collapse

Advertisement


Author Topic: Tiger Mountain?  (Read 25759 times)

Offline CAMPMEAT

  • CAMPMEAT
  • Trade Count: (0)
  • Explorer
  • ******
  • Join Date: Sep 2010
  • Posts: 13347
  • Location: ARIZONA, A PLACE WHERE I DON'T WANT YOU LIVING !!
  • I love my gun rights in Arizona..
Re: Tiger Mountain?
« Reply #15 on: September 24, 2012, 01:02:42 PM »
Is any of 454 on the eastside of highway 18 and south of I-90 ? I used to haul export dirt into that area and guys would see elk, bear and deer in there.
« Last Edit: September 28, 2012, 01:58:42 PM by CAMPMEAT »
I couldn't care less about what anybody says..............

Offline asl20bball

  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+1)
  • Scout
  • ****
  • Join Date: Oct 2010
  • Posts: 358
  • Location: Maple Valley
Re: Tiger Mountain?
« Reply #16 on: September 24, 2012, 03:16:06 PM »
Is any of 454 on the westside of highway 18 and south of I-90 ? I used to haul export dirt into that area and guys would see elk, bear and deer in there.

Yes, its all 454. Not sure how long ago you hauled but now you see mainly democrats, hippies, and hikers to the west of Hwy 18.  I only know of 1 small pocket of elk S of 90 and West of 18 in the 454 and they run on all private land around Cedar Grove.
Take up your bow, a quiver full of arrows, head out to the country and hunt some wild game.  GEN 27:3

Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21190
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Tiger Mountain?
« Reply #17 on: September 24, 2012, 03:25:30 PM »
Tiger Mountain does not hold many, if any elk. You're better off trying to find some private land in the Issaquah-Hobart valley with elk. They are there; I've seen them.

Deer - that's another question. There are plenty of them on Tiger but they're typical blacktails: spooky and cautious. You need to get away from the trails and roads to find them.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Kc_Kracker

  • Sauceman
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 4122
  • Location: olympia
Re: Tiger Mountain?
« Reply #18 on: September 24, 2012, 03:25:50 PM »
wrong. 454 ends at 18, once you cross 18 to the east your on taylor mountain your in GMU 460  :tup:

http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/2009-10_wa_gmu_map.pdf

Offline Kc_Kracker

  • Sauceman
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 4122
  • Location: olympia
Re: Tiger Mountain?
« Reply #19 on: September 24, 2012, 03:27:18 PM »
Tiger Mountain does not hold many, if any elk. You're better off trying to find some private land in the Issaquah-Hobart valley with elk.

bingo, zilch elk up there  :'( :'(

Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21190
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Tiger Mountain?
« Reply #20 on: September 24, 2012, 03:28:27 PM »
wrong. 454 ends at 18, once you cross 18 to the east your on taylor mountain your in GMU 460  :tup:

http://wdfw.wa.gov/hunting/2009-10_wa_gmu_map.pdf
That is incorrect.  GMU 454 encompasses areas east of Highway 18.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21190
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Tiger Mountain?
« Reply #21 on: September 24, 2012, 03:30:24 PM »
"...E on I-90 to SR 18; S on SR 18 to the Raging River; SE along the Raging River to Kerriston Rd; S on Kerriston Rd to the City of Seattle Cedar River Watershed boundary;..."
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Kc_Kracker

  • Sauceman
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 4122
  • Location: olympia
Re: Tiger Mountain?
« Reply #22 on: September 24, 2012, 03:32:37 PM »
well, id NOT like to be the one to argue that with WDFW, they are going to take their map over anyone elses. here is their map. 18 is right on the border in blue, but no part of 454 actually crosses the blue border.


Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21190
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Tiger Mountain?
« Reply #23 on: September 24, 2012, 03:33:30 PM »
Highway 18 is the orange line to the west of the blue boundary.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Kc_Kracker

  • Sauceman
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 4122
  • Location: olympia
Re: Tiger Mountain?
« Reply #24 on: September 24, 2012, 03:36:32 PM »

Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21190
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Tiger Mountain?
« Reply #25 on: September 24, 2012, 03:38:03 PM »
Ok. Stick with your maps. ;)
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Kc_Kracker

  • Sauceman
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 4122
  • Location: olympia
Re: Tiger Mountain?
« Reply #26 on: September 24, 2012, 03:42:39 PM »
 :twocents: your right BOB i see what you mean, sorry i assumed we were only talking about the part of GM<U454 that was TM state forest land, so i dunno about that area if its huntable or not  :dunno: sorry man!  :chuckle:

Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21190
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Tiger Mountain?
« Reply #27 on: September 24, 2012, 03:43:19 PM »
 :tup:
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

Offline Kc_Kracker

  • Sauceman
  • Washington For Wildlife
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Frontiersman
  • *****
  • Join Date: Aug 2012
  • Posts: 4122
  • Location: olympia
Re: Tiger Mountain?
« Reply #28 on: September 24, 2012, 03:44:23 PM »
so tiger mountain master, is that part east of 18 huntable since its not SF land?  :dunno:

Online Bob33

  • Global Moderator
  • Trade Count: (+2)
  • Legend
  • *****
  • Join Date: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 21190
  • Groups: SCI, RMEF, NRA, Hunter Education
Re: Tiger Mountain?
« Reply #29 on: September 24, 2012, 04:44:18 PM »
so tiger mountain master, is that part east of 18 huntable since its not SF land?  :dunno:
Absolutely.  Don't go into the watershed, however (it borders 454).  Also, there may be some private land. Generally speaking it's legal to hunt on private land, but not trespass.

The north side of Taylor Mountain is mostly public and huntable.
Nature. It's cheaper than therapy.

 


* Advertisement

* Recent Topics

Let’s see your best Washington buck by abhold87
[Today at 12:03:27 PM]


Springer Fishing Opportunity 3/29 & 3/30 by xXLojackXx
[Today at 11:47:13 AM]


Bearpaw Season - Spring 2024 by bearpaw
[Today at 11:45:41 AM]


Walked a cougar down by Rainier10
[Today at 11:17:49 AM]


SB 5444 signed by Inslee on 03/26 Takes Effect on 06/06/24 by hughjorgan
[Today at 09:03:26 AM]


Springer 2024 Columbia River by WSU
[Today at 08:31:10 AM]


Average by lhrbull
[Today at 07:31:56 AM]


CVA optima V2 LR tapped hole for front sight by Remdawg
[Today at 07:09:22 AM]


Which 12” boat trailer tires? by timberhunter
[Yesterday at 08:22:18 PM]


Lowest power 22 round? by JakeLand
[Yesterday at 08:06:13 PM]

SimplePortal 2.3.7 © 2008-2024, SimplePortal