Post by: link on February 07, 2025, 07:24:34 PM
Post by: link on February 07, 2025, 07:26:10 PM
Post by: CarbonHunter on February 07, 2025, 07:30:54 PM
Post by: Boss .300 winmag on February 07, 2025, 07:38:50 PM
Is that your Navy boot camp picture?
Post by: link on February 07, 2025, 07:55:21 PM
Post by: The scout on February 07, 2025, 07:57:13 PM
Post by: lewy on February 07, 2025, 07:59:18 PM
Post by: CarbonHunter on February 07, 2025, 08:01:24 PM
Post by: Fidelk on February 07, 2025, 08:05:36 PM
Post by: boneaddict on February 07, 2025, 08:16:46 PM
Post by: jeffro on February 07, 2025, 08:34:43 PM
Post by: Buckhunter24 on February 07, 2025, 08:52:29 PM
Post by: Timberstalker on February 08, 2025, 01:36:01 AM
Post by: mburrows on February 08, 2025, 06:23:58 AM
Post by: BKMFR on February 08, 2025, 06:42:02 AM
Post by: MLHSN on February 08, 2025, 06:46:13 AM
Post by: chukardogs on February 08, 2025, 07:07:46 AM
Post by: timberhunter on February 08, 2025, 07:20:31 AM
Post by: meatwhack on February 08, 2025, 07:36:05 AM
Post by: Romulus on February 08, 2025, 08:38:16 AM
Post by: nwwanderer on February 08, 2025, 09:19:58 AM
Post by: Ironhead on February 08, 2025, 11:59:07 AM
Post by: LDennis24 on February 08, 2025, 01:45:24 PM
Post by: High Climber on February 08, 2025, 06:38:57 PM
G2s 16”
G3s 11”
G4s 10”
Mains 21”
Spread 21”
Mass 32”
172”
Post by: huntnphool on February 09, 2025, 07:27:19 PM
Post by: MtnMuley on February 09, 2025, 07:42:25 PM
Post by: trophyhunt on February 09, 2025, 07:55:21 PM
Post by: greenhead_killer on February 09, 2025, 09:18:42 PM
Post by: huntnnw on February 10, 2025, 08:26:58 AM
Post by: pianoman9701 on February 10, 2025, 08:35:07 AM
Post by: Mtnwalker on February 10, 2025, 08:52:32 AM
Post by: link on February 10, 2025, 08:17:06 PM
Post by: huntnphool on February 10, 2025, 08:33:37 PM
Smaller than the photo’d buck, mostly because of his short mains and spread credit. Lovely backs. Also a little less mass. Mains are a killer. Upper 160s to 170ish.
This is clearly bigger than the photo buck. :twocents:
YMMV
Post by: teal101 on February 11, 2025, 08:26:29 AM
Smaller than the photo’d buck, mostly because of his short mains and spread credit. Lovely backs. Also a little less mass. Mains are a killer. Upper 160s to 170ish.
This is clearly bigger than the photo buck. :twocents:
YMMV
Yup. Looks to be slightly wider, better mass, looks maybe weaker in the mains.
Post by: boneaddict on February 11, 2025, 10:12:49 AM
Smaller than the photo’d buck, mostly because of his short mains and spread credit. Lovely backs. Also a little less mass. Mains are a killer. Upper 160s to 170ish.
This is clearly bigger than the photo buck. :twocents:
YMMV
Apparently, with those numbers. I must be biased because I was standing next to the live animal versus a skeleton on the wall. I would never have guessed his backs to be 19 or his mains to be 21. They look shorter to me. For some reason Although they are similiar I like the other one better. :dunno:
Post by: huntnphool on February 11, 2025, 11:24:48 PM
Smaller than the photo’d buck, mostly because of his short mains and spread credit. Lovely backs. Also a little less mass. Mains are a killer. Upper 160s to 170ish.
This is clearly bigger than the photo buck. :twocents:
YMMV
Apparently, with those numbers. I must be biased because I was standing next to the live animal versus a skeleton on the wall. I would never have guessed his backs to be 19 or his mains to be 21. They look shorter to me. For some reason Although they are similiar I like the other one better. :dunno:
I have one very similar to this one, that I believe you have seen in a pic, with my daughter holding it, that has even shorter mains than this one (19”) and it still scores over 180” officially. ;)
Post by: OutHouse on February 13, 2025, 08:51:07 AM
Post by: Mtnwalker on February 13, 2025, 09:50:42 AM
Post by: The scout on February 13, 2025, 11:19:00 AM
Oof
:yeah: My measurements were off all around from that picture, I figured his backs were about 16” mains were 19” and 4’s were about 8-9”