Hunting Washington Forum
Equipment & Gear => Guns and Ammo => Topic started by: deerslyr on January 08, 2011, 12:00:19 PM
-
I want to get a new gun that I can hunt everything north america has to offer. Elk, deer, bear, antelope moose etc. Id like to keep it under $800 but Im not exactly sure what caliber or make/model I should get. I dont reload either. Start throwing ideas out to me. I usually like a light stainless/synthetic rifle but im open to other ideas. Im thinking I want a 30 cal mag but theres alot to choose from and im not sure which one would be the best for me (300 RUM 300WSM 300WIN 338 etc.) but Im open to any ideas lemme know what you guys would get.
-
Tikka T 3 stainless lite in 300 mag, 300 wsm or 30-06 . Some will suggest 7mm
Can pick one up for around $625. Would buy after market rings like Tally or Warne . Less than $700 spent for a very good, accurate proven rifle
-
300 win mag or wsm. But why on earth would someone want only one rifle?
-
I would recommend the 30-06. Or, if you don't mind more recoil and more expensive cartridges, the 300 WSM.
-
300 win mag or wsm. But why on earth would someone want only one rifle?
Because I dont have alot of money, im primarily an archer and would rather spend my money on optics than a bunch of guns that do the same thing as one can.
-
Do you have any kind of self imposed maximum range limitations? What kind of shots do you like to take (body/neck)? Running animals--requiring quick follow ups? Dangerous animals? Since you mentioned any North American animal, I'd say the .30-06 is a good choice with ammo ranging from 100-220 grains (55 if you count accelerators). Basically has a round for every animal. A bolt action is pretty tough to beat for reliability, as is a single shot rifle.
-
Tikka T 3 stainless lite in 300 mag, 300 wsm or 30-06 . Some will suggest 7mm
Can pick one up for around $625. Would buy after market rings like Tally or Warne . Less than $700 spent for a very good, accurate proven rifle
I will be first to recommend 7mm! I agree with this post.
-
300 win mag :IBCOOL:
-
Beware the man with one gun. Just guessing here...but you likely don't reload and not shoot a ton. I would stay away from the big Magnus....rum, 338,etc. The 30-06 is a proven killer to way out. The level of recoil is a bit more forgiving and will likely get you to shoot more. Nothing wrong with a big magnum...but they do beat on you a g good bite.
-
Beware the man with one gun. Just guessing here...but you likely don't reload and not shoot a ton. I would stay away from the big Magnus....rum, 338,etc. The 30-06 is a proven killer to way out. The level of recoil is a bit more forgiving and will likely get you to shoot more. Nothing wrong with a big magnum...but they do beat on you a g good bite.
:yeah: You WILL NOT regret buying a 30-06. You could get by your whole life with nothing other than a bolt action 30-06 for all your big game hunting.
-
Of the 4 you listed, I'd do the 300WM in a Tikka.
As far as the etc's, I like both my 7mmRM in the Tikka or the Ruger M77.
-
Of the 4 you listed, I'd do the 300WM in a Tikka.
As far as the etc's, I like both my 7mmRM in the Tikka or the Ruger M77.
Have shot two ruger 77's (7mm and 25-06) both rifles just felt right to me. My dad has a tikka t3 stainless LH .308 and has killed several deer with it. Both the rugers and the tikka are tack drivers!
-
Yup, the Ruger I've had since 1979. Dropped a lot of animals in it's time. Was 14 for 14 on one shot kills with it until 87 or 88 when it took 2 bring down my Utah bull. Bought the Tikka just because.
-
The 300 wsm will do anything you want it to do, and does not recoil that hard.. less powder burned.. and it kicks an elks butt. lol
-
I am assuming that you won't be hunting grizzlies, so for all the other North American big game, I would start with 7mm. Rem. Mag., 300 Win. Mag., 30.06, or .308. All great, dependable and proven cartridges. Then put your chosen cartridge in a Remington 700, and you're all set.
-
Any of the 7mm or 300 mags are good all around big game guns. If you don't like much recoil, get a 30/06 or 280, they will get the job done too, and still shoot fairly flat.
-
30-06.
-
30-06.
:yeah:
-
The only big game rifle I own is my Savage in 30-06. It's taken half a dozen deer with it, all one shot kills. Love the savages. Great dependable guns and are reletively cheap. Well within your price range. Ammo is easy to find for the 06 and you have a variety of choices.
-
I also support the .30 06 and .280. The old 06 has proven itself for decades, as mentioned a big variety of bullets.
I have been shooting a .280 since 1974, also proven on all the game mentioned. Recoil about the same on both. The .280 is 7mm I'm sure many of you know this but some might learn it here.
mtncook
-
I already have a 270 and 30/06 and I want a bit more knockdown power than that of a 30/06 for some extended range shots on elk. I shoot a good amount and recoil doesnt bother me much. thanks for all answers guys keep em comin.
What does everyone think of savages new accustock?
-
So you want bigger than an '06? And recoil doesn't bother you. I'd look around for a .338 Lapua or .338-378 Weatherby Mag or .338 RUM. The weatherby can get 250 grains up to 3100 fps and also push a 185 gr TSX over 4000 fps. The others are close. There are other .338s that are more of wildcards, and can be difficult to obtain both gun or ammo. Once you leave the .338 calibers for extended ranges, there is kind of a gap until in the .40 cal area (.406) then another gap until the .50 BMG. The .338 can still be light/portable and affordable. Above the that it, the guns get heavy and/or expensive.
-
most of those guns are a considerable amount of over kill on deer sized game than id like, and like you said most of them are quite expensive.
What ive come up with that I like and is in my budget are the savage 116 (already have one and I like it) and the tikka t3 (already mentioned) in either 300 win or 300wsm. Ive looked into the Abolts a bit and also the Remingtons but I dont have alot of experience with them compared to the savage and tikka. Also im not sure what would be better the wsm or the win mag. Both have there pros and cons but I dont reload and im not sure if the price of factory ammo is worth it for the wsm.
-
In my opinion you're not gaining much by going from a 30-06 to a 300 mag. But if you do, I'd go with the 300 Win Mag over the WSM. It's a bigger case than the 300 WSM and I don't care what they say, you WILL get more velocity because the bigger case holds more powder. There's no way around that. The WSM may be more "efficient" but it's also slower.
But really it sounds like what you need is a 338 Win Mag. For longer range shooting a 225 grain Accubond or a 210 or 225 grain Barnes would be great elk medicine. At least with the 338 you'll have something with a definite advantage over your 270 and 30-06.
-
Sounds like a .338 might be the way to go. I've shot deer with a .338, and it wasn't a problem, I'd do it again. Plus, a .338 has some pretty good ballistics.
-
338 is where its at.
-
Then comes the other factor, wieght. Is the 338 gunna be alot heavier than the 300 win??
-
NO
-
If anything, it might be slightly lighter due to the bigger hole in the barrel. :dunno: But definitely won't be heavier than a 300 Win Mag. Heavier than a 300 WSM- yes.
-
Then comes the other factor, wieght. Is the 338 gunna be alot heavier than the 300 win??
nope it all depends on the gun. If you get, say a tikka t3. the 338wm and 300wm should be very close to the same weight maybe a tiny bit of difference.
-
Perhaps a bit much but I really like the .338 Win.
Practically speaking though, the .270 Win is a great cartridge.
-
I already have a 270 and 30/06 and I want a bit more knockdown power than that of a 30/06 for some extended range shots on elk. I shoot a good amount and recoil doesnt bother me much. thanks for all answers guys keep em comin.
What does everyone think of savages new accustock?
If your looking for just a "bit" more knockdown power. Why not just try the Hornady Light Magnum ammo. You can get into the magnum power-range without having to buy another rifle/scope. An '06 has plenty of punch as-is... unless your talking about "Best of the West"-type shots.
-
I already have a 270 and 30/06 and I want a bit more knockdown power than that of a 30/06 for some extended range shots on elk. I shoot a good amount and recoil doesnt bother me much. thanks for all answers guys keep em comin.
What does everyone think of savages new accustock?
If your looking for just a "bit" more knockdown power. Why not just try the Hornady Light Magnum ammo. You can get into the magnum power-range without having to buy another rifle/scope. An '06 has plenty of punch as-is... unless your talking about "Best of the West"-type shots.
I have used this ammo and it works great. With my 7mm-08 i should 6 inch's higher at 300 yards. pretty significant
-
Go with a .280. If you reload make it a Ackley and your good to go.
-
.338 is only to much for hunting vermin like coyotes if you want the pelts.
It is not to much for long range deer, or for elk, or bear, and moose. My handloads go 2950 with a 210 gr. bullet. Nice and flat shooting.
-
To be honest im a bit skeptical of an 06 punching through the shoulder of an elk at 300+ yards regardless of the ammo and I want a gun that can do just that.
-
Beware the man with one gun. Just guessing here...but you likely don't reload and not shoot a ton. I would stay away from the big Magnus....rum, 338,etc. The 30-06 is a proven killer to way out. The level of recoil is a bit more forgiving and will likely get you to shoot more. Nothing wrong with a big magnum...but they do beat on you a g good bite.
:yeah: You WILL NOT regret buying a 30-06. You could get by your whole life with nothing other than a bolt action 30-06 for all your big game hunting.
Bobcat is right on, no regrets with a 30-06. When your talking 300+ yards its not the cartridge it will be the optics and the shooter.
-
30-06, 280, 270, 7mm-08, 308, 7mm rem mag, All Fine! Lean to shoot what ever you buy!
-
To be honest im a bit skeptical of an 06 punching through the shoulder of an elk at 300+ yards regardless of the ammo and I want a gun that can do just that.
How many 300+ yards shots do you plan on taking? I've hunted for over 25 years and consider myself to be a pretty good shot... don't think that I would attempt a 300+ yard shot on a big game animal unless conditions were perfect (and I absolutely couldn't get any closer)... doesn't matter if I had a .243, .30-06, .300 Win Mag or .338 Lapua. With the right shot placement and the right bullet, the time-proven '06 will do its job... if you do yours. :twocents: I guess its your choice and your money.
-
.30-06 will do you fine - for anything! I recommend the Remington 700 for whatever you do buy.
-
But guys, he already has a 30-06 and wants something that's better at killing elk at long range. Which is why I said 338.
-
To be honest im a bit skeptical of an 06 punching through the shoulder of an elk at 300+ yards regardless of the ammo and I want a gun that can do just that.
An '06 will penetrate. This is more a funtion of bullet design than cartridge. There are a few minds that think the '06 will pass through large animals better than its bigger brothers. Bullets typically have an ideal velocity for their performance. Too fast and they will explode with little penetration (from a large retained slug). Too slow and they may pass right through with out expanding much at all. If you match the right bullet to the gun/velocity/range, you can outperform many 'ideal' cartridges.
-
I agree with most everything said here, I see a ton of votes for the 06 which I expected when this started its a great proven cartridge and anyone I know who has one loves it. For good reason they work.
Personally I have never owned one, I have shot them in many configurations though. I will most likely never buy one for the simple fact that it's just not my cup of tea. Absolutely nothing against it but I have no need for it.
I really like my 7mm RUM its fun to shoot and doesn't beat up your shoulder nearly as bad as some say, keep in mind I am a big guy though. I also have a 300wsm and its a great shooter as well. I like packing it mostly cause it's the lightest bigger cal. gun I have. If I were shooting long range with a 30. cal my choice would be the win mag over the WSM though, they just perform better with long bullets and hot loads.
For long range I'll still stick with my RUM.
I can see myself in the future wanting a bigger bullet mainly cause I like guns and collecting them is fun. My next choice at this time would probably be the 338 Lapua it looks like a fun round for long range shooting.
I will also throw in a vote for the Rem 700. Great guns and the aftermarket is HUGE for them.
-
But guys, he already has a 30-06 and wants something that's better at killing elk at long range. Which is why I said 338.
just spend time working on shot placement with the 06 or 270, and get a new Hoyt for next season. But if you Absolutely have to buy a new gun, I guess the 338 will do.
-
Yeah I know, and I am one who recommended the 30-06, until he said he already had one. Who am I to try to talk someone into NOT buying a new rifle, because he doesn't NEED it? ??? :dunno:
-
Yeah I know, and I am one who recommended the 30-06, until he said he already had one. Who am I to try to talk someone into NOT buying a new rifle, because he doesn't NEED it? ??? :dunno:
Except at the cost of financial recklessness and irresponsibility, I am always a fan of owning more guns! Americans who have five hunting rifles in the safe and no home defense, personal carry, or end of the world guns make me go :dunno: Money only goes so far, and I think its good to cover all the bases.
A few years ago I posted this same question. Many of you were kind enough to offer insights. A few parsed ballistics charts, powder charges, and weight retention, and others asked what was wrong with my current gun. I determined that my money was better spent on target practice. I wound up sticking with my one big game hunting rifle and think it was absolutely the best choice I could have made.
The caliber? You guessed it: .30-06
-
A lot of guys on here love the ''magnum'' cartridges. I guess if the owner can shoot threw the recoil accurately that is what matters. I just never really cared if I had a magnum. After harvesting many many deer and a elk, the damage to the rib cage/vital area is so devastating from a 270 or 30-06 I just don't see the need! Compair a skinned deer killed with a Magnum, then put a skinned deer killed with a 270 or an .06 with similar shot placement and try to see a difference.
-
I have killed elk with most of the mentioned rounds. My experience is bullet and placement trump headstamp 100x. I killed an elk at 400 with a 257 resulting in a bang flop.....yet had one run when hit at 40 feet with a 300 rum. Both were lung shots....both with tsxs. I have also seen an elk bang flopped at a measured 770 yards with a 30_06 using 168 tsx. About the only place bigger truly trumps is in brown bears and way heavy for caliber bullets. Technology has really leveled the playing field.
-
Like the original poster, I also have a 270 and a 30-06, and I think if I was going to get something to really extend my range, I'd go with a 7mm Rem Ultra Mag.
-
I already have the 1 gun...how many barrels can I get?
-
I already have the 1 gun...how many barrels can I get?
??? :dunno:
-
I already have the 1 gun...how many barrels can I get?
??? :dunno:
Encore :chuckle:
As said by many here, you already have the gun you need in the '06. Spend the time practicing with it and you'll be much a much deadlier hunter than the guy shooting a whizbang ".204/.600 Super Ultra Long Westly Snipes Lapua Ackley Improved Maximum" at any range you need to be.
-
My Tika 300 short mag is grouping on paper at 400 yds nicely. I also have hunted with 300 ultr mag. In my opinion 300wsm is a much flater further shot
-
As said.....you have what you need, now go get what you want.....but consider this, the $ spent on another rifle could go to a scope and ammo to really wring the accuracy out of your rig.
Ss, are you saying the wsm shoots flatter then the ultra? The wsm bestseller the 06 a bit and the ultra bests the wsm a bit....all will show similar results out to as far as most guys can shoot with respected accuracy. There are few that can make the most of the super mags and to do so requires spending a serious chunk on glass and mounts.
-
To be honest im a bit skeptical of an 06 punching through the shoulder of an elk at 300+ yards regardless of the ammo and I want a gun that can do just that.
You should try Federal Premium cartridges with 165 gr Barnes TSX bullets and see if they shoot accurately in your 30-06. If they are accurate enough in your rifle, then that would be a good load that will work for punching through that elk's shoulder. :twocents:
-
Well give that you HAVE a .30-06 and a .270, I'd look at a .338 WM or a 338RUM with the .338WM having the advantage of easily available ammo.
-
theres alot votes for the tikka's, get one in 300 win mag then get a limbsaver recoil pad. You can find 300 win mag ammo for reasonable prices still. They are accurate and you can adjust the trigger yourself.
-
alright so heres the deal, I have a couple of different 06's and yes no *censored* they'll kill anything that moves in the lower 48, but so will a 243 if you have good shot placement. BUT im going to college in montana next year and my parents offered to buy me a new gun for a graduation present (within a reasonable budget) SO Im trying to find a NEW gun that can be my go to gun over there. And yes im thinking my shot opportunities are goin to be a bit longer over there, but either way I want to get a little more knockdown power at a farther distance if im getting a new gun (other wise there would be no reason to like you guys are saying) The 06's I have now are either heavy as hell or sentimental so I want a new gun can take some punishment (like my 270) but if im getting a new gun I want to upgrade anyways I see no since in owning 4 3006s.
-
7mm Remington Ultra Mag
-
Or better yet, 300 Ultra Mag, if you dont mind the recoil. This one's more popular so you'd probably be better off with it over the 7mm. Should be good with bullet weights from 150 to 200 grains.
-
I would agree with Bob... 300RUM if you can handle the pounding it will dish out. It will kill anything on this continent very extrememly dead...much more deader than a 30.06
-
338 win mag kills deader than a 300 rum.
How are we going to measure deadness anyhow?
-
Man if you have a 30-06s and are heading to my....look seriously at the 257roy. It is THE flat shooter king without ridiculous recoil. I can tell you that I have never seen anything make more bang flops.
-
Without a doubt....300RUM.Load it down for '06 recoil and prformance and crank it up for straight whoop ass.Love the heck outta mine
-
without a doubt 7mm mag. :IBCOOL:
-
without a doubt 7mm mag. :IBCOOL:
Which one? There are at least three. :dunno:
-
Either the 7mm RUM or 7mm wby
-
I got a 300 rum love the gun and the recoil is not that bad. fun to shoot and load for. Its my favorite rifle. I see peaple saying that it's over kill and it wont make thing any deader then how is the round over kill if it don't make them deader??? it's 30. cal like my 308 but it pushes them faster and flater. I still like to shoot my little rifles to 308 270 and the list could go on. it's just up to the shooter that why thay make so many right? If your looking for something bigger i'd go with a 300 wm.
-
Either the 7mm RUM or 7mm wby
OK, I thought you were gonna say the 7mm Rem Mag, and I was going to say that's exactly the same as the 30-06- why would he want that? :)
-
I guess that if you already have a 270 and 30-06, then all this chat about a 7mm anything is wasted air. Stretching to any of the .30cal magnums may give you another 250-300fps on a 180gn bullet.
I own a 30-06 and a .30 mag wildcat. If your budget is only $800, then some for optics, I guess that suggesting a caliber for any rifle that costs $50/box of 20 is quite possibly out of your budget to enjoy shooting. I haven't purchased ammo for a long long time, but I figure that in the tri-state area you're going to find 338win mag on more store shelves than you will 300rum or even the newer 300sm's. The 338 will take anything in the America's with comfort to spare.
-Steve
-
.270!!! shoots flat, i killed a deer at 450 yards with it and a bear at 435 yards I'd say that this gun would do the trick 8)
-
alright so heres the deal, I have a couple of different 06's and yes no *censored* they'll kill anything that moves in the lower 48, but so will a 243 if you have good shot placement. BUT im going to college in montana next year and my parents offered to buy me a new gun for a graduation present (within a reasonable budget) SO Im trying to find a NEW gun that can be my go to gun over there. And yes im thinking my shot opportunities are goin to be a bit longer over there, but either way I want to get a little more knockdown power at a farther distance if im getting a new gun (other wise there would be no reason to like you guys are saying) The 06's I have now are either heavy as hell or sentimental so I want a new gun can take some punishment (like my 270) but if im getting a new gun I want to upgrade anyways I see no since in owning 4 3006s.
This info could have saved a couple of pages of comments!
-
Another option might be to have one of your current guns built to what you want.$500 for a stock and about that again to build and barrel it....then it is just what you want.
-
Do you plan on doing any shooting for fun? or just strictly hunting? ?If you do think you might want to do some long distance target shooting with this rifle then 7mm and .338 generally have the best ballistic coefficients of your preferred caliber range, which means less wind deflection and better speed retention. If it is strictly for hunting and you are dead set on getting a more powerfull cartridge than the 3006 i don't think you can go wrong with any of the previous suggestions for any practical hunting distances. bottom line, its up to you to make your own decision, a lot of people have their own cartridge/caliber preferences and tend to dis on anything other than what they like. look up some ballistic charts/ammo prices and make your own choice.
-
338. I use mine for everything from deer, to elk and everything in between. Hell I've even shot a few yotes with it. I actually choose to get a 338 years ago because I always wanted to go on a moose hunt and that's what most of the guides I talked to recommended. I have a 338 Browning A bolt and I love it. Can't go wrong.
