Post by: alwinearcher on September 05, 2009, 12:31:14 AM
Anyways, he had been selected for the state wide insentive tag for elk, opened for him sept 1st with any weapon...
Anyways, lucky guy! i should have snapped a picture. he had a 6x9 that i grossed around 350..what a tag to have! He probably pick a bull a little sooner then most would have with that tag, but he was all smiles so congrads to him!
Post by: PacificNWhunter on September 05, 2009, 12:43:01 AM
Post by: Buckblaster on September 05, 2009, 08:06:25 AM
Post by: Ridgerunner on September 05, 2009, 08:08:09 AM
Post by: BLKBEARKLR on September 05, 2009, 08:46:34 AM
Bad for you and us for no pictures!!! :chuckle:
Post by: bow4elk on September 05, 2009, 09:05:16 AM
Post by: SpokaneSlayer on September 05, 2009, 12:45:33 PM
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi130.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp245%2Frocker_dude77%2FIMG_2028.jpg&hash=a86d6ef922f61b933b56b337e352d53c10506cc5)
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fi130.photobucket.com%2Falbums%2Fp245%2Frocker_dude77%2FIMG_2029.jpg&hash=9a59cdb749e253fe775623487d22e6496c59c91e)
Post by: jackelope on September 05, 2009, 01:03:20 PM
nothing against nothing, but i don't think i'd be hunting the colockum if i had the opportunity to hunt anywhere in the state with a bull tag...but that's just me.
:dunno:
Post by: GoPlayOutside on September 05, 2009, 01:13:21 PM
Post by: Craig on September 05, 2009, 01:21:53 PM
Post by: bucklucky on September 05, 2009, 01:22:41 PM
Post by: MtnMuley on September 05, 2009, 02:34:33 PM
Post by: huntnphool on September 05, 2009, 05:08:12 PM
Post by: Buckblaster on September 05, 2009, 09:42:32 PM
Post by: robrunwild on September 05, 2009, 09:53:53 PM
Post by: Turkeyman on September 05, 2009, 10:17:01 PM
Post by: bucklucky on September 06, 2009, 09:46:00 AM
Doesn't look like a 350" bull?? Mass puts it right up there. Thats a 350" bull for sure. What would a 350" bull look like then if this isn't it??
Dude , Take it easy man. You dont gain much inches on mass, its mainly tine length man, tine length. The thirds are basically nonexistent and his beams look short. Now that extra is pretty long and probably makes up for some inches. But like I said the picture probably dont do him justice, I never said it wasnt a 350 bull just dont look like it. Oh , and if you want to see a 350 bull I can probably pull up some pictures somewhere. If you get eastmans archery magazine look on the cover of that newest issue, that bull has the mass and way longer tines all the way around, its just over 350.
Post by: Todd_ID on September 06, 2009, 10:17:54 AM
Post by: hornhunter on September 06, 2009, 03:24:41 PM
Post by: cle elum bowhunter on September 06, 2009, 04:25:21 PM
Post by: markts on September 06, 2009, 07:24:30 PM
Post by: alwinearcher on September 07, 2009, 01:41:04 PM
Post by: Ridgerunner on September 07, 2009, 04:26:23 PM
Post by: SHANE(WA) on September 09, 2009, 01:04:36 AM
Post by: alwinearcher on September 09, 2009, 06:36:38 AM
NOT 350. The one side is barely a 315 bull, character yesactually the one side was more like 320"
Post by: h2ofowlr on September 09, 2009, 07:34:26 AM
Post by: Pathfinder101 on September 10, 2009, 03:45:38 PM
Post by: Lowedog on September 10, 2009, 03:55:57 PM
Nice bull! At least that is one the Indians won't get to shoot this year. (oops did I just say that?) :dunno:
-Lowedog
Post by: SpokaneSlayer on September 10, 2009, 03:58:53 PM
Post by: GoldTip on September 10, 2009, 04:10:41 PM
Post by: HuntingFanatic on September 10, 2009, 04:15:19 PM
Dandy bull, would be hard to pass with any tag in your pocket I'd bet. I just pray to the lord in heaven he did not use that motersickle in his pursuit of that regal creature. (said with tongue in cheek and a huge roll of the eyes.):chuckle: :rolleyes: