer on spring bear was appropriate.
-
It was some what of a cop out, Smith said it wasn’t a scientific decision but rather a decision based upon social considerations
He should have referred to that comment with his answer, which he very lightly alluded too.
I’m not “docking him any points” for the response he gave however, as it was accurate, prudent but lacked the red meat we’d like to see
Reading between the lines though, I think we get a good picture of what he thinks about Smith and some of the others though
The guy is intelligent
-
Of course we would love to hear them shout out this commission is an abomination and they are here to help fix it... But they aren't confirmed and they likely wouldn't have been chosen if they would say such a thing.
I'm much more interested than anything else in how they vote than anything else.
-
Of course we would love to hear them shout out this commission is an abomination and they are here to help fix it... But they aren't confirmed and they likely wouldn't have been chosen if they would say such a thing.
I'm much more interested than anything else in how they vote than anything else.
:yeah:
Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk
-
Same.
-
It was some what of a cop out, Smith said it wasn’t a scientific decision but rather a decision based upon social considerations
He should have referred to that comment with his answer, which he very lightly alluded too.
I’m not “docking him any points” for the response he gave however, as it was accurate, prudent but lacked the red meat we’d like to see
Reading between the lines though, I think we get a good picture of what he thinks about Smith and some of the others though
The guy is intelligent
:yeah:
-
Of course we would love to hear them shout out this commission is an abomination and they are here to help fix it... But they aren't confirmed and they likely wouldn't have been chosen if they would say such a thing.
I'm much more interested than anything else in how they vote than anything else.
:yeah: exactly, staying middle of the road answering questions was a no brainer