Hunting Washington Forum

Other Activities => Fishing => Topic started by: TheHunt on March 07, 2012, 07:32:26 PM


Advertise Here
Title: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
Post by: TheHunt on March 07, 2012, 07:32:26 PM
WDFW are going to kill off all but 250,000 early coho and all but 250,000 late coho over on the Hump hatchery.  The fry will be released into duck lake as they do not have the resourses to feed them until smolt stage =$25,000.00 and cannot release them into the river @ a fry stage.  25,000 is not much money since the process is partly completed. 

Please call Ron Warren @ region 6 and blow up the phones 360-249-4628.  Ron reports to Jo Wadsworth (360-902-2325) who reports to Jim Scott (Director of Fish for DFW, 360-902-2736).



Title: Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
Post by: high country on March 07, 2012, 07:40:21 PM
Where did you hear this?
Title: Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
Post by: TheHunt on March 07, 2012, 07:45:53 PM
I heard it from another fishermen. Then I called down there and it is true.  Please call down there and verify yourself.   The more phone calls the better.
Title: Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
Post by: benhuntin on March 07, 2012, 07:47:42 PM
Sound right up WDFW's alley  :bash: :bash:
Title: Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
Post by: TheHunt on March 07, 2012, 07:49:39 PM
This is the comment from Ron Warren:

The reductions are actually due to the reduced budgets coming into 11/13 biennium. The original reduction was to eliminate the Chinook program 500,000 and a coho reduction of 730,000, down to 240,000. Director Anderson, Jim Scott and I met with about twenty constituents that came to a meeting organized by Superfly in Hoquiam last October and the reduction was modified. We heard very clearly that everyone there wanted us to save the Chinook program, done. We also modified the coho reduction to keep 500,000 (250,000 normal timed and 250,000 lates). In an effort to try and fund the new buy back we worked with a group and the Quinault Nation, who agreed to fund the fish food need of $25,000. The group have stated that they would organize volunteers to do the mass marking this spring, huge commitment. This fish being suggested for Duck Lake are fry that resulted from egg takes prior to the reduction being implemented, now in excess of funding. Bottom line is that the agency did not have the funding for this program since July 1st, 2011, the start of biennium.
Title: Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
Post by: wraithen on March 07, 2012, 08:25:56 PM
This is the comment from Ron Warren:

The reductions are actually due to the reduced budgets coming into 11/13 biennium. The original reduction was to eliminate the Chinook program 500,000 and a coho reduction of 730,000, down to 240,000. Director Anderson, Jim Scott and I met with about twenty constituents that came to a meeting organized by Superfly in Hoquiam last October and the reduction was modified. We heard very clearly that everyone there wanted us to save the Chinook program, done. We also modified the coho reduction to keep 500,000 (250,000 normal timed and 250,000 lates). In an effort to try and fund the new buy back we worked with a group and the Quinault Nation, who agreed to fund the fish food need of $25,000. The group have stated that they would organize volunteers to do the mass marking this spring, huge commitment. This fish being suggested for Duck Lake are fry that resulted from egg takes prior to the reduction being implemented, now in excess of funding. Bottom line is that the agency did not have the funding for this program since July 1st, 2011, the start of biennium.
Title: Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
Post by: pjb3 on March 07, 2012, 09:19:54 PM
I know the president of everett trout and salmon club and why donate them? I'll ask him
I know tehy have their own hatchery too
Title: Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
Post by: high country on March 08, 2012, 09:07:11 AM
Bump
Title: Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
Post by: saylean on March 08, 2012, 09:33:08 AM
Send the info to news channels. Maybe one of them will pick it up.
Title: Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
Post by: TheHunt on March 08, 2012, 10:11:38 AM
Sounds like they are going to dump them in Duck Lake.   Duck Lake has lots of bass in it so it will feed the bass I guess.
Title: Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
Post by: money794 on March 08, 2012, 07:51:29 PM
*censored*es :bash: :bash: :bash: :bdid: :bdid: :bdid:
Title: Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
Post by: Hilltop123 on March 10, 2012, 09:55:57 AM
Stupid question........If they don't want the expense of feeding the smolt, and will dump them in a lake, then why not dump them in the river and let them take there chances.....If they were raised at the hatchery, then in therory they should come back to the hatchery to spawn, correct?  Why release them in a lake?
Title: Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
Post by: Moose22 on March 10, 2012, 11:00:26 AM
Stupid question........If they don't want the expense of feeding the smolt, and will dump them in a lake, then why not dump them in the river and let them take there chances.....If they were raised at the hatchery, then in therory they should come back to the hatchery to spawn, correct?  Why release them in a lake?

I agree, never have understood some of the decisions made.
Title: Re: WDFW killing off 250,000 early Coho and all but 250,000 late Coho.
Post by: money794 on March 11, 2012, 05:18:21 PM
because there not smart enough lol there all dumb and there tree huggers  :chuckle: :chuckle:

Stupid question........If they don't want the expense of feeding the smolt, and will dump them in a lake, then why not dump them in the river and let them take there chances.....If they were raised at the hatchery, then in therory they should come back to the hatchery to spawn, correct?  Why release them in a lake?
SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2025, SimplePortal