Post by: jamesjett on October 18, 2011, 04:02:23 PM
Thanks!
Post by: uplandhunter870 on October 18, 2011, 05:57:59 PM
i like the side focus as it takes the parralax out of the equation, one less thing i have to worry about. i also have the BDC recticle and have used the nikon "spot on" deal on their website and a word of warning is that the "spot on" gets you in the ball park you really have to go shoot at various distances to see exactly where each circle puts you once you do that its potential really shows the BDC is not an out of the box cure for shooting dead on long range
Post by: wastickslinger on October 18, 2011, 06:29:32 PM
My .204 has the Leupold VX II 4-12X50. I love it!! You cant beat the warranty either.
My 7mm has the Monarch. Nikon now has custom dial up turret available. I got tired of waiting for it to come out and had Kenton Industries build me one.
So the plus to the Leupold is warranty. The plus to the Nikon is the dial up turrets. Tough call. Cant go wrong either way.
Post by: thinkingman on October 19, 2011, 12:19:34 PM
Too many Leupold warranty stories for me to risk it.
Post by: landcbeitner on October 19, 2011, 05:21:36 PM
Post by: jamesjett on October 21, 2011, 05:35:24 PM
Nikon is clearer. Same warranty. Just waiting for my Cabela's gift
cards to show up!
Post by: addicted on October 21, 2011, 11:39:45 PM
Post by: fishngamereaper on October 22, 2011, 08:20:38 AM
Post by: rtspring on October 22, 2011, 08:29:30 AM
Post by: addicted on October 22, 2011, 04:33:25 PM
Ive got two monarchs, love them both, no problems. Of course leupold isnt a bad choice, I have a Mark iv that is a great scope as well...Just started shootin a nightforce...so far a sweet scope as well. Look at what you can afford then spend a little more. Good glass is a must.
I would like to see a side by side 500 round test with a monarch X and a mark IV 8)
Post by: carpsniperg2 on October 22, 2011, 05:55:21 PM
I have had nothing but junk from Nikon myself, I was asked to rep for nikon at the trade shows, good money :tup: BUT! I won't sell or use gear I don't trust.
Post by: addicted on October 23, 2011, 05:55:00 AM
Leupold all the way :tup: Best warrenty in the business if you ever have to use it! Which out of the 20+ that I own I never have.
I have had nothing but junk from Nikon myself, I was asked to rep for nikon at the trade shows, good money :tup: BUT! I won't sell or use gear I don't trust.
I read a thread 2 nights ago where 5 separate lupy owners had their turrets screw out on them, the whole mechanism so they could see into the tube. :stirthepot:
Post by: jamesjett on October 23, 2011, 07:33:47 PM
not centered you lose the whole field of view. The scope goes black. Some like this. On the Nikon's I noticed the
reticles will change color if you are not centered but you do not lose the field of view. That being
said...I know this creates a window for error but you can tell if you are not centered on the Nikon's.
Just something that kinda irritates me about the Leupold. I decided to try a Nikon!
Post by: bman940 on October 24, 2011, 04:45:27 PM
Addicted, earlier this summer I put 1000 rounds of .223 followed by almost 1000 rounds of .308 through two rifles and the Monarch Scope I used functioned flawlessly on both rifles, as it should. Better then I did for sure as it took 8 hours to do in the Texas heat that was over 100 deg., so hot it melted part of my front rifle rest!
Keep us posted and I'd love to see a pic of your rig.
Bart
Nikon Pro Staff
bbk940@verizon.net
Post by: C-Money on October 24, 2011, 05:06:08 PM
Post by: MDGrand on October 24, 2011, 09:03:52 PM
cant speak to the lupy as i do not own one but i do own a nikon monarch 4-16x42sf its a great scope have it sitting on a ruger m77 hawkeye its crystal clear and holds zero perfectly. as a matter of fact last time i shot that rifle/scope was a year ago yesterday until this afternoon (so 366 days ago) and ive moved twice in that time frame went out today to "resight" it in for the montana rifle opener this coming saturday first three shots at 100yds were one ragged hole 1inch high of the bull, exactly were i set it about 13 months ago
i like the side focus as it takes the parralax out of the equation, one less thing i have to worry about. i also have the BDC recticle and have used the nikon "spot on" deal on their website and a word of warning is that the "spot on" gets you in the ball park you really have to go shoot at various distances to see exactly where each circle puts you once you do that its potential really shows the BDC is not an out of the box cure for shooting dead on long range
I will have to echo the statements made here.. For a very long time, I have been a Nikon fan.. I think just as clear as a Leupold, but for the past several years.. just few dollars less.. And the warranty is identical.
That being said, when it comes to the "spot on" technology... even when calculated with an exact load, it just gets you in the ball park. Here is what I mean... I hand loaded and chrony'd a load for my 300 WSM.. when I put these variables in the spot on system with my BDC reticle, it said the 1st circle below the cross hairs was 207 yards..
so.. I went and tried this out.. I took all equations out of the rifle.. put it in a lead sled, and focused in.. turned out my shots came probably within the circle, but about 7-8" high. With the ballistic data, I should have been maybe 2" right above the bullseye.. But I wasn't.. the area just below the cross hair and above the 1st BDC circle was where 200 is at.
So.. you really do have to go try it out to see where your rifle is at.
Given this info.. I decided to try a different method.. instead of hold over points, I am going to try and CDS dials from Leupold :)
Post by: MDGrand on October 25, 2011, 08:50:03 AM
But
Leupolds new VX R line.. is awesome.. standard 30mm tubes, and an illuminated reticle is pretty freaking awesome.
Add that to the dial option.. and I decided to make a change.. I would rather have built in Hold over marks, but the more I read about them, the more they are hit and miss. As opposed to dials that you can adjust for. We will see.