-
.338 win is my go to gun. Ive shot deer bear and elk with it so far and has never failed me. It has bullets from the 160 barnes to the 300gr match kings. It could take an elk easy at 300+ yards with the 225 accubonds and it would even punch though a shoulder at those ranges if the wind got you. :twocents:
-
Another option might be to have one of your current guns built to what you want.$500 for a stock and about that again to build and barrel it....then it is just what you want.
Ive always wanted to do that but never really gave it much thought. I have a springfield 3006 and I love the action on it, would this be a decent base for the gun?
-
Take one of your '06's and have it made into a 338-06.
-
Another option might be to have one of your current guns built to what you want.$500 for a stock and about that again to build and barrel it....then it is just what you want.
Ive always wanted to do that but never really gave it much thought. I have a springfield 3006 and I love the action on it, would this be a decent base for the gun?
[/quoteAnother option might be to have one of your current guns built to what you want.$500 for a stock and about that again to build and barrel it....then it is just what you want.
Ive always wanted to do that but never really gave it much thought. I have a springfield 3006 and I love the action on it, would this be a decent base for the gun?
lots of customs have been built on them. The biggest problem will be finding a stock. If you already have the action, you can build anything you want. Lots of pressure to go bigger......I would build a 6-06, 25-06ai, 6.5-06, 280ai.....something with lots of reach, good b.c. bullets and not burning 70 gr of powder every shot. If you look at sierra match kings and berger vlds in the calibers I mentioned and imagine shooting long range chucks and speed goats.....you will will want one. In a factory gun I still say look at a 257roy......bad medicine from coyotes to elk.
-
My dad has a custom Springfield 06, that cannot be beat unless you are bench shooting or something like that. For a hunting gun, at normal person ranges (out to 450 ish) it is all a guy needs.
Yep, find a good builder, have them put a new McMillan stock on it and a custom barrel (many to choose from) and you'll have a shooting sob...
But seriously, buy a Browning A Bolt or X Bolt in most any caliber mentioned and you will be set... Ive been shooting an 06 now for 26 yrs... I see no reason to change that.... (well... I have a 300 that I dont shoot but sometimes think about shooting it a abit.....)
-
Or buy one of these new Savages... THIS IS A BEAST!!!!!
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.savage338lapuamag.com%2FThemes%2FAkust114%2Fimages%2Flogo.gif&hash=4249fe1ea13274ef3375fa26b7634f01ddb0e241)
-
7mm Mag ammo is just about the cheapest of all the boomers... It will do anything a 300 Win Mag will do and cost a little less doing it.
-
deerslyr, so after everyone's input, which caliber have you decided on?
-
to be honest, im still undecided lol the thread made me extremely confused on what I want as far as calbers go :chuckle: I though i was set on a 300 win or 300 wsm but apparentley there very similar to the 3006. I still have time left and im in no rush until I find the rifle I feel is perfect for my situation. ill let you guys kno what I decide to buy :)
-
I went back and read your first post, I think a 300 Win Mag is the smartest move, inexpensive catridges compared to some of the less common calibers, and they can be purchased anywhere. The 300 Winmag will outperform the 30:06. Another thing when you step up to 338 calibers the recoil takes a step up too, you might consider that.
FYI - There is a good looking 300 Mag in the classifieds on here. There are also some 300WSM's.
-
Oh I know Ive been eyeing them :)
-
Take grizzlies out of the big game list I would really look at the 7mm mag with a 160 grain bullet. I have a 7mm mag in a browning with an A bolt floating stock and boss. I put a 6.5-20x50 leapold on it with a bi pod. I have killed yotes out to 617 yards and deer out to 500. One of the bears that I have pics of on the site I killed at 475yds with it. Lots of practice put into being able to make these shots but the gun makes it fun! If you don't like that caliber I have a 300 win in a ruger M77, great gun but it kicks like a mule. Another caliber that I like that I have is my 338 RUM. More than you need, but will take anything you want it to. I have shot one animal with it a 5x5 whitetail and it actually bulged the eyes out from such extreme pressure. There was no hint of life when I walked up to the animal, extremely fast kill, again kicks like a mule.
-
The other part of the question that never really got answered was which gun? I like the abolts and the t3s Im inpressed with my savage i have now, how about the remingtons? I want it to be farely light, and its gotta be a work horse. I beat the hell out of all my gear, not intentionally but it happens with the way I hunt.
-
T3 :tup:
-
Remingtons are great for guys that like to mod guns.....gobs of parts. Tikka is known for out of the box accuracy but next to no aftermarket parts. If you want to build a custom someday.....remington. if you want a stocked....Tikka
-
How is the accuracy with the as far as out of the box remmys? I know there a sturdy gun but ive had no experience with them
Also all of you guys talk about reloading, how much does it cost to get set up for only a few calibers? It interests me I just dont know anybody whose ever done it so I dont really no where to start. Maybe I need to start a different thread for that lol
-
Every remington I have owned has shot at least moa with some tinkering, many shoot into the .4s and some better yet.....on the days that I can keep up.
Reloading is going to cost you about $400 to get started with components, tooling and all if you buy good stuff new. Used or lee could cut that in half or more. You want a good scale, throw and dies. The press, tumbler, load blocks, trickle, trimmer....etc, can be less then the best. I ride for the green teams myself.
-
I have three go to makes, Remington, Ruger, and Browning. I have all three, one in 338 RUM, one in 300 Win Mag, and one in 7mm Mag. I love all three, they all have there places. Not a big fan of winchester or savage, but for no real reason :chuckle: :dunno: Just never really liked there results. I know Savage has changed in the last decade but I have had no reason to start with a new make. Why fix it if its not broken.
What type of hunting do you want it for again? Range I love my Abolt and Ruger, all around gun my Remington. The Ruger feels the best in my shoulder the Remington 700 is the most awkward. The Browning has the smoothest bolt and trigger. So many variables. Not everyone will feel the same it also matters how you are built, I'm 6' 230 pounds and have very broad shoulders. The ruger M77 may kick to much for someone a little smaller than me :dunno:
-
There is a reason Remington is #1 in the USA. Good guns at a reasonable cost. They say there used to be a problem with some safety's on some older rifles, I have never seen or know of anyone who has seen a faulty safety, but just to be safe, if you go to buy one more than a couple years old, just try the safety before you buy. Other than that if the barrel is in good shape and you like the looks of the rest of the gun, you should be good.
I would imagine any gun sold on here by a regular and respected member will be just as the person says. :twocents:
-
Truth is just about any late model rifle should be pretty accurate. Manufacturing tolerance has come a long way in the last decade.
-
Truth is just about any late model rifle should be pretty accurate. Manufacturing tolerance has come a long way in the last decade.
:tup:
-
Truth is just about any late model rifle should be pretty accurate. Manufacturing tolerance has come a long way in the last decade.
:tup:
:yeah:
-
well I guess comes down to what feels the best to me and I need to head to the gun shop soon. Thanks for all the help guys
-
Yep, Bearpaw is right. Can't go wrong with the 300 Win mag for a one "gun for the west" cartridge. That is the route I went when I was wanting one gun for everything. (Now I have two 300 win mags, a 280, a 250-3000 Savage, a couple 30-30's, a .284 Win, several 12 ga and 20 ga shotguns, .50 cal ML, .54 cal ML, and some others.)
-
well I guess comes down to what feels the best to me and I need to head to the gun shop soon. Thanks for all the help guys
Yes it does. Go through a lot of guns in your hand, hopefully some that are scoped already. Use the safety, pull the trigger, take your hunting gloves with you. Take some dummy rounds and load/unload it. Don't let a salesman sell you his favorite. If you like a feature or where the balance is on a rifle, stick to it. Savages out of the box are really tough to beat. The best triggers out of the box will be a Remington or Savage. (with the Savage Acutrigger as tops) If you drop the stainless requirement, I think that the Marlin XS7 or XL7 is the most gun for the dollar.
Caliber/Cartridge? If I was to choose only one rifle, I'd go with one chambered in 30-06.
-Steve
-
I would have to recomend a remington 700 in a 30-06 good proven round and a good proven gun :twocents: