Hunting Washington Forum

Community => Advocacy, Agencies, Access => Topic started by: WWC on August 16, 2023, 11:40:32 AM


Advertise Here
Title: Downlisting wolves letters Govenor puts thumb on the scale.
Post by: WWC on August 16, 2023, 11:40:32 AM
Director defends down listing as part of the agreed process. Govenor puts thumb on the scale.



https://nwsportsmanmag.com/inslee-wades-into-wdfw-wolf-downlisting-proposal/
Title: Re: Downlisting wolves letters Govenor puts thumb on the scale.
Post by: mcrawfordaf on August 16, 2023, 11:52:11 AM
https://publicinput.com/psr-gray-wolf

Public comment ends today FYI!
Title: Re: Downlisting wolves letters Govenor puts thumb on the scale.
Post by: pianoman9701 on August 16, 2023, 01:08:55 PM
Inslee does love his environmentalist money.  :bash:
Title: Re: Downlisting wolves letters Govenor puts thumb on the scale.
Post by: ducks4days on August 16, 2023, 01:25:23 PM
Quote
And Inslee said moving wolves off the state endangered species list “would be counter to public opinion and would put aside the stakeholder-developed Wolf Conservation and Management Plan.”


I'm surprised his eyes arent brown, Inslee is so full of *censored* he has to at least have horrid breath.
Title: Re: Downlisting wolves letters Govenor puts thumb on the scale.
Post by: pianoman9701 on August 16, 2023, 01:31:05 PM
He's one of the nation's most corrupt politicians and the money someone offers him is all the ethics he needs. This is the case with environmental activism.
Title: Re: Downlisting wolves letters Govenor puts thumb on the scale.
Post by: nwmein199 on August 16, 2023, 01:38:15 PM
Thank you for posting this. I submitted my comments supporting the downlisting of wolves
Title: Re: Downlisting wolves letters Govenor puts thumb on the scale.
Post by: pianoman9701 on August 16, 2023, 02:27:06 PM
I did leave a comment to downlist.
Title: Re: Downlisting wolves letters Govenor puts thumb on the scale.
Post by: mcrawfordaf on August 16, 2023, 02:34:26 PM
Quote
And Inslee said moving wolves off the state endangered species list “would be counter to public opinion and would put aside the stakeholder-developed Wolf Conservation and Management Plan.”

  • The management plan was put aside when we ignored the fact that we exceeded population objectives


I made comment to this at the WDFW Commission meeting on Saturday. We probably could've met population objectives a year or two ago considering all wolf counts are MINIMUM counts (crap they already know :bash: ). No one knows how many lone wolves or expanding pairs there are. It should be clear as day that they are no longer "endangered" here.
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal