Hunting Washington Forum
Big Game Hunting => Other Big Game => Topic started by: Skyvalhunter on May 01, 2024, 12:53:44 PM
-
https://publicinput.com/2024cougarseasonsetting
-
Thanks Skyval, posted my comment.
-
Commented. Thanks for sending the link.
-
Done
-
Done
-
Done
-
:yeah:
-
Done, thanks for the link!
-
done, but do you actually believe anyone will read these?
-
done, but do you actually believe anyone will read these?
The department does and tabulates them for the commission. So the more comments we can have against this the better.
-
Done!!
-
https://publicinput.com/2024cougarseasonsetting (https://publicinput.com/2024cougarseasonsetting)
\
Thanks Done
-
Thanks for the heads up. Sent my comment and i will share with some like minded fellows tomorrow at work.
-
Done, and shared to my friends podcast and other hunting friends.
-
Done
-
I gave my :twocents:
1. Only harvested independent-aged cougars shall count towards the total cougar mortality cap.
2. The cougar hunting season will begin September 1 and end August 31.
3.The cap will be based on the best available estimates of cougar density and growth rate; currently those parameters are estimated at 2.3 cougars per 100 km2 and 1.13 intrinsic growth.
4.Human-related cougar mortality (cougars killed to resolve conflicts, and any other form of human-caused cougar mortality) shall NOT be counted toward the total cougar mortality cap.
5.Agree
6.PMU will close once the harvest quota is obtained from hunting only. All human-related cougar mortality shall not be counted towards harvest quotas
-
https://publicinput.com/2024cougarseasonsetting
Just commented again today and will continue to comment.
Also bringing this link to the top of the page.
-
Commented done 👍
-
done, but do you actually believe anyone will read these?
The department does and tabulates them for the commission. So the more comments we can have against this the better.
I'd encourage everybody to make your stance clear right off the bat as well (Against, do not support, etc) Some of the comments are pretty long and convoluted, they're not going to take the time to decipher every opinion these should be yes or no. Comments like below are likely to be added to the "support" tally if they're flying through these things trying to count the yays and nays :twocents:
-
I guarantee you these comments are falling on deaf ears but commented anyways :beatdeadhorse:
-
Beating the dead horse should be a cat eating a dead horse. Many of the management goals, less consumption, more predators, is a recipe for a collapsed department and failed rewilding.
-
"Using activism instead of biology to determine any game season is foolhardy, at best, and dangerous. Cougar/human conflict is increasing because cougars have lost their fear of man and cougar populations are burgeoning since the prohibition of hounds to track them. I've seen cougars within the city limits of Vancouver. Seasons should be increased and in problem areas, hounds should be allowed by permit according to the boots on the ground scientists' evaluations. In the past, the harvest for a sustainable population has been 14%+/-2%. I see that's been lowered to 13%. In addition, it's quite possible that the increase of attacks is due to underestimating the population. Please stop favoring predators over other species. Balance is leaving the food chain and the ungulates are suffering as a result. USE SCIENCE TO SET LIMITS!"
-
I guarantee you these comments are falling on deaf ears but commented anyways :beatdeadhorse:
Exactly right, but if people don't comment they can say there was no opposition!
-
commented - is this going up on Howl sometime soon?
-
I guarantee you these comments are falling on deaf ears but commented anyways :beatdeadhorse:
Exactly right, but if people don't comment they can say there was no opposition!
👍👍 bearpaw.
-
Just commented again.
Night hunting with thermals should be allowed too.
-
Commented.
Thanks.
-
It says comment if you disagree.
So, what if you agree. Will the only comments on file be those that disagree?
Sent from my SM-A426U using Tapatalk
-
Also, what happens if this doesn't go through? Status quo or no cougar hunting.
Sent from my SM-A426U using Tapatalk
-
Those that are able might want to attend this event. Certain commissioners seem to be leaning heavily on this project for guidance.
https://events.eventgroove.com/event/A-Conversation-About-Cougars-89957?fbclid=IwZXh0bgNhZW0CMTEAAR37XZSMXsg5a27aFG6oodmYq30avXwwT6XenamsPzGG2IqwUpx4F4kdPT8_aem_Ab10jRiTMAxfkZ7tt9rcq-ooo_0WCopKne07oOSATroyIg5azJpv2IzY6xW4B2imazKoQZYiGxsXPRA7uMjc9bCw
-
Back to the top, comments are still open for anybody who hasnt submitted yet.
For all of the lurkers here, if you want to support predator management, you can click the link, type "disagree", hit enter, then close the tab. It will take 5-10 seconds depending on internet speeds and typing ability.
https://publicinput.com/2024cougarseasonsetting
-
Thanks, again good reminder
-
Done!
-
Sent
-
Great reminder, commented again. We really need to do this daily, just write something different :IBCOOL:
-
Disappointed and disagree with WDFW, comments sent.
-
Let’s keep the comments up. Just sent a new thought to them yesterday
-
Sent
-
Sent
-
Done, thanks for the reminder
-
Sent it again
-
Cougar sighting last week in downtown Selah WA. Yeah, we better reduce the harvest. Brilliant!
-
And at a elementary school in Ellensburg on Friday
-
Sent
I noticed on the howl site that goal is 2400 and still need a couple hundred to reach that goal
Let’s go !
-
That’s odd. I went to the site and got a much lower goal and total.
https://www.howlforwildlife.org/wacougarjune24?utm_campaign=washington_cougar_gohunt&utm_medium=email&utm_source=howlforwildlife
-
Done
-
That’s odd. I went to the site and got a much lower goal and total.
https://www.howlforwildlife.org/wacougarjune24?utm_campaign=washington_cougar_gohunt&utm_medium=email&utm_source=howlforwildlife
Beats me ?
Here’s the link they sent me on email
https://www.howlforwildlife.org/lionbearseason#newmode-embed-43508-64543
-
Looks like 2 separate HOWL messages, one for cougar season setting another for science based seasons for bear and cougar. Similar but it’s good to get more messages to commission even if they don’t read them.
-
"7 recent cougar sightings in Vancouver and the WDFW accredits them to human expansion. Let's say that is true, ignoring the prohibition on hounding and the lack of action by the Commission to curb the trend. You can either choose to cull the human population or the cougar population. This is a statewide problem with both cougars and bears, yet the Commission majority not only doesn't change policy, it seeks to make it more restrictive. Human/cougar conflict will only increase and the Commission will be responsible and liable for the resulting injuries and deaths. Figure out your job and start doing it please.
https://local.newsbreak.com/clark-county-wa/3469075465541-7-recent-cougar-sightings-in-clark-county-3-livestock-killed?s=dmg_local_email_bucket_6.web2_fromweb"
-
Done. Glad I saw this. Thanks for sharing.
elksnout
-
Saw this article in the Seattle Times, so just another reminder to get those comments in:
Proposed WA cougar-hunting regulations are good science; support them
South of Sequim on May 8, 2021, we caught a 2-year-old female cougar as part of the Olympic Cougar Project and fitted her with a GPS collar. We used her data to determine where cougars are most likely to cross highways and to contribute to Washington’s Statewide Habitat Connectivity Strategy.
Yoko, as we called her, lived on the outskirts of town, navigating rural properties and recreation areas. She gave birth to two litters, the first of them just 200 yards from a popular parking spot for hikers and mountain bikers on Burnt Hill.
In documenting 100 of her kills, we learned that while weaving among the people, pets and livestock of southern Sequim, Yoko mostly fed on deer, along with coyote, raccoon, snowshoe hare and one domestic cat that ventured onto public land.
It’s unclear what changed on April 12, 2024. Perhaps the play of moonlight on white fur caught her attention. That night, Yoko killed an alpaca unprotected by adequate fencing or a night enclosure — an animal she had passed many times in previous years. The angry livestock owner demanded retribution, and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife removed not just Yoko, but her two 1-year old kittens as well when they were caught in a trap at the scene.
Right now, WDFW hunting regulations do not account for their deaths, because only adult cougars legally killed by hunters count toward regional hunting quotas. Yoko didn’t count because she was killed by WDFW, and her kittens didn’t count either, because they were young.
This month, the Fish and Wildlife Commission is attempting to close these loopholes, and others, through much-needed changes to Washington’s cougar hunting regulations. Washingtonians who wish to preserve wildlife and wild places, and see greater science-based management and conservation of our state’s natural resources, should support these proposed rules.
Time is of the essence: Express support for proposed changes as the WDFW Commission discusses public comment during their June 21-22 meeting, and will vote July 19. (To comment, go to st.news/cougar)
A glaring hiccup in the current quota structure is that it fosters an environment prone to overharvesting cougars, which impacts their abundance and social organization. In fact, the Olympic Cougar Project has found that 50% of local cougar mortality remains unaccounted for in management decisions because these animals are killed by the state, illegally poached or die from vehicle strikes.
If the new rules are adopted, all independent cougars (18+ months old) and all cougars killed by humans, whether they be legal hunters or state wildlife officials, will contribute to Washington’s regional hunting quotas. The new rules would also utilize cougar density estimates determined by WDFW to set regional hunting limits, specifically capping local mortality at 13% of independent animals in each population. In regions that reach the 13% cap before the start of the cougar hunting season — say, due to conflict removal by state agents — the cap would increase to 20% of the population for that season to provide local hunting opportunity.
These changes would also make Washington home to the most scientific and progressive cougar harvest regulations nationwide, and a model for states like Texas, which after decades of resistance has finally made headlines in granting mountain lions, or cougars, their first-ever protections.
The deaths of Yoko and her two kittens didn’t “count” toward Washington’s hunting quota this year. But if the proposed rules succeed, WDFW might and should pause — so as not to jeopardize hunting opportunity — before killing the next Yoko and her kittens.
Mark Elbroch is the Puma Program director for Panthera, a global wild cat conservation organization.
-
Saw this article in the Seattle Times, so just another reminder to get those comments in:
Proposed WA cougar-hunting regulations are good science; support them
South of Sequim on May 8, 2021, we caught a 2-year-old female cougar as part of the Olympic Cougar Project and fitted her with a GPS collar. We used her data to determine where cougars are most likely to cross highways and to contribute to Washington’s Statewide Habitat Connectivity Strategy.
Yoko, as we called her, lived on the outskirts of town, navigating rural properties and recreation areas. She gave birth to two litters, the first of them just 200 yards from a popular parking spot for hikers and mountain bikers on Burnt Hill.
In documenting 100 of her kills, we learned that while weaving among the people, pets and livestock of southern Sequim, Yoko mostly fed on deer, along with coyote, raccoon, snowshoe hare and one domestic cat that ventured onto public land.
It’s unclear what changed on April 12, 2024. Perhaps the play of moonlight on white fur caught her attention. That night, Yoko killed an alpaca unprotected by adequate fencing or a night enclosure — an animal she had passed many times in previous years. The angry livestock owner demanded retribution, and the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife removed not just Yoko, but her two 1-year old kittens as well when they were caught in a trap at the scene.
Right now, WDFW hunting regulations do not account for their deaths, because only adult cougars legally killed by hunters count toward regional hunting quotas. Yoko didn’t count because she was killed by WDFW, and her kittens didn’t count either, because they were young.
This month, the Fish and Wildlife Commission is attempting to close these loopholes, and others, through much-needed changes to Washington’s cougar hunting regulations. Washingtonians who wish to preserve wildlife and wild places, and see greater science-based management and conservation of our state’s natural resources, should support these proposed rules.
Time is of the essence: Express support for proposed changes as the WDFW Commission discusses public comment during their June 21-22 meeting, and will vote July 19. (To comment, go to st.news/cougar)
A glaring hiccup in the current quota structure is that it fosters an environment prone to overharvesting cougars, which impacts their abundance and social organization. In fact, the Olympic Cougar Project has found that 50% of local cougar mortality remains unaccounted for in management decisions because these animals are killed by the state, illegally poached or die from vehicle strikes.
If the new rules are adopted, all independent cougars (18+ months old) and all cougars killed by humans, whether they be legal hunters or state wildlife officials, will contribute to Washington’s regional hunting quotas. The new rules would also utilize cougar density estimates determined by WDFW to set regional hunting limits, specifically capping local mortality at 13% of independent animals in each population. In regions that reach the 13% cap before the start of the cougar hunting season — say, due to conflict removal by state agents — the cap would increase to 20% of the population for that season to provide local hunting opportunity.
These changes would also make Washington home to the most scientific and progressive cougar harvest regulations nationwide, and a model for states like Texas, which after decades of resistance has finally made headlines in granting mountain lions, or cougars, their first-ever protections.
The deaths of Yoko and her two kittens didn’t “count” toward Washington’s hunting quota this year. But if the proposed rules succeed, WDFW might and should pause — so as not to jeopardize hunting opportunity — before killing the next Yoko and her kittens.
Mark Elbroch is the Puma Program director for Panthera, a global wild cat conservation organization.
Wow,just wow.
Maybe these conservation organizations should provide livestock enclosures that are cougar proof.
-
The article used the term “greater science-based management.”
Let’s come up with the definition:
Arm chair biology?
Passion science?
-
It's the Seattle times. What would you expect from a fish wrapper?
-
:yike:
our state is run by morons and the Seattle times is contributing
so frustrating
-
its going to take a kid getting mauled or worse
that's my 2 cents
-
Well that Seattle Times story about made me puke..... Yoko and her kittens please.... This tells me that the commission is worried and they don't have the public support they were counting on. Our comments must out number theirs to write a story like that. I am holding my breath our season doesn't change.
-
:yike:
our state is run by morons and the Seattle times is contributing
so frustrating
The ST is part off the Dem machine. Expect no better and you'll not be disappointed.
-
I know it doesn't seem to matter much, but today is the last day to comment on the proposed changes at https://publicinput.com/2024cougarseasonsetting (https://publicinput.com/2024cougarseasonsetting)
The antis have submitted a lot of comments...
-
Commented. I read through the last 100 or so comments, about 75% are in support, and 8 of those directly cite the seattle times article as their source of information or motivation for commenting.
These are people who are completely disconnected from life in places not covered in concrete or asphalt, who couldnt tell you how many cougars were harvested last year (198) but have no problem asserting that whatever that number is is FAR too high to be sustainable. They bare false witness without shame, and all it takes is a single opinion piece + the people who do know better to stand aside, and just like that the comments get flooded and reasonable wildlife management is lost forever.
The commission isnt actually reading the responses, they have somebody tally opposition vs approval and report the totals. You dont need to write a story. Simply clicking the link and commenting "oppose" is enough to make a positive difference.
https://publicinput.com/2024cougarseasonsetting
-
Done. Thanks for the link!
-
I was unable to watch any of the meetings. Did anyone watch to see how the cougar issue went?
-
I was unable to watch any of the meetings. Did anyone watch to see how the cougar issue went?
I'm curious as well.
Maybe I'll go look to see if it's been on the agenda.
Hope this doesn't turn into dragging there feet,then no season.
I already bought a tag for a fall season.
I just skimmed through some of the agenda.
Looks like there waiting for the comment period to end.
Cougar season will be a hot topic in July.
Also the anti-hunters are strong in the comments right now.
I just commented again,I would urge everyone to comment or comment again.
-
I was unable to watch any of the meetings. Did anyone watch to see how the cougar issue went?
I'm curious as well.
Maybe I'll go look to see if it's been on the agenda.
Hope this doesn't turn into dragging there feet,then no season.
I already bought a tag for a fall season.
I just skimmed through some of the agenda.
Looks like there waiting for the comment period to end.
Cougar season will be a hot topic in July.
Also the anti-hunters are strong in the comments right now.
I just commented again,I would urge everyone to comment or comment again.
Comment period ended Friday.
-
I was unable to watch any of the meetings. Did anyone watch to see how the cougar issue went?
I'm curious as well.
Maybe I'll go look to see if it's been on the agenda.
Hope this doesn't turn into dragging there feet,then no season.
I already bought a tag for a fall season.
I just skimmed through some of the agenda.
Looks like there waiting for the comment period to end.
Cougar season will be a hot topic in July.
Also the anti-hunters are strong in the comments right now.
I just commented again,I would urge everyone to comment or comment again.
Comment period ended Friday.
I just commented like 34 minutes ago.
It posted my comment,so is this a scam .
Where the anti-hunters get a whole weekend to run the comments up.
Here's a link ,where I commented.
https://publicinput.com/2024cougarseasonsetting
-
The commission met on Friday and Saturday. Looks like cougar seasons were discussed on Friday afternoon.
The recording of the Friday meeting is available at https://tvw.org/video/washington-fish-and-wildlife-commission-2024061250/?eventID=2024061250 (https://tvw.org/video/washington-fish-and-wildlife-commission-2024061250/?eventID=2024061250).
The discussion on cougar seasons starts around 2 hrs 47 minutes into the video, when the timestamp at the bottom right is at 4:16 PM.
I just started watching it. At the beginning they say they are extending the comment period only for 52 people who were signed up to give in-person comments but there was not time for them. But it isn't open for anyone else now.
-
The commission met on Friday and Saturday. Looks like cougar seasons were discussed on Friday afternoon.
The recording of the Friday meeting is available at https://tvw.org/video/washington-fish-and-wildlife-commission-2024061250/?eventID=2024061250 (https://tvw.org/video/washington-fish-and-wildlife-commission-2024061250/?eventID=2024061250).
The discussion on cougar seasons starts around 2 hrs 47 minutes into the video, when the timestamp at the bottom right is at 4:16 PM.
I just started watching it. At the beginning they say they are extending the comment period only for 52 people who were signed up to give in-person comments but there was not time for them. But it isn't open for anyone else now.
Well I never signed up to speak .
I can leave comments still strange I guess.
-
big big thank you for recording this and allowing us to review it. :tup:
-
We need to show up... and we need to show up at every meeting. I remember the earlier meeting in March or April where we had a lot of people at the meeting. It was joyous. I honestly cant say if it was the second April meeting that we had good turn out too but I watched it and I feel like it had dipped but I could be wrong.
I was at this one in Vancouver. As its a meeting near where I live. The cougar section was on Friday late afternoon. Now I know its during work hours etc etc but I'm telling you we need to start taking the half days of work off to show up if that's what is necessary. I fortunately could excuse myself early from work and what I can tell you is that when I showed up the room was not half full. Aka we missed an opportunity to take over a room and we didnt. Its great if you are in the room all day but you can show up just for your comment period. So the commitment with travel is a half day tops. We have enough hunters and fisherman here in Vancouver alone to have had that room filled past standing room only.
We ask them to bring our meetings closer to us so we dont have to go all the way to Olympia and the least we could do is show up.
I'm sorry that my girls got stage fright, that was even tough for me. They could say there part with confidence at home but got a bit timid in that room. After watching the pro cougar folks bring their kids I felt we should bring a couple of our kids along too. I'm mighty proud of them. Plus its the first lesson in teaching them exactly what I am saying above. If we are passionate about something and we want change we need to perform our civic duty. Show up to the meetings, overwhelm their inbox's, and fill their voicemails.
They tally our comments online. The commission and really everyone since its recorded and on the WWW have to hear us when we show up. Its not just a check box for or against summarized in one slide.