Hunting Washington Forum
Equipment & Gear => Guns and Ammo => Topic started by: jaymark6655 on January 18, 2012, 09:33:58 AM
-
I have been thinking about getting a 1911. It needs to be cheap, but not a Taurus (worried about some of their issues). So far I have kind of narrowed it down to the three pictured, two Springfields and a Metro Arms. The Springfields are the Loaded or the Mil-spec. The Metro Arms is the American Classic II. I am open to your thoughts about which one I should buy or why I need a 1911.
I already have a Glock 23 and a 26 for my carry guns.
My thoughts:
The American Classic is made in PI, but it only cost $489.53. I am not sure I like the front slide serrations. I think the the grips are plastic, but can replace those easy enough. It seems to have a lot of features at a the lowest price and is blued (the picture is crappy sorry).
The Mil-spec is the second cheapest at $596.06, but is American made. It has to extra features except the lowered ejection port which they all have. It doesn't have the front serrations :), but the rear ones look weird :(. All the extras I can buy and install over time as I want them. It doesn't have the left side safety, which I didn't want on the gun.
The Loaded is expensive, $765.40. It pretty much has everything I want, but I am not sure about those front serrations. I could get the mil-spec, install an aftermarket trigger, hammer, beavertail safety and Novak sights for about $50 less. It has that retard left side safety (ambi).
Wait why do I need a 1911, I have two glocks. I could take that money and buy my first black powder rifle or save it towards a .338 lapua or another upper for my AR or set up a trust, get my tax stamp and put silencer on that AR.
-
check out the new ruger 1911.. real reasonable price, well made..
-
I would get the mil-spec Springfield. That way you know you have a rock solid base to build on. You can upgrade it at your own pace, and hand pick every little component that goes into it.
-
That Ruger look nice, but its getting up there in price and I am a little anti-SS. I noticed that it also doesn't have the front serrations like the mil-spec. What are those things suppose to do anyway? My glock doesn't need them.
-
I would get the "loaded" of those, I've been thinking about picking one up myself, they are very well made with excellent fit and finish. Those front serrations are on the front of the slide for you to grab to rack the thing, on a mud or blood slicked gun you might just want all the purchase you can get!
-
Rock Island
-
have u checked out the remington R1? i dont have one but have handled them and they seemed as good as the springfield GI
-
Buy a mil-spec and play with it.
Aftermarket parts don't always fit the cheaper clones. If you want a real 1911, then go with the Springer or a Colt.
-Steve
-
I vote mil-spec
-
I just bought this last week its a limited run wiley clapp colt. Retails for 1395 but i picked it up used for $1000. Real nice gun only made 1300 last year.(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fimg576.imageshack.us%2Fimg576%2F8914%2Fwileyclapp.jpg&hash=8891f43cee55870155ccdc2ba5f5ca6a179c1ac5) (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/576/wileyclapp.jpg/)
Uploaded with ImageShack.us (http://imageshack.us)
-
Save a little longer, buy a Kimber and be done with it. If you need to be talked into it, then spend the money on the muzzy if you don't have one.
:yeah:
-
So what makes the kimber better than the Springfield or Remington?
Pretty sure the Metro Arms is out, unless I see one for $300 range.
-
If it were me I would go with either of the beaver tail grip safeties. I find the narrow grip safety highly uncomfortable. As said above the front serrations are great for racking a round in or cycling the slide after you oil it
Also for 750 odd dollars I'd save a bit longer and pick up something like a kimber custom 2. I got a kimber c2 and love it
-
I don't know if it's necessarily "Better" but my Eclipse custom II is Very accurate at 50 yards i can keep all my shots on a paper plate. :tup:
-
If it were me I would go with either of the beaver tail grip safeties. I find the narrow grip safety highly uncomfortable. As said above the front serrations are great for racking a round in or cycling the slide after you oil it
Also for 750 odd dollars I'd save a bit longer and pick up something like a kimber custom 2. I got a kimber c2 and love it
This.
Those Springers you're looking at are Imbel forgings with some assembly in the US.
I talked a friend into buying a Springfield Loaded and it is the roughest 1911 I've ever seen, even after a trip back to Illinois.
How about an STI Spartan?
-
An STI Spartan is just an American assembled Armsco from what I studied. Between the Armsco and Metro Arms, Armsco has been along longer, but Metro seems to be better made and the company was founded by a pistol competitor. Is that Imbel forging thing confirmed or just a rumor? The frames still say Il and don't have any Brazil markings on them. Yes I would only need to save about $200 to break into the Kimber market, but if there isn't something that definately makes them worth $200 more why get them?
-
Save a little longer, buy a Kimber and be done with it.
i dont get the fascination with kimbers, dollar for dollar i would pick a springfield trp or any of their higher end guns over a kimber or even get a para with a doublestack and save some $$$.
problem with all this talk is it much more than the OP was planning to spend...
-
Kimbers are far overrated, you cant go wrong with a colt or smith & wesson. If price is a big deal ive seen Sig Sauer 1911's go for decent prices
-
STI Spartan is an Armscor cast frame, forged slide.
Assembled and finished in Texas(possibly a foreign country, depending on who you ask)
Very good fit and finish, function and accuracy in an STI.
Sights are way way better than a Springer GI or Milspec.
Beavertail safety and much better trigger.
If one thinks Kimber is overrated, which they may be, Colt has been gliding on reputation and Koolaid for many years.
Discriminating 1911 buyers know Colts all rattle out of the box.
-
Kimbers are far overrated
Agreed.
Discriminating 1911 buyers know Colts all rattle out of the box.
What rattles on a Colt?
I've shot a few 1911's recently, having been on the search for the one I like best. Kimbers are extremely tight fit guns, so tight that I wonder how well they run when dirty. I shot one alongside a Rock Island and actually ended up liking the RI better in every way, pretty sad IMO. Having a shot a few Kimbers now and even repairing a friends that had issues with fmj bullets pushing up the slide release...I wouldn't buy a Kimber at half price, I would sooner own a RI or Springfield.
-
Kimbers are far overrated
Agreed.
Discriminating 1911 buyers know Colts all rattle out of the box.
What rattles on a Colt?
I've shot a few 1911's recently, having been on the search for the one I like best. Kimbers are extremely tight fit guns, so tight that I wonder how well they run when dirty. I shot one alongside a Rock Island and actually ended up liking the RI better in every way, pretty sad IMO. Having a shot a few Kimbers now and even repairing a friends that had issues with fmj bullets pushing up the slide release...I wouldn't buy a Kimber at half price, I would sooner own a RI or Springfield.
Try modern Dan Wesson for THE TIGHTEST fit I've ever seen.
Slide to frame was unbelievable.
It's hard to rack the slide or release the slide when brand new.
Colt.....they just rattle...probably the slide, possibly the grip safety.
They just do....and the guys in the shop just smile and roll their eyes.
People just love The Pony.
-
Just build one, not much harder than an ar. Caspian frames ( very good) can be picked up pretty cheap, guys start gathering for builds all the time then change what they want and sell off parts for cheap. 1911's are like ars and glocks endless after market options, frame sizes, triggers, slide sizes and types. ask your self what do you want it for? Carry, target, home. This will influence the slide length, grip length, round capacity, site style. Take your time in choosing your gun, dont rush it, get the gun in your hands before you buy. Every gun fits people differently.
-
Until you've learned to shoot a tuned 1911 efficiently, you probably won't realize the differences between a RIA, Rem, Para or Kimber/DanWession/STI. The Taurus/Sig/S&W/anything from Brazil or the Philipines is just another clone and you get what you pay for in less workmanship, fit and finish. My Bullseye gun is a Kimber. I've tuned it up a bit to be more accurate, But it would feed target LSWC ammo and hot ball ammo with only a recoil spring change even before I touched it. Will they shoot dirty? I ran mine in a simulated competition for 850rnds before cleaning it last year shooting LSWC and Bullseye powder. Not the cleanest combination. (A normal day of competition is less than 200rnds) If I had the money, I'd buy a Colt series 70 Gold Cup National Match with a correctly fit KART barrel. (for lead bullets, or Barsto barrel for jacketed bullets) For the money I have spent, the Kimber with just a little tuning has done me well for more than 30,000 rounds. Next to a Colt, the Springer is the next best thing. Yes, Colts rattle and in many cases are not quite as accurate as the tighter slide/frame fit guns, but what comes with that rattle is often ultimate reliability. I have a SS Officer's ACP that rattles but you can feed it rocks and it'll shoot. (It's kinda for sale) But I don't expect it to shoot as accurately as my Kimber at 50yds. So, determine the specific use of your 1911 to help you decide what grade of 1911 you want to spend your money on. For the dollar, the Mil-Spec is tough to beat with great customer service and lasting warranty. It is very rare that a Springer frame won't accept quality drop in parts too. There are a lot of custom guns built from the Mil-Spec. I've heard many horor stories about Para's lack of correct fit of barrel lugs to slide lockup. This can lead to feed/function issues with different bullets. Same with the Smiths, Taurus, RIA, Rem, Sig. Springfield and Colt have been building 1911's since WWI. That's gotta say something. The new Ruger has me interested as it has the Colt Series 70 trigger design, but I've yet to fire one. In my circles, the jury is out. (everyone shoots a 1911 in my discipline) Lots of Kimbers and Tuned Colts on the firing line. Those that have deeper pockets opt for a Les Baer or Essex custom build by a Bullseye gunsmith. A few STI's are on the line too but most of the time they aren't quite as accurate as a custom or Les Baer for the same money.
Oh and... Uh, building a worthy 1911 when you know nothing about them should be left to gunsmiths that know better. For what you spend on the parts then the tools to assemble it correctly, you'll never be able to sell it for half of what you spent building it.
-Steve
-
:)I own Springers, A Colt, A Remington Rand, and a Para P14, I have owned S&W 645, (not a 1911), Olympic arms 1911, Brolin, couple other colts, of all of them the two Kimbers I own came from the factory ready to shoot aand shoot very well. thousands of trouble free rounds thru both. very wll fitted, accurate, I would buy more if these were not so good. :chuckle: that said the Springer is a very good gun.
my 2
Carl
-
I didnt read everything but at least consider a Remington R1. I bought one last year and its really been great. they go about $600ish. I have 2 $1000.00 Kimbers and like the R1 just as much as I like them. The trigger leaves a little to be desired but I wouldnt say its necesarily bad.
Just a thought.
-
Jackofalltrades is correct...you don't just slap together a 1911, if you want a decent outcome.
As mentioned before, Colts come with loose tolerances from the factory and just like the GI-issued 1911's they resemble, are more likely to receive parts that don't require fine fitting.
If you want a higher-end fit and finish, you pay.
-
.
As mentioned before, Colts come with loose tolerances from the factory .
The wiley clapp colt i have doesn't have any "loose tolenrances" the gun is probaly the best pistol i own. I actually have the kimber in the above picture it's an Eclipse Custom II which they don't make anymore in .45, but you can find them in 10mm anyways i would choose my colt any day of the week over the Kimber, Kimbers are very nice but they are also mass produced. The Colt i have gets its specs from TALO so i guess that could be the difference to in the "loose tolerances".
-
DONT buy a kimber!!!!!! your paying for the name and they are not as reliable as you would think. i did lots of research before buying a 1911 and talked to lots guys at several gun shops. I ended up buying a springfield mc operator 1911. Shoots like a dream. My dad bought a kimber about 5 months ago even though i told him not to. it had major issues with hollow points. and after about 50 rounds started to jam. He just traded it in for a 223 and said will never buy kimber again.
-
Whatever. :rolleyes:
Thats what I love about the internet. Ive got two that run perfect but all other Kimbers suck? Kimbers are awesome along with so many others. I can find just as many negative (rumors) because thats what they are, rumors, about springfields. All I have to do is a quick google.
-
...
-
my buddy has the springfield lightweight operator which is much like the second one you pictured except it has an accessory rail on the front and the frame is aluminum. He likes it a lot. I like it a lot. BUT it doesnt have the soul that mine has, not even close.
COLT Government commander
-
Went to the store and got to handle all three. The Springfield felt and looked the best (my personal opinion).
The coating on the R1 looked strange. It felt weird in my hands and some of the pieces had milling marks on them (not a smooth finished part) and you could tell the grips where cheap wood. On the plus side that thing had a stainless steel barrel and the bushing fit was tight.
The Metro Arms gun, just felt cheap compared to the other two. I can't pick out anything that made it seem like that. Maybe it was the plastic feeling grips (I thought they were suppose to be wood on this model) or maybe it was the blued surface versus the parkerized or maybe it was just in my head because I knew it was cast and only cost less.
As far as Kimbers, maybe some day I might get one. Right now I kind of view them as a snob gun (don't take it personal if you own one, I have read several other forums and post and that's just the way they read) and am convinced I would rather die than ever carry one. I have never seen one in a store for less than the mil-spec. Cheapest I could find started in the $800 range and it does seem that your just paying for the name. Like the difference between buying a lexus or a fully loaded Toyota.
So I will be going with the Springfield. Not sure what I want to do with it. I might try conceal carry, but I doubt it will replace my Glock. I think the only reason I want one is because its 2011 and I have always wanted one. Plus I like the single action trigger pull. There is a Anniversary Edition R1, but its like $2000+ price range, so that's out. I am going to shoot it a lot before I decide what parts I should change on it.
-
Jaymark, I think you've made a wise decision. By shopping, you have identified that there truly are different grades of 1911's for your money. You're starting at a good pricepoint with a gun that can be customized the way you want it to be.
Love my Colts. Love my Kimber. But I wouldn't kick a Springer out of bed either!
-Steve
-
I have shot a few 1911's and almost bought a few. I just have never had the love for them. There are some great ones out there and just get something that fits you well.
-
Sounds like you've made a good, informed choice jaymark. Please post up a review (with pics of course) after you get it!
-
Went to the store and got to handle all three. The Springfield felt and looked the best (my personal opinion).
The coating on the R1 looked strange. It felt weird in my hands and some of the pieces had milling marks on them (not a smooth finished part) and you could tell the grips where cheap wood. On the plus side that thing had a stainless steel barrel and the bushing fit was tight.
The Metro Arms gun, just felt cheap compared to the other two. I can't pick out anything that made it seem like that. Maybe it was the plastic feeling grips (I thought they were suppose to be wood on this model) or maybe it was the blued surface versus the parkerized or maybe it was just in my head because I knew it was cast and only cost less.
As far as Kimbers, maybe some day I might get one. Right now I kind of view them as a snob gun (don't take it personal if you own one, I have read several other forums and post and that's just the way they read) and am convinced I would rather die than ever carry one. I have never seen one in a store for less than the mil-spec. Cheapest I could find started in the $800 range and it does seem that your just paying for the name. Like the difference between buying a lexus or a fully loaded Toyota.
So I will be going with the Springfield. Not sure what I want to do with it. I might try conceal carry, but I doubt it will replace my Glock. I think the only reason I want one is because its 2011 and I have always wanted one. Plus I like the single action trigger pull. There is a Anniversary Edition R1, but its like $2000+ price range, so that's out. I am going to shoot it a lot before I decide what parts I should change on it.
I absolutley Love my Springfield 1911-A1 Loaded. That firearm is set up perfect from the factory. Night sights, Good trigger, extended beavertail with a good sized palm swell on the grip safety. Ambidextrous thumb safety :tup:
-
Finally picked up a 1911! I found a used Springfield Armory Mil-Spec. Below are some pictures. I haven't shot it yet (school is keeping me too busy). Here is some things that I have noticed so far:
This thing is freaking tight, I have trouble getting the slide on during assembly and nothing rattles.
It has a Stainless steel barrel and bushing. The picture I posted at the start of this thread showed a non stainless bushing so I was a bit suprised.
The frame does not say made in Brazil. From what I could find, Springfield did make some 1911s in Brazil. It seems like the ones that where actually say Brazil on the frame. I was told that Springfield has stopped having 1911s made there. I have one picture below, but have seen others.
I haven't shot it yet, but I expect I will be replacing the cheap holster, getting a beaver tail grip safety and commander hammer and some more magazines.
The 3rd pic shows how tight the slide to frame is. The 4th is a pic of a Brazil pistol. It has a few scratches (I don't have to worry about putting the first scratch on it), but it was $60 cheaper than any new price and most of the places I looked didn't have them in stock, I found only two.
-
I love my Kimber Covert. Not sure why anyone would slam Kimber based on their 1911's, for any reason other than price. If someone wanted to debate the quality of their rifles, I would have a word to say about that (my Kimber Classic had to be re-barreled due to factory defects). But their 1911's, come on. Don't down play the quality gun it is based on the price.
-
But their 1911's, come on. Don't down play the quality gun it is based on the price.
I base my opinion on my experience, having to fix things that never should have made it out of the factory on a gun that costs that much is ridiculous. Their warranty is a sad joke, they can keep their junk.
-
Haha. To each their own. Everyone handles situations differently and gets different results accordingly. Kimber did a great job righting the wrong with my rifles barrel, and I was very happy with the end result. But like you said, one does have to question how it even left the factory the first time. Good point. I would just caution to not let one poor experience conclude your entire opinion.
Sounds like you got yourself a good gun Jaymark! It's always good to see someone make a highly informed decision when purchasing a firearm. And to respond to your comment; I would definetly buy a Infiniti over a fully loaded Toyota (not a Lexus fan) :tup: No matter how much you polish something up, sometimes there's still no substitute for the real deal. Look at the new Kia's haha.
-
And to respond to your comment; I would definetly buy a Infiniti over a fully loaded Toyota (not a Lexus fan) :tup: No matter how much you polish something up, sometimes there's still no substitute for the real deal. Look at the new Kia's haha.
so would you buy a nissan over a toyota because thats all an infinity is...
-
so would you buy a nissan over a toyota because thats all an infinity is...
Some people's kids huh?
-
:yike: I screwed that up was suppose to say: "Would you buy a Infiniti over a fully loaded Nissan". :sry:
-
lol
-
:yike: I screwed that up was suppose to say: "Would you buy a Infiniti over a fully loaded Nissan". :sry:
Wait I said Lexus vs Toyota in my first post, what the hell am I appologizing for? :dunno: Was just suppose to draw a comparison of getting a 1911 from a certain manufacturer to buying a the exact same car from Lexus and paying more than you would at Toyota dealership. Of course some prefer Nissan, but its no longer the same car.
I guess a better comparison might be do you get the Toyota 4 Runner or the Nissan Xterra. Problem is I don't know anything about 4 Runner, except they probably cost more.
-
I don't know anything about 4 Runner, except they probably cost more.
For good reason too!
-
I don't know anything about 4 Runner, except they probably cost more.
For good reason too!
That reminds me....I finally got my Tacoma suspension working!
It only cost $600 and about 8hrs of my labor.
A 3 yr old 'truck' needs new suspension?
-
That reminds me....I finally got my Tacoma suspension working!
It only cost $600 and about 8hrs of my labor.
A 3 yr old 'truck' needs new suspension?
EIGHT hours! What did you do, replace the entire back end of the truck?
I know that you have had some weird issues with your truck but it's far from the norm, Toyota is well known for quality and longevity.
With the kind of issues you have described to me in the past it makes me wonder why you would ever buy your Tacoma after taking it for a test drive. :twocents:
-
That reminds me....I finally got my Tacoma suspension working!
It only cost $600 and about 8hrs of my labor.
A 3 yr old 'truck' needs new suspension?
EIGHT hours! What did you do, replace the entire back end of the truck?
I know that you have had some weird issues with your truck but it's far from the norm, Toyota is well known for quality and longevity.
With the kind of issues you have described to me in the past it makes me wonder why you would ever buy your Tacoma after taking it for a test drive. :twocents:
I had to find out if the reputation was deserved or not.
Test drive did not have the topper on it or my wife, kid and dog in the bed which apparently, the springs think is too much for such a burly 'truck'.
Also, I did not know about the long list of TSB's that Toyota will only recognize if you're under warranty.
Mainly for the resale...it's some powerful Koolaid.
I learned.
-
You are hopeless to argue with on this one, you obviously don't know much about autos in general as I have garnered from previous discussion on this topic. I'm not sure what gave you the idea that a Tacoma was a heavy-duty truck, perhaps you should consider a 3/4 ton or larger?
NO manufacturer does repairs on TSB's unless the vehicle is under warranty, if you want to see an impressive list of bulletins you ought to have a look at pretty much any model Ford, GM, Chrysler, Jeep or VW (probably the worst in all cases is VW).
How you managed to get a new vehicle out of warranty in 3 years is beyond me, I know very few ways to do that.
-
From a gun snob.........I own a Kimber and it is better than anything you have. I also have a Lexus and it is better than anything you have. I also own a Toyota and it is better than your Honda.
Kidding of course. I do own a Kimber and it is a great gun. I also have an XD, great gun. I also have a Springfield 1911, damn fine gun.
I have a Lexus, 2012......and still also drive my 1996 Ford Ranger 2x manual tranny little truck.
Take any product of any reputation and someobody will have a problem with the one they own. Doesn't mean anything about the overall quality.
It looks like to me you got a sweet pistol that will handle your every needs. Good looking gun, gonna shoot nice, fits you......what more can you want.
Thanks for sharing the pics....now get that thing out and shoot!
-
so would you buy a nissan over a toyota because thats all an infinity is...
Some people's kids huh?
Kinda funny you make this personal over my opinion on what I prefer in life.
Fillthefreezer: In hopes of keeping this thread as on track as we have been. Yes I would :). Although I do feel that's like saying an Acura is a Honda. Yes it is. But a completely different level of Honda. I work hard and a lot so I can spend my money in a manner that makes me happy. If that makes me a snobby "kid" (as interrpretred from FC's comment) so be it. I'm happy and that's what matters. Have fun being a grouchy tight fisted old man if that makes you happy FC haha.
-
Well said H2O :tup:
-
I don't know anything about 4 Runner, except they probably cost more.
For good reason too!
Xterra Pro-4X $30,170 4 Runner SR5 $32,830
Haven't check everything, but it looks like 4 Runner can seat 7 which is cool, but they don't have a manual transmission.
Xterra can only seat 5, but it does have a manual. Gas mileage, engine hp and torque, towing cap and skid plates all seem to be close to the same.
Manual transmission is big for me so I choose the Xterra.
H2O, will be shooting today or tomorrow actually leaving school now. :) Thinking about doing a glock vs 1911 video that should :stirthepot:
-
You could generate a whole new discussion with the glock vs. 1911. both have strenghts, weaknesses, likes and dislikes. Both very effecient machines and will get the job done yet very different.
-
You are hopeless to argue with on this one, you obviously don't know much about autos in general as I have garnered from previous discussion on this topic. I'm not sure what gave you the idea that a Tacoma was a heavy-duty truck, perhaps you should consider a 3/4 ton or larger?
NO manufacturer does repairs on TSB's unless the vehicle is under warranty, if you want to see an impressive list of bulletins you ought to have a look at pretty much any model Ford, GM, Chrysler, Jeep or VW (probably the worst in all cases is VW).
How you managed to get a new vehicle out of warranty in 3 years is beyond me, I know very few ways to do that.
Never thought a Tacoma was heavy-duty, not sure where you made that assumption.
A 'truck' should be able to carry 500lbs of people and dog without riding on the bumpstops.
Apparently leaf springs should only work until the 60k warranty expires.
My Kimber 4" and 5" have run perfectly.
Nice fit and finish.
They are nice guns.
-
Lexus does plenty of repairs based on TSIB's when a vehicle is out of the standard warranty. It is referred to as "goodwill" and is quiet common.
-
Oh......the thread is jacked!
-
You are hopeless to argue with on this one, you obviously don't know much about autos in general as I have garnered from previous discussion on this topic. I'm not sure what gave you the idea that a Tacoma was a heavy-duty truck, perhaps you should consider a 3/4 ton or larger?
NO manufacturer does repairs on TSB's unless the vehicle is under warranty, if you want to see an impressive list of bulletins you ought to have a look at pretty much any model Ford, GM, Chrysler, Jeep or VW (probably the worst in all cases is VW).
How you managed to get a new vehicle out of warranty in 3 years is beyond me, I know very few ways to do that.
Since the thread is jacked, I'll address the statement 'You obviously don't know much about autos in general'...
In 1988, I installed a Jackson Racing suspension kit on my 87 Integra and ran SCCA Solo 1 autocross for two years.
From 1989 to 1995, I actively participated in the SCCA CenDiv chapter....ususally coordinating the F&C (courseworkers) at various road racing venues throughout the Midwest including the nationals at IRP and the runoffs at Nelson Ledges.
During that period, I also graduated from Jim Hall Racing Go-Kart school and thought about campaiging a kart in enduro class, but for lack of space (lived in a condo) didn't pull the trigger.
During the same time I worked for Skip Barber Racing running F&C at their midwest venues to get discount credits for their Formula Ford racing school...My two cousins were racing the the FF series and sponsored a car in the Skip Barber Saab ProSeries (Lifesavers/Planters Peanuts car with various drivers).
In 1996, I bought a 1972 Datsun 240Z with the hopes of running F prod in the NW SCCA chapter.
As I went throught the car and made it ready for road racing, Nissan announced a buyback program for the 26th anniversary of the US Fairlady/Z car and I left it stock as the dashboard, door panels, and engine bay were unmolested.....sold it for twice what I paid in 1998.
The only thing I didn't refresh myself were the twin SU carbs...way outta my league and most 'mechanics' you find in the area.
In the past 11 years, I successfully modded two VW Passats.
Crazy how dead reliable those cars are.
Amazing, really.
In the mean time I put 108k miles on a 1995 Jeep Gr Cherokee that needed NOTHING but basic maintenance and wear items.
My Dodge Durango siezed a front caliper while I owned it...I guess that would qualify as a letdown. $60 and an hour in my garage and it was gtg.
Over that time I kinda got a sense of what what should and shouldn't work on a car.
-
Thinkingman were you working on the front or rear suspension? I know from first hand experience replacing the front struts can be an absolute nightmare. But in my tacoma I replaced the rear shocks and put on an add a leaf to the leaf springs in around 1.5 hours (Im far from a mechanic). 8.5 hours for the front suspension could be possible if many things went wrong and you didnt have a coil spring compressor.
-
so would you buy a nissan over a toyota because thats all an infinity is...
Some people's kids huh?
Kinda funny you make this personal over my opinion on what I prefer in life.
You are reading way too much into that one dude, it was more of a backhanded crack at fillthefreezer than you! I sensed a thread jack in the works and went with it, you may now take your panties off, untwist them and then put them back on :P
-
@thinkingman, yeah you've owned a few cars, "modded" a couple and put "kits" in a few too. For a backyard guy you probably do ok but what you are talking about sounds like a couple weeks work for an average mechanic, just something to keep in mind. :twocents:
-
Thinkingman were you working on the front or rear suspension? I know from first hand experience replacing the front struts can be an absolute nightmare. But in my tacoma I replaced the rear shocks and put on an add a leaf to the leaf springs in around 1.5 hours (Im far from a mechanic). 8.5 hours for the front suspension could be possible if many things went wrong and you didnt have a coil spring compressor.
I roll commando.
The rear involved replacing an airbag I had installed to get off the bumpstops....It developed a leak and while replacing that, I decided to replace the shocks with Bilstein 5100's.
The stock shock shaft was rusty and the nut was frozen....Kroil and visegrips got me to the top of the shaft where It would spin as I tried to back off the nut....another hour of cussing....enter the cutting wheel...that was 3 hours on top of the 2 hours I spent installing the airbags to begin with.
The fronts were supposed to drop out if I undid the ball joint bolts and loosened the lower control arm with a floor jack under the LCA to release the spring slowly.....Fail.
Took out the struts and used a wall mount strut compressor to get them done.
That was 3 hrs, mostly wasted time.
The Bilstein 5100's are a major improvement in ride quality.
Much better shock than the OE spec shock on the TRD Tacoma.
I highly recommend them.
Suspension works now.
-
(https://hunting-washington.com/smf/proxy.php?request=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.freesmileys.org%2Fsmileys%2Fsmiley-basic%2Fpopcorn.gif&hash=fb9cb660882c608b2edf852002491c917ec0a9b9) (http://www.freesmileys.org/smileys.php)
-
OP--take a look at STI Spartan.
Maybe the best 1911 in the $600 category.
-
Here is what mine look like. The black one is factory. The tan one is Factory with an aftermarket Gun Kote finnish.
-
The gun kote looks great on that one! Who did it?
-
11B, looks like your yote hunting there, couldnt help but notice the scope, lol. im looking at a 1911, wanted the ruger, but fk them tired of waiting just another Ruger snafu, get something good, and fail to produce or market it, looking at springers right now, think i want a black fullsize Loaded, model.