Hunting Washington Forum
Big Game Hunting => Other Big Game => Topic started by: Palmer on March 20, 2008, 05:59:57 AM
-
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004285453_cougar16m.html
Is cougar hunting breeding chaos?
By Sandi Doughton
Seattle Times science reporter
CLE ELUM, Kittitas County — Jane the cougar is having a bad day.
Ben Maletzke, the cougar biologist, couldn't be happier.
After days of chasing the crafty animal, his team of hounds finally ran her up a tree where Maletzke could take aim with his tranquilizer gun.
Now, the predator powerful enough to take down a bull elk is lying helpless under a tent of fir trees while Maletzke replaces the batteries in her radio collar, checks her teeth and measures her girth.
Jane is part of a healthy cougar population that lives in relative harmony with its human neighbors in the rapidly growing communities just east of Snoqualmie Pass.
In the past six years, Jane has killed deer less than 50 paces from homes — yet residents don't even realize she's there. She has never harmed pets or livestock, nor have any of her offspring.
The story is different in northeastern Washington, where the state has stepped up hunting in response to soaring numbers of complaints about cougars, including two attacks on toddlers. A bill signed by Gov. Christine Gregoire last week could expand the cougar killing.
But startling results from studies such as Maletzke's question this traditional approach to cougar management.
Instead of reducing conflicts between cougars and humans, heavy hunting seems to make the problems worse, says Robert Wielgus, Maletzke's graduate adviser and director of Washington State University's Large Carnivore Conservation Laboratory.
"It goes against the grain of what we've been doing for decades," Wielgus says.
Killing large numbers of cougars creates social chaos, Wielgus and his students found. Trophy hunters often target adult males, which act as a stabilizing force in cougar populations. The adults police large territories and kill or drive out young males. With the grown-ups gone, the "young hooligans" run wild, Wielgus says.
"Every time you kill a dominant male, about three of these young guys come for the funeral."
Evidence suggests cougars under two years of age, just learning to live on their own, account for the majority of run-ins with people and domestic animals. "You don't get to be an old cougar by doing stupid stuff like hanging out in backyards and eating cats," Wielgus says.
In the Selkirk Mountains at the confluence of Washington, British Columbia and Idaho, Wielgus and his students discovered the cougar population was actually crashing at a time when everyone assumed it was booming — because complaints were off the charts.
Hunters had killed all the older males. Then they targeted adult females, whose numbers were plummeting. "About all that was left were these teenagers, and that could well be the reason there were so many complaints — even though there weren't many cougars," Wielgus says.
Another project focused on a smaller area in the Colville National Forest, also in northeastern Washington, where the state opened emergency hunts to reduce cougar numbers in response to complaints. But the cougar population didn't drop at all. Instead, young males from a hundred miles around moved into the territories vacated when adults were killed.
"The only change is that the problematic component — the younger males — increased," Wielgus said.
By contrast, the cougars Maletzke studies along the Interstate 90 corridor have been subject to light levels of hunting. Yet conflicts are rare.
"When you've got a population of smart, resident cats, that's a stable situation," he says.
"Respect for that cat"
Sometimes Maletzke wishes the cougars weren't quite so clever. Jane has learned how to lead the dogs in circles — and leave them barking up the wrong tree.
"We've got a lot of respect for that cat," Maletzke says as he sets out on his fourth attempt this winter to nab her.
He pulls his truck to the side of the road and holds up a small antenna, trying to pick up a signal from the cougar's collar.
Sporadic beeps lead him to a hillside above the Yakima River.
Maletzke and his assistants strap on snowshoes while dog handler Dallas Likens unloads his three fastest hounds. The dogs' frenzied barks explode like gunshots in the cold air. They strain at their leashes, dragging Likens behind them.
Most hunters used to rely on dogs to track and tree cougars, which are so elusive they are otherwise hard to find and shoot. But in 1996, Washington voters overwhelmingly passed a citizen initiative that banned the practice, which some consider cruel.
If voters thought they were putting an end to cougar hunting, though, they were wrong.
The number of cats killed by hunters in Washington has climbed in recent years, exceeding levels in the 1950s when the state paid a $75 bounty to encourage eradication.
Before 1996, hunters killed an average of 156 cougars a year. Since the initiative, the harvest rate increased more than 40 percent, to an average of 225 animals a year.
That's because state wildlife managers, worried cougars would proliferate when hound-hunting ended, liberalized the rules for so-called "boot" hunters: Those who walk or drive the woods primarily in search of deer or elk.
The state raised the bag limit to two cougars, doubled the length of the season, and cut the cost of a cougar tag to $10. Before the initiative, the state issued about 600 cougar permits annually. Now, more than 60,000 hunters have license to kill cougars every year.
State lawmakers also enacted several bills to allow hound hunting in counties where complaints about cougars killing livestock or menacing people were high — leading to the heavy kill rate in northeastern Washington.
One unintended consequence of the new rules is a growing toll on female cougars. Whereas hound hunters selectively targeted large males, or toms, "boot" hunters tend to shoot any cougar they run across.
"Killing big adult males is not a good thing," Wielgus says. "But once you start killing off females, there's nowhere to go but down."
The state is revising its game-management plan and considering quotas to reduce the number of female cougars killed, says Donny Martorello, carnivore-section manager for the Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
The agency also is weighing the research that suggests heavy hunting may aggravate cougar problems but is waiting for more solid evidence, Martorello says.
Jane is up a tree
The dogs have picked up Jane's scent, and their baying reverberates up the canyon.
Maletzke's radio crackles. Jane is treed, Likens reports.
But she's perched nearly 60 feet up a Douglas fir, too high to shoot with the tranquilizer gun.
Maletzke breaks out tree-climbing spurs and begins a slow shimmy up an adjacent fir.
As he approaches Jane's level, he shouts and flings branches, hoping to scare her out of the tree. The plan is for Likens to loose his hounds an instant after Jane hits the ground, forcing her to bolt up another tree — which he hopes won't be as tall.
It works.
Jane scrambles up a 15-foot pine and soon has a dart in her rump.
She leaps down but doesn't get far before she's wobbling like a drunk.
Maletzke has collared a dozen cougars in these wooded hills and estimates a dozen more may roam the area.
In the six years of the study, cougars have twice snatched sheep from ranchland and killed a cat in a yard where residents were feeding deer and elk.
In state Rep. Joel Kretz's district, the stories are worse. Cougars have killed at least 10 colts from his own ranch in Okanogan County. A boy was attacked in his grandparents' backyard, and a little girl grabbed in a campground. Both children survived, but the next victim may not be as lucky, Kretz says.
"I don't want to wait until we lose a child."
He sponsored the bill that would extend hound hunting in five northeastern counties for another three years. Other counties could join the "pilot project" if they have cougar problems.
Cle Elum hunting spikes
If cougar hunting is going to continue, Wielgus and state wildlife managers agree the use of hounds is preferable to more indiscriminate forms of hunting. It's easier to control and set limits on, Martorello says.
But the British Columbia conservation group Big Wildlife, which fought Kretz's bill, argues voters already signaled they want cougars protected, except for targeted "taking" of problem animals.
Maletzke worries about the future of the cougars near Cle Elum, where hunting spiked this year for the first time and ranches are being carved into subdivisions.
Boot hunters shot 14 animals, including several females and kittens. Among the casualties was a mature tom, whose territory included the sprawling new Suncadia Resort, with its golf course, condominiums and elegant lodge.
A young male has moved into the area.
Sandi Doughton: 206-464-2491 or sdoughton@seattletimes.com
Copyright © 2008 The Seattle Times Company
This article makes about as much sense as something I wrote up to mock them:
There's another article in the PI today about the deer in the wheat fields in Lincoln county. They say that the 6 to 10 year olds stick to the ravines and canyons browsing on wild grasses and Pines. However, hunters have gone in with their "license to kill" deer tags and eliminated these older more mature deer as trophies to hang on their wall.
As soon as these mature bucks are murdered, the young yearlings drift out of the herd and into the wheat fields devastating cash crops. This is where the "boot hunters" come in. "Boot Hunters" are the more novice hunters who walk around and can't sneak up on a trophy buck in a canyon so they walk around a 1000 acre wheat field shooting any deer at 500 yards or less decimating a population that would have otherwise learned to evade these "boot hunters" if they had received a little tutelage from their father buck whom had not a chance to rear them when their life was needlessly cut short.
This bit of information supplied by Junk Science international and sponsored by A. Gore and company.
-
I dont think it is junk science, more like mis-interpreted by some, mis-represted by the writer in some sense, her title is a bit misleading, should be more along the lines of: how cougars are hunted today versus the past creating this "social caos", and i think more evidence needs to be presented before anyone can definitively give such facts. I do agree though there is strong evidence to support that the average age of cougars in NE washington study areas and where hound hunting is occurring is 2-3 years of age, essentially a younger age structure of cougars on the landscape which could Potentially be a problem if in fact it is these young animals that cause problems and kill livestock. Some may wonder why no one is killing older age toms, its because the males that immigrate into the these counties are shot before they can even get some age and size on them. Every hound hunter in the state is thrown into a small section of this state looking for cats, rather than having a hound hunting state wide with permits like we had before 1996 and people had their choice in the state of where they could put in for to draw a permit, not sure what the zones were back then though, but people were harvesting older age toms.
-
I I do agree though there is strong evidence to support that the average age of cougars in NE washington study areas and where hound hunting is occurring is 2-3 years of age, essentially a younger age structure of cougars on the landscape which could Potentially be a problem if in fact it is these young animals that cause problems and kill livestock. Some may wonder why no one is killing older age toms, its because the males that immigrate into the these counties are shot before they can even get some age and size on them. Every hound hunter in the state is thrown into a small section of this state looking for cats, rather than having a hound hunting state wide with permits like we had before 1996 and people had their choice in the state of where they could put in for to draw a permit, not sure what the zones were back then though, but people were harvesting older age toms.
There's still a pretty strict quota on the Hound hunters. I don't know what it was before the new laws, but I have trouble believing that things have drastically changed in NE washington. Cats don't live forever; the difference in the mature cats and sub-adults might only be two years. NE washington is a big place, there's a lot of country that doesn't get hunted. I'm not sure I buy the argumant about totally disrupted age structure in the NE washington lions. :dunno:
-
What troubles me is the loose evidence in the authors argument and the notion that hunting of cougars is only to cut down the number of troublesome animals. I have to guess that the author is using a loose scientific argument to outlaw the hunting of cougars period and then what's next?
A hunting partner of mine loves the taste of cougar and I can't wait to harvest one myself. There are plenty of them so why not harvest them. This debate backed with the sound of a scientific argument without alot more evidence is mute to me. If there is a thriving population and I plan to put cougar on the dinner table then what is the difference if I put beef on my table? Or is this journalist going to tell me that beef from cattle creates pollution and I should stop eating any beef before the Earth warms due to methane gas?
I don't shoot anything that's endangered and I don't shoot animals that aren't a pest, a danger, or that I don't plan to eat. I wish that others would respect my pursuit of happiness and the welfare of my family instead of legislating their semi-religious or cultist beliefs and values on me or other like-minded citizens who enjoy our American tradition.
-
Below is the rebuttal sent to the author of the article by a respected aquaintance...
============================================
SUBJECT: Hooligan Cougars vs. Boot Hunters
============================================
Dear Sandi Doughton,
To begin with, allow me to introduce myself. I am a 46 year-old native Oregonian, hunter, hiker, fisher and American soldier.
I read, with astonished fascination, your article entitled: "Is cougar hunting breeding chaos?" (17 March 2008)
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2004285453_cougar16m.html
While it is well written, I find myself compelled to address several issues contained within it. The findings of these "researchers" are prejudiced with an agenda which is, at best, lunacy and at worst, outright dangerous.
Their own statements clearly point out the flaw in their theory.
Lets review...
"Most hunters used to rely on dogs to track and tree cougars, which are so elusive they are otherwise hard to find and shoot."
"...in 1996, Washington voters overwhelmingly passed a citizen initiative that banned the practice."
So by their own admission, cougar hunting is much harder without the use of dogs.
IN FACT...it is the primary technique THEY themselves use in order to track down their "guinea pig" subjects (how hypocritical).
"Since the initiative...the number of cats (READ: wild carnivores lions) killed by hunters in Washington has climbed in recent years...the harvest rate increased more than 40 percent."
"...the state has stepped up hunting in response to soaring numbers of complaints about cougars, including two attacks on toddlers...snatched sheep from ranch land...killed a cat in a [residential] yard..."killed at least 10 colts" [on a] ranch in Okanogan County"...attacked a boy "in his grandparents' backyard"...grabbed "a little girl in a campground." In fact, The Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife have logged fifteen (15) attacks including one fatality. Have I left anything out?
Let's do the math...
Enact laws that prohibit the only effective method of culling these lions + Your average "boot hunters" are encountering more lions (even without dogs) + Complaints and attacks on humans have soared = THERE ARE NOW A LOT MORE WILD LIONS ROAMING AROUND! (go figure)
They hang themselves with there very own words!
Now these activist/researchers want to psycho-analyze these beasts by suggesting that some "young hooligans" are engaging in "stupid stuff" (eg. attacking anything that moves). Note to reader: They are WILD LIONS! It's what they do! They go so far as to personify them by giving them names like "Jane" and calling them "cats" and "kittens." They are WILD LIONS! Give me a break!
This same lot has done the same thing in Oregon. These elitists in their hemp suits and Birkenstocks (Sierra Club out of San Francisco and the National Humane Society from Washington DC) descended on Oregon in 1996 from their urban high rises with a pocket full of money and a bunch of bunny-hugger propaganda. We now have over 7,500 WILD LIONS roaming the state. Nowhere is this more evident than by the declining number of deer and elk (not to mention livestock and pets). We now have cougars living within the Portland city limits! One was even discovered on a school play ground! Now these fools have the audacity to accuse the HUNTERS for the problem?!
Don't get me wrong Ms. Doughton...I do NOT blame these magnificent creatures for the problem. Lions do what they do. Unfortunately they have less and less space in which to do it and it's this kind of pseudo-science that is to blame.
Wildlife management belongs in the hands of educated State and Federal scientists...not the ballot box! This problem is a direct result of what happens when "citizen initiatives" override trained biologists in the field.
Maybe it's time we have an open season on these deranged activists. No bag limit!
Now there's a head-mount that would look great over the fireplace mantle.
Feel free to reprint any of this rebuttal.
==============================================
For the record, Ms. Doughton has yet to respond.
Beast Regards,
Todzilla
-
And.. increased sales of ice cream cause drowning deaths. It's a proven fact... doggone it!