Hunting Washington Forum

Big Game Hunting => Wolves => Topic started by: huntrights on December 02, 2011, 07:28:25 AM

Title: This Seattle Times article needs some wolf facts
Post by: huntrights on December 02, 2011, 07:28:25 AM: This Seattle Times article needs some undisputable wolf facts. It appears the author is trying to appeal to the emotional side of people versus presenting actual facts.

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/opinion/2016881924_guest29mccredie.html

Consider posting your comments with wolf facts on the Seattle Times web site; the general population needs to see through the propaganda smokescreen.
Title: Re: This Seattle Times article needs some wolf facts
Post by: CAMPMEAT on December 02, 2011, 07:39:32 AM: Typical greenie writing about something he knows nothing about.
Title: Re: This Seattle Times article needs some wolf facts
Post by: wence5 on December 02, 2011, 06:30:43 PM: Quote from: CAMPMEAT on December 02, 2011, 07:39:32 AM
Typical greenie writing about something he knows nothing about.

:yeah:
Title: Re: This Seattle Times article needs some wolf facts
Post by: denali on December 02, 2011, 06:37:14 PM: The paper misspelled his name, it should be Scott McClueless :tree1:
Title: Re: This Seattle Times article needs some wolf facts
Post by: MtnMuley on December 02, 2011, 06:38:56 PM: You're forgetting what paper you're reading. ;)
Title: Re: This Seattle Times article needs some wolf facts
Post by: wence5 on December 03, 2011, 08:37:19 AM: Quote from: MtnMuley on December 02, 2011, 06:38:56 PM
You're forgetting what paper you're reading. ;)

That's the one I buy to wrap fish, and line the bird cage. :chuckle:
Title: Re: This Seattle Times article needs some wolf facts
Post by: high country on December 03, 2011, 09:09:25 AM: It amazes me to no end the level of close mindedness that takes place in the subject of wolves. If wolves are so good at ballancing an ecosystem as most pro wolf types will profess, then why would they come out of the richest food base known only to travel to our area which has less food and more people?
Title: Re: This Seattle Times article needs some wolf facts
Post by: Elkaholic daWg on December 03, 2011, 09:16:23 AM: From that write up......

"But times have changed. A wilderness ethic runs strong through a majority of Washingtonians. According to a statewide poll, most people want to give wolves a fair shake, a chance to reclaim their ancestral homeland. It's the right and fair thing to do."

And I see many places on this forum where hunters agree with greenies tactics, advocating limiting access to areas (Colockum). Hating motorized recreation (who have been under attack from greenies since Reagan was in office). These people would eat their young if it will further their (NOT your)agenda.

Careful!
What do we suppose a statewide poll on hunting would show? hound hunting? Baiting? Trapping?
Anti----greenie =SAME BED
In this state we have already seen what the initiative process can do to us.
Title: Re: This Seattle Times article needs some wolf facts
Post by: Dave Workman on December 03, 2011, 07:37:29 PM: The thread was locked. It was filled with anti-hunting bullcrap.
Title: Re: This Seattle Times article needs some wolf facts
Post by: huntrights on December 03, 2011, 08:40:00 PM: I heard that from another person who tried to comment. The Seattle Times shut the comment period down pretty quick.
Title: Re: This Seattle Times article needs some wolf facts
Post by: CAMPMEAT on December 03, 2011, 09:37:07 PM: Quote from: Elkaholic daWg on December 03, 2011, 09:16:23 AM
From that write up......

"But times have changed. A wilderness ethic runs strong through a majority of Washingtonians. According to a statewide poll, most people want to give wolves a fair shake, a chance to reclaim their ancestral homeland. It's the right and fair thing to do."

And I see many places on this forum where hunters agree with greenies tactics, advocating limiting access to areas (Colockum). Hating motorized recreation (who have been under attack from greenies since Reagan was in office). These people would eat their young if it will further their (NOT your)agenda.

Careful!
What do we suppose a statewide poll on hunting would show? hound hunting? Baiting? Trapping?
Anti----greenie =SAME BED
In this state we have already seen what the initiative process can do to us.

Hit that nail on the head .................. :tup: