Hunting Washington Forum
Equipment & Gear => Guns and Ammo => Topic started by: jackelope on February 19, 2011, 12:47:42 PM
-
In advance I know this is going to be one of those threads that is maybe a little pointless, but let's try it anyway. I have a Savage rifle. It's a 116 Weather Warrior currently in 338 win mag. I don't really have a use for the .338 as I am an archery elk hunter and not much into bear hunting...don't get me wrong, it's a cool caliber but I'd really like something different. I have a couple .223's, a .22-250, a .243 and a .300 win mag. I got some great info from a member on here. The barrel can be switched out to a different caliber. My simple options are as follows. I'd like to stick to simple by just changing the barrel.
7mm magnum
300 win mag
264 win mag
458 win mag
257 weatherby
270 weatherby
7mm weatherby
350 magnum
anything off of the .375 ruger case(which these are I have no clue) including the Ruger Compact Magnums.
I narrowed it down some to the ones that interest me the most. Out of those choices, which one and why would you choose?
This will be a deer sized game rifle. I don't care too much about the cost of ammo because I don't do much plinking. I had a .257 Weatherby that I shoulda kept.
The only other stipulation to this is that it has to be a factory round. No wildcats and no handload only stuff...I don't reload.
-
From what you list. 257Wby. That is one of the few Wby cartridges I like. A great intermediate between your 243 and the 300wm you have now. Pronghorns to Muledeer or even elk. Bullet selection may not be as good as the 264 but is adequate. The 257Wby isn't offered in many factroy actions either, so in a way, you'd have something pretty unique. Your 300wm will kill anything in Wa... But if you wanted a medium big game cartridge, then I'd have said 358Norma.
-Steve
-
Initially I was going to say .264 win mag, I just think they are really cool, and someday hopefully I'll have one....
.....but since you said you don't want to reload I voted .270 Weatherby. I guess the .257 would good as well.
-
I'm with Steve on the .257 Wby, it's a flat shooting deathray on anything from prairie dogs on up to Moose in a pinch.
-
25-06 ;)
Of the list you gave I would really want the 264 or 257. They are both great gun and flat shooters. With plenty of power for deer and even larger game animals. If you are not doing much plinking then the 264 would work fine. But ammo is a little harder to find for it. But its still around. The 257 would also be a fine choice because you can find the ammo around. I am not a master of these 2 cals. But I have shot both more then a few times, and been around a 264 in the hands of a friend a lot. The only thoughts I have "which like I said I have not personally looked into" is bullet weight range. I know the 25's because of having the 25-06 I reload for. The range on bullets is not huge like mainly 90-120 grains. I like at least a 100 grain bullet myself. I don't think you could go wrong with either one, myself. there are some other great guns up there. But given what you already have these would be my pick's.
-
257!
-
.257 out of this list. (I am also a 25-06 fan)
-
If you want to be practical about it, I say 257 Weatherby. If you want to be slightly less practical, I say 416 Ruger. :P I'd hate to see you get injured because you went deer hunting with an insufficient caliber and the deer mauled you. ;)
Andrew
-
I voted other.
I'd sell it. I hate belted cartridges!
It's going to cost some money to make it a weatherby. There is some action work that will have to be done.
-
I shoot a Remington Model 700 in 300 Win. Mag. and I like it alot. I can use it for most big game and don't need more than on rifle for myself. It is accurate and I know the balistics from shooting this rifle only. It just happened to be the one with the best price when my husband was looking. A 270 or 30-06 was another option but I don't the make or model. I don't have to decide what rifle I'm going to use for each species, just grab my rifle and pick the bullet and practice til I'm comfortable.
-
there are more options...
.244 H&H Magnum
.275 H&H Magnum*
7mm STW
.300 H&H Magnum
.300 Weatherby Magnum
8mm Remington Magnum
.340 Weatherby Magnum
.375 H&H Magnum
.375 Weatherby Magnum
.400 H&H Magnum
.416 Remington Magnum
.458 Lott
.465 H&H Magnum
and the shortened 375 casings
.257 Weatherby Magnum
.264 Winchester Magnum
.270 Weatherby Magnum
7x61 Sharpe & Hart Super*
7mm Remington Magnum
7mm Weatherby Magnum
.308 Norma Magnum
.300 Winchester Magnum
.338 Winchester Magnum
.358 Norma Magnum
.458 Winchester Magnum
I vote for either something BIG or maybe the 7x61 S&H. something a little different that you can still find a ton of bullets to choose from. then i would probably go with a 160grn partition or something. 8mmREMMAG would be cool too, but it is kind of an eccentric step sideways from the 338WM.
-
i know a guy who hunts everything with his 375. He says it is the best caliber for any game because he doesnt want to track it, he just wants it to die right there. :chuckle:
-
I'm not interested in something big...if I were I'd just keep the .338
A lot of those are exotic by my standards and I don't need anything exotic. I like the .257 Roy and I will likely go that way.
Oh and a few of those that you pasted there I mentioned and/or already have.
-
there are more options...
.244 H&H Magnum
.275 H&H Magnum*
7mm STW
.300 H&H Magnum
.300 Weatherby Magnum
8mm Remington Magnum
.340 Weatherby Magnum
.375 H&H Magnum
.375 Weatherby Magnum
.400 H&H Magnum
.416 Remington Magnum
.458 Lott
.465 H&H Magnum
and the shortened 375 casings
.257 Weatherby Magnum
.264 Winchester Magnum
.270 Weatherby Magnum
7x61 Sharpe & Hart Super*
7mm Remington Magnum
7mm Weatherby Magnum
.308 Norma Magnum
.300 Winchester Magnum
.338 Winchester Magnum
.358 Norma Magnum
.458 Winchester Magnum
I vote for either something BIG or maybe the 7x61 S&H. something a little different that you can still find a ton of bullets to choose from. then i would probably go with a 160grn partition or something. 8mmREMMAG would be cool too, but it is kind of an eccentric step sideways from the 338WM.
Using any of the full length (375 H&H) rounds will require action modifications for them to cycle through the magazine.I voted other.
I'd sell it. I hate belted cartridges!
It's going to cost some money to make it a weatherby. There is some action work that will have to be done.
The only expense to make it a 257 Weatherby will be a new barrel. There won't be any other gunsmithing required.
Andrew
-
I shoot a Remington Model 700 in 300 Win. Mag. and I like it alot. I can use it for most big game and don't need more than on rifle for myself. It is accurate and I know the balistics from shooting this rifle only. It just happened to be the one with the best price when my husband was looking. A 270 or 30-06 was another option but I don't the make or model. I don't have to decide what rifle I'm going to use for each species, just grab my rifle and pick the bullet and practice til I'm comfortable.
I already have a 300 win mag and a 30-06. Really don't need another .30 cal. A .270 is cool but not one that interests me much at this time. It's not really a need issue at this time....I just don't see myself using a .338 when I have a .300 especially if I don't spend much time elk hunting with a rifle. My .300 makes deer very dead.
I voted other.
I'd sell it. I hate belted cartridges!
It's going to cost some money to make it a weatherby. There is some action work that will have to be done.
What would "other" be? I'm open to suggestions. The wow factor of the .257 Roy pretty much does it for me. I was just wanting to hear if anyone had any other ideas. I don't think any action work is needed on a Savage action. Could be wrong but my research says no.
-
I voted other. If I was going to hunt the modern season again, I'd get a 7mm-08. Short action, and all the power I would need for deer sized animals. I've seen too many "older" shooters have to go in for a Detached Retina from shooting the big blasters, and at my age I don't want to risk it.
-
I voted 7mm Rem Mag and I'm not even a big fan of that cartridge. But I don't think a 257 Weatherby does anything any better than the 7 Mag. I just don't think the Weatherby will gain you anything over the 7 Mag, and you will pay a lot more for the Weatherby cartridges. I know you said it's not much of a factor but still, why pay more for something that doesn't perform any better? The 7 Mag you can shoot 140 grain bullets plenty flat and recoil shouldn't be an issue. I guess the 257 would have a little less recoil shooting the 100 or 120 grain bullets.
I don't know- really either cartridge would be fine. If it were me I'd go with a 270 WSM over either of those, if that's possible.
-
I voted other because I like my 300wsm Pretty much same velocity as its big brother but less powder to get there.
-
7mm Rem Mag for the simple fact that you can find ammo anywhere and at a better price.
If you were to switch out the bolt to go with a non belted cartridge I would go with 25-06.
Savage rifles are fun! I have a 110 that started out as a 30-06 and I turned it into a SS heavy barrel 25-06 varmint/pronghorn/deer rifle for less than $200.
-
He's got an Ought 6, and a 300win mag. No need for a 7rem mag at all.
You mention that the barrel swap allows the list of cartridges in your poll. But, the Savage 116 is based on the 110, which has a replaceable bolt face, No machining required. So, your only limitation is the magazine length.
If you didn't have to pay for bolt machining of the face, would you consider 7mm/08 or something that doesn't require something with such a large breechface? Your choices really are nearly endless.
-Steve
-
He's got an Ought 6, and a 300win mag. No need for a 7rem mag at all.
I didn't realize it was about what he "needed." :)
-
I'm a realist without excess income. So filling gaps seems more in order.
-Steve
-
Yeah, actually I agree, the 7 Mag wouldn't really fill a "gap." But really, with a 30-06 and a 300 Win Mag he doesn't "need" a 257 Weatherby either. The 7 Mag could be strictly for long range deer hunting. Find a good 140 or 150 grain boattail bullet that it "likes" and sight it in at 300 yards. Sure the 300 Mag would be similar in performance but the 7 Mag would recoil less. :dunno:
-
458!!!!!!!!!!! just to have it, killer brush gun!
Carl
-
I'm not really trying to fill a gap or fill a need. I have this rifle sitting here. I could sell it or trade it or turn it into a caliber that is more desireable for me to use/shoot. I'm not much into the big boomers. Hell I have a brake on my .300. I'd venture a guess that most 7mag's unless they're "broke" are gonna kick a lot more than my .300. Maybe I should sell the rifle and buy a pistol or a scope or something. I dunno.
I voted other because I like my 300wsm Pretty much same velocity as its big brother but less powder to get there.
Short fats won't work without mods to the action...that equates to money I don't want to spend.
I voted other. If I was going to hunt the modern season again, I'd get a 7mm-08. Short action, and all the power I would need for deer sized animals. I've seen too many "older" shooters have to go in for a Detached Retina from shooting the big blasters, and at my age I don't want to risk it.
Pretty sure this would require some mods too... $$ although I'm really intrigued by that round lately too...buttt.....then there's the issue of a short action round in a long action. I think I'd rather have the short round in the short action...take advantage of the weight savings via the short action. Just thinking on the screen here...
-
A 7 Mag shouldn't kick "a lot more" than a 300 Mag. Probably pretty close if you're comparing similar bullet weights. Is the 270 WSM an option? (or 7mm WSM)
-
Pretty sure this would require some mods too... $$ although I'm really intrigued by that round lately too...buttt.....then there's the issue of a short action round in a long action. I think I'd rather have the short round in the short action...take advantage of the weight savings via the short action. Just thinking on the screen here...
The 7mm-08 would work, and if you handloaded you could load the long heavy bullets to take advantage of the extra mag length. Since you want to run factory ammo, this is meaningless to you. And like you said, a short action round makes more sense in a short action. If I wanted a long action non-magnum 7mm I'd get a 280 Rem.
Like you said, the 7mm-08 would require some extra modifications. Granted a complete bolt head is only about $40, and the magazine box and follower are another $20. Heck, I have all the parts that you need sitting in a drawer out in my garage right now, including a 7mm-08 barrel. But it wouldn't be as cool as a 257 Weatherby! :IBCOOL: Go Weatherby and never look back! :tup:
Andrew
-
I shoot a Weatherby 270 mag. I love it, it's all I shoot anymore for deer. (I freezer hunt larger game from my neighbors), I have never had a deer run,the energy it hits with is amazing. Very flat shooting 417 yards longest shot on a coyote with nossler ballistic tip 140gr. Used Barnes X 150gr. for my only elk.
-
Voted other, .300 winmag because I like to reach out and touch stuff.
-
Sell it and buy an AR! :chuckle: :IBCOOL: :chuckle:
-Steve
-
i said 7mm weatherby. I'm not big on recoil and i know they are pretty tame yet you they still shoot flat , fast, and you can reach out and touch something with it.
-
.270 win is my preference. very flat shooting good varmit/target round with 100grainers and will take anything with the 150grain bullet in the U.S.A also very cheap to shoot and can find ammo at any sporting good stores, walmart pretty much anything that sells ammo :twocents:
-
FWIW if you are interested in a 7mm 08 it wouldn't require any mods, it's just a necked down .308 Win and the weight difference between short and long action isn't really that much. What barrel maker are you planning to use? I was doing some looking a while back at Shilen barrels since they make them ready to bolt on for the Savage actions in a variety of contours.
-
I've got the 7 Mag & 264 & I don't think you can go wrong with either one.In 1984 I bought the Model 700 Remington 264 Win Mag with the 26" barrel & a Redfield scope in a Seattle pawn shop for $ 200.00. Not a bad deal :rockin: Anyway I don't pretend to be a Gun expert but all I know is if I do my part the 264 will flat out shoot & kill what your aiming at & that includes Elk. The 264 is a fun gun to shoot, its a little different & best of all its a good conversation piece that usually ends up in a argument. :chuckle:
-
Sell it and buy an AR! :chuckle: :IBCOOL: :chuckle:
-Steve
:yeah:
-
I voted 7mm mag. But you should really just get the .264 WM and get into reloading. :twocents:
-
FWIW if you are interested in a 7mm 08 it wouldn't require any mods, it's just a necked down .308 Win and the weight difference between short and long action isn't really that much.
He's starting with a 338 Win Mag, so he would need to change the bolt face and magzine box/follower to shoot the 7mm-08.
Andrew
-
A 7 Mag shouldn't kick "a lot more" than a 300 Mag. Probably pretty close if you're comparing similar bullet weights. Is the 270 WSM an option? (or 7mm WSM)
But it would likely kick more because the new 7mag barrel would not have a brake on it and his 300 WM does have a break on it. (But then the Savage probably weighs more than the TC, so that might help even out the recoil issue)............ :dunno:
-
:iamwithstupid:
-
7 Rem Mag.
Good selection of factory ammo available everywhere, fast and flat 120's through high BC 160's to heavy 175'.
A realy good all around cartridge, if a future (any big game in any state) hunt comes along, your ready.
-
Jackelope,
Isn't it time for you to start another thread?
-
7 Rem Mag.
Good selection of factory ammo available everywhere, fast and flat 120's through high BC 160's to heavy 175'.
A realy good all around cartridge, if a future (any big game in any state) hunt comes along, your ready.
While I don't disagree with that, I already have a 300 win mag so feel I'm pretty ready either way.
:dunno:
Jackelope,
Isn't it time for you to start another thread?
Something will come up, I'm sure.
:chuckle:
-
I voted for the .270. Hva a few in the family and love them, but I also have a .257 Bob, and am likng the gun more and more.
From deer to yotes, its a good gun.
-
Sell it and buy an AR! :chuckle: :IBCOOL: :chuckle:
-Steve
Ok JackOfAllTrades what are the advantages of an AR over a .300 winmag? This might surprise alot of people but I really don't like to target shoot. I love to hunt though, and guns are really just a tool to use. Two exceptions trap, and small bore rimfire. I only have one hunting rifle, you guessed it my trusty .300 winmag featherweight SS. And yes I am not savy to all the different calibers I see being talked about here, but am learning a ton of stuff from all the good gun topics.
-
Funny--In all this, nobody has mentioned the "Ackley Improved" versions of the cartridges. OOPS! I'm showing my age again! :bash:
-
Ackley cartridges probably haven't been mentioned since Jackelope doesn't reload.
-
Ackley cartridges probably haven't been mentioned since Jackelope doesn't reload.
Curly's good...don't mess with him.
I wish I reloaded sometimes...one of these days I will. I would really like to entertain the idea of one of these "exotic" wildcats one of these days but at this time I don't have time or room for it. Once I have an established "dude room" where I can set all this stuff up, I'll likely start reloading....and tying flies and jigs and whatever other stuff I don't currently do that I could/should be doing.
-
Would have said 7mm RM burt since you already have the 300 WM and being as their so close.......
Of your listed choices I'd do the 257 Wby.
I'd choose the 270 Win 1st then 25-06 just for the simple price of the shelf ammo.
-
6.5x284 ;)
-
270 win not bad kick but still power
-
Would have said 7mm RM burt since you already have the 300 WM and being as their so close.......
Of your listed choices I'd do the 257 Wby.
I'd choose the 270 Win 1st then 25-06 just for the simple price of the shelf ammo.
Posted by: hokey97
270 win not bad kick but still power
Josh, if you're willing to rebarrel, then add the cost of that and any bolt face machining or parts replacement required. Now, if it's not a wildcat that you need to reload for, but rather a factory round plentiful off the shelves, then does it make sense to rebarrel, or just sell it and buy a factory built gun in that cal? Its one thing if you were building a 6mm BRx for sage rats at 600yds.
And don't get me wrong; I love the 270win. I was sizing shells for one just last night.
That said, if you want something to be a backup to the 300 you have now. Something to fill a gap in what you have now. Something a bit more unique that just not everyone has, the 257 Roy stands out as something that fits each billing. (I know, you said you weren't looking to fill a gap or as a backup)
But only for someone that reloads. Have you priced that stuff?
You might think about selling it and buy some reloading equipment. You have some new hand guns. You have some rifles... I don't know how much you shoot throughout the year, but if you reloaded, you can save money for everything you shoot. (yes, I know. I've preached that reloading as a hobby isn't to save money, but to create custom concoctions, but it is possible to cut a bunch of costs if you do it smartly)
-Steve
-
:bumpin: ForJackOfall trades