Hunting Washington Forum
Big Game Hunting => Wolves => Topic started by: Seabeckian on December 29, 2011, 11:22:07 PM
-
Interesting article. Wonder what the story will read in another decade. I do like how they at least acknowledge that in that specific application things seem to be working out, not nessecerily outside a national park.
http://summitcountyvoice.com/2011/12/26/wolves-spur-rebirth-of-yellowstone-ecosystems/
-
Great news for beavers and aspen trees.
-
let us hunt in national parks it might improve things too. This whole wolf thing is a joke. They act like they have more rights then us. I dont care who was there first. Were here now and I like to eat elk too.
-
:yeah:
-
Im by no means pro-wolf. I just like reading the scientists, biologists, and all the other big brains great ideas and theories of how great the wolfs are. Thought this was a less biased read than most findings they disclose to the public...
They act like they have more rights then us. I dont care who was there first. Were here now and I like to eat elk too.
Are you talking wolves or natives? :stirthepot: :chuckle:
-
One of the points I made on the other thread was that Wolves will reduce the number of coyotes and have a positive effect on small game and bird populations.
Here's a quote from the above article.
"The coyote population decreased with the increase in wolf numbers, potentially allowing more small mammals that provide food for other avian and mammalian predators, such as red foxes, ravens and bald eagles."
Someone asked what good wolves will provide. This article provides many. You can learn, or be an ostrich and stick your head in the sand and say "If I don't see it, it's not really happening."
-
FY 2006 FY 2010
Coyotes $174,492 $634,008
Adult cattle 1 killed 4 killed
Calves 111 killed, 2 injured 1,348 killed, 7 injured
Adult sheep 135 killed, 7 injured 422 killed, 2 injured
Lambs 698 killed, 14 injured 2,488 killed, 13 injured
Adult goats 1 killed 9 killed
Kid goats 31 killed 14 killed
Chickens 19 killed 12 killed
Geese 8 killed 2 killed
Turkeys 5 killed 0
Wolves $73,269 $512,981
Adult cattle 17 killed, 2 injured 156 killed
Calves 51 killed, 2 injured 454 killed
Adult sheep 22 killed 728 killed
Lambs 6 killed 48 killed
Adult goats 0 2 killed
Horses 6 injured 36 killed, 1 injured
Llamas 4 killed, 1 injured 3 killed
Guard dogs 0 3 killed, 2 injured
Pet dogs 0 1 killed
Grizzly bears $5,126 $21,481
Adult cattle 1 killed 4 killed
Calves 5 killed 32 killed
Adult sheep 2 killed 29 killed
Lambs 0 12 killed
Adult goats 1 killed 4 killed
Kid goats 0 3 killed
Black bears $23,450 $75,785
Adult cattle 2 killed, 1 injured 14 killed
Calves 8 killed, 1 injured 32 killed
Adult sheep 43 killed 106 killed, 2 injured
Lambs 2 killed 13 killed
Adult goats 4 killed 3 killed, 1 injured
Pigs 10 killed 0
Llamas 7 killed 0
Chickens 0 15 killed
Bee hives 17 destroyed 99 destroyed
-
One of the points I made on the other thread was that Wolves will reduce the number of coyotes and have a positive effect on small game and bird populations.
Here's a quote from the above article.
"The coyote population decreased with the increase in wolf numbers, potentially allowing more small mammals that provide food for other avian and mammalian predators, such as red foxes, ravens and bald eagles."
Someone asked what good wolves will provide. This article provides many. You can learn, or be an ostrich and stick your head in the sand and say "If I don't see it, it's not really happening."
Those are the statistics from Montana. Looks like the FACTS about coyotes are proving otherwise.
-
Sence you asked seabeckin. The wolves and the natives. They should not have anymore rights then you or I.
-
let us hunt in national parks it might improve things too. This whole wolf thing is a joke. They act like they have more rights then us. I dont care who was there first. Were here now and I like to eat elk too.
I agree the wolves should not have more rights.