Hunting Washington Forum
Big Game Hunting => Elk Hunting => Topic started by: Todd_ID on May 03, 2008, 09:42:23 AM
-
B-n-B told me on the phone this morning that the 2008 hunting regulations are on the website now. I like the treatment of the Blue Mountain bull tags and the new sheep tag in Asotin County. I'm still checking it out for life-altering changes, but I'm not holding my breath. :chuckle:
-
anyone know when the hard copies will be available... I think I heard late may???
-
Swwweeeeeet! Thanks for the info. I think the hard copies will be available within 2 weeks.
-
Looks like they opened up part of the Loowit for AHE could make for an interesting hunt :dunno:
-
i know 1 place i'll put in for my sheep tag that i won't get this year.
good to hear.
-
Is it just me or are goat tag numbers down this year? I noticed that some sheep and moose have increased.
-
Time to strategize on permit choices. I sooo due for a moose tag. Lightning can strike twice in the same spot.
-
How stupid are these people???
They have a late archery hunt in 503 & 505 Nov 19th- Dec 15th.
Late Muzzle loader hunt in 503 & 505 Nov 19th- Dec 8th
Now i really do not hunt these areas but how dumb is it is schedule 2 user groups at the same time... Over and over again...
-
Sorry Slider, I think there is a sheep area out there that has a 190" ram... Looks like your odds in Swakane just got 16/1,000,000th better with me not putting in for there...
-
While at Cabelas last night they said the reg book will be out by the 15th of May.
-
Web site says May 15th.
I downloaded it 20 mins ago. Not a whole lot of changes.
-
I can't get on the site....must be overheating from so many trying to check out the permit hunts..............Les
-
I can't get on the site....must be overheating from so many trying to check out the permit hunts..............Les
Same problem here. I've been trying to get in there for an hour or so and can't.
-
Sheep and goat odds are worse than bad.............
I'd cut off my little toe for a sheep tag.
-
I can't get on the site....must be overheating from so many trying to check out the permit hunts..............Les
+1!!! what a joke!!!(WDFW) they are the last to do anything and then their site doesn't work!!! Oh thanks Pope. Now if you can just convince enough people? Maybe I'll draw this year!!!(on the second draw)..............lol
-
It might improve your odds if they narrowed it down to 1 choice instead of 4. Basically the first 12 people of 9000 get their tags. :(
-
1 choice and 1 species for goat sheep moose.
-
here here.
-
1 choice and 1 species for goat sheep moose.
Theres other states that do that and the odds aren't bad, +2
-
1 choice and 1 species for goat sheep moose.
Theres other states that do that and the odds aren't bad, +2
+3 (as long as we can still get points for all the species)
-
I don't think you should be able to accrue points for those species, but make it so you don't lose the ones you got when you make the switch.
-
I don't know, if you aren't able to accrue points you get so far behind everyone else that your chances of getting drawn at a later date essentially disappear. I don't think WDFW would ever be able to sell it to a majority of hunters if you weren't also able to accrue points.
On another note, did anyone notice any significant changes in the regs? I did a quick read through, but I don't see anything ground breakingly new this year. (other than the fact that archery elk opens on a Monday for some stupid reason.)
-
How is it stupid? Isn't it always the 8th? :dunno:
-
It has been the 8th for sometime. I am actually glad that it opens on a monday because that means there will be less people in the woods to compete with. It all works out though, we still get two weekends to hunt for those that are weekend warriors or can't get time off during the week.
-
Allocating 10% of the special permit tags to non residents is a must. They should not be considered to have the same chance to draw as a resident. Others states do it.
-
Thats the nice thing about Idaho.....NO points.
Thats what Utah does...infact they take it a step further an dyou have to choose if you want elk or deer.
-
I don't think you should be able to accrue points for those species, but make it so you don't lose the ones you got when you make the switch
I could not agree more. Point systems are one of the evils of the world.
I really like the Idaho and NM system :dunno:
-
I don't think you should be able to accrue points for those species, but make it so you don't lose the ones you got when you make the switch
I could not agree more. Point systems are one of the evils of the world.
I really like the Idaho and NM system :dunno:
I don't agree. I like the idea of points. Without points you don't get any closer to getting drawn the longer you apply. I think if anything, I like Colorado's system best. I would like to see WA draw by going half preference points (preferably - if not preference points, than at least bonus points.) And then the other half at random. Also limiting the number of non-resident tags, and number of premiere species you can draw for.
-
preference points are satin IMHO
-
Here is some anectodotal evidence for you.........
No points in NM. Put in for the most sought after unit and hunt in the state, and drew first year.
No points in Idaho for Moose. Put in for the first year and drew.
No points in Idaho for Moose, put Dad in and he drew the first year............
Points in Montana...........No draws except for this year finally drew deer and elk with FOUR points
Points in Wyoming...........None $$$$
Points in Nevada............None $$$
Points in Utah...............None $$
Points in Arizona...........None $$$$
Points in Colorado.........None $
Points in Oregon...........None $
each dollar sign represents the cost to apply and to get that point.
-
Before this state went to points the number of applications was WAY less than what it is now for ALL species.
-
:yeah:
-
Before this state went to points the number of applications was WAY less than what it is now for ALL species.
Before this state went to points less people in general were interested in putting in for the big 3. Putting in for tags and collecting points has become the cool thing to do :bash:
-
the expensive thing to do.
-
the expensive thing to do.
It's no more expensive than just applying for the tags without ever getting drawn. Points are at least a way to "feel" like you are getting something for your dollar where at least you aren't getting any farther behind other applicants as long as you keep applying.
-
I should clarify something. Don't get me wrong, I understand the inherent evils of bonus points, but at the same time, I don't want to lose my gains thus far in WA. I look at it this way: if there were no points with moose and I'm applying for a unit with 12,000 applicants, I would have way less of a chance of getting drawn than I have now. At least now I'm getting something.
-
]Let me explain to you why its more expensive. Pick Nevada for instance. I have no desire to go hunt there this fall particularly, but in order to stay in the race and be able to do it 5 years from now, I have to buy a $150 license, plus tags for each animal….$10 each I think in order to get a point. Arizona, same thing. I have to apply for about 15 years before there is a remote chance in hell to be drawn. That’s $200 for the license plus tag fees and all the convienence fees etc that go along with it. This year I drew Montana elk. I have no desire to hunt in NM as I did it last year, and I want to put my efforts into Montana. Because it’s a no point system, I do not have to apply this year. I do not have to buy a license (non –refundable one) and I do not have to put in for the elk tag. I can eait until next year or the year after. Does that make sense. For Colorado, I have to front $3000 but am not even eligible to draw for 3 years. You get most of that back fortunately, but you do have someone else holding onto your money for several months. Wyoming, I want to hunt moose and sheep. I have to stay in the points race to even have a shot at being drawn. Its $100 for the sheep point and $75 for the moose point. Every year it goes up and you can’t just say heck with it as you have invested plenty……..
-
Bone did you not put in for Utah?
-
Well, if you don't like the point system in WA, you can just put in for the raffles. It's essentially the same chances of getting drawn minus the effects of points. :P
-
I dont think point systems are sustainable into the future........If someone is born today and wants to hunt the strip in AZ or a top Colorado unit for mule deer or elk it is mathematically impossible with point creep for them to get a tag in the next 70 years...............things will have to change.
Point systems were designed for hunters in there 40-50's to have a chance at a great tag before they can no longer hunt and that has crated a situation where people who did not start applying until recently have an almost impossible disadvantage because of the back log of points at the top of the list.
Id love for a single nationalized draw system with no points but it will never happen.........just think of all the apps every year that are out there because someone does not want to fall behind the point curve.......especially when one point could mean a 10 year difference in drawing a tag.
-
Yea but do you honestly think that those people who have built up points would realistically be willing to give up their points(and in some cases where you had to buy points or a non resident hunting lisc) to start from scratch with everyone else?
-
Yea but do you honestly think that those people who have built up points would realistically be willing to give up their points(and in some cases where you had to buy points or a non resident hunting lisc) to start from scratch with everyone else?
Nope, it's an endless, vicious cycle! The best they could do is stop issuing points, and then wait until everyone has used their points up.
-
exactly!!
-
I applied for Utah....jsut another example of a non-refundable license and that cute little point. !0 more years I might have a shot to hunt once, then I can try for elk and when I am 60 can possibly hunt again. :)
-
It really is a matter of fund management. Right now I can only afford to apply for Washington, so that's all I do. This year I will apply for all five species (6 if you count bear) and buy one raffle ticket per species. Once I am out of college and have begun a full time career I hope to apply for deer and elk in CO, sheep, moose, and goat in MT, and all the species in UT. I will also continue to establish productive hunting spots in Washington. That way I am only buying one non-refundable license and I am really applying for a smorgasboard of species. Hopefully it will eventually pay off in the future.
-
That is normal and absolutely a great plan. Here is the problem with those points you love. I will have about 12 in Utah and max will be about 24 and you will be at zero. Essentially it will be too late for you to ever hunt a premium hunt, same for Colorado, same for Nevada, same for Arizona, Wyoming and even Montana, except for maybe deer or elk. If you are lucky then you can apply for Idaho and have a great chance. If they start a point system, then you will be that far behind in that one. Its one of the biggest issues for young hunters.
-
That is normal and absolutely a great plan. Here is the problem with those points you love. I will have about 12 in Utah and max will be about 24 and you will be at zero. Essentially it will be too late for you to ever hunt a premium hunt, same for Colorado, same for Nevada, same for Arizona, Wyoming and even Montana, except for maybe deer or elk. If you are lucky then you can apply for Idaho and have a great chance. If they start a point system, then you will be that far behind in that one. Its one of the biggest issues for young hunters.
I know, that's the problem I am seeing. I love points to an extent because it increases your chances of getting drawn each additional years. But with the number of hunters playing the point system, I am basically screwed in a lot of the good states. I have very mixed feelings and the more I talk about it, the more I want to do away with points. The only real solution I can see is setting a maximum number of points hunters can have. That way long time applicants still have an advantage, but new applicants can eventually catch up.
-
Boneaddict is spot on. If you want THE premiere elk tag in CO and have not been applying for the last 20 years or so, you are hosed. I started applying in 1993 and will have 16 preference points after this years draw, CO keeps $25 a year now for the point. The unit I want to hunt (201) required 18 in '07, probably 19 this year. It has been steadily incrementing by one, every year for about 10 years now. It only required 7 or 8 when I started to put in. The problem is that there are so many people with 1 or 2 more points than me that I may never be able to hunt that unit, given the very few tags available to NR's. I have too much invested now to quit also. Probably will have to settle for another unit some day.
Oh well, sour grapes I guess. at least I can draw deer and elk in MT every other year or so. Of course, I'll probably spend a grand or more on gas this year........ Dang this hunting thing is getting expensive.
-
These states that require you to buy a non-refundable license are contributing to a trend that has been happening more and more, hunting becoming a rich mans sport. I will not apply for tags in states that require a non-refundable license. Its *censored*!
-
i just stick with wa. i cant afford to apply for out of state hunts, nor do i have the time to go out there and actually hunt. and even then i dont really have the desire to spend that much money to go out of state to hunt. i like washington, i like hunting in washington.
-
I applied for nearly 10 years for the Maine non-resident Moose permits. If you miss a year you loose all your points. I moved a few years ago when I retired from the Air Force, the send out the notices 3rd class mail. 3rd class mail is NOT forwarded. I called to check on my permit only to find out it had closed two weeks ago. 10 years down the drain! :bash:
-
Here's a question about the new AHE permit areas at St. Helens. Can the winner of the westside elk raffle tag hunt those areas? It seems to me like they would be able to...
-
Here's a question about the new AHE permit areas at St. Helens. Can the winner of the westside elk raffle tag hunt those areas? It seems to me like they would be able to...
Shouldn't be able to unless they are a Master Hunter.
-
But the regs say for the raffle ticket:
Westside Elk Raffle Permit
Number of permits: 1
Bag limit: One additional any bull elk
Open area and season: Western Washington,
EXCEPt GMU 485 and those GMUs closed
to elk hunting, and those GMUs not opened
to branch-antlered bull elk hunting by the
Fish and Wildlife Commission
Open season: Sept. 1-Dec. 31, 2008
Weapon: Any legal weapon
Eastside Elk Raffle Permit
The only thing I can find that might make them not open is that they are permits for an "Elk Area" rather than a "GMU", even though those Elk Areas are within GMU's. Nothing says the entire GMU must be open...
:dunno: :dunno: :dunno:
-
It seems to me that since those elk areas are within GMU 522 (Loowit) which is closed to elk hunting, with the exception of those special elk area permits, that the raffle tag would not be good for that unit. This pretty much says it all:
those GMUs not opened to branch-antlered bull elk hunting by the Fish and Wildlife Commission
-
But 522 is open to branch antlered elk hunting within the designated elk area.... Not much different than the GMU's around Cathlamet that are only open in certain areas. I guess the distinction is between GMU's and Elk Areas?
-
Seems to me that you would be able to hunt there. The rule says all GMU's that are open to branched antler hunting. Well at least a part of the GMU is open at some part of the season to branched antler hunting, so I would guess you could hunt there. It is kind of vague though, you would probably want to call Fish and Game first.
-
I agree....would definitely want to give them a call.
-
I looked over the permits available and out of the four elk areas within the Loowit GMU, three of them have permits available for all user groups. The other Elk Area (Pumice Plains) is only available to AHE hunters.
So Antlershed, I assume that is the one you are referring to? I don't think the raffle permit holder would (or should) be able to hunt that area, unless he is also a Master Hunter (as BTKR said.)
I think the other three MAY be open to the raffle permit hunter, but I would want to verify that with the DFW. Of course, chances are, I, or anybody else on this board, will not have to worry about whether we can hunt there or not. First we would have to win that raffle.
-
I looked over the permits available and out of the four elk areas within the Loowit GMU, three of them have permits available for all user groups. The other Elk Area (Pumice Plains) is only available to AHE hunters.
So Antlershed, I assume that is the one you are referring to? I don't think the raffle permit holder would (or should) be able to hunt that area, unless he is also a Master Hunter (as BTKR said.)
I think the other three MAY be open to the raffle permit hunter, but I would want to verify that with the DFW. Of course, chances are, I, or anybody else on this board, will not have to worry about whether we can hunt there or not. First we would have to win that raffle.
Actually I hadn't looked that in depth at the permits to see there were some available to non AHE guys. I was just flipping through the regs at work today and that question popped into my mind. I'm not saying they should be able to, but the regs are not very clear whether or not they can.
-
I just picked up two copies of the new regs at Wal Mart in Lacey so they are out.
-
A lot of you guys piss and moan about to much stuff. Where does it say you have to apply out of state. If you don't like the draw systems then don't apply! It's that simple. Plus it will only help me out. :IBCOOL: :chuckle